Dustin Penner - Fat, Slow, and Lazy
When Dustin Penner was traded, I wasn't very happy. On a struggling team with so many players who couldn't do a thing to help an NHL team win games, Penner was able to deliver results, and handle any criticism of his play with aplomb. On a deeper Los Angeles team, I was looking forward to watching Penner continue to deliver the mail alongside Kings' top forward Anze Kopitar. When Penner first arrived, things looked good; through seven games, he had scored six points, and fans were warming to the big man. Then he didn't score a single point for the Kings' last dozen games, and had just two in Los Angeles' six-game loss to San Jose in the playoffs. Two points in eighteen games. What happened to Dustin Penner?
Things didn't exactly start off on the right foot. started getting smoked in the media, by the fans, and even by his coach. This is what Terry Murray had to say shortly after Penner had been acquired (when he was doing well!):
I don't think it's a matter of the wind. I think he's a heavier guy than what he should be. He's a big body, and I'd like to get him to be a little leaner and I think that's going to really improve his hockey game with a greater level of intensity and keeping the pace and tempo of play.
That's right out of the Dustin Penner criticism playbook: fat, slow, and lazy. I can't imagine that kind of very public criticism helped him to perform. But as Bruce showed earlier today, Penner didn't just start struggling in L.A. His game this season had already taken a downward turn. In Penner's first three seasons in Edmonton, he had taken 7.88 shots per hour of ice time (including 8.08 in 2009-10), but this year that number tumbled to 7.18 while Penner was in Edmonton, and all the way down to 6.73 in the twenty-five games he played in Los Angeles.
That decline also corresponds to what's gone on with Penner's scoring chance numbers. Last year, he was far and away the team leader, but this season he fell behind a few of the team's forwards, and in Los Angeles (with a much better team) he dropped below 50% at even strength in the eighteen games we have recorded (+51 -63 or 44.7%). Whether it's points, or shots, or scoring chances, for whatever reason, the L.A. version of Dustin Penner was inferior to the version that played in Edmonton.
Is he going to be able to come back? I think he will. He's got a reasonably long track record of success, he's still under thirty years old, and - if the motivation concerns are real - he's in a contract year. Still, after such a horrendous start in Los Angeles, Penner will need to got on track quickly in order to earn a role on the top power play unit and alongside Anze Kopitar on the Kings' first line.
Projection: 45 to 55 points and a return to the plus side in terms of Corsi and Scoring Chances playing in a variety of roles with the Kings.
4 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I made this comment in the “Penner scoring chances” thread earlier, but I think it corresponds nicely so I’m simply going to say it again.
1) Most likely I think it’s just really hard to get traded to the Kings. I like the Kings, but they play a very specific system that I don’t think you can just pick up overnight, I think it takes a long time to develop into a quality player on that team. It must be frustrating to join a system like that 2/3 of the way into the season, and I think that frustration, combined with the flack he was getting from the coaching staff and fans, started to catch up to him.
2) Getting traded makes Dustin Penner a sad panda…..
3) As per above, he is sad AND on the flight down to LA he ate his feelings, meaning he gained 20 pounds of fat that simultaneously destroyed some of the muscle he had built up.
4) Garry Bettman told him to play poorly so that San Jose would win their series, because Bettman believes San Jose has the best chance of ensuring Vancouver doesn’t win the cup.
Thanks a lot, jerks.
But yeah, I think Penner had trouble adjusting. I think in Edmonton he was used to doing his own thing because he was the offensive threat on his line while with the Kings he has a very specific structure to follow. Plus, it doesn’t help that he joined a line where he was expected to control the puck the 3rd most and then both of those guys immediately went down with injury.
Overall, Penner wasn’t great but I saw some things I liked out of him. He’s very good in the offensive zone without the puck, I think, and he makes some nifty passes in tight. His defense isn’t that great but I think a training camp with the team will help a lot. Overall, I think he and Kopitar will make a pretty good duo next season until Penner gets benched because Terry Murray hates all big left wingers. We’ll see!
I'm not fat slow or lazy!
I suspect that a Penner is not so much Fat slow or lazy but that he just does enough to get by and loves to enjoy all that money he “earns”. On a 30th place team he seemed to be doing enough but in LA that was not enough. I wont be surprised at all if he comes in to camp in the fall a lot lighter and in better shape. He needs pressure from expectations always has.
by Sheldon Oilers Fan for Life on May 6, 2011 10:03 AM MDT reply actions
Yeah, that fat, slow, and lazy title is somewhat in jest. I just thought it was funny that his coach hinted at those things a week or two after he arrived. I like Penner a lot, and would gladly take him back.
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on May 6, 2011 11:00 AM MDT up reply actions

by 



























