Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

More To The Sam Gagner vs. Chosen Line Comparisons

BSOD has everyone in Edmonton in love with all players drafted since 2008 while simultaneously crapping all over every player drafted prior to 2008. But when those players are compared directly to each other, a noticeable trend (at least by the possession metrics) is evident. The shiny baubles (except for Taylor Hall) aren't outpacing the musty old things.

The horizontal axis shows qualcomp, specifically Corsi relative quality of competition taken from the venerable and terrifying Gabriel Desjardins' behindthenet.ca. The vertical axis shows percentage of faceoffs taken in the defensive zone, again from the venerable and terrifying one. The bubbles are color-coded: blue means the player in the bubble has a positive zonestart-adjusted Corsi, red a negative. Finally, the size of the bubble indicates absolute value zonestart-adjusted Corsi. The shapes are matched by age, so direct comparisons can be made between the prospects everyone should like more (Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Jordan Eberle) and the prospect it's okay to hate (Sam Gagner).

Rycwp_medium

*Click to enlarge or find the full-sized chart here.


Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I thought this was supposed to be an article on Escapegoatism.

by gvblackhawk on Feb 18, 2012 6:53 PM MST reply actions  

I’m a little confused. In the Gagner article you have one of these charts and his 11-12 season is a small, positive blue dot, but in this chart his 22 year old season (which would be this season, right?) is a red, negative dot. What am I missing?

by melancholyculkin on Feb 19, 2012 10:44 AM MST reply actions  

Couple of weeks between the data snapshots, I imagine.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Feb 19, 2012 10:46 AM MST up reply actions  

What doesn’t make sense is how Gagner’s bubble has gone from positive to negative during a time he’s been killing it with Hall and Eberle. Makes me wonder just how punitive is that adjustment coefficient in Zone Star Adjusted Corsi.

Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.

by Bruce McCurdy on Feb 19, 2012 12:02 PM MST up reply actions  

They really aren’t killing it by possession though.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Feb 19, 2012 12:31 PM MST up reply actions  

Doesn’t this miss the point.

It would seem that the weighted average used to adjust for zone starts could easily distort the data when a player has few starts in a particualr zone. For this reason it is perfectly reasonable to question whether the conclussion you draw is at all valid.

by Fourier on Feb 19, 2012 5:44 PM MST up reply actions  

How is it distorting the data? As I pointed out here:

http://www.coppernblue.com/2012/2/12/959577/horcoff-hemsky-vs-gagner-eberle

The team was relying on goaltending. They were all getting beaten at evens. The Chicago game alone sent their numbers deep into the red.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Feb 19, 2012 6:49 PM MST up reply actions  

I think you have again missed the point. The issue is the nature of the statistic itself which is a weighted average. If one of the factors is a rather rare event for one player vs another the weighting can create a significant distortion. In essence it is similar to what happens if you try and use statistics such as XXX/60 with players who play only a few minutes per game over a small number of games.

Bruce McCurdy asked if it was possible that the adjustment method is punitive. You did not answer this but rather first reiterated the conclussion and now you reference the same stat beening used over a different period oftime.

If you want to make definitive statements using a formula like this isn’t it important to at least acknowledge the potential flaws in the analysis.

by Fourier on Feb 20, 2012 5:11 AM MST up reply actions  

They’re under water without the adjustment, that’s my point. If they were in the black without the ZS formula, I might find the question interesting.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Feb 20, 2012 9:13 AM MST up reply actions  

The link you posted in defense of the claim contains this phrase:

" Working with the zonestarts linked above, here is the zonestart-adjusted Corsi/60 for the same six forwards:"

It does not seem that the evidence you produced jibes with your intended point in the response.

by Fourier on Feb 20, 2012 11:26 AM MST up reply actions  

I had the same basic question, but when I looked at players who had similar ZS assignments, the group was, on average, in the black by adjusted Corsi.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Feb 20, 2012 9:58 AM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ryan_2008_small
The Oilers Begin the Road to Rebuilding
Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL