Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Oilers Fall 4-2 To Columbus, Inch Closer To 30th

Photo

If you're a fan of the Oilers you've likely grown tired of seeing yet another player go down with an injury on what seems like an almost nightly basis. For a team already missing Ryan Whitney the losses of Tom Gilbert, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, and Jordan Eberle have seriously depleted an already thin Oilers roster over the last two weeks. But even with all the injuries, the hockey gods seem unwilling to give the Oilers a break and tonight took Taylor Hall away from us after a scary incident in the warmup where Hall slipped on a puck and ended up taking a Corey Potter skate to the face. The cut above Hall's eye took 30 stitches to close. If it wasn't for bad luck the Oilers wouldn't have any luck at all.

Despite losing the player that makes this team run, the Oilers came out strong tonight going ahead by two goals before the midway point of the first period. Unfortunately that would be all the scoring the Oilers would do and a combination of bad goaltending, unlucky bounces, and shoddy defense would allow the Blue Jackets to come back and defeat the Oilers by a final score 4-2. As a result of the win, in what was a four point game between a couple of the NHL's bottom feeders, the Jackets are now only seven points behind the Oilers in the race for last place. Closer to last and the Hall injury isn't as bad as it could have been, maybe the hockey gods are giving us a break after all.

Scoring Chances - Fenwick/Corsi - Head-to-Head Ice Time - Shift Charts
Box Score - Event Summary - Faceoff Report - Shot Report
Game Recap from The Cannon

Star-divide

Anton Lander started the scoring for the Oilers with an impressive move around Derick Brassard where he was able establish position and used his left arm to keep Brassard off the puck before avoiding a Curtis Sanford poke check and sliding the puck into the open net. It was a flash of offensive skill that we haven't seen much of from Lander this season.

Ben Eager would increase the Oilers lead minutes later when Jeff Petry found him open for a pass in front of the Jacket net. Besides the goal Eager had a solid opening period using his speed to his advantage; when he focuses on playing hockey he can be a useful player. The good play was rewarded and Eager later found himself replacing Hall alongside Ales Hemsky and Sam Gagner on the Oilers defacto top line.

The Blue Jackets would cut into the Oilers lead when a Ryan Johansen wrist shot from the slot beat Devan Dubnyk under the right pad. If you watch the Blue Jackets cross the blue line it looks as if Gagner and Ladislav Smid miscommunicate allowing Johansen a clear path to the slot. There's a breakdown in the defence but the goal was a classic example of the one bad goal a game that we've unfortunately become accustomed to with Dubnyk.

Where Dubnyk can be blamed on the first goal, it would be a lot harded to blame him on the Jackets second goal of the night, a goal scored with 0.8 seconds remaining in the second period. On the goal Dubnyk saved the first shot from Rick Nash and Brassard's rebound attempt. But the rebound off the second shot hit Petry, who was trailing Brassard, in the leg and then went off Dubnyk before crossing the line.

After tying the game in the last minute of the first, the Blue Jackets took the lead in the first minute of the third period. Because of an intermission the Jackets second and third goals were separated by about 20 minutes, in game time they were separated by 33 seconds. Josh Green skated beside the Jackets goal scorer, Derek MacKenzie, but didn't do anything to tie up his stick allowing him to convert the Colton Gillies pass for the Jackets third goal of the night.

Although being down a goal the Oilers didn't create many scoring chances over the last 19 minutes. Perhaps being down their top line (at least in terms of offensive production) and two top defensemen was too much to overcome. As the game neared it's end the Oilers pulled Dubnyk and promptly turned over the puck before the goalie could even reach the bench forcing Dubnyk to touch the puck and take a too many men on the ice penalty. It was a play oddly appropriate for a season like this one.


News and Notes:

  • Twice tonight an Oilers defenseman went awkwardly into the end board after a reckless play by the trailing Blue Jackets player. Petry was tripped by Johansen in a play similar to the one that saw Taylor Fedun break his leg during the preseason and Tomas Kubalik helped Smid into the end boards in the third period. In both cases the Oilers player is vulnerable and the Jackets player make contact, why the players can't grasp how dangerous these plays are is beyond me.
  • Tonight might have been the most offensive night that I've seen from Petry. Repeatedly he jumped up to join the rush, a decision that lead to the Oilers second goal of the night. With the Oilers just playing out the string at this point I'd love to see him keep playing like this to try and get a better idea of when to take these types of risks.
  • In what is becoming a nice pattern, Hemsky looked good again tonight. He recorded an assist on Eager's goal, his third point in four games, and he seems to be working well with Gagner as his centre. He also took a couple of hits that left me holding my breath and hoping that his shoulder would be fine, each time it appeared to be.
  • The Oilers haven't said much about the Hall injury but all the signs appear to be good and he may even be back on the ice tomorrow morning. Considering how much worse the injury could have been I think that is better could have been hoped for.
  • The Hall injury will certainly have some people questioning why he wasn't wearing his helmet during the warmup. It's not something I'd ever thought about before tonight but I can't come up with a single good reason not to make it league wide policy, the benefits are obvious and there is zero downside.

Comment 60 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

The only question I have is, how log till the Oilers crush Taylor Hall’s soul?

The Edmonton Oilers, keeping opposition fans happy for the last 6 years

by OilLeak on Jan 18, 2012 1:39 AM MST reply actions  

Thought the exact same thing

by SoCalOil on Jan 18, 2012 4:06 AM MST via mobile up reply actions  

You’re not talking about crushing his soul and spirit by sending him to juniors as an 18 year old, right?

Cool. Just checking.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Jan 18, 2012 7:17 AM MST up reply actions  

Not a good night by Paajarvi and Smyth scoring chance wise, I was watching a poor quality feed and couldn’t see all the players clearly, but I can’t recall hearing Smyth’s name being called. I’m guessing he’s playing injured along with Horcoff.

The Edmonton Oilers, keeping opposition fans happy for the last 6 years

by OilLeak on Jan 18, 2012 1:46 AM MST reply actions  

Why aren’t you copy/pasting your write ups from previous games? Same ol’ story, different night. As much as I look forward to them, I’d completely understand.

by SoCalOil on Jan 18, 2012 4:05 AM MST via mobile reply actions  

But then we’d miss out on all the new and exciting ways the Oilers find to lose games.

by TakeoutArtist on Jan 18, 2012 7:02 AM MST up reply actions  

Which, if you think about it, is an amazing accomplishment on its own considering how much we’ve lost the past few years

Insert Witty Comment Here

by VanillaAcid on Jan 18, 2012 7:27 AM MST via mobile up reply actions  

Believe me it’s very tempting to just write “Stuff happened, you know how it ended.”

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Jan 18, 2012 7:52 AM MST up reply actions   2 recs

‘You Know How It Ended’ is one I’ve used more than once.

Editor and Lead Writer for Oil On Whyte - An Edmonton Oilers Blog

by chappy35 on Jan 18, 2012 8:00 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

That first song made me sad, then the 2nd one made me laugh, then after I realized how true it was it made me sad again.

"When you find yourself rooting for mediocrity – you might be an Oilers fan." - Neal Livingston

by proxy on Jan 18, 2012 11:38 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Defence an afterthought

I wonder if the Oilers will FINALLY put some priority into building a defence. That’s where it all starts, and the Oilers always manage the defence like an afterthought.

This year the draft is loaded with defencemen, and I wonder if they will still be busy shoring up the offence.

The last time the Oilers first first round pick was a dman was 1989. That represents 21 first round picks.

by Marvellous on Jan 18, 2012 7:27 AM MST reply actions  

You only need to look at Ottawa to see how focusing on defence (and goaltending if you like Anderson) can help a rebuild.

by gcw_rocks on Jan 18, 2012 7:31 AM MST up reply actions  

Yes

Funny you should mention Ottawa. That’s where I’m from. I am a Sens fan and an Oilers fan… which never seems to be a conflict.

And yeah, great defence and goaltending would transform many of the Oiler forwards into the WINNING stars they are meant to be.

by Marvellous on Jan 18, 2012 7:44 AM MST up reply actions  

The Oiler’s success in the first twelve games of the season was built precisely on tight defence and hot goaltending. Unfortunately, neither could last.

by Yeti# on Jan 18, 2012 8:00 AM MST up reply actions  

My favourite question – if they draft a forward, who out of the current top 6 goes, assuming they re-sign hemsky?

by gcw_rocks on Jan 18, 2012 7:32 AM MST up reply actions  

Ha ha ha, re-sign Hemsky. Just about spit coffee all over my computer screen when I read that.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Jan 18, 2012 7:54 AM MST up reply actions   2 recs

It’s sad when even the replicants know that Hemsky is gonezo.

"When you find yourself rooting for mediocrity – you might be an Oilers fan." - Neal Livingston

by proxy on Jan 18, 2012 11:41 AM MST up reply actions  

Funny as it may sound, for every person saying trade Hemsky there is a person saying re-sign him (although I think they are completely niave as to what that will take). Many of those folks spend quality time here.

So, if by some miracle Tambo grants your wish and they draft one of the two Russians, who plays where? If its Nail, you have him, Eberle, and Hemsky on the right. Who plays on the third line or gets traded? And if its the centre, you have Grigorenko, RNH, Gagner and Horcoff as centre options for the top 2 spots, with Belanger and Lander fighting for the 3rd and 4th line spots. Who goes where? Who goes out the door?

BTW – ISS has Grigorenko at number 1 this month.

by gcw_rocks on Jan 18, 2012 3:39 PM MST up reply actions  

BTW – ISS has Grigorenko at number 1 this month.

ISS and Hockey Prospectus both do.

Red Line, Future Considerations, Button, McKenzie, The Scouting Report all have Yakupov.

Button has Grigorenko in 7th, Redline and FC in 3rd.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Jan 18, 2012 3:45 PM MST up reply actions  

Here’s a crazy idea that will be completely ignored, don’t play the Russian in Edmonton next season.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Jan 18, 2012 3:55 PM MST up reply actions  

WHOA! Slow Down! That’s just dangerous talk there, someones liable to end up with hurt pride.

by Joe Girth on Jan 18, 2012 5:14 PM MST up reply actions  

We all know that isn’t going to happen.

So, I am curious. What do you do with the extra top six forward(s)?

by gcw_rocks on Jan 18, 2012 6:42 PM MST up reply actions  

You create a a 3rd scoring line where offense doesn’t die.

The Edmonton Oilers, keeping opposition fans happy for the last 6 years

by OilLeak on Jan 18, 2012 8:04 PM MST up reply actions  

So which one of Nail, Eberle or Hemsky plays the 3rd line minutes?

If Grigorenko, which two of him, RNH, Gagner and Horcoff drop to the 3rd line? Which of Paajarvi, Lander, Hartikainen and Belanger join them and which get bumped to the 4th line?

by gcw_rocks on Jan 19, 2012 7:07 AM MST up reply actions  

Probably fair to assume that there would be some fluidity based on what’s working, and who’s injured. Many teams have a strong top nine. It’s a good thing.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Jan 19, 2012 7:58 AM MST up reply actions  

I agree having three strong lines is a good thing for the team, but elite players tend to get fussy about thier minutes and role. I think you guys are avoiding a very important question. If you keep adding forwards, through the draft or otherwise, you gotta figure out where they play. Now this is the Oilers and maybe they need 9 top 6 forwards to have a hope in having 6 in the line up at any given time.

But at the start of the year, Renney or the new coach is going to make a line up. And while the 1st and 2nd line could be blurry, some line is going to be obviously the third line and get less minutes, especially if its Renney and he wants to play his 4th line.

So, how does Hemsky feel if its him that drops down? If Yakupov is the real deal everyone says he is, then that is a distinct possibility. It’s more interesting if its Grigorenko. If he and RNH earn the top 2 spots, what do you do with Horcoff, Lander, Belanger and Gagner, especially if you re-signed Hemsky and can’t really move Gagner to the 2nd line RW? The Oilers could be building the most expensive 3rd line in hockey.

And they will still suck because they didn’t trade anyone for a real NHL defenseman.

by gcw_rocks on Jan 19, 2012 9:57 AM MST up reply actions  

No one’s avoiding the question. The reality is that lines don’t stay consistent for very long even when players are healthy. It’s possible that I think this is a non-issue because I think “top nine” makes way more sense than “top six” if you’re describing even strength minutes. If you just want a starting lineup, I’d probably start the year with something like this:

Hall / Gagner / Hemsky
Smyth / Horcoff / Paajarvi
Yakupov / Nugent-Hopkins / Eberle

That “third” line would get the least minutes at evens in the top nine, but they’d get plenty of protection and OZ starts, so no doubt some folks would be calling them the first line anyway.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Jan 19, 2012 10:57 AM MST up reply actions  

Thanks.

you would move Nail and MPS to thier off wings? Interesting. I would think you have to flip them.

So, Lander, Belanger, and harti fight Jones and Eager for 4th line minutes. Omark is traded or goes back to Europe.

8 of those 9 need/want/will demand PP minutes. Would be interesting to see Renny juggle that line up and keep everyone happy before the team plunges into Cap hell.

What I am pushing for is people seem to want to keep all the forwards and then complain about defence and goaltending. There is zero evidence that top free agents want to sign in Edmonton, so trades is the most viable route for fixing the back end. So, pushing a bit to see if looking at the line up the pro-Hemsky Gagner camp would ice surfaces an expendible asset that can be used as the centre peice for a Bogosian/Schneider/Bernier.

Cause when I look at it, I keep coming back to Gagner and Hemsky as the only viable assets to trade, unless someone makes a sweetheart offer for this years first round pick.

by gcw_rocks on Jan 19, 2012 12:58 PM MST up reply actions  

Hall, Eberle, Hopkins and Hemsky have all missed time this year.

Having a healthy roster isn’t what I’d consider a problem and because we should no longer expect to have one (a healthy roster), you better improve your roster depth.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Jan 19, 2012 1:38 PM MST up reply actions  

At what cost? Keeping them all includes the opportunity cost of the defenders or goaltenders that spending some of those assets would bring the team. And this team desperately needs defence and a goalie to build around more than it needs another forward.

It would be nice if stud free agent defencemen were lining up to come to this team, but they aren’t and they won’t until the team starts winning. The old catch 22. Can’t win without defence, can’t acquire any through free agency and won’t spend assets to get some.

by gcw_rocks on Jan 19, 2012 7:25 PM MST up reply actions  

That’s different.

The question was about keeping forwards and whether they should or not.

If the Oilers can acquire a good defenceman at the cost of one of their young forwards, they should do it.

In terms of opporunity cost, All the young guys are still on their ELC, so their contracts aren’t that high for next year, plus both goaltenders are already signed and this team has a bunch of cap room still.

If you can move a forward for a defenceman, fine, do it. But don’t move a forward because you might be able to add a defenceman.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Jan 20, 2012 7:28 AM MST up reply actions  

I think you’re exaggerating the PP thing. Having four forwards on a unit is possible, and if Horcoff is being overplayed this year, then take him off the PP. As for Omark, my actual preference would be to see him play in Yakupov’s spot, and then demote the Russian, but if not that, there’s room for him to start on the 4th or in the PB. Nothing at all wrong with having Lander and Hartikainen slated for the AHL to start the year; if they play well there, they’re sure to get time in the NHL. As for trading to get a defender, I’ve got no problem with that. But I don’t see why you’d limit your trading options to Gagner or Hemsky. Everybody’s got a price.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Jan 19, 2012 1:46 PM MST up reply actions  

I don’t like many if any of those forwards for the point, unless yakupov has a gun for a shot. I don’t think its good for your PP to only have one guy high who can shoot. Makes your PP predictable and/or eliminates an scoring option. If one of them had a big shot I would probably feel differently.

The team paid too much to get Hall and RNH to trade them, and Eberle is too good. Horcoff is untradeable with his contract and point production. Smyth is too old and plays an important mentoring role. That leaves Hemsky, Gagner and MPS as trade options with enough value to bring back a serious defender.

I have also come around to the belief that goaltending and defence wins championships in todays NHL, or at least you need one of the two. Top goaltending can cover a myriad of sins. Strong defence can bail out average goaltending. Without at least one of those two areas strong, forward depth is irrelevant.

by gcw_rocks on Jan 19, 2012 7:21 PM MST up reply actions  

If that’s what you believe, why would you be opposed to trading one of the top forwards for a top defender? If, say, Hedman were available, but it would cost you one of Hall or Nugent-Hopkins, wouldn’t that be worth considering?

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Jan 19, 2012 8:39 PM MST up reply actions  

Yes, but as I said, I think management has put themselves in a corner where they can’t trade either of those two. Fans have too much invested, and suffered to much to get them.

I would swap Hall for Hedman in a heartbeat. Not sure I would trade RNH for him, because I think centres are worth more than wingers.

by gcw_rocks on Jan 19, 2012 9:10 PM MST up reply actions  

If they pick in the top 2 they’d be stupid to draft a defenceman this year.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Jan 18, 2012 8:55 AM MST up reply actions  

Two's better than one

Yes, and I expect that they will pick another forward, and settle for a dman in the 2nd or 3rd round like they always do. Then in four or five years they may have a dman…

If they had their heads screwed on properly, they could trade down and end up with at least two great dmen prospects instead of one.

by Marvellous on Jan 18, 2012 9:34 AM MST up reply actions  

I’d rather just trade #1 or 2 for an established (or near established) defenceman around 24-25.

Drafting a defenceman now means we are still looking at 3-4 years (in a good case scenario) for him to be a top 4 option.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Jan 18, 2012 11:09 AM MST up reply actions  

How is what the Oilers are doing now working?

Sure in theory that would work great, but can you give me an example of one “established (or near established) defenceman around 24-25” that is available?

These guys are like gold, and for the most part you’ll only get the ones who are not developing up to expectation in a trade.

Do you think you will get Karlsson or Cowen or Ekman-Larsson or any of these top guys in a trade?

That’s why you have to draft them. Sure you can go ahead and overpay for underachieving veterans and then when your young guns come out of their Entry Level deals, then what?

How is it going trying to piece a defence together from everyone’s castoffs? Yes, that’s an exaggeration but the point is, you have to draft defencemen.

The reason why Oiler fans are frustrated with the development of the dmen drafted is that they are not for the most part first rounders. They spend those picks on forwards? How is that strategy working?

by Marvellous on Jan 18, 2012 12:17 PM MST up reply actions  

Make a list of the top 20, 30, 60, whatever defencemen in the NHL along with their current team. Then look at who drafted them and where they were drafted.

Out of the 20 Norris finalists last year, only Pronger and Doughty were top 5 picks.

Only Doughty, Suter, Myers and Staal are still with the team that drafted them in the 1st round (all of whom are still in their RFA years).

A good defenceman is important, but you better not pass on a better player because you are fishing for one. When it comes time to draft, you pick the best player available.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Jan 18, 2012 12:34 PM MST up reply actions  

That’s a pessimistic view of Murray, but probably reasonable on the rest.

by gcw_rocks on Jan 18, 2012 12:23 PM MST up reply actions  

I don’t think 3-4 years after being drafted before being a top 4 defenceman is pessimistic at all.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Jan 18, 2012 12:52 PM MST up reply actions  

We do see exceptions. Hedman, Larsson, Kulikov. Murray could be one of those exceptions based on his scouting reports.

by gcw_rocks on Jan 18, 2012 3:46 PM MST up reply actions  

I never said anything about exceptions.

I just said that in a good case scenario, a drafted player becomes a top 4 defenceman in 3-4 years.

Obviously there is best case where they are at that level as rookies or sophmores, but they are exceptions.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Jan 19, 2012 1:36 PM MST up reply actions  

Trading for an established d-man is difficult but not impossible, especially if you have the #1 or 2 draft pick as bait. There are some teams who need help on forward and might be willing to sacrifice a d-man because they have the depth (eg. Nashville). There are other teams who might be unwilling or unable to spend the money to retain their top d-men (eg. Nashville, Florida, Phoenix). If the Oilers can trade for one top d-man and sign a decent UFA this summer, when you add that to Gilbert-Smid they have a pretty stellar top 4. Drafting without a trade or UFA signing will equate to another long season next year.

by gvblackhawk on Jan 18, 2012 1:34 PM MST up reply actions  

So, starting Green/Eager/Hordichuk to start the 3rd in a tie game, eh? Interesting strategy there.

by Geeezeus on Jan 18, 2012 7:58 AM MST reply actions  

I think you miss the subtlety of lulling the opponents into a false sense of security before pouncing like a leopard and ripping them apart. Of course, we need to work on the second part of that…

by Yeti# on Jan 18, 2012 8:01 AM MST up reply actions  

We already figured out most of the roadmap for this in the game day thread:

1. Play 4th line Eager/Hordichuk/AHL fodder

2. Lull other team into false sense of security

3. ????

4. Profit

Any day now they’ll figure out step 3.

"When you find yourself rooting for mediocrity – you might be an Oilers fan." - Neal Livingston

by proxy on Jan 18, 2012 11:37 AM MST up reply actions  

Who needs Step 3 if you can get to 4 without it?

by DarrenV on Jan 18, 2012 11:41 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Yes, but Renney hasn’t seemed to figure out how to make the profit come about yet.

"When you find yourself rooting for mediocrity – you might be an Oilers fan." - Neal Livingston

by proxy on Jan 18, 2012 11:46 AM MST up reply actions  

Are you kidding, the Oilers are profiting like crazy.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Jan 18, 2012 12:52 PM MST up reply actions  

That line started the game too. I’ll never understand it.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Jan 18, 2012 8:21 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Renney started that line (at least the pairing of Eager/Hordichuk) versus the Kings as well.

by Geeezeus on Jan 18, 2012 8:35 AM MST up reply actions  

He did the same in Dallas as well. If it ain’t broke don’t fix it. Oh.. wait..

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Jan 18, 2012 8:44 AM MST up reply actions  

Hey, it worked against the Kings!

by DarrenV on Jan 18, 2012 9:01 AM MST up reply actions  

The Copper & Blue -An Edmonton Oilers Fan Site – We haven’t seen the bottom of the elevator shaft yet.

This conjures up the image of Kevin Lowe standing at the top in an open elevator doorway, holding on to the belt of Steve Tambelini as he leans in towards the cables with a hacksaw, all the while laughing maniacally together in their hand made "We’re with Stu" T-shirts.

by Joe Girth on Jan 18, 2012 10:50 AM MST reply actions  

“..maybe the hockey gods are giving us a break after all.”

I just wish it wasn’t in the form of Taylor Fedun’s legs etc.

"When you find yourself rooting for mediocrity – you might be an Oilers fan." - Neal Livingston

by proxy on Jan 18, 2012 11:35 AM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ryan_2008_small
The Oilers Begin the Road to Rebuilding
Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL