Magnus Paajarvi Scoring Chances 2010-2011
It's not often a fan base should be excited about a forward with a scoring chance percentage of .451, but in Magnus Paajarvi's case, there is so much to be excited about. By the numbers and to the eye, Paajarvi started slowly as he adjusted to the NHL in his rookie season, but sometime around his 20th game, he started to understand this whole NHL hockey thing.
Chance % Team Rank: 15/23
Chance % Fwd. Rank: 10/15
Diff/60 Team Rank: 15/23
Diff/60% Fwd. Rank: 10/15
Scoring Chances by Season Segment
TCF = season total even strength chances for; TCA = season total even strength chances against; SCF = segment even strength chances for; SCA = segment even strength chances against; Segment % = player scoring chance percentage during the season segment; Team Seg % = Oilers team scoring chance percentage during the season segment.
| Game # | TCF | TCA | SCF | SCA | Segment % | Team Seg % |
| 1-10 | 25 | 44 | 25 | 44 | 0.362 | 0.453 |
| 11-20 | 36 | 90 | 11 | 46 | 0.193 | 0.401 |
| 21-30 | 77 | 135 | 41 | 45 | 0.477 | 0.449 |
| 31-40 | 111 | 168 | 34 | 33 | 0.507 | 0.467 |
| 41-50 | 151 | 207 | 40 | 39 | 0.506 | 0.531 |
| 51-60 | 181 | 246 | 30 | 39 | 0.435 | 0.470 |
| 61-70 | 212 | 281 | 31 | 35 | 0.470 | 0.454 |
| 71-82 | 265 | 322 | 53 | 41 | 0.564 | 0.486 |
Scoring Chances Line Graph by Season Segment
*click to enlarge
Rather than talking about regression, we can talk about progression. Paajarvi's first two segments were brutal, sub-AHL-type segments. A look at his totals with his most common linemates during those 20 games shows just how tough Paajarvi's transition was on him and his linemates:
| Linemate | CH F | CF A | CH % |
| Sam Gagner | 8 | 28 | 0.222 |
| Gilbert Brule | 11 | 29 | 0.275 |
| Andrew Cogliano | 11 | 26 | 0.297 |
But starting with the 3rd segment of the season, games 21-30, Paajarvi's results changed significantly. In his last six segments, he was 50% or above three times. He was above the team average four times. The graph shows the beautiful contrast in his results. In fact, from game 21 through the final game of the season, Paajarvi's scoring chance totals were as follows: 229 CF - 232 CA or .497 chance percentage. He was nearly an even player in the last six segments of the season.
Scoring Chances WOWY
| With Paajarvi | Without Paajarvi | Paajarvi Without | |||||||||
| # | CF | CA | % | CF | CA | % | CF | CA | % | ||
| 10 | 31 | 30 | 0.508 | 168 | 156 | 0.519 | 234 | 292 | 0.445 | ||
| 13 | 56 | 70 | 0.444 | 234 | 259 | 0.475 | 209 | 252 | 0.453 | ||
| 14 | 32 | 44 | 0.421 | 277 | 259 | 0.517 | 233 | 278 | 0.456 | ||
| 23 | 102 | 103 | 0.498 | 51 | 82 | 0.383 | 163 | 219 | 0.427 | ||
| 27 | 27 | 30 | 0.474 | 221 | 218 | 0.503 | 238 | 292 | 0.449 | ||
| 28 | 51 | 63 | 0.447 | 112 | 201 | 0.358 | 214 | 259 | 0.452 | ||
| 67 | 24 | 40 | 0.375 | 84 | 114 | 0.424 | 241 | 282 | 0.461 | ||
| 83 | 24 | 27 | 0.471 | 169 | 171 | 0.497 | 241 | 295 | 0.450 | ||
| 85 | 24 | 21 | 0.533 | 87 | 112 | 0.437 | 241 | 301 | 0.445 | ||
| 89 | 103 | 144 | 0.417 | 168 | 173 | 0.493 | 162 | 178 | 0.476 | ||
| 2 | 74 | 96 | 0.435 | 172 | 203 | 0.459 | 191 | 226 | 0.458 | ||
| 5 | 85 | 109 | 0.438 | 247 | 268 | 0.480 | 180 | 213 | 0.458 | ||
| 6 | 56 | 58 | 0.491 | 112 | 135 | 0.453 | 209 | 264 | 0.442 | ||
| 26 | 55 | 79 | 0.410 | 184 | 222 | 0.453 | 210 | 243 | 0.464 | ||
| 43 | 43 | 42 | 0.506 | 97 | 118 | 0.451 | 222 | 280 | 0.442 | ||
| 49 | 63 | 86 | 0.423 | 215 | 274 | 0.440 | 202 | 236 | 0.461 | ||
| 58 | 51 | 52 | 0.495 | 111 | 91 | 0.550 | 214 | 270 | 0.442 | ||
| 77 | 88 | 99 | 0.471 | 283 | 293 | 0.491 | 177 | 223 | 0.443 | ||
Paajarvi's best extensive work came with Linus Omark at .498 and that includes time spent with Sam Gagner (51 CF - 65 CA). Find the two Swedes a center who can work with them and the Oilers have a very dangerous line.
7 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Trade for Smyth, sign Arnott or another quality vet C, sign a cheaper vet C (Reasoner type), draft Couturier, sign a goaltender who can share time with Dubnyk (not sure who is available but somoene will be) and go with the following:
94 – Vet C – 83
91 – 10 – 23
14 – Couturier – 4
28 – Reasoner – 13
77 – 6
26 – 58
5 – 49
40
G
Not quite a playoff team but it’ll be damn close. Replace Foster with a solid vet after next year and it’s got a good shot.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
I’m not sure I see the logic of playing two of our best wingers (14 and 4) out of position, and then slapping them with a rookie center and giving them third minutes. If you’re hoping for Hemsky’s line to go PVP I would probably go Hall-Horcoff-Hemsky. Put Couturier with the Swedes and feed them the soft parade, and then have 94-Vet C-14 take on second toughs.
It should have been 4-Couturier-14
I was feeding this group the soft parade, letting 91-10-23 take on the second toughs.
I think the 4-14 combo should play together and get more responsibilities every year.
I’m not sure if the offense will ever be there for 91 (i.e. being a 65+ point player) but I think he can be the new Dustin Penner in terms of being able to put up 45+ and win the possession battle.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
to be realistic, we will see the same team as last year. Perhaps a new offensive player and a veteran defender. I see no changes before 2012.
we must find a way to use the existing material. This requires Whitney and Hemsky stay healthy. Brule should shoot more goals again and find a center for our Swedish.
A top 4 defenders, would be desirable (not a rookie)
I’m just not entirely sure that whatever it was Paajarvi learned about the North American game this year couldn’t have been learned in the AHL. Seems like a bit of a wasted ELC year to me.
by melancholyculkin on Jun 3, 2011 11:21 AM MDT reply actions
Petry?
Writer for The Cult of Hockey, The Copper & Blue, and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Jun 3, 2011 11:06 PM MDT up reply actions

by 



























