Jérémie Blain - #24 in Copper & Blue's Top 25 Under 25
Jérémie Blain has been a mainstay in the mediocre middle of our Top 25 for a while, but that mediocrity has generally been on an upward trajectory. Right after being drafted, we slotted him in at #27, but he quickly rose to #25 and then up to #19 this summer. With the winter edition of the Top 25, the list of players available is usually pretty similar to the list that was available in the summer - no new players have been drafted, and there aren't usually many trades before the start of February, so any change in a player's ranking is usually based on his performance over the last half-season. So what's gone wrong for Blain?
As you can see, his decline in the rankings hasn't been unanimous. Of the five returning panelists, three moved Blain down the rankings (Derek down four, Bruce down five, and Jon down twelve), while two moved him up (Ben up six, and Scott up two). In that Jon has him ranked lowest and hammered him down so quickly, I asked him for a brief comment:
My big concern with Jeremie Blain is a simple one, and one that's all too familiar for Oilers fans: injury. He hit a career high 64 games played in his draft year, after managing just 49 the year before. He played 40 games last season, and has already missed time this year. There's no question about his ability but injuries at his age tend to do a number on development, and then on top of that it's probably fair to wonder if he'll be able to stand the rigors of the professional game.
I should say off the top that I agree that injuries are a concern, but I don't buy this as a reason for Blain's fall down the list because this season has probably been Blain's healthiest to date. So far as I can tell, Blain has missed a maximum of five games due to injury so far this year (four consecutive games in November, and one at the end of December but I don't know the reason for any of them). Given that, I don't see why injuries are a much bigger concern now than they were in the summer.
Now, Blain also missed some time because of inappropriate racial remarks, and it seems likely that those comments might have something to do with the fall because his on-ice performance has been pretty darn good. In 29 games with Acadie-Bathurst, Blain registered 24 points including 6 goals on 66 shots (2.3 per game). Blain was then traded to Victoriaville, one of the best teams in the QMJHL. He has played 11 games since the trade and has earned 15 points; his shot rate is down (1.4 per game), but his +9 rating is the best on the team (on a per game basis). Overall, his point per game rate is a very healthy 0.98. That's close to the same rate as last season, so I suppose you could argue that he hasn't shown much offensive progression, and his total is made a little bit less impressive because the QMJHL is a higher-scoring league so far this season (7.10 goals per game compared to 6.85 for the OHL and 6.77 for the WHL). Still, nearly a point per game is a solid offensive performance, and the fact that he's just duplicating last year's total isn't necessarily a bad thing because it demonstrates that his current level is sustainable.
From what I can see, there's no reason to think Blain has taken a significant step back in his on-ice performance. As a right-handed defender, he also has a structural advantage in the Oilers' system because so many of other defenders about his age are lefties. I'm not saying that Blain is guaranteed to make it, but I am excited to see him start his professional career in the Oilers' organization.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He shares my birthday so I’m pullin for him
http://www.dustymitts.blogspot.com/
by DontDoughtDrew on Jan 27, 2012 1:37 PM MST via mobile reply actions
Very erratic defender, and I’m definitely in the saw him bad camp(from 2 seasons at Prospect Camp). He gets beat wide far to easily and didn’t positionally or physically box out the opposition player as they entered the zone. Maybe he refines his game and becomes a player, but I haven’t seen that in his game yet.
The Edmonton Oilers, keeping opposition fans happy for the last 6 years
He didn’t make much impression on me during training camp this year, either positive or negative. I do remember him looking awful in the 2010 camp with exactly the things you mention coming to the forefront, but he was far from alone in that among the Oilers’ younger defense prospects. I guess what I’m saying is that I’m not all that optimistic about anyone on this list becoming a good top four defender or top nine forward outside, probably, the top eleven guys. There will probably be one or two who make it (replacing the one or two who don’t at the top of the list), but I wouldn’t bet on any one of them (though, obviously, if I had to bet, I’d be going with the guy I’ve got at #12).
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Jan 28, 2012 8:43 AM MST up reply actions
I dropped him because I expected complete dominance in his final year in the Q, my take has nothing to do with injuries, racism or suspensions.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
I assume you’d measure this primarily by the offense he contributed. Is that true? If so (and even if not), how far do you think he has fallen short of that “dominance” standard?
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Jan 28, 2012 8:26 AM MST up reply actions
A bit more dominant that Davidson ?
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
So how is he not meeting that standard? He’s about seven months younger and has a point-per game rate of 0.98 compared to 0.72 for Davidson. Are you using something other than points to measure their performance?
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Jan 28, 2012 10:08 AM MST up reply actions
The kid is a project. Seems to be enough there to give him a professional contract, but he probably should be developed on the Red Wing model. 3 or 4 years of AHL time before the Oilers even think about bringing him up so he has time to refine his game and fill out.
The entry-level contract thing is very interesting. It’s a three-year commitment, and the Oilers have a bunch of picks in the next two years. If they’re set on bringing in AHL veterans on two-way deals, they don’t actually have all that much room for signing prospects. I figure that there will be at least two guys that they don’t sign from the 2010 draft.
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Jan 28, 2012 8:47 AM MST up reply actions
This is where the team needs to rid itself of guys like Tremblay and Arcebello, and maybe Petrell and free up some spots.
Also, while its a 3 year committment, these are under 25 contracts that will be fairly close to league minimum. If you needed to buy one out a year or two from now, its not going to materially impact the team’s cap space at 1/3 of remaining contract value. I would sign them, see how they perform for a year or two and flush as required.
Tremblay was on a one-year deal, and they didn’t really have another use for the spot, so I thought that signing was fine. One guy out of the CIS every year actually seems like a decent strategy to me so long as you’re one of the only teams doing it.
The Arcobello signing was a two-year commitment, so that one’s a bit dicier, especially since Arcobello didn’t look like anything special.
Petrell was signed in his prime on a one-year deal. I think you get more out of that slot with a new guy like that every year than you do trying to develop Drew Czerwonka for three years.
I’m not a fan of buyouts. If you buy a prospect out, it’s eating (a small amount of) cap space for two to four years, and the guys we’re talking about not getting signed are the more marginal picks anyway. It’s not worth wasting NHL cap space on those guys.
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Jan 30, 2012 11:03 AM MST up reply actions
On the cap space, if we are talking about a prospect on a $500K entry level deal, the cap hit would be ~$160K spread over 2 years or $330K spread over 4 years. Aren’t we talking about less than 100K per year on a $62M+ cap? if so, its a rounding error.
I certainly don’t think you automatically give the spot to a prospect, but when you have 2 players like Blain and Davidson, I would like to see at least one year of pro hockey from them, and maybe 2, before I flushed them because puck moving d-men are valuable. If we are talking about the same spot for Drew, I would prefer rolling to dice on the European because big forwards are a dime a dozen.

by 

























