Omark's Success: Cycle, or Illusion?

I asked about a pattern I saw in Linus Omark's on-ice results and if any of my readers saw the same. The data and the question, once again:

So in the quest to find matching linemates for Omark, I went to the shot attempts data (Corsi), for and against per 60 to find more clues:

#	Player	SA F/60	SA A/60	SA %
10	Shawn Horcoff	59.9	44.3	0.575
91	Magnus Paajarvi	56.2	47.3	0.543
13	Andrew Cogliano	58.2	50.1	0.538
16	Colin Fraser	58.2	51.5	0.531
67	Gilbert Brule	61.1	57.5	0.515
56	Teemu Hartikainen	61.5	59.0	0.510
27	Dustin Penner	54.5	54.5	0.500
89	Sam Gagner	53.8	57.8	0.482
85	Liam Reddox	45.7	52.2	0.467
13	Eric Belanger	49.4	59.0	0.455
94	Ryan Smyth	52.4	62.9	0.455
83	Ales Hemsky	49.3	66.2	0.427
42	Ryan O`Marra	31.7	63.5	0.333
28	Ryan Jones	36.0	75.5	0.323

I think I see something, though I'm not sure if it's real (especially given the minute sample sizes we have) or if it's confirmation bias at work. So does anyone (Copper & Blue writers need not apply!) else see a common thread to the linemates Omark enjoyed success with during his time in Edmonton?

It could all be in my head, but I swear I can see a pattern of success with forwards who utilize the cycle as part of their repertoire. He's marginal to extremely bad with players who aren't strong cyclists. Yes, there are outliers (Cogliano), but we're trying analysis by extremely small sample size, so we're going to see weird things, and maybe my pattern is just a coincidence. After all, small sample sizes can see some whacky results.