Taylor Hall & Eric Belanger WOWY, A Tale Of Two Seasons
Taylor Hall and Eric Belanger have been on the ice for a total of four scoring chances thus far in 2011-12. Their paths don't often intersect, so their WOWYs should give us an idea, by proxy, of the strength of their linemates. Call it the transitive property of scoring chances.
All data compiled and published by Dennis King and mc79hockey.com
| With Hall | Without Hall | Hall Without | |||||||||
| # | CF | CA | % | CF | CA | % | CF | CA | % | ||
| 10 | 24 | 25 | 0.490 | 123 | 145 | 0.459 | 113 | 98 | 0.536 | ||
| 14 | 79 | 68 | 0.537 | 67 | 89 | 0.429 | 58 | 55 | 0.513 | ||
| 83 | 43 | 37 | 0.538 | 65 | 80 | 0.448 | 94 | 86 | 0.522 | ||
| 89 | 21 | 22 | 0.488 | 70 | 93 | 0.429 | 116 | 101 | 0.535 | ||
| 93 | 93 | 74 | 0.557 | 54 | 67 | 0.446 | 44 | 49 | 0.473 | ||
| 5 | 46 | 34 | 0.575 | 109 | 137 | 0.443 | 91 | 89 | 0.506 | ||
| 6 | 9 | 11 | 0.450 | 47 | 63 | 0.427 | 128 | 112 | 0.533 | ||
| 13 | 11 | 17 | 0.393 | 22 | 31 | 0.415 | 126 | 106 | 0.543 | ||
| 24 | 35 | 43 | 0.449 | 76 | 110 | 0.409 | 102 | 80 | 0.560 | ||
| 25 | 16 | 15 | 0.516 | 51 | 61 | 0.455 | 121 | 108 | 0.528 | ||
| 33 | 13 | 15 | 0.464 | 35 | 43 | 0.449 | 124 | 108 | 0.534 | ||
| 44 | 40 | 33 | 0.548 | 60 | 79 | 0.432 | 97 | 90 | 0.519 | ||
| 58 | 41 | 39 | 0.513 | 83 | 114 | 0.421 | 96 | 84 | 0.533 | ||
| 77 | 53 | 33 | 0.616 | 103 | 119 | 0.464 | 84 | 90 | 0.483 | ||
Exactly one player has been better without Hall and shockingly, it's Cam Barker. Every other player is worse, and significantly so, without Hall. Without Ryan Nugent-Hopkins or Tom Gilbert, however, Hall is underwater.
| With Belanger | Without Belanger | Belanger Without | |||||||||
| # | CF | CA | % | CF | CA | % | CF | CA | % | ||
| 14 | 8 | 13 | 0.381 | 138 | 144 | 0.489 | 76 | 106 | 0.418 | ||
| 28 | 50 | 71 | 0.413 | 58 | 61 | 0.487 | 34 | 48 | 0.415 | ||
| 37 | 3 | 14 | 0.176 | 25 | 32 | 0.439 | 81 | 105 | 0.435 | ||
| 55 | 21 | 19 | 0.525 | 25 | 36 | 0.410 | 63 | 100 | 0.387 | ||
| 89 | 28 | 40 | 0.412 | 63 | 75 | 0.457 | 56 | 79 | 0.415 | ||
| 91 | 27 | 30 | 0.474 | 23 | 22 | 0.511 | 57 | 89 | 0.390 | ||
| 94 | 17 | 21 | 0.447 | 138 | 153 | 0.474 | 67 | 98 | 0.406 | ||
| 5 | 26 | 41 | 0.388 | 129 | 130 | 0.498 | 58 | 78 | 0.426 | ||
| 6 | 16 | 19 | 0.457 | 40 | 55 | 0.421 | 68 | 100 | 0.405 | ||
| 13 | 7 | 12 | 0.368 | 26 | 36 | 0.419 | 77 | 107 | 0.418 | ||
| 24 | 20 | 31 | 0.392 | 91 | 122 | 0.427 | 64 | 88 | 0.421 | ||
| 25 | 13 | 18 | 0.419 | 54 | 58 | 0.482 | 71 | 101 | 0.413 | ||
| 33 | 13 | 11 | 0.542 | 35 | 47 | 0.427 | 71 | 108 | 0.397 | ||
| 44 | 27 | 27 | 0.500 | 73 | 85 | 0.462 | 57 | 92 | 0.383 | ||
| 58 | 21 | 47 | 0.309 | 103 | 106 | 0.493 | 63 | 72 | 0.467 | ||
| 77 | 24 | 28 | 0.462 | 132 | 124 | 0.516 | 60 | 91 | 0.397 | ||
Belanger on the other hand, is dragging on his teammates, at least in the scoring chance department. Only four players are better with Belanger than without: Ben Eager, Ryan Whitney, Colten Teubert and Corey Potter. Eager is easy to explain - his regular linemates, Lennart Petrell and Anton Lander should both in the AHL right now.
Of particular interest are the numbers with Magnus Paajarvi and Sam Gagner. Working as a line, those three are 12 CF - 9 CA (57%), which means that Gagner and Belanger without Paajarvi are 16 CF - 31 CA (34%) and Paajarvi and Belanger without Gagner are 15 CF - 21 CA (42%). It's far too small of a sample size to make inferences on who is driving the bus, but we can see how much both Paajarvi and Gagner's numbers are affected when on the ice with Belanger.
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Could the case of Belanger’s teammates be that along with joining his line they also face tougher competition? If they are getting an easier ride away from him, it would explain the improvement of their SC’s. I’m not familiar enough with QUALCOMP to check myself, but is there the available data to do a QUALCOMP WOWY?
The Eager-Belanger combination looks interesting. Not sure who the heck you play on the other wing, but maybe if you can find the right winger maybe you have a 4th line.
The line they had going when those two were playing together was Belanger, Eager, and Jones, which seems like a pretty reasonable fourth line to me (and it better be given the price).
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Jan 17, 2012 3:16 PM MST up reply actions
In addition to ZS and QoC, doesn’t WOWY also directly relate to what other options are available? Belanger is clearly not the best centerman on the team but gets put into tough situations.
When not playing with Hall, other players are either playing the toughs with Smyth or a choice of AHLers/PB candidates. Seems like he’s going to cleanup on the WOWY for some time.
WOWY or not, I think it can be agreed Belanger’s stick is the black hole of offense right now.
by till_horcoff_is_coach on Jan 17, 2012 3:19 PM MST reply actions
When not playing with Hall, other players are either playing the toughs with Smyth or a choice of AHLers/PB candidates. Seems like he’s going to cleanup on the WOWY for some time.
That’ an interesting point.
Before the last rash of injuries hit, they were running 94-93-14 and 4-89-83, so if the kids come back and they don’t trade Hemsky, then there might be better information.
Belanger is a useful 4th line centre who can PK, and help out on defensive zone draws. Renney not being able to realize this is a testament to Renney’s incompetence.
There is no problem with Paajarvi. All one has to do is don’t play him with Belanger.
Notice that a good defenseman (Gilbert) supercharges Hall’s stats. Ryan Murray please.
The Oilers have enough elite forward prospects. They need defensemen who can get them the puck in stride and on the tape.
When has Belanger ever been a 4th liner?
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98
Belanger’s career ATOI is 16:28. Over 10.5 seasons he has ranged from 13:25 to 17:50 minutes, topping 15:30 in each of the last nine years.
I guess it would be possible to be getting fourth EV minutes with a shit ton of special teams time, but that’s not exactly my definition of a fourth liner. Although that definition has applied to Belanger a couple of indivdual games this year it certainly hasn’t in general terms.
Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.
by Bruce McCurdy on Jan 18, 2012 5:16 PM MST up reply actions

by 

























