Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Keys to 2011/12 - Score First and the Home Wins Will Come

Over the last couple of days I've looked at how better goaltending and not being the doormats of the Northwest Division are two key items that the Oilers will need to accomplish if they are going to compete for a playoff spot this season. But last season the Oilers finished with 62 points, 32 points less than the post lockout average for the last playoff spot in the Western Conference, so goaltending and a better divisional record will only get this team partway to their goal.

If the playoffs are going to happen for this team, the Oilers are also going to have to get off to a better start on most nights. Last season the Oilers spent far too much time playing from behind and that isn't an easy way to win games. If you want to win games, get the lead and don't let it go.

Star-divide

Below is a table showing each team's record when scoring first. The table has been sorted by total games scoring the first goal.   

Team Result When Scoring 1st
W L OT Total W% PT %
1 TAMPA BAY 32 12 7 51 0.627 0.696
2 LOS ANGELES 36 12 2 50 0.720 0.740
3 PHILADELPHIA 34 9 7 50 0.680 0.750
4 VANCOUVER 41 2 6 49 0.837 0.898
5 CHICAGO 32 10 5 47 0.681 0.734
6 ANAHEIM 34 10 2 46 0.739 0.761
7 ST LOUIS 27 14 5 46 0.587 0.641
8 ATLANTA 22 14 9 45 0.489 0.589
9 MONTREAL 32 6 6 44 0.727 0.795
10 SAN JOSE 32 6 5 43 0.744 0.802
11 NASHVILLE 30 5 8 43 0.698 0.791
12 PHOENIX 31 5 6 42 0.738 0.810
13 BOSTON 30 6 6 42 0.714 0.786
14 PITTSBURGH 31 7 3 41 0.756 0.793
15 DETROIT 30 5 6 41 0.732 0.805
16 NY RANGERS 28 11 2 41 0.683 0.707
17 DALLAS 32 5 2 39 0.821 0.846
18 MINNESOTA 31 4 4 39 0.795 0.846
19 CALGARY 28 8 3 39 0.718 0.756
20 NEW JERSEY 27 9 3 39 0.692 0.731
21 FLORIDA 23 8 8 39 0.590 0.692
22 BUFFALO 25 10 3 38 0.658 0.697
23 OTTAWA 24 10 4 38 0.632 0.684
24 CAROLINA 28 5 4 37 0.757 0.811
25 COLUMBUS 22 9 5 36 0.611 0.681
26 WASHINGTON 25 4 6 35 0.714 0.800
27 COLORADO 18 11 4 33 0.545 0.606
28 TORONTO 21 4 7 32 0.656 0.766
29 EDMONTON 18 8 6 32 0.563 0.656
30 NY ISLANDERS 20 4 5 29 0.690 0.776

 

And, as you've no doubt become accustomed to by now, there the Oilers are right there at the bottom of the table, scoring first in just 32 games last season. For an idea of the value of scoring that first goal you'll find only two teams in the top 16 spots - the Blues and Thrashers - that didn't make the playoffs. That the Blues and Thrashers ranked 28th and 30th in point percentage when scoring first is probably a big factor in why they didn't get in.

Looking at the Oilers numbers for a minute, on the rare occasion that they did score first, they had a point percentage of 0.656, but when they didn't score first their point percentage drops to a league low 0.200. Based on that differential, scoring first was, on average, worth just over 0.9 points in the standings for the Oilers last season. If the Oilers were just average and scored first half the time, that would have been equivalent to another four wins. That certainly isn't insignificant. And it also doesn't account for the improvement in the point percentage when scoring first. There is real room for them to pick up some wins by improving here.

But of course saying "score first" is easier said than done. So how do the Oilers go about getting on the scoreboard first, giving themselves a better chance to win? They do it by taking adavantage of home ice. 

With the home crowd behind you and the ability to control the on-ice match-up it would seem to me that a team would be more likely to get a lead when playing at home. However, in the case of the Oilers last season that wasn't true. Of the 32 time that the Oilers scored first, exactly half of those were on home ice and their success rate when doing so was almost exactly the same as their overall rate. Those numbers need to be better.

If you go past the first goal and look at the first period, the results are no better. At home last season the Oilers went to the dressing room at the end of the first period with the lead 11 times in 41 tries. That isn't very good. And more often than not, the outcome was already decided at that point. The Oilers won nine of the 11 games they were leading after one period; in the other 30 games they won four times and in three of those games the score was tied after one period of play. That kind of performance is not what I would call taking advantage of the benefits of home ice.

Improving on home ice is something that is going to take changes from both the players and the coaches. Working the lines and getting the right match-ups is something that the coaches need to be responsible for, it's their job. But the players need to make sure they're ready to play as well. More than a few times last season the Oilers failed to register a shot in the game's first ten minutes and that's not acceptable. These are professional athletes and they can't be dependent on the coaching staff to motivate them on a nightly basis, that's something they have to do themselves.

I think we can all agree that good teams win games at home. They take advantage of the benefits of being at home and they more often than not come away with the win. In the post-lockout NHL only five teams out of 96 have made the playoffs with more losses in front of their fans than wins. If the Oilers want to be considered a good team and make the playoffs this season they will obviously need to win more games than they did last season, so they might as well win them where wins are easiest to come by, and that's at home. If the Oilers play better early in home games they could improve by four to six wins over last season, getting them another step closer to the playoffs.

Comment 14 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

There’s nothing more disgruntling for fans than watching their home team drop trou on a regular basis. Improving their home record has to be one of the top goals for the Oilers this year.

by TakeoutArtist on Aug 31, 2011 3:51 PM MDT reply actions  

One season post lockout with more wins than losses at home. And people wonder why it’s pretty quite in the building sometimes.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Aug 31, 2011 4:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think “improvement” should be the focus. Let’s not worry about home and away records – Quinn and Debrusk do enough of that for all of us on the air.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Aug 31, 2011 9:55 PM MDT up reply actions  

When you actually go to most of the home games, it matters a lot more, mostly from an entertainment perspective. I know quite a few people who care a lot more about how the club plays at home than they do about how the club plays on the road.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Sep 1, 2011 10:26 AM MDT up reply actions  

I think you’re right Scott. Say the Oilers win 35 games this year, if the split is 25 home and 10 road I think the feeling around Edmonton would be a lot more positive than 10 home and 25 road.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Sep 1, 2011 1:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

“Improvement” has to be the goal but it should be easier to win games at home. If there is improvement that’s where it’ll most likely show up first.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Sep 1, 2011 1:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

Clearly scoring first is important, but I’m more concerned by the fact that when the Oilers do score first, they blow a lot of leads. Their win percentage when scoring first from the table above is a pathetic 0.563, good for 29th place; the league average is 0.686.

Getting the lead is one thing, but the Oilers can’t win if they don’t hold onto it. Last year, the team blew 89% of their one-goal leads (19th in the league), 50% of their two-goal leads (24th in the league) and 22% of their three-goal leads (25th in the league).

Loyal fan of the Edmonton Oilers. Don't you judge me.

by Ben Johnston on Aug 31, 2011 4:03 PM MDT reply actions  

Clearly scoring first is important, but I’m more concerned by the fact that when the Oilers do score first, they blow a lot of leads. Their win percentage when scoring first from the table above is a pathetic 0.563, good for 29th place; the league average is 0.686.

I think this is the point where the things I’ve been looking at start to overlap. Would better goaltending have improved that win percentage? Most likely.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Aug 31, 2011 4:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

Better goaltending, better defense, powerplay, penalty kill, even strength scoring?
is there a single area that the team was even close to average? All areas seem to be weak points, that could be improved to bump that win%.

All these things show is just how weak the team was all around last year.
(PS not disagreeing with you here, this is a good look at the reality the team faces.)

by UnrefinedCrude on Aug 31, 2011 4:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good work, Ryan. Scoring first has a WAY bigger effect on game outcomes than shots and so forth, I’m always surprised by how much emphasis is placed on the latter in serious statistical analyses when so much of it is driven by score effects. I know newer work based on leading/trailing/tied is a big step in the right direction.

The Oilers persistent suckitude on home ice has been a major downer for years.

Writer for The Cult of Hockey, The Copper & Blue, and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Sep 1, 2011 8:43 AM MDT reply actions  

Kind of a chicken and egg argument isn’t it? What are the shots on goal before the first goal?

I did a quick check for Oiler home games for when they lead after 1 period vs trailing after 1 period.

When they lead after 1 period (10 times), they tied their opponents in shots 103-103, or a period average of 10.3 shots for and 10.3 shots against.

When they trailed after 1 period (19 times), they were outshot 195-126, or a period average of 6.63 shots for and 10.26 shots against.

Now, ideally you’d count shots (corsi or fenwick) up until the first goal of the game, but it wouldn’t surprise me to see the same trend, which is the Oilers getting outshot.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

by dawgbone98 on Sep 1, 2011 11:18 AM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

Kind of a chicken and egg argument isn’t it? What are the shots on goal before the first goal?

a) It’s not an argument, how many times do I have to tell you guys I don’t argue? ;)

b) Exactly, which is why I like leading/trailing/tied stats. What are the shots before a team gets the lead and what they are after can be two Very different things. Your end of period study is probably a decent proxy, although I agree the best would be to the first goal. Once that is scored it seems the lion’s share of games are already in the bag so to speak. Let’s put it this way, give me the first goal and you can have your shots.

c) Unless, of course, your team sucks like the Oilers in which case the first goal often isn’t enough. Thing about split stats like Ryan presents here is that a terrible team is going to suck relative to the league on both sides of the equation.

Writer for The Cult of Hockey, The Copper & Blue, and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Sep 1, 2011 8:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

enh..last year we had big fat lazy Penner..this season we will have Smyth..so we will win a lot more.

Success is not a goal..its a byproduct

by SumOil on Sep 1, 2011 9:32 AM MDT reply actions  

Last season so many times i would tune into a game 5-7 mins late and Oilers were down 1 or 2 goals… Its not just that we gave oposing teams the lead, but we gave them loads wayy too early in the game. That kind of start is bound to have a demoralizing effect too, IMO

Success is not a goal..its a byproduct

by SumOil on Sep 1, 2011 9:33 AM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ryan_2008_small
The Oilers Begin the Road to Rebuilding
Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL