Jeff Petry - #6 in Copper and Blue's Top 25 Under 25
In an organization that wasn’t shaved to the wood bare in defensive depth, Jeff Petry would probably be a depth defenceman, working his way into the lineup in sheltered circumstances. The Oilers, not being such an organization, have used Petry consistently in a top 4 role all year, especially when Tom Gilbert was out due to injury.
Petry’s path to the NHL has been full of ups and downs. He struggled to improve his counting numbers from his freshman season in Michigan (though he was the highest scoring defenceman on his team all 3 years there). His first foray into the AHL saw him get creamed in an 8 game sample, but he was able to follow it up with a strong half season in 2010-11. This pattern continued in the NHL where he struggled initially but has since played his way past several veterans.
Jeff Petry’s counting numbers still don’t tell the full story about his play this year:
| QOC: | 2nd |
|---|---|
| QOT: | 5th |
| Corsi: | 1st |
| Rel Corsi: | 3rd |
| O-zone Start: | 4th 49.3% |
| PDO: | 6th 992 |
Petry’s basically been playing on the top pairing and doing a tremendous job at moving the puck in the right direction. He’s gotten the rough end in terms of PDO, mostly on the back of a .905 ES save % behind him.
For a 23 year old to have this much responsibility and to be able to handle it provides the Oilers with at least one young defenceman who will hit his prime as a pretty good player to go along with the kids. He’s been exceptional in terms of his decision making in his own zone and his positional play and decision making while defending the rush are almost on par with Tom Gilbert.
One area where he needs to improve is his play in the offensive zone. Because of his skillset, he’s going to get opportunities to handle the puck offensively and it’s this area here where he can make the biggest gains. He hasn’t been particularly good at creating a shooting lane and often puts his shot right into the shin pads of the opposing forward. For him to take the next step he’s going to need to move his feet to create his lanes and make better decisions on when to shoot and when to just put it in the corner to keep the puck safe.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Petry’s basically been playing on the top pairing and doing a tremendous job at moving the puck in the right direction. He’s gotten the rough end in terms of PDO, mostly on the back of a .905 ES save % behind him.
But you put him 10th? I fear you are selling him a little short in your ranking, DB.
When I made my rankings, it was around January 10th.
At that time I had 6-10 as pretty interchangable. My problem with Petry then was the same negative that I wrote about (poor offensive zone instincts). I also wasn’t convinced that he was good enough defensively to balance that out. Since that time though, he’s been saddled with a lot more responsibility and played has played well (even better than when he was more sheltered).
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98
Like Yeti, your review only makes me more curious as to your reasoning for shuffling him so far down the list.
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Feb 15, 2012 12:57 PM MST reply actions
I thought Petry would have moved up a place or two based on his showing this year. Full of bumps, yes, but for a 23 year old defenseman, he’s playing very well and has lots of upside, the way I see it. And even his kinks aren’t as damning as his defensive age-mates. I’d argue that his importance to the team over the next few seasons is greater than a guy like Paajarvi, who I’m assuming is 5 or 4. I think the downsides to Petry tanking or injured or not reaching his potential are a lot scarier than the same things happening to MPS or Gagner, which is why I’d have him higher, and certainly nothing below 6.
Like the rest says, your review seems completely at odds with your ranking of Petry.
I thought I was reading Zona’s take for a minute, and then realized it wasn’t praising Petry enough
The one I had written over a month ago looked a lot different.
It had a lot of things in it that he’s addressed and corrected in his game since that time.
I can’t take away the initial ranking.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98
Your vote is awful! Why do you hate Petry so much! You’re just negative!
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Nit: while Michigan State is in Michigan, that’s confusing and implies that he played for the Wolverines instead of the Spartans. I would have enjoyed that but it is not true. FWIW, in college he was quality in the offensive zone. Maybe that will come later as he figures things out.
by Brian @ MGoBlog on Feb 15, 2012 9:03 PM MST reply actions

by 


























