Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Latest NBA Trade Rumors

Sam Gagner - #4 In the Oilers Top 25 Under 25

Oiler fans all agree that Sam Gagner is a tremendous asset to the Edmonton Oilers - but they don't all agree that he'll be a tremendous player. There are those who believe that it's time to cut bait on the young centerman now so that the club can bring back value instead of dumping him for a second round pick in two or three years when there's more clarity about what kind of player he's become. Others feel that moving a twenty-one year-old with top-line potential is the exact opposite of what this team should be doing. Some think he's taken big steps forward; others that he's stagnated since his career-high 49-point rookie season in 2007-08. Those who have followed these lists for a while know that Sam Gagner has usually been just ranked just a little bit higher. Are the writers here giving up on him?

Star-divide

RankPlayer DOBDraftedYearBen
Bruce
Derek
JaysenJonScott
4 Sam Gagner 08/10/89
6 2007
4 5 2 4 4 5

 

Previous Rank: 2

No. At least I don't think so, and I say that as someone who moved Gagner from 2nd to 5th on my list. I'll say off the top that I'm one of the folks who think that there's been substantial improvement in Gagner's game since his rookie season, and that this improvement shows up in his stats when we take a close look at his performance at even strength, but that this past season showed some stagnation. First up, let's look at the possession metrics, which tells us how the Oilers are doing with Gagner on the ice:

Gagner_1_medium

I think that we can say with confidence that the last two seasons have been much better than the first two seasons. Gagner is no longer receiving the same kind of protection, but the Oilers have been able to nearly break even with regard to shots and they've generally been able to move the puck to the good end of the ice, but I don't think there's much of a case for saying that 2010-11 is significantly better than 2009-10 either in terms of responsibility or results.

His more "personal" statistics at even strength show a similar pattern of improvement through his first three seasons, and then stagnation in 2010-11:

Gagner_2_medium

The two underlying metrics are down even as the percentages are all up. He's taking less shots himself, and the team is getting fewer shots when he's out there, but both he and the team scored at a higher rate. Gagner himself also got points on a higher percentage of the goals scored when he was on the ice (IPP = "Individual Point Percentage" and tells us the number of times a player gets a point on the goals scored when he was on the ice; in 2010-11, Gagner got a point on 68.2% of the even strength goals scored when he was on the ice).

But for much of the season Gagner was asked to carry around a couple of rookies. He's gone from being sheltered to being the shelterer, so to speak. Derek's earlier scoring chance analysis showed us that he really wasn't ready for that - when he was playing with good players, he did well, and when he was playing with rookies, he really struggled. If the Oilers play him with good players for most of 2011-12, there's an excellent chance that he'll bounce back, and if performance was the only concern, I probably wouldn't have dropped him so far.

But it isn't. Sam Gagner's season ended with surgery on a severed tendon in his hand. Of course, I'm not a doctor, and my very limited research into the injury hasn't suggested that there should be long-term damage here, but it's the kind of injury that I have a hard time just blowing off. Sam Gagner's passing is one of his most important skills, and even though I don't know that this injury will have an impact on those passing skills, until I see him play for a few weeks, I won't be satisfied that it didn't. That uncertainty combined with what was a season stuck in neutral were enough for me to move Gagner back a few spots. But they're certainly not enough for me to give up on him.

Comment 13 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

It’s tough to judge Gagner, on one hand he has played through 4 seasons without setting the world on fire, on the other hand he’s still only 21.

Although it seems like consensus that the oilers botched Gagner’s development, I don’t know if I would have done anything different considering the circumstances.

Imagine its 2007 and you are Kevin Lowe. You have your latest highly touted prospect who just finished putting up 118 points in 53 games in the OHL. You can choose to put him in the OHL or the NHL. It’s obvious there was not much left to accomplish in juniors (unless you want to ask him to put up 200 points next time), so I can certainly see why that the NHL would appear to be the best developmental route for him.

Furthermore, at the end of his first NHL season, he came away a point shy of 50 in his rookie year as an 18 year old. Players in over their heads do not put up 40+ points in the NHL as a rookie. He was right in the middle of the production of other first overall picks, Stamkos (42pts), Tavares (54pts), and Hall (42 in a short season). Unless someone wants to argue that each of those players were rushed, I think we should cut some slack to the oilers management.

For whatever reason, Gagner has not progressed as quickly as some expected him to, but I don’t think blaming management is a valid excuse. I still believe Gagner will be a very good NHL player (and is a decent one already), so we have to remember that everyone develops at different rates. Even the Sedins took about 7 years after they were drafted to even approach a point per game pace. Gagner still has some time.

by Oiltank on Aug 1, 2011 5:24 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

You only get to “control” players in the NHL for 7 years or until they are 27, whichever comes first. Which is likely to have more value: his 18 and 19 year old seasons or his 26 and 27 year old seasons? Generally, unless the player is Hall or better, you should send the kids back to the CHL and let them mature physically and mentally to get the most out of your 7 years.

Gagner should have gone back.

by gcw_rocks on Aug 1, 2011 7:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

He’s going to become really good just in time to go UFA.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Aug 1, 2011 8:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

It may be early to ask...

But if he puts up a career year in points next year, do you give him a deal that retains his RFA rights, or try to buy some UFA years? You might get exceptional value on a 7+ year deal, as opposed to paying him his rate based on his prime years.

by eskimo44 on Aug 1, 2011 8:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

My point is you know have to buy two additional UFA years at the peak of his career. That’s not good asset management. They did it right with Eberle, they blew it with Gagner.

by gcw_rocks on Aug 2, 2011 7:35 AM MDT up reply actions  

Never debated that. Just asking what they do because it’s going to be a tough decision.

by eskimo44 on Aug 2, 2011 8:30 PM MDT up reply actions  

Well said

I think the two thing that i consistently hear as a criticism of Gagner that drive me nuts are “he hasn’t improved”, and “he is only ever going to be a mediocre 2nd line center, at best”. You did an excellent job dispelling the former notion with this article. Add the points made in the article, along with the facts that players don’t develop in a straight line and he is still a very young center (in fact most center’s haven’t even made the NHL yet), and i think one could make a very reasonable argument that his celling is still very much unknown.

For comparison Jordan Eberle, not even a year younger, scored at virtually the same rate while playing an easier position, and according to the majority of these same fans is a “sure thing star”. Another example is Henrik Sedin who scored at a worse rate in every single comparable year to this point in Gagner’s career, yet it would be considered lunacy by these same people to suggest Gagner could still develop into a first line center. They refrence Stamkos, Tavares, and other elite centers and say, " top 6 centers are established stars at this point in their career" ignoring the fact that they are in fact the exception, and not the rule (I’m too lazy to provide evidence, but i did look it up once before, and had found it to be true in an argument i made on a diffrent forum).

So in summary, I am not going to sit here and say Gagner is a sure thing 1st-2nd line center, however in considering common understandings about player development, i think it is very reasonable to expect he is still at least 4 years away from his prime, and a very good bet to make be a offensive diffrence maker in that time. 21 year old centers do not typicaly post the kind of numbers of a Sam Gagner at this point in their career, so for that I rate him 4th overall(he’s neck and neck with Eberle), and say to all Oiler fans pateince.

by eskimo44 on Aug 1, 2011 5:50 PM MDT reply actions  

If you use the criteria of top 30=1st line, top 60=2nd line then Gagner is already a second-line center. He was the 49th highest scoring center last season. If he had played a full year and scored 50 points last year he would be 36th.

Also, should we be worried about Gagner’s next contract? Laich got $4.5M and Dubinsky and Callahan got $4.275M and $4.2M. Offensively speaking, Gagner is in the same class as those guys. Not to mention it will probably be his last contract before UFA status.

by melancholyculkin on Aug 1, 2011 7:59 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Those three all bring a lot more than Gagner does though, in terms of defensive play/PK ability, physicality, faceoffs etc… However I think you still make a good point. He may not be able to argue that he is as good as them, but with similar offense but less intangibles, you’re still looking at 3.5ish, which is a pretty sizeable amount. And that’s provided Gagner doesn’t have a big offensive year (which I think he likely will).

by bhommy on Aug 1, 2011 8:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

I see valid points on both sides of the Gagner argument (i think we should trade him because his girlfriend is way too hot!)

My question is how many seasons under 50 points until the “He’s still young/developing” crowd changes their minds? I guess the answer is….until the market prices him out of edmonton’s depth chart"

I’m sure theres a better answer out there

by One_Roy_Save_On_The_Calendar on Aug 2, 2011 1:57 AM MDT reply actions  

My problem with Gagner is that I think he would do best with fairly big two-way wingers with some speed, and I just don’t see them on the Oilers’ depth chart. Give him Lucic-type wingers and watch him soar. Give him Omark or Eberle and watch the line get crushed.

by gcw_rocks on Aug 2, 2011 7:40 AM MDT reply actions  

Exactly. he played best with Penner because Penner drew the physical coverage and everyone’s attention. Without that I don’t feel he is very effective, basically a perimeter player with passing as his only above average skill. Too scary for me.

by FastOil on Aug 2, 2011 2:58 PM MDT reply actions  

That’s why I don’t buy into looking at a player’s talent level in isolation. Talent and fit combined make for great hockey teams.

by gcw_rocks on Aug 3, 2011 6:21 AM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 60 38 16 6 82
Calgary 60 28 23 9 65
Colorado 60 29 27 4 62
Minnesota 59 26 24 9 61
Edmonton 59 23 30 6 52

(updated 2.22.2012 at 8:41 PM MST)

23 - 30 - 6

Won 1

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (24-7, .774)
  2. Vancouver Canucks (20-8, .714)
  3. St. Louis Blues (15-6, .714)
  4. San Jose Sharks (15-7, .682)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (18-14, .563)
  6. Nashville Predators (12-10, .545)
  7. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (13-12, .520)
  9. Anaheim Ducks (11-14, .440)
  10. Dallas Stars (12-16, .429)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (10-14, .417)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (12-18, .400)
  13. Calgary Flames (10-16, .385)
  14. Minnesota Wild (8-15,.348)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (6-21, .222)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-7, .750)
  2. New York Rangers (20-10, .667)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (20-10, .667)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (15-13, .536)
  5. Ottawa Senators (13-13, .500)
  6. New Jersey Devils (12-12, .500)
  7. Washington Capitals (14-15, .483)
  8. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-15, .483)
  9. Montreal Canadiens (12-13, .480)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (12-15, .444)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (10-13, .435)
  12. Florida Panthers (8-13, .381)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (9-16, .360)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-22, .290)
  15. New York Islanders (6-17, .261)

Division Standings

  1. Central (59-42, .584)
  2. Atlantic (51-42, .548)
  3. Northeast (53-48, .525)
  4. Pacific (42-39, .519)
  5. Northwest (37-48, .435)
  6. Southeast (36-59, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL