Edmonton Goaltending Scoring Chances Data, 2009-2011
Dennis King's scoring chance data has created a bit of a mystery. For an as yet undetermined reason, the Edmonton Oilers have been a significantly better team in front of goaltenders not named Nikolai Khabibulin over the last two seasons. The effect is obvious when looking at WOWY comparisons of the players in front of him and looking at the numbers of the Oilers regulars compared to those of the Capitals.
I've compiled the totals from the last two seasons below.
TCF = Total even strength chances for on, TCA = Total even strength chances against on, % = percentage of even strength scoring chances for while on the ice, CF/60 = even strength chances for on per 60 minutes of even strength playing time, CA/60 = even strength chances against on per 60 minutes of even strength playing time, DIFF/60 = even strength scoring chance difference per 60 minutes of even strength playing time.
| 2009-2011 | Minutes | TCF | TCA | % | CF/60 | CA/60 | DIFF/60 |
| With Khabibulin | 2893 | 729 | 962 | 0.431 | 15.117 | 19.949 | -4.832 |
| W/O Khabibulin | 4111 | 1153 | 1317 | 0.467 | 16.827 | 19.221 | -2.393 |
Over two seasons the Oilers have been 2.438 chances per 60 better without Khabibulin. Khabibulin's total minutes over those two seasons are equivalent to those of an average starter in a single season. Sample size warnings are still in effect and variance is the likeliest answer.
However, if there is a deeper answer, ceteris paribus, the Oilers would expect to be 25 goals worse per season in front of Khabibulin at even strength compared to the Jeff Deslauriers, Devan Dubnyk, Martin Gerber triumvirate. Note that this number is the expected goal differential based on scoring chance differential alone and has nothing to do with save percentage.
16 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I suggest you do a WOWY with Washington goaltenders to get an idea of what the chance separation looks like for another team.
http://hockeyzen.com - An Oilers blog
Here’s the Rangers. It’s only through February, I haven’t finished compiling yet, but there was a decent difference between the two for the first five months of the season.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on May 11, 2011 7:05 PM MDT up reply actions
So according to that, they played an inferior game in terms of chance ratios in front of Lundqvist? That’s kind of contrary to some of the ideas being thrown around to reason out the difference between the two Edmonton goalies.
http://hockeyzen.com - An Oilers blog
I’m fairly confident strength of schedule played a major role in the differences btwn the two, however I never got around to splitting based on like opponents.
Blueshirt Banter - Where Rangers' Fans Matter
Tracking the Rangers - Numbers don't lie. They just don't agree with you.
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on May 16, 2011 11:35 AM MDT up reply actions
I thought this might be because Dubnyk is a far superior puckhandler to Khabibulin, so the Oilers are just a better team with him in net, getting the puck out of their own end more rapidly. But Deslauriers was a crap puckhandler, just like Khabibulin.
Deslauriers rebound control was also bad, which should lead to more rebounds, more chances against.
by David Staples @ The Cult of Hockey on May 11, 2011 1:54 PM MDT reply actions
Deslauriers used to leave a lot of rebounds in front of him, but they weren’t necessarily in the scoring area.
Khabibulin kicks rebounds right back out to the prime scoring area.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Any control for quality of opponents? I guess there’s enough events there to suggest no implied effect, but I figured I’d ask.
I was thinking the same thing. Plus I want to see more posts with evidence that Khabibulin is a craptastic goalie.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
Could positioning be a factor? If Dubnyk is in good position to make a save and khabby in the same situation isn’t, that would make a difference
by DuLock on May 11, 2011 4:56 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
I’d be interested in seeing these stats split for wins, close losses and blowout losses. I suspect the team tries harder in close games and tries harder to keep the young guy’s confidence up
by DuLock on May 11, 2011 5:06 PM MDT via mobile reply actions
If you are looking for an interesting comparision, look the the Leafs with and without Reimer. It would be very interesting to see if the same effect applies with Giggy and The Monster were in net (like Khabby) vs with Reimer (like Dubnyk).
They are the only other team I can think of that played that dramatically different in front of different goalies.

by 


























