Teemu! Teemu! Teemu! (Photo courtesy of Rob Ferguson)
In my last post on the Barons, Permaculture wondered about what might be causing such sharp changes in the team's shot differential. With the Barons being a minor league team, there were plenty of changes to the lineup throughout the season, often with key players being missing for large swaths of time. There's no doubt that these changes were a factor. Something else I thought might be a factor is the team's level of competition at various points during the season.
The chart below shows OKC's shot differential as well as the average year-end goal differential of their opponents, both expressed as a twenty-game average:
There is, as you would expect, a negative correlation between the two variables. -0.34 isn't nothing, but it's also not particularly strong. In other words, it looks like there's a real impact here, but it's not overwhelming, and other factors are also going to be very significant.
What I did find interesting, however, is just how bad the Barons' opponents were this season. At no point during the season did they have a twenty-game stretch where their opponents had a positive goal differential (on average). On the season, the average Barons' opponent had a goal differential of -5.7, and that's mostly made up of playing more really bad teams than really good teams.
The Barons had 20 of their 76 games against teams with a goal differential of -20 or worse. In those games, they had a record of 15-3-2 and a goal differential of +24. They played just eight games against teams with a goal differential of +20 or better. In those games, they had a record of 3-5-0 and a goal differential of -7. Now, the Barons are the top seed in the Western Conference, so they may not have to play a really good team for a couple of rounds, and their record against mediocre teams (27-14-7 +20) is excellent. So even though their record against good teams isn't exactly encouraging, their record against poor teams has put them in a great spot.