Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Retire Doug Weight's Number?

Our friend B.C.B. at Bringing Back The Glory says that retiring Doug Weight's number should be a no-brainer.  He bases that opinion on the expectation that Weight will someday be in the Hall of Fame:

Well, because I do not see a reason why Doug Weight should not be in the HHOF! I am going to look at three players—who I believe should barely, or not at all, be in the HHOF—and compare them to Mr. 39.

Star-divide

B.C.B. then goes on to compare Weight to Dino Ciccarelli, Cam Neely, and Pat LaFontaine, noting Weight's comparable, but slightly lower numbers and points out the era effects.  However, Ciccarelli doesn't belong in the Hall of Fame in the first place and Neely is there essentially because his career was cut short by injury.  LaFontaine is deserving of his Hall status. Even though Weight's numbers are lower, he has something those three players don't have - a Stanley Cup.  That carries a ton of, ahem, weight in B.C.B.'s eyes:

Also we have to take in to consideration the fact Doug Weight won the Stanley Cup. I am of the opinion that if you don’t win the Stanley Cup, you should not be considered eligible for the HHOF.

 

How much weight should the Hall of Fame have on a number retirement ceremony?  Should Doug Weight be inducted into the Hall of Fame?  Should the Edmonton Oilers retire his number?

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

No, and no.

I’m all about ceremony, back-patting, hand shaking, and drinking. Retiring a number should be saved for the rarest of circumstances. Doug Weight was a great player. A B or B+ player. I know there are no real ‘credentials’ in getting your number retired (Ray Bourque, COL) but I don’t know about Doug Weight getting his number pulled.

I’m aware no one has worn it since his departure, but I think it’s more of a ‘silent pull’, similar to Kevin Lowe’s #4 not making a comeback until Taylor Hall.

I am of the opinion that if you don’t win the Stanley Cup, you should not be considered eligible for the HHOF.

I’m sorry, I can’t agree with that at all. Gil Perreault not a HOF? 500+ goals, sixteen years, no cups, no HHOF? Surely you don’t agree that Marcel Dionne should be shuttered? Mike Gartner? Dale Freakin’ Hawerchuk? Peter Stastny, Darryl Sittler?

I know there are more, but those six just hit me.

I can see your debate in getting Weight’s number retired. I can’t see the Cup prerequisite.

Lead Writer for Oil On Whyte - An Edmonton Oilers Blog

by chappy35 on May 30, 2011 11:06 AM MDT reply actions  

I’m aware no one has worn it since his departure

Chris Minard! (What a dumb thing for that guy to do)

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on May 31, 2011 8:32 AM MDT up reply actions  

Looking at Stanley Cup wins to measure a players Hall of Fame worthiness is ridiculous. Winning a Stanley Cup takes a great team and plenty of things falling the right way over a two month stretch. The logic connecting a Stanley Cup win with individual worth is what led to an often injured, over the hill, generally lousy goalie playing the lions share of the games for the Oilers last season, and next season, and the year after that too.

Is Weight a Hall of Fame player? He’s should certainly be in the conversation. I’m not sure that a quarter of a season as a rental player that led to a Stanley Cup will be enough push those from the no camp to yes though.

A retired number? I could get behind that. He played eight seasons here and was better here than anywhere else. He’s tough to compare to a couple of the other retired numbers at Rexall but really who isn’t?

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on May 30, 2011 11:26 AM MDT reply actions  

I never said “winning the cup” should be a pre-requiste to signing a current player to a multi-million dollar contact for years into the future. I said it is my standard for getting into the HHOF for players that can play in the NHL: for example I said USSR players and women should not have to win the Stanley Cup.

I think it is logical to think that team accomplishment should reflect on a player’s legacy. The are part of the team, and hockey is a team sport. Doug Weight also won a silver medal in Salt Lake, and the World Cup of Hockey in 1996. And he did get a 1000 pts over his career. Plus the Stanley Cup, that has caused so much controversy. When was the last time an ex-Oiler captian retired with anything close to those accomplishments? Mark Messier. Yeah that is the answer: the Moose has way more, of course, but he would be the last player with that as a minimum. Who will be the next one? Seriously, maybe one of the Holy trinity will do that but that is a steep feat. I’d call that a reason to retire his number: a celebration of a great player. So to do so he got to make the HHOF, but I said I would not take a bet that he will. I hope that number 39 would be retired but I think I’ll have to weight a long time.

PS: I would not retire Ryan Smyth’s number.

one of the founders and most prolific writers of Bringing Back the Glory

by B.C.B. on May 30, 2011 12:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

I’ll leave hockey and talk football for a minute. Dan Marino never won a Super Bowl mostly because Dolphins management simply couldn’t get all the required pieces around him onto the team at the same time. Is that his fault? No of course not. I’m sure that missing out on that team accomplishment is one of his biggest regrets but it has nothing to do with how great of a player he was. The same thing applies in the NHL. A great player is a great player regardless of whether he was lucky enough to be in the right place at the right time and win a Stanley Cup. Should it form part of the picture? Sure. But it certainly shouldn’t be the only, or even a major, factor in the decision.

And I have no issues with Weight going into the Hall of Fame. He was one hell of a hockey player both here and elsewhere.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on May 30, 2011 12:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

PS: I would not retire Ryan Smyth’s number.

Agreed. If he’d played his full career here who knows but he didn’t and his numbers don’t come close.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on May 30, 2011 12:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

By B.C.B.‘s argument, Smyth wouldn’t be eligible for the Hall because he played, and lost, game 7 in 2006. Weight would be eligible for the Hall because he "won" the same game wearing street clothes. Sorry, B.C.B., I can’t buy into that … and I probably place higher value on team success than most around here.

Weight won a World Cup in 1996, a best-on-best tourney. Should that "count"? (Oh, and Smytty won World Cup and Olympics gold.)

Writer for The Cult of Hockey, The Copper & Blue, and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on May 30, 2011 2:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

Well when you put it that way Bruce.
But really Ryan Smyth has 760 pts in 1069 games, compared to Weigh’s 1033 pts in 1238 games. Smyth would have to score 273 points in his next in 169 games to match 39’s pts/g. I am talking 1000 pts. careers. That is the real difference between Weight and Smyth: regardless of a single achievement that I value more then you..

one of the founders and most prolific writers of Bringing Back the Glory

by B.C.B. on May 30, 2011 2:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

Well, points are one way to measure value. So are goals.

Writer for The Cult of Hockey, The Copper & Blue, and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on May 30, 2011 2:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

Weight is a great NHL player then Smyth & Smyth is a better Oiler then Weight are not mutual incompatible with each other. The issue is not the retiring Oiler sweaters mean you are the greatest Oiler ever since it does not. Current practice is that Oilers wait till a player is in the HHOF to retire their jersey. With that in mind, the argument is that Weight is more likely to make the HHOF based on his career numbers and achievements then Smyth; hence 39 is more likely to have his jersey retired by the Oilers.

If Smyth scores 1000 pts but does not win the cup and still gets into the HHOF before (or instead of) Weight, I’ll print this blog and eat it. But he’ll of earned to get his jersey retired as well. I won’t be mad that he did not win the cup and is in the HHOF (but I might mutter under my breath on occasion).

one of the founders and most prolific writers of Bringing Back the Glory

by B.C.B. on May 30, 2011 2:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

Smytty not only might still get to 1000 points, he might still win the Stanley Cup. The book just closed on Weighter, not Smytty. The Oiler book has (presumably) closed on both, which is why I chose that particular table.

Looking at their careers as a whole, Smyth has 355 goals and counting, Weight finished up with 278. Smyth already ranks 12th among active goal scorers, which is to say he ranks among the better snipers of his generation, and that should attract some Hall consideration. He could still make it to 400 goals and that’s a helluva career in the Dead Puck Era.

Weight meanwhile retired in a tie for 24th active goal scorer. Take away the word “active” and I can pretty much guarantee you he’s not making the Hall for his goals. Fortunately his points are good, and 1000 points are likely every bit the accomplishment in the DPE as 400 goals. (They both are NHL “milestones”, after all.)

I’m not sure either guy has or will have enough to get in, but I’d be absolutely shocked if either of them got shut out in the voting, let’s put it that way. Two hella good players.

Writer for The Cult of Hockey, The Copper & Blue, and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on May 30, 2011 5:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

So what do you do with a guy like Marcel Dionne? Tell him to shove off while you induct Doug Weight instead?

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on May 31, 2011 8:42 AM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, playing a full career here should be a prerequisite for sweater hanging.

Hamilton
Gretzky
Kurri
Coffey
Fuhr
Messier
Anderson

Phillips

Writer for The Cult of Hockey, The Copper & Blue, and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on May 30, 2011 2:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

I can see the argument for retiring the number, but personally I probably wouldn’t. Though, if 94 isn’t retired when Smyth’s body gives out I’ll be one unhappy camper.

And yeah, I agree with everyone else that the Stanley Cup thing is ludicrous.

by Adam Dyck on May 30, 2011 11:59 AM MDT reply actions  

One of the questions posed is do I think his number should be retired even with no HOF. I say no to that. Weve kept that standard for the others (Hamilton notwithstanding) so keep it going. Put his number with the unofficial retirees if that were the case.

And just cause I am here I will throw out that winning Stans Cup as a prerequisite for entering the HOF is ridiculous. Plenty of great players miss out, they shouldnt be punished for it.

Insert Witty Comment Here

by VanillaAcid on May 30, 2011 12:27 PM MDT reply actions  

I don’t agree with the Cup criteria adding sway to a HHOF nomination either. By this logic Joffrey Lupul would be a better candidate.

Is Doug Weight worthy of a HHOF induction? Personally I’m not sure he is, just by the fact that he played so many years on bad teams would overshadow his career performance.

Should the Oilers retire his number? No. As good a player/captain he was for the Oilers his time spent in Edmonton was just too brief, thanks in large part to the small market era.

by TakeoutArtist on May 30, 2011 12:30 PM MDT reply actions  

As good a player/captain he was for the Oilers his time spent in Edmonton was just too brief, thanks in large part to the small market era.

He’s 14th in games played with the Oil, ahead of Coffey. He might not have been here for a long time but he was pretty damn good while he was here. With a different ownership situation maybe he’d have hung around another 5 years and this wouldn’t even be a debate.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on May 30, 2011 12:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

retire Weight's #

Just wondering if any of the people calling for Weight’s # to be retired were laughing at the Canucks for retiring Naslunds #.As much as I liked Weight as a player the unofficial retiring of his # is enough for me.

by jbh on May 30, 2011 1:38 PM MDT reply actions  

Doug also has 164 more points in only 121 more games. It might seem to be an insignificant number but it is more then a point a game in those extra 121 games.

Naslund PPG in his career- .777 and Weight .834. Pretty significant difference when spread out over a whole career. Weight was a better player the Naslund in my opinion.

by Metal&Oil on May 30, 2011 2:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

naslund PPg as a Canuck-.86 over 11 seasons
weight PPg as an Oiler-.98 over 8 seasons

No one else is going to retire Naslunds # and no one else is probably looking at retiring Weights #.Neither deserves HOF and neither probably deserves a jersey ceremony.Thats why I said the “unofficial” retiring of Weights # is enough in my eyes.

by jbh on May 30, 2011 10:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

Okay I did some research and their are currently 238 in the Hall of fame and Since Doug Weight started playing in 1991, 39 (Isn’t that ironic :) ) forwards alone have been inducted.

I don’t know, it seems to me that Weight was underrated(maybe because he has never played for a big market team other then his brief time with the NYR???).

Usually I like to say a players name out loud and then see what my first thought is regarding whether or not they should be in the Hall of Fame but I am having a tough time with this one. He does have the Cup ring so he passes that test. It really does not help that the Oilers have sent such great legends into the Hall. That’s probably another reason why most Oiler fans would not think of Weight as a Hall worthy candidate. I don’t think that is really rational myself.

by Metal&Oil on May 30, 2011 1:55 PM MDT reply actions  

The HHOF is worthless, so there is no point using that as the basis for this argument.

I wouldn’t retire any numbers either. It’s a silly practice.

by RiversQ on May 30, 2011 2:12 PM MDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Care to expand and give reasons why you feel this way?

This seems kind of cold to me. I mean it’s not just hockey where years of high quality service gets honored. Many companies honor workers for years of dedication, top notch work and exceptional results. Ever walk into a fire hall or police station and see pictures of old fire or police chiefs? That is their equivalent to the HHOF.

by Metal&Oil on May 30, 2011 2:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

I’m not crazy about retiring numbers in general, so my initial reaction to this is to keep it in circulation. I’m not totally against it, but I think the criteria needs to be even stricter than “Hall Of Fame”. It needs to be someone who’s done something or been of major significance to the team, the region the team plays in, or was of major importance to the history and culture of the game. It’s this criteria that makes me uncomfortable with Colorado’s retiring of Ray Borque’s number, for example. The other team I cheer for has retired almost every number under 20 and at this point it just seems like a way to market the glory days. So I don’t think #39 should be retired officially. Doug Weight was a great player, and I absolutely think he should be a Hall Of Famer, I just don’t think that “he was a good player for the team when they were really crappy” has quite the same significance as some of the other numbers up there, and I’m not crazy about all of them either. But that’s something of a contentious debate.

by despisethesun on May 30, 2011 2:20 PM MDT reply actions  

That first sentence is right in Derek’s wheelhouse.

Lead Writer for Oil On Whyte - An Edmonton Oilers Blog

by chappy35 on May 30, 2011 2:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

I’m sure that there are other criteria, or at least, I’m sure that there will be some expressed once Chris Pronger is inducted to the Hall of Fame.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on May 31, 2011 8:46 AM MDT up reply actions  

This one's easy

No.
Sure , Weight was a great Oiler, no question.
And he stuck around through thin and thick.
Sweaters are generally retired because you are a part of the storied history of the team or
your life / career has been sadly cut short.
Weight doesn’t fit either category for two reasons
a)Storied history implies many successes
and b) happy to report his career went on and on until injuries and age finally caught up
Great Oiler? Yes
Historic? No

by Fred Furlong on May 30, 2011 6:16 PM MDT reply actions  

Weight neither began nor ended his career with the Oilers. He was one of the league’s five best centres for a few years in Edmonton but was arguably only an absolute alpha guy for one. He had good career totals piled up mostly in cities that weren’t Edmonton.

No thanks.

Manager at Vancouver Whitecaps and western Canadian soccer website Eighty Six Forever and infrequently-posting flunky at Edmonton Oilers blog The Copper & Blue.

by Benjamin Massey on May 30, 2011 10:29 PM MDT reply actions  

Marcel Dionne was a terrible hockey player.

Does he call it Luongo underwear?

Co-Manager at Behind the Net

by Bettman's Nightmare on May 31, 2011 12:07 AM MDT reply actions  

Why?

1771 points and 5th on the All-Time points list sounds like a pretty good player to me.

by EasyOil on May 31, 2011 4:20 AM MDT up reply actions  

Pretty sure that was in jest, given the Little Beaver never won a Stanley Cup.

by Geeezeus on May 31, 2011 8:01 AM MDT up reply actions  

Ah ok, fair enough!

by EasyOil on May 31, 2011 9:29 AM MDT up reply actions  

Partly in response to RiversQ’s comment, and in general response to this post:

RiversQ: If that’s your opinion that’s fine, I respect that fully. However, I would like to put my PoV out there, as an “outsider” (i.e. being a Brit who has never even been to Canada, let alone EDM, but is a die-hard Oilers fan). Here in the UK, we have many great sporting traditions in our primary sports (football/soccer, rugby, cricket etc.), but remembering past heroes is not one of them. In football, the likes of Geoff Hurst, Bobby Moore (whose number is actually retired by West Ham, but this is an extremely rare case, and probably not known to anyone who isn’t a West Ham supporter) and Bobby Charlton are not known to the kids who love their football (my friend who is a soccer coach confirmed this after getting Geoff Hurst’s autograph and showing it off to some kids he was coaching; they looked baffled as to who he was on about). Beckham will be remembered more for his celebrity status than for the excellent footballer he was, whilst Lineker (one of the best goal scorers in history) is only really known as the guy who presents football shows on TV. In rugby, Richard Hill, Jason Leonard, Rory Underwood, Jeremy Guscott, Gareth Edwards, all only known and remembered by those that were there at the time. In cricket, Geoff Boycott is forgotten and Ian Botham is “the guy in the Shredded Wheat adverts”.

Now, to my point: when I started to follow the NHL properly 6 years ago, I was supremely impressed by the way that Americans and Canadians honour their past heroes. Retired jerseys that hang in the rafters for all time, a perfect way to preserve the memory of past greats, and for when you bring your kids to a game and they look up and say, “who was Messier?” or “why does no-one wear 99?”, I happen to think is a great way to pass on experiences, memories and inspirations to the younger generations (I sound old here but I’m only 23!). It’s something that you guys on “that” side of the Atlantic do very well, and does impress us here in the UK. Although I know impressing an Englishman/woman isn’t your greatest concern in life :)

As for my opinion on Doug Weight: I believe he should have his number retired by EDM, although I won’t be on the warpath if he isn’t. I would actually consider the same for Smyth. As I said in an article here the other day, whilst I think that HHOF membership is a great requirement by the Oil for jersey retirement, Smyth and Weight were supreme ambassadors for the team and great players through a difficult era for both the Oilers, and for hockey in general. Elite? No, save for a couple of seasons probably not. Huge part of the team’s history? Yes, no doubt. Jersey retirement should be just as much about team history (the Little Team That Could) than it is about honouring the game’s greats. If we don’t remember them and “teach” the new generation of Oiler fans about the team history, that leaves a huge gap between the departure of Messier, Fuhr and Anderson, and the arrival of Taylor Hall, MPS, Eberle and whoever is picked No.1 this year. Whilst those years were lean, they were still important and Weight and Smyth were the main components in a gritty team that was at least competitive for a few years. In my opinion, and I admit I love history as a subject in general, a grasp of the history of the team you support results in a far more passionate, knowledgeable and appreciative fan.

How about a simple compromise on the Jersey Retirement thing? They “retire” the jersey, but that doesn’t mean players can’t use that number in the future. Result? Great player remembered by fans, number still in circulation. Simple, and everyone gets their way. Of course it’ll never happen, but still.

Sorry for the ramble :)

by EasyOil on May 31, 2011 4:08 AM MDT reply actions  

Just 'Honour' the Jersey

I think EasyOil has the simple solution. Just do what teams like the Habs already do and honour the jerseys. That way they go up in the rafters, players get remembered, numbers can still get used.

You can then reserve retirement for your all time greats. Not a if this is a new idea.

by proxy on May 31, 2011 4:59 AM MDT via mobile reply actions  

Toronto mostly does it this way; they retired 2 jerseys but have 15 “honored numbers”. The two retired numbers weren’t so much for all-time greats as for more humanitarian reasons (Ace Bailey and Bill Barinko).

by MathMan on May 31, 2011 5:34 AM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ryan_2008_small
The Oilers Begin the Road to Rebuilding
Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL