Brad Richards Is A Great Comparable For Ryan Nugent-Hopkins; It's Just That... Sean Couturier Is Better
In an effort to figure out a way around Scott's comparables list for Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, commenters in three different commonly-traveled sites have determined that Brad Richards is, in fact, the best comparable for Ryan Nugent-Hopkins based on the need for a better class of comparable player. They've used era effects and team effects and nailed their man because rather than starting out with a list of parameters, and working through that criteria, they started with a list of targets and worked backwards to get to that target.
So if Brad Richards is such a great comparable for Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, we should probably compare Sean Couturier to Brad Richards and Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, given that Couturier posted better per game numbers than Nugent-Hopkins in 2010-11.
First up, let's look at their raw numbers.
| GP | G | A | P | G/G | P/G | |
| Brad Richards | 68 | 33 | 82 | 115 | 0.485 | 1.691 |
| Sean Couturier | 58 | 36 | 60 | 96 | 0.621 | 1.655 |
| Ryan Nugent-Hopkins | 69 | 31 | 75 | 106 | 0.449 | 1.536 |
Well, of course Nugent-Hopkins' numbers are going to be suppressed; he plays in the always-difficult WHL. We need to normalize these numbers for league effects and then normalize for era effects. Couturier plays in that crazy, wide-open, no-one-cares-about-defense QMJHL and Richards played in the days where goaltenders from the Q were drafted no matter what they did, so scoring was out of control.
| League & Era Effects | League G/G | |
| Brad Richards | 7.4 | |
| Ryan Nugent-Hopkins | 6.7 | |
| Sean Couturier | 6.7 |
Hm, that's odd. That Richards' thing works out in favor of Nugent-Hopkins, but that darned Couturier is still hanging around. Oh! Oh! I know! Red Deer was a defense-first, defense-always team and their offense took a huge hit because of that. If we compare him to those silly QMJHL offense-only kids, this will work out.
| Team Effects | Team G/G | |
| Brad Richards | 4.229 | |
| Ryan Nugent-Hopkins | 3.722 | |
| Sean Couturier | 3.691 |
Hm. You mean Couturier's team wasn't a run-it-up team? Well, this isn't taking into account Nugent-Hopkins' playmaking ability. Figure out the % of offense and we're there.
| % of offense | ||
| Sean Couturier | 0.448 | |
| Ryan Nugent-Hopkins | 0.413 | |
| Brad Richards | 0.400 | |
Oh.
See, the problem here is that you need to combine all of this to show exactly how Nugent-Hopkins is comparable to Brad Richards.
| Normalized for League and Team | ||||||
| G | G | A | P | G/G | P/G | |
| Sean Couturier | 58 | 41 | 68 | 109 | 0.703 | 1.874 |
| Ryan Nugent-Hopkins | 69 | 35 | 84 | 119 | 0.504 | 1.725 |
| Brad Richards | 68 | 30 | 73 | 103 | 0.434 | 1.513 |
Oh. Well, this doesn't take into account Nugent-Hopkins' vision. I'll be right back with a different player that's better suited to what I believe.
29 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Fortunately junior performance is not a perfect predictor of an NHL career, or NHL scouts would be vast banks of computertrons.
http://hockeyzen.com - An Oilers blog
by mindmasher on Jul 29, 2011 11:36 AM MDT reply actions 3 recs
That’s clearly the message you should take away from this post.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
that, and the fact that we should have taken Couturier
by Bananahammer on Jul 29, 2011 11:55 AM MDT up reply actions
You and me both. Landeskog 2nd overall? Really Colorado? Really?
Worst part is that NJ managed to snag Larsson at 4th. Also Winnipeg went a little nuts there and allowed Boston to snag Hamilton at 9th and of course Philly gets Couturier.
by proxy on Jul 29, 2011 4:38 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
What the crap was Winnipeg thinking? I still don’t get that.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Robertson's Rants - Exceedingly occasional, lengthy ramblings on hockey topics, hosted at Puck Podcast. And no, my name's not Doug.
Follow his coaching lineage.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
by Derek Zona on Jul 29, 2011 6:21 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Right. I forgot about that. Still, you’d think you could trade for a pick in the teens and he’d still be there.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Robertson's Rants - Exceedingly occasional, lengthy ramblings on hockey topics, hosted at Puck Podcast. And no, my name's not Doug.
Gabe’s been banging away at the pick and he’s right. If you think he’s that great, just slide back 5 spots and pick up anything offered as compensation.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
I’d be happier.
Oilers fan base has been bitching that the Oilers don’t have that big #1 C who can play in all situations and is a goal scorer.
Well here he was and we went and took a guy who scored in just 2 out of 25 games and didn’t score a goal in 15 straight games… in junior.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
All I’m saying is that while they are indicators of possible future performance, scouts also look at features of players that really do make up a big part of future NHL performance.
The idea that certain abilities transfer better to the NHL level is not a new concept. Some of Couturier’s flaws include the fact that he’s not an elite skater and RNH has a very dynamic wheelbase.
I mean really Derek if it was such a huge fuck up of a pick, why did Couturier fall so far in the draft? i would hope that NHL scouts run comps and combine it with detailed qualitative information that has proven to be reliable in some way before. This is the part of the picture that virtually everyone posting on CnB do not have access to.
I think RNH is a fine pick. He should be a dynamic presence and I’d say it’s a good bet that even if Couturier is a better player RNH can still give the Oilers exactly what they need.
http://hockeyzen.com - An Oilers blog
The article isn’t about Hopkins vs. Couturier, it’s about running comps to fit your preconceptions.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
That’s interesting, because you compared and contrasted RNH and Couturier throughout the whole article, and your title says ‘Brad Richards Is A Great Comparable For Ryan Nugent-Hopkins; It’s Just That… Sean Couturier Is Better’
‘Better’ implying the article would explain that statement.
Ultimately my point is that regardless of whether comps fit preconceptions (there’s no proof he had any before he started the exercise), it is all very imperfect anyways.
http://hockeyzen.com - An Oilers blog
He IS a better comp, which was clearly spelled out in the article.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
I’m pretty sure scouts don’t run comps, actually. That’s not exactly part of their job description. They’re there to eat shitty arena hot dogs and try to figure out which 17-year-old kid is going to be a useful NHLer in five to seven years by sight.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Robertson's Rants - Exceedingly occasional, lengthy ramblings on hockey topics, hosted at Puck Podcast. And no, my name's not Doug.
I’d say that the scouts in charge of picks probably have access to some smart minds who do a little number crunching. Certainly I expect there will be a lot more of this moving forward — even if it’s not widespread right now.
http://hockeyzen.com - An Oilers blog
I’d be surprised if anyone other than the head scout saw numbers like that in any organization, TBH.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Robertson's Rants - Exceedingly occasional, lengthy ramblings on hockey topics, hosted at Puck Podcast. And no, my name's not Doug.
I’d say that the scouts in charge of picks probably have access to some smart minds who do a little number crunching. Certainly I expect there will be a lot more of this moving forward — even if it’s not widespread right now.
Some orgs are doing a ton of it. Some are doing absolutely none of it.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
I had one guy on BSB insisting that based on scouts he’s talked to around the league, it’s 98% seen it good, 2% stats.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Jul 30, 2011 10:10 PM MDT up reply actions
That’s much more like what I’d expect.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Robertson's Rants - Exceedingly occasional, lengthy ramblings on hockey topics, hosted at Puck Podcast. And no, my name's not Doug.
Don’t really know what your problem is with the comps. IMO era effects are incredibly important to take into consideration when doing these. I fully admitted that the comps I posted were not a representative sample, and the fact that Sean Couturier is statistically better is irrelevant to doing RNH comps.
I have no problems with comps. I run them all of the time.
I have a problem with doing comps to get a preferred answer, then ignoring the results when they don’t turn out. Or ignoring the non-preferred answers like Couturier.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
I would say the “intangable” is that Nuge is from Red Deer and hopefully will
want “to die for” an Alberta based team. If pro hockey players do that anymore.
He’s from Burnaby. He’s in Red Deer because he was drafted by the Rebels, not because he’s a true-blue Alberta boy.
by despisethesun on Jul 29, 2011 11:59 PM MDT up reply actions
I'm getting very excited
Could you do up some comparables – Nuge to Gretzky?
Thanks
by Mr DeBakey on Jul 29, 2011 12:59 PM MDT reply actions 1 recs
FLAGGED
for being a BIG MEAN STUPID JERK
Pension Plan Puppets
I hope YouTube comes down to film this.
With Nugent Hopkins, scouts thought his skills would better translate in the NHL than Coutuier (skating in particular), despite better production. Whoever turns out better should help answer whether it’s better to take the best offensive player, or the player who the ‘experts’ believe will be the best player in the future.
by Oiltank on Jul 29, 2011 1:47 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
The article isn’t about Hopkins vs. Couturier, it’s about running comps to fit your preconceptions.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by 



























