
Would any of these forwards be of interest to the Oilers? Let's compare the three players statistically.
Time On Ice
Huselius: 13:37 EV, 3:50 PP, 0:14 SH
Nolan: 12:34 EV, 2:06 PP, 1:51 SH
Yelle: 9:19 EV, 0:10 PP, 2:27 SH
Points/60
Huselius: 2.23 EV, 4.83 PP
Nolan: 1.55 EV, 2.21 PP
Yelle: 0.96 EV
GFON/GAON per 60 at 5-on-5
Huselius: 3.00GF, 2.39 GA EV
Nolan: 2.38GF, 2.13 GA EV
Yelle: 1.22GF, 1.57GA EV
Quality of Competition Rank at 5-on-5
Huselius: -.03 (8th)
Nolan: .02 (4th)
Yelle: -.04 (T-9th)
GFON/GAON per 60, Special Teams
Huselius: 7.14GF, .61GA PP
Nolan: 3.03GF, .38GA PP; 1.37GF, 7.76GA SH
Yelle: 0.34GF, 7.46GA SH
What can we say about these players?
Kristian Huselius was fantastic against weak opposition at even strength, and added a strong presence on the powerplay. Unfortunately, he's also a) about to receive a big-time contract and b) the kind of small, skilled, needs-to-be-shielded player that already abounds on Edmonton's roster. Huselius is not a player of interest to the Oilers.
Owen Nolan did a decent job outscoring good-to-middling opposition at even strength; he was also a poor performer on special teams. He's a big body and good in the face-off circle (52.3%), but he's slowing down and recorded just over 1 hit per game. He does shoot a lot (163 in limited ice-time) and I think he'll add value to some team in a third-line checking role. He isn't better than Pisani, though, and probably not far ahead of Stortini either at this stage in his career. Nolan may be a player of interest, but it seems unlikely.
Stephane Yelle is getting outscored by weak opposition at even strength and is no longer a positive contributer shorthanded. I wouldn't sign him to a league-minimum deal.