In the discussion about Andrew Cogliano's scoring chances by season segment, frequent commenter godot said:
How is it a good sign that even when he was playing with Hall and Eberle, and with Horpensky playing the toughs, Cogliano couldn’t get above 50%?
After the jump is a look at Cogliano's WOWY comparisons through Sunday's game.
TCF = Total even strength chances for on, TCA = Total even strength chances against on, % = percentage of even strength scoring chances for while on the ice.
| With Cogliano | Without Cogliano | Cogliano Without | |||||||||
| # | TCF | TCA | % | TCF | TCA | % | CF | CA | % | ||
| 4 | 82 | 93 | 0.469 | 258 | 223 | 0.536 | 155 | 194 | 0.444 | ||
| 14 | 73 | 75 | 0.493 | 189 | 184 | 0.507 | 164 | 212 | 0.436 | ||
| 27 | 89 | 106 | 0.456 | 158 | 142 | 0.527 | 148 | 181 | 0.450 | ||
| 28 | 39 | 54 | 0.419 | 88 | 174 | 0.336 | 198 | 233 | 0.459 | ||
| 67 | 64 | 83 | 0.435 | 40 | 69 | 0.367 | 173 | 204 | 0.459 | ||
| 85 | 37 | 40 | 0.481 | 42 | 54 | 0.438 | 200 | 247 | 0.447 | ||
| 91 | 41 | 58 | 0.414 | 163 | 218 | 0.428 | 196 | 229 | 0.461 | ||
| 2 | 53 | 68 | 0.438 | 131 | 181 | 0.420 | 184 | 219 | 0.457 | ||
| 5 | 80 | 89 | 0.473 | 208 | 233 | 0.472 | 157 | 198 | 0.442 | ||
| 6 | 46 | 55 | 0.455 | 122 | 138 | 0.469 | 191 | 232 | 0.452 | ||
| 26 | 59 | 73 | 0.447 | 153 | 193 | 0.442 | 178 | 214 | 0.454 | ||
| 43 | 35 | 49 | 0.417 | 80 | 87 | 0.479 | 202 | 238 | 0.459 | ||
| 49 | 72 | 94 | 0.434 | 161 | 227 | 0.415 | 165 | 193 | 0.461 | ||
| 58 | 25 | 21 | 0.543 | 88 | 73 | 0.547 | 212 | 266 | 0.444 | ||
| 77 | 84 | 104 | 0.447 | 245 | 257 | 0.488 | 153 | 183 | 0.455 | ||
The only teammate who's been able to break 50% with Cogliano is Jeff Petry.
After the season I'll look at some of the three-man line combinations and compare their WOWY's as a line.
All data via Dennis King's scoring chances counts at MC79hockey.com