2010-11 Special Teams Efficiency (STE)

Remember the diamond?

I developed Special Teams Efficiency last year after realizing that total special teams percentage would always average 100% league-wide.  As I said in the original article:

If we had a simple metric to apply to special teams, we could get a sense of just how much of an impact special teams can have on a season.  Since the league average for power play success percentage plus penalty kill success percentage is 100, why not add the two and use it as a baseline for measuring special teams efficiency?  Though the tendency to regress toward the mean may be somewhat less strong (but then again, maybe not!), it may still be useful as an evaluation tool.  In this case, we'll call the combined number Special Teams Efficiency, or STE. Since the post-lockout orgy of power plays (2005-2007) the per team yearly average of special teams situations is 643.  If all teams were to draw the same amount of penalties, a team with a 100 STE would net zero special teams goals. It follows, then, that a team with a 105 STE would net 32 special teams goals more than average, and a team with a 95 STE would net 32 special teams goals less than average.

The Oilers were far and away the worst team in the league at the time, so bad in fact, the Oilers were twice as worse as any other team in the league except two, the Panthers and Maple Leafs:

The Oilers' special teams are so bad that if they were to continue on their current pace, they would net -110 goals by the end of the season compared to an average team.  They would net -190 goals compared to the Canucks.

I've listed the December STE and goal differential next to the final STE and final goal differential in the table below:

Rk Team
Dec. STE Dec. Goals Gained / Lost  STE Goals Gained / Lost 
1 Vancouver Canucks 112.22 80 109.9 64
2 Anaheim Ducks 105.17 34 104.82 31
3 Detroit Red Wings 104.81 32 104.59 29
4 Tampa Lightning 110.92 72 104.31 28
5 Montreal Canadiens 105.66 37 104.06 26
6 Washington Capitals 108.62 57 103.11 20
7 San Jose Sharks 104.93 32 102.94 19
8 Buffalo Sabres 95.03 -33 102.35 15
9 Chicago Blackhawks 100.24 2 102.32 15
10 Pittsburgh Penguins 106.7 44 101.87 12
11 Los Angeles Kings 101.09 7 101.66 11
12 Ottawa Senators 98.3 -11 101.24 8
13 Minnesota Wild 107.14 47 101 6
14 Calgary Flames 97.71 -15 100.71 5
15 New York Rangers 98.62 -9 100.56 4
16 Long Island Islanders 98.96 -7 100.45 3
17 St. Louis Blues 97.82 -14 100.36 2
18 Nashville Predators 94.44 -37 100.17 1

League Average 100 0 100 0
19 Philadelphia Flyers 101.42 9 99.36 -4
20 Boston Bruins 102.1 14 98.81 -8
21 Dallas Stars 92.96 -46 98.11 -12
22 New Jersey Devils 92 -53 97.75 -14
23 Florida Panthers 89.51 -69 97.75 -14
24 Carolina Hurricanes 94.32 -37 97.15 -18
25 Atlanta Thrashers 104.5 30 95.88 -26
26 Colorado Avalanche 100.88 6 94.6 -35
27 Phoenix Coyotes 97.11 -19 94.3 -37
28 Columbus Blue Jackets 96.22 -25 94.2 -37
29 Toronto Maple Leafs 88.35 -77 93.4 -42
30 Edmonton Oilers 83.31 -110 91.42 -55


  • Edmonton finished last, but had the largest improvement in the league over the last four months of the season. The reasons behind the improvement were two-fold:  first, Tom Renney stopped using the terrible Diamond Penalty Kill, second, and more importantly, Nikolai Khabibulin was benched more often in favor of Devan Dubnyk, a goaltender who didn't specialize in kicking rebounds into the slot 22 feet away from the goal.
  • Florida experienced the second-largest rebound because, let's face it, a power play can't continue at 9% all season long.
  • The Buffalo Sabres experienced the third-largest improvement in STE during this time period, which coincided with the Tyler Myers revival tour.
  • The Thrashers experienced the largest decline, which, coincidentally knocked them out of the playoffs and out of Atlanta.
  • Tampa's special teams fell off, but they also trade for Dwayne Roloson, improving the worst goaltending in the league to mitigate the fall off in special teams.
  • Colorado's special teams went from average to terrible, and without solid even strength play, the team fell apart.
Log In Sign Up

Log In Sign Up

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join The Copper & Blue

You must be a member of The Copper & Blue to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at The Copper & Blue. You should read them.

Join The Copper & Blue

You must be a member of The Copper & Blue to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at The Copper & Blue. You should read them.




Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.