Should The Oilers Consider Adding A Defenseman Just To Be Safe?
If you're a frequent reader of this site you've undoubtedly come across a post where the depth, or lack thereof, of the Oilers blueline was mentioned. As part of their offseason plans the Oilers needed to add at least one more defenseman to their roster that was capable of playing minutes on one of the top two pairings. Instead they added Cam Barker through free agency and traded Kurtis Foster for Andy Sutton, neither of which is the top four defenseman that was needed.
A quick glance at the depth chart and the Oilers blueline looks to be okay. Not great by any means, just okay. At least it's okay when everyone is healthy. If one of the top four go down with an injury, then the likes of Barker, Theo Peckham, or Sutton will need to fill in. Each of those three players need to be protected to some extent and forcing them to play a pairing above where they belong will not bring good results. So with the news that Whitney has a "minor sprain" of his surgically repaired ankle, should the Oilers be looking at the remaining unrestricted free agents just to be safe?
The short answer to that question is yes. Whitney is the Oilers best blueliner but he's had issues with injuries throughout his career. He had surgery on his ankle in January and seven months later it's still a little tender. I'll admit that in the seven years I spent in university I didn't take any medical courses but that seems like a very long recovery time to me. And now we've got news of a minor setback. Considering how big of a role Whitney plays on this team, any setback in his recovery should be cause for concern.
Injuries happen to every team every year, they are a fact of life in the NHL. Still, there has been a lot of talk around Edmonton of late that if the Oilers can stay healthy they'll be a better team this season. While that statement is technically accurate it's a stretch to think that this, or any, team is going to go through a season without a few injuries. Considering how thin the defense already is and the questions surrounding Whitney I think the Oilers should be looking for help now.
The pickings available from the free agent defenseman scrapheap are certainly thin but there is one name that is worth considering, Bryan McCabe.
Last season in time with the Panthers and Rangers, McCabe scored seven goals and added another 21 assists. Hardly anything worth getting too excited about but still more than any Oiler defenseman scored last season. McCabe's detractors point to his defensive shortcomings and the stats from Behind the Net back those claims up. His relative Corsi ranks him near the bottom of both teams he played on last year and the quality of competition shows he wasn't playing the toughest minutes either. So he would need to be protected a little bit, that's fine because he wouldn't be coming onto this team to play as a top pairing defenseman, he'd be an insurance policy. He isn't the top four defenseman I was hoping the Oilers would acquire this offseason but the ship has sailed on that front. McCabe still has value though and he'd be a good pickup.
The simple fact is that while he may be a defensive liability at times McCabe can score and the Oilers could use a little more of that coming off a season where they finished with the third fewest goals in the league. At even strength McCabe's points per 60 minutes last season was higher than all the Oilers current defensemen not named Whitney. On the powerplay the numbers tell a similar story with McCabe's production ranking him behind only Whitney and Tom Gilbert. McCabe, not Barker, would be a far better option in the Foster/Sheldon Souray spot on the Oilers blueline.
But aside from just goals and assists, with over 1100 games played in the NHL, McCabe would instantly bring another veteran voice to the very young Oilers dressing room as well. Jason Strudwick was that veteran presence among the defensemen for the last couple of seasons but with him now gone and not coming to camp as an invite there is a void in the Oilers dressing room that McCabe would be well suited to fill. He was the captain of the Panthers before he was traded to New York last year so the role of leader is something he is more than a little familiar with.
For whatever reason the calendar has turned to September and McCabe still finds himself without a contract. Perhaps he's just asking for too much money or is waiting for a team to suffer an injury to drive up his price. Maybe he wouldn't even want to come and play here. But at a minimum the Oilers should be on the phone trying to find out. This is a guy who scores goals and can be a veteran voice in the dressing room. Considering the available information McCabe would be a good insurance policy for the Oilers very thin blueline.
26 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
As a third pairing D and a PP specialist McCabe would definitely be worth a gamble at the right price.
Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.
We’ve got plenty of third pairing defensemen; we need two more top four guys, and I don’t know that there are any left on the UFA market.
by sarcasticidealist on Sep 4, 2011 12:38 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
I’d be all in for a top four guy but I don’t see any left. Bottom pairing depth is better than nothing in that case.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
I would agree, but do you really want Tambellini pulling the trigger on that trade?
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Tambellini is sure he can get a top four d-man for Brule. He’s working the phones now, stay tuned for updates.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
Is this really being debated?
Seriously, the Oilers have a sub par dmen corps when they are health. McCabe would be an ok addition but he is a left shoot. Any help at this position would be a positive development.
one of the founders and most prolific writers of Bringing Back the Glory
I seriously thought this was one of Massey’s articles because the first words to come into my mind were “Is this a joke?”. If you strip out the rookies and marginals, we probably need two or three D “just to be safe”.
Exactly. Just to be safe, the Oilers could use 4 guys to displace Sutton, Barker, Chorney and push Petry to the A
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
I think McCabe would help us and be a great signing… of course, he’d never fucken sign here because it is the oilers.
Never say “never” … five years, $27 MM ought to get ’er done.
Just sayin’.
Writer for The Cult of Hockey, The Copper & Blue, and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Sep 5, 2011 11:31 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m betting Tallon is putting the finishing touches on that deal right now.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
I think adding another veteran defenseman would be silly.
Especially a pylon like Bryan McCabe. What have his teams ever done? He has a history of mediocrity.
But aside from that, the Oilers need to give playing time to their cadre of young defenseman. Jeff Petry, Tom Gilbert, Ladislav Smid, Theo Peckham and Cam Barker all need to be given a chance to further develop and prove themselves, especially with Colton Teubert, Alex Plante, Martin Marincin, Oscar Klefbom and David Musil coming up the pipes over the next 3 seasons.
Buying out Kubas since July 2010
by GelatinousMutantCoconut on Sep 5, 2011 4:18 PM MDT reply actions
The Oilers would be a better team with McCabe playing on their third pairing. Better teams tend to win more games. Somewhere I thought that was the goal of team in the NHL.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
But is signing McCabe right now a priority?
If Oilers play both Peckham and Petry, we are already looking at Sutton as a 7th D man. We know Oilers will play Barker in some sort of a top 4 capacity. So Whitney, Gilbert, Smid, Barker, Petry, Peckham, Sutton. So who does McCabe replace? If Sutton, then what do you do with him? I think I would have been happier with McCabe over Sutton and Barker, but now that we have those 2 signed, I dont see a place for McCabe now. Maybe if one of our D men get injured fr the season, then singing McCabe would be the smart thing to do. As is we just have 1 spot left on the 50 contract restriction.
Success is not a goal..its a byproduct
Maybe one of Petry, Peckham, Barker, or Sutton would wind up in OKC. The idea of ignoring a good option to add depth just because it might bump someone else down a spot just doesn’t seem right to me. Any time you add depth it’s at the expense of someone else.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
I understand your point and would rather have him over Sutton/ Barker. However we know Barker will play as a regular. So consider him safe.
How much better is McCabe than Peckham/ Petry/ Sutton? Is he good enough to justify spending the 50th contract on him?
Success is not a goal..its a byproduct
Who else are we saving that 50th contract for? Since you can’t roll them over from one year to the next they might as well use it at some point. Adding a player who is better than two of your top seven defensemen seems like a good way to spend it if you ask me.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
I think you drastically underrate Peckham. If he got demoted i’d be seriously pissed. I think Barker is a higher risk/reward version of McCabe. As tempting as adding veteran depth may be, they already have his position filled.
I don’t know how they can have his position filled when I can’t name 3 defencemen on this team that are better than he is.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Whitney, Smid, Gilbert
Probably Petry too but I wouldn’t lose sleep if he spent some time in the A this season.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
Based on my impressions from last season Peckham will get eaten alive if he had to play consistent minutes in the top four. McCabe might not flourish but I think he’d do a whole lot better.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
I'm not convinced that they would be.
MCCabe brings more offense than any Oiler not named Whitney, but he’s a liability in his own end. At least guys like Smid, Peckham, Sutton are reliable defensivly. You know what they say, offense wins games, but defense wins championships.
Plus, there’s untapped offensive potential in guys like Gilbert, Barker, Petry, Chorney, and Smid. They need to be allowed to develop that potential.
Buying out Kubas since July 2010
by GelatinousMutantCoconut on Sep 10, 2011 8:50 PM MDT up reply actions

by 


























