Taylor Hall, Jordan Eberle, Tom Renney and Qualcomp
I've written at length about the importance of context in framing statistical discussions. Some pundits aren't capable of comprehending context, leading to gross misrepresentations of stats, both traditional and underlying. Fans are selective in recall, muddling hazy memories with facts, leading to gross misrepresentations of memories, which collide with stats.
Corsi helps to understand team and individual puck possession through a simple count of shot attempts. Though people like Don Cherry consistently misrepresent what it means, certain metrics exist that help to better explain the numbers. We've previously graphed the inverse relationship between Zonestart and Corsi at the team level, but Vic Ferrari and JLikens have worked out the math at the individual level. Vic demonstrated that each net offensive zonestart is worth +.6 Fenwick, and Jlikens demonstrated that each net offensive zonestart is worth +.8 Corsi.
With that information, we can use a bit of simple math to understand how each player's starting position impacted their overall Corsi and compare that to Qualcomp to get a more complete picture of each player's performance in 2010-11.
Legend: DZ - defensive zone starts; OZ - offensive zone starts; OPct. - Offensive zonestart percentage; Corsi/60 - Net Corsi per 60 minutes of even strength ice time; Adj. Corsi - Corsi adjusted for zonestart; Corsi Rel QC -Quality of competition relative to on-ice Corsi.
All stats are taken from the venerable and terrifying Gabriel Desjardins' Behind The Net. The data is sorted by Adj Corsi/60.
| Forward | DZ | OZ | Opct. | Corsi/60 | Adj Corsi/60 | Corsi Rel QC |
| Linus Omark | 146 | 167 | 0.534 | -0.19 | -1.762 | -0.405 |
| Jordan Eberle | 264 | 257 | 0.493 | -3.27 | -2.925 | 0.189 |
| Taylor Hall | 233 | 252 | 0.520 | -2.14 | -3.071 | 0.461 |
| Shawn Horcoff | 174 | 178 | 0.506 | -3.68 | -3.975 | 0.571 |
| Sam Gagner | 256 | 265 | 0.509 | -3.81 | -4.267 | 0.023 |
| Andrew Cogliano | 289 | 267 | 0.480 | -5.88 | -4.904 | 0.187 |
| Magnus Paajarvi | 264 | 281 | 0.516 | -4.76 | -5.530 | -0.061 |
| Ales Hemsky | 173 | 202 | 0.539 | -6.59 | -8.742 | 0.484 |
| Liam Reddox | 123 | 143 | 0.538 | -7.77 | -9.713 | -0.044 |
| Zack Stortini | 69 | 57 | 0.452 | -13.6 | -11.040 | -1.166 |
| Colin Fraser | 152 | 135 | 0.470 | -14.9 | -13.265 | -0.801 |
| J.F. Jacques | 98 | 90 | 0.479 | -14.71 | -13.628 | -0.601 |
| Gilbert Brule | 111 | 108 | 0.493 | -15.38 | -15.092 | 0.261 |
| Ryan Jones | 241 | 238 | 0.497 | -16.16 | -15.994 | -0.023 |
| Steve MacIntyre | 30 | 34 | 0.531 | -30.24 | -31.853 | -1.529 |
- I've given up on things to say about Ryan Jones' underlying numbers. They're all just so bad. Middling qualcomp and even zonestarts weren't enough to help. Compare his numbers to Liam Reddox and cringe.
- If you're an eternal optimist, you could find hope in Gilbert Brule's Qualcomp suppressing his Corsi, I guess.
- There is a building narrative amongst the fanbase that Omark should be on the trading block. His underlying numbers disagree. Though his Qualcomp wasn't as strong as some others on the list, he's a possession machine and scored at an impressive rate for a rookie.
- Tom Renney should do everything in his power to keep Paajarvi away from the toughs or even second-toughs for the coming season. Paajarvi came on strong at the end of the season and performed pretty well against middling competition last season.
- If Renney again fails to match lines, the Hall - Horcoff - Eberle line is going to take the tough minutes. By the possession numbers, they aren't ready to do so just yet. Renney is better off matching lines and giving the toughs to Smyth - Gagner - Hemsky and allowing Horcoff and the kids to beat up on second minutes.
| Defense | DZ | OZ | OPCT | Corsi/60 | Adj Corsi/60 | Corsi Rel QC |
| Jeff Petry | 139 | 134 | 0.491 | 0.11 | 0.532 | -0.164 |
| Tom Gilbert | 365 | 386 | 0.514 | -3.36 | -4.093 | 0.455 |
| Jim Vandermeer | 247 | 248 | 0.501 | -4.63 | -4.681 | -0.2 |
| Ladislav Smid | 324 | 306 | 0.486 | -6.03 | -5.346 | 0.199 |
| Kurtis Foster | 247 | 295 | 0.544 | -7.55 | -9.907 | -0.89 |
| Theo Peckham | 308 | 274 | 0.471 | -12.18 | -10.708 | 0.461 |
| Ryan Whitney | 153 | 175 | 0.534 | -11.86 | -13.599 | 0.175 |
| Jason Strudwick | 134 | 157 | 0.540 | -19.37 | -21.362 | -0.348 |
- Steve Tambellini should be doing everything in his power to make sure Theo Peckham is not going to play toughs should injuries hit the Oilers again this upcoming season. His Adj. Corsi is better than his raw Corsi, but it's still terrible. Peckham struggled when exposed to second and third-pairing minutes and can't be counted on to be much better than he was in 2010-11. Andy Sutton and Cam Barker aren't enough.
- Gilbert takes so much crap from the fans but he took on the toughs for the third season running, and considering his partner, he looks damned good by the possession numbers.
- Petry played easy minutes, though not as easy as Foster, and performed extremely well. If the Oilers are able to keep him as the 6th or 7th defenseman for the entire season, he should be able to perform in the same manner.
| Call-up | DZ | OZ | OPCT | Corsi/60 | Adj Corsi/60 | Corsi Rel QC |
| Alex Giroux | 28 | 31 | 0.525 | 5.93 | 4.348 | -0.109 |
| Teemu Hartikainen | 49 | 62 | 0.559 | 1.04 | -2.569 | -0.403 |
| Chris VandeVelde | 42 | 50 | 0.543 | -9.01 | -11.317 | -0.34 |
| Taylor Chorney | 43 | 41 | 0.488 | -15.02 | -14.404 | 0.179 |
| Ryan O`Marra | 44 | 67 | 0.604 | -23.6 | -28.769 | -0.774 |
- Hartikainen's positive Corsi is underwater when adjusted for his zonestart and his qualcomp was generally easy. The numbers are still impressive for a 6th-round pick making a cameo in the NHL.
- O'Marra's already terrible Corsi is substantially worse when his easy zonestarts are considered. Throw in the easiest non-goon Qualcomp and that number is just awful.
- Taylor Chorney is a case study in how not to develop a defenseman. Last season he was thrown into action due to numerous injuries on the blueline. Tom Renney (who ran the defense for Pat Quinn) paired him with Jason Strudwick and gave him the toughest zonestarts on the team, which were some of the toughest in the league. The results were bad. This year, he was again thrown into action due to injuries and Tom Renney paired him with Kurtis Foster and ran them out against middling competition (though the number is likely skewed because of a limited sample size) and the results were bad. If Chorney were a pilot, he would be in the midst of learning to fly by landing a commercial airliner at Kathmandu's airport with a comatose co-pilot and a tower full of drunken air traffic controllers. Is it so much to ask to give the guy a capable veteran and some easy assignments just to see what they have in the player?
14 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great analysis!
Would it be terribly pedantic of me to point out that Kathmandu airport is not a difficult airport to land at? Your link is to footage of landing at a different airport in Nepal, somewhere much further up in the Himalaya, it would seem. That said, anyone who manages to work in references to Nepal in a hockey article deserves considerable leeway.
I cede the argument about airports in the Himalayas to Yeti every single time.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
by Derek Zona on Jul 19, 2011 3:01 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
Good stuff.
Any chance of breaking down these numbers into 3 categories of game state? (team trailing, team tied, team ahead)
It was the OIlers… you can almost bet that 70% of the game state was team trailing…
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
by dawgbone98 on Jul 19, 2011 8:17 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
I started to do the scoring chances by game state but the sample size for both tied and leading were really small
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
by Derek Zona on Jul 19, 2011 3:00 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
Plus, He's Old
There’s something wrong with your numbers.
They seem to say Giroux was effective.
I have it on good authority that this is not the case.
I’m already bracing myself for Omark to be underutilized for most of the year, demoted or traded; only to go on to success in an appropriate role on a winning team that appreciates his skill set.
Paajarvi Belanger Omark is pretty much ideal. If Belanger meshes with their cycle game there’s no reason to ever switch that line around.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
by Derek Zona on Jul 19, 2011 2:58 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
good work Derek!
Omark will be a question mark in the season. Perhaps it would be easier to find a new wing for Paajarvi?
Why will Omark be a question mark?
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
by Derek Zona on Jul 19, 2011 2:57 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
I thought you meant that as a negative.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
by Derek Zona on Jul 20, 2011 2:29 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
The return for Omark right now would be a lot like the return this team got for Cogliano – something that will return MUCH less to the Oilers than what was delivered to the trade partner.
Really, unless this team got a stud defensive or center prospect in return (being a package deal of course) it just doesn’t make sense to trade Omark. Which means, of course, that they will.
Omark and Cogliano for Despres.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
by Derek Zona on Jul 20, 2011 2:30 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions

by 


























