The Mike Cammalleri Trade
The Calgary Flames haven't had the season that Jay Feaster was hoping for. Feaster made it very clear that he wants this team to make the playoffs, and has been one of the most active general managers through the first half of the season in trying to make that happen. He added a struggling Blake Comeau with a waiver claim in November, a move that didn't cost anything but money with no long-term negative consequences likely because Comeau's contract is up at the end of the year. A few days ago, he traded defender Brendan Mikkelson for Blair Jones, a big 25-year-old winger who's been able to score in the AHL - he had 55 points in 56 games last season - but hasn't been able to translate that success to the NHL. That experiment is in its infancy - and Jones is getting an amazing opportunity, playing almost 17 minutes per night - but safe to say that it was another low-risk move with the potential for big payoff since, like Comeau, Jones is a restricted free agent after the season. His decision to acquire Mike Cammalleri doesn't exactly follow that same pattern.
With Cammalleri spouting off the other day ("We prepare our games like losers. We play like losers. So it's no wonder why we lose."), it was pretty clear that he was on his way out of Montreal, but with a $6M cap hit for this year and each of the next two seasons, moving him might have been easier said than done, especially since Cammalleri hasn't put up exceptional offense during the regular season since coming to Montreal. Given that situation, it didn't seem like the Flames would need to give up a whole lot in order to make the deal work.
And they didn't. The Flames moved a 2nd round pick in 2013, prospect Patrick Holland, and Rene Bourque out, and received a 5th round pick in 2012, goaltender Karri Ramo, and of course, Mike Cammalleri. There are several reasons that I like the deal, and the greatness of Mike Cammalleri is well down the list.
Starting with the big names, I don't think that there's a huge difference between Cammalleri and Bourque today. Neither guy has been a positive driver in the possession metrics over the last season and a half, but both have been seeing decent competition in top nine minutes at even strength, and significant time on the power play, which has helped them to amass some points. The question for me is which guy is a better bet going forward, and I'd be betting on Cammalleri for sure. He has a longer track record of success, his peak years are much better, and even though he makes a bit more now (his $6M cap hit compares to just $3.33M for Bourque), Cammalleri's contract contains less risk because it expires at the end of the 2013-14 season, shortly before his 32nd birthday; Bourque's doesn't expire until after the 2015-16 season, at which point he'll already be 34.
As for the extras, I think the Flames do better here too. The difference between a mid-second rounder and a fifth-rounder is significant, but (a) both picks are still very unlikely to become top players (about 15% for the 2nd and 4% for the 5th), and (b) the Flames get to make their pick one year sooner, which helps to bridge that gap even more. And what little difference there is there is more than made up for in the swap of young players. Granted, Patrick Holland is having a good season in the WHL, but he's also 20. You never know, of course, but I'd be pretty surprised to see him make it to the NHL. Karri Ramo, on the other hand, could be a significant help to the Flames in the long-term.
Ramo has played in the NHL before, and while he wasn't particularly successful (his career save percentage is .895), he was also in his early twenties. Since then, Ramo has gone to the KHL, where he's been excellent in each of the last two seasons. In 2010-11, Ramo had the fifth best save percentage in the league at .925, which was well ahead of backup Alexei Kuznetsov's .911. In 2011-12, Ramo has been even better with a save percentage of .932, which is once again among the league leaders. I've been very underwhelmed by Henrik Karlsson, and would have to think that the Flames would be well-served to bury him in the minors for the last year of his deal to give Ramo a shot. If he plays well, he's an excellent long-term solution for the team's goaltending needs.
All in all, this is a much larger move than Feaster's two previous acquisitions, but like those, I think it's a move that makes good sense for the Flames.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Nice breakdown Scott. Like you I think this is a good move for the Flames. Even if they don’t make the playoffs this season it doesn’t hurt them down the road so there isn’t a lot of risk.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
Bourque is 24th in the league in even strength goals since 08-09 and is 115th in the league in cap hit among forwards. I think he’s a good value pickup for Montreal.
He was also last on the Flames in terms of scoring chance ratio last year and near the bottom this season…and he’s mostly played third liners this season.
He went from a Selke level forward to a detriment inside a couple of years.
Yeah, I’ve been following the chance counting and noticed that he’s fallen off quite a bit in the last year and a half, which isn’t exactly uncommon for guys heading into their thirties, but it is worrisome when you’re on the hook for four more years.
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Jan 13, 2012 9:38 PM MST up reply actions
It’s a good deal for the Flames. Montreal is in Edmonton mode.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Yes and no. It does seem likely Montreal doesn’t intend to win much the rest of this season, and Cunneyworth is either under orders to play the kids more or else a head coach of rare cluelessness.
And don’t get me wrong, I hate this trade. Montreal trading guys for “attitude” is repeated, profound stupidity, and it’s never worked well.
But even minus Cammalleri, consider their situation next season. They’ll have:
- a real NHL roster with solid players at all positions
- a reasonably high draft pick (although unlikely to be in the lottery because of the above, unless Cunneyworth really bumbles it)
- a virtually unlimited budget
- and a media who, instead of bending over backwards to praise the organization, seeks every possible reason to critcize it and manufactures one if they can’t find it, but like Edmonton media, largely has no clue.
I don’t think they will go for the long-term “rebuild” (and certainly hope they don’t), but they’ll do the one-year reload. Whoever succeeds Gauthier could find a worse place to begin a GM career. Expectations will be rock-bottom, no one will remember that the team did most of its losing by one goal (current non-shootout non-empty net goal-differential: -1), and he’ll even have some cap space to work with. And a club that was 52% Fenwick-close before Gomez and Gionta got hurt.
It shouldn’t be too hard to get credit for “rescuing a storied franchise from the edge of disaster”. It will be painful to watch in the meantime, I bet.

by 

























