We're Going Streaking, Again!
So Tom Gilbert sees an end to his iron man status on the Oilers roster, making Andrew Cogliano by far the highest consecutive games played man. Gilbert did not play against the Vancouver Canucks due to a sore back. Thankfully, the Oilers still had enough players up, especially with the potential loss of Jordan Eberle. With the final back to back game of the season happening (depending on when you read this) tomorrow or tonight in Calgary, it will be disappointing if Eberle is out of the lineup, but precautions should be taken.
Now before some start expressing their emotions and thoughts on this game, I'll be honest and say that I don't hate the Vancouver Canucks. If the Edmonton Oilers would only get to win one game this week, I want it to be a game against the Flames. Every. Single. Time. So, it is with great joy that I saw the Oilers win, but now I can't help but worry about the next match up. Oh please hockey gods! Hear my plea!
The Oilers led the Canucks in scoring through the opening minutes of play, and in fact the Canucks didn't register their first shot until 4:26. Chris VandeVelde had the best scoring chance for most of the period, ringing it off the post at the halfway marker. With seven minutes left in the period, the "Let's go Nucks" chant started, and were quickly quieted by the "Let's go Oilers." For some reason, that didn't last very long either. Alright, we know what reason, we have all been in this together and the end is soon. Jannik Hansen took the first penalty of the game for hooking and that was all the opportunity the Oilers needed. Jeff Petry found Jordan Eberle who had made an opening and had a great shot on net, but just wide. Thankfully, Ryan Jones was parked in front of the net and the puck bounced off of Jones' shin, off of Roberto Luongo and into the net short side. It was 1-0 Oilers thanks to a power play goal 3 seconds before the period expired. The Oilers also lead in shots, 8-4.
The second period started off with both teams at even strength, thanks to the power play goal by Jones. Both teams seemed to have found their pace, but it might have been a little slow for the Oilers. The Canucks had their best scoring chance when Jeff Tambellini secured his position on the side of the net and once he had the puck, jammed away at it, hoping to push it through or under Devan Dubnyk. The whistle was blown and still Tabellini pushed. This didn't sit well with the Oilers, who appeared eager to bring on some physical play. Theo Peckham had apparently tried to strike a chord, or Aaron Rome had, either way, Peckham dropped one glove and his stick but Aaron Rome wasn't interested in fighting. The taunting continued once both players returned to the respective benches.
At 8:42, in front of the Oilers' net, Ladislav Smid hit Daniel Sedin, and Alexandre Burrows took offence to the situation. Some pushing and shoving ensued, Smid took a roughing penalty, and Burrows a hi-sticking. Again, no fighting even if it looked like that is what things were leading to. The 4 on 4 play that followed was slightly quicker, and that continued once full strength play resumed. It wasn't even strength for long though, at 11:32, Burrows took a slashing penalty. Jordan Eberle and Magnus Paajarvi looked like a force to be reckoned with, both creating and taking scoring opportunities. On one such opportunity, Eberle ended up on his stomach sliding towards the net, and Jones tried to find his second on the night. Instead, Jones found himself in the middle of a pack of Canucks. No penalties were called, but it looks as though some egos might be bruised.
With less than four minutes to go in the period, Kevin Bieksa took a hi-sticking penalty, but the Canucks successfully killed the Oilers' man advantage. Burrows had the Canucks best scoring chances on the period but also served the most time in the penalty box. There was no further scoring in the second, and the Canucks lead in shots 14-6. Smid, wearing the A for this game due to Gilbert's absence. Smid himself was a possible scratch duw to a foot issue from the Saturday game. Smid has opted to wear the shot protectors on his skates and said "You have to enjoy these division battles." On why it was important to him to play this game.
The Canucks got their first power play of the night, 32 second into the final frame. Jim Vandermeer was called for hooking and Oilers fans held their breath. The Oilers successfully killed their first penalty, but soon after took a second hooking penalty in a row. With less than one minute of full strength team between calls, Ryan O`Marra made his way to the box. Luck would be on the Oilers side somehow when the Canucks leading power play scorer, Daniel Sedin was hauled off for tripping, a minute into their power play. The Oilers were unable to score on their short power play, but the Canucks weren't able to to either.
Linus Omark seemed to tempt the fates again, taking a holding penalty and giving the number one power play team in the league another opportunity. The Oilers successfully killed the penalty, their third in the period but the next calls are where things got messy. With slightly less than 7 minutes in the game, an unsuspecting Jordan Eberle was the recipient of a headshot by Raffi Torres. O'Marra immediately dropped the gloves, but was soon toppled by Torres. Torres was assessed a 5 minute elbowing major, and speculation immediately began as to whether or not Torres would receive some major punishment from the league.
Unfortunately for the Canucks, or their fans, the team seemed to have come completely unhinged with 6 minutes left in the game. Rome and Burrows each took a cross checking penalty on Eberle and Cogliano respectively. 5 on 3 hockey and for four minutes. The Oilers were able to take advantage of it for the first time all season, and it's not as if this was their first 5 on 3. Jeff Petry was again involved in a power play goal for his team, finding Linus Omark who of course was looking for his good friend and line mate Magnus Paajarvi. The best part was that Omark passed back to Paajavi, then skated across to the front of the net to screen, but not before Paajarvi released his shot on Luongo. Omark jumped over the puck, and Luongo was once again beaten short side, 2-0 Oilers. With one mad advantage, the Oilers were unable to find a third, but maintained their lead. The Oilers closed out the final period tied at 8 with the Canucks for shots on net.
Yes, the 2010-11 Oilers beat the Vancouver Canucks, and not just once, but twice in less than a week. The only thing that should make this better is a victory over the Calgary Flames on Wednesday. Beating division rivals has been an issue, for the most part, for the Oilers this season. At first I didn't think it mattered that the Oilers wouldn't get anther win on the rest of the season, but the win on Saturday has changed my thinking. Winning is a better way to end the season, and have the players come back to training camp with.
Jeff Petry played one of his best defensive games of the season, which is not a surprise against the Canucks. The Oilers also blocked a large number of shots on the night, and helped Dubnyk keep the Canucks off the board. So, it's not surprising to hear that the Oilers defensemen stood up and played their best. It was an added bonus that Petry had an assist on both goals. Dubnyk's shutout on the night was his second in the NHL and what a shutout it was. Facing 26 shots, and a number of blocked shots, Dubnyk looked solid and like a ray of sunshine in the Oilers future.
On taking both games in the home and home series, Paajarvi told Gene Principe "It's huge for us, even with out season ending in three more games." When asked what he thought about breaking the 5 on 3 power play goal drought, "I didn't know that we hadn't scored before. I heard this after the game. That was nice to get that out of the way. You have to execute when you have the shot and when you can close the game, an opportunity like that you can't miss it. Especially against a team like this. That was really huge for us." Obviously the youth is buying into the rebuild, even though they don't have another option. The rookies are finding chemistry with each other and are stepping up at critical times in the game. The Canucks had crumbled by the time that Paajarvi scored, but it might have been a different result if Paajarvi had not scored and taken the wind out of the sails for the Canucks.
Jordan Eberle jumped to his feet from the hit, and many questioned why he was not pulled off for 15 minutes after his hit to the head. Perhaps he didn't seem off, but with a player like Eberle some fans were likely concerned why he wasn't assessed off of the ice. On the hit itself, Eberle said "From what I saw, I thought he had me beat to the puck, so I thought he was just going to get it and turn up ice. At the last second, he left the puck and hit me. I'm not sure if it was elbow or shoulder blade that hit me. Obviously it's tough." On staying in the game Eberle said "I don't really feel anything, so it's obviously a positive." Whether or not he should have stayed in the game will likely be made clear when the Oilers assess him tomorrow and make a decision on whether or not he will play in Calgary.
Coach Tom Renney was proud of his whole team and said of Eberle staying in the game, "The kid's a trooper, he's an Oiler" not willing to discuss his thoughts on the hit, "I'm not going to do it in the media. We'll let the punishment fit the crime. I'm not going to go there." Smart move Renney, I'm impressed that Renney has held it together all season and not been fined yet. There have been some questionable calls, some unfortunate injuries, and an awful lot of missed calls against Omark.
"We just want them to under estimate us possibly so that we can pursue a win because we need that kind of help. That being said, we played hard from the drop of the puck." Renney said of his team's efforts on the night. If Renney is okay with other teams taking their foot off the gas when playing the Oilers, well, he must be finding a way to get that message through to his team. We as fans can still be upset over it, but it should matter more how it affects the players.
"I don't want my team to play in fear of making mistakes. That's fatal quite honestly. They have full license to go try things. There is a game plan, there is structure, there is a way that we have to play in order to have success and manage our game, no question. But at the same time, I don't think that you win by being safe late in a game like that at all. I think you just do what got you there." That should be excellent advice for a young and developing team, and we have seen that Renney stands by this when Gilbert Brule took a tripping penalty in Minnesota on March 31st. Learning from mistakes can be painful, but it's not as if the Oilers have a lot to lose at this point of the season.
This Oilers fan was shocked and glad for the win, as this is one of the last for the season and I have seen more than enough losses on the season. So, it is with great pleasure that I remind you that the Oilers are once again going for a winning streak on the season. Three more games, I won't even guess how many more wins.
For this evening, I am in complete agreement with the Sportsnet panel. Here are your three stars.
The Copper & Blue Oilers Three Stars:
★★★ - Ryan Jones
★★ - Magnus Paajarvi
★ - Devan Dubnyk
Our very own Ryan Batty was at the game tonight and did have this to offer:
Ryan's Vancouver fan three stars:
3: Genius #3 - Well we're making the playoffs. Ryan - After dropping back to back games to an AHL team I'd certainly plan the parade route. Might even start camping out. Genius #3 - Huh?
2: Genius #2 stands up and applauds every call against the Oilers. Stands up and boos all calls against the Canucks.
1: Genius #1 - Oilers fans are just jealous of our success. Ryan - What success?Genius #1 - What did you miss the news about the Presidents Trophy?Ryan - How many has Detroit won? Or New Jersey? Or Colorado?Genius #1 - What does that matter?Ryan - Just proves nobody cares. Genius #1 - Well we won it and that's all that matters.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
1: Genius #1 – Oilers fans are just jealous of our success. Ryan – What success?Genius #1 – What did you miss the news about the Presidents Trophy?Ryan – How many has Detroit won? Or New Jersey? Or Colorado?Genius #1 – What does that matter?Ryan – Just proves nobody cares. Genius #1 – Well we won it and that’s all that matters.
Rule number one when dealing with most Canuck fans is if it hasn’t happened within the last, let’s say, 30 second to 3 years it either A. Didn’t happen or B. Doesn’t matter. All those Stanley Cup banners in Rexall? DOESN’T MATTER cause the Canucks JUST won the Presidents Trophy, ergo, clearly the better franchise.
This may be true, but I was impressed by the disdain over the Torres hit on Eberle at Nucks Misconduct. Yes, it was a dirty play, but often times fans aren’t willing to admit the errors of their favourite hockey players.
Now if they could own up to Burrows’ misdeeds….
The Edmonton Oilers - All we do is win!!
Same here. I thought it was going to be a lot of “Eberle ducked! He didn’t get him with the elbow! blah blah blah” but a good majority of them seemed to me more angry about it than we were. And that’s also why I said most Canuck fans. I have run across a decent amount who are just generally solid hockey fans, but with anything it’s the worst examples that are usually the only ones remembered, and with hockey fans they’re also usually the most vocal. And believe me, if I try hard enough I could probably spit on Rogers Arena from my apartment, so I personally know how bad it can get. Needless to say I’m not looking forward to the first few days of the playoffs…
How many mentioned Torres used to be an Oiler?
Writer for The Cult of Hockey, The Copper & Blue, and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 6, 2011 5:17 AM MDT up reply actions
Or that he had a hat trick against the Oilers this year? Ugh.
Copper & Blue
by Lisa McRitchie on Apr 6, 2011 8:00 AM MDT up reply actions
Well, I'm glad Eberle's fine as far as we know
Even though he popped up right away, I was very surprised they let him continue to play right after.
Just a dumb, hotheaded, frustrated move by Torres.
Best thing I’ve ever heard from a fan at an OIl/Canucks game actually came from an Oiler fan. Follow a loss a couple years ago everyone is crowding into the LRT station and Canuck fans are being yappy as usual. Two Oiler fan start chanting “Global warming, you won’t have a team”. It was so random that the Canucks fans went dead silent. You know you’re doing something right when you shut up Vancouver fans.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
Good game oilers!
canucks mailed it in, plus you guys played hard…deserved win and deserved loss by us. Torres hit was bad. Nothing to own up on burrows, however, smid is a class A douche. But only when he’s on someone else’s team. Not unlike Max LaPierre.
Yeah yeah, u won 5 stanley cups before most of u were born. Have I mentioned that I had seasons tickets to the oilers from 1985-1991? 8th row behind the home goal; those were good times. I also had season tickets to the canucks during the Messier/Keenan debacle years, when they consistently stunk up the joint. Those 5 cups mean a lot, in the context of those cups. But they mean nothing in the context of today…that’s probably what “genius #1” was on about. Do you look with reverence at the leafs for winning a bunch of cups…before color tv was in most canadian houses? Yeah, that’s what I thought. Fly the flags with pride, but to say the current canucks team sucks because the 1989 oilers won a stanley cup is a bit odd, isn’t it? Hey, we’re the best team in the NHL right now. We’ve suffered thru under-performing failure for years and years (17 for me, as many as 40 for others). Heck yeah we’re gonna be proud of our team’s accomplishments this year…and be cautiously optimistic about the post season.
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
I never even bring up the glory days. Just simply point to the fact that the Canucks haven’t yet won anything this season that really matters. Or ever really. San Jose and Washington won the last two, somehow I doubt their fans would be up in my face about their big Presidents Trophy wins.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
someone pointed out the other day
if any other canadian team was in the position that Vancouver is right now, their fans would be worse than unbearable. With the possible exception of Ottawa. Canucks fans are used to having a good season then something tripping us up, many people here are still saying ‘oooo chicago will beat us’. Not me, I think this is Vancouver’s year, but we all know, anything can happen in the second season. I still remember steve smith…
Sure, the last two president’s winners didn’t win the cup, but overall, in the last 20 some years the president’s winner went on to the stanley cup like 28% of the time…those are good odds. It remains to be seen what the post season brings, but I think the Canucks have the team to do it…unless they put in an effort like these past two games. That’s not to diminish how the oilers played, but let’s face it, the canucks looked listless both games.
And yeah, washington and san jose fans most definitely would be in your face about the president’s trophy…at least any that I knew were. It’s just hockey. If the oilers won it, you’d do it too. The worst would be leafs and flames fans tho…good god they’d be unbearable.
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
If the oilers won it, you’d do it too.
I can’t speak for the masses but no I wouldn’t. Regular season success is great but winning in June matters a hell of a lot more.
Vancouver fans can be thrilled to death with that Presidents Trophy but when I point out it doesn’t count for anything in the playoffs and all I get back is “Well we won it” I’ll ridicule that every time.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
i don't disagree with u
most of us don’t think of it as the prize we really want. Having said that, it is worthy of some pride, it’s a major accomplishment. In the end, we all know it won’t mean jack with out lord stanley’s mug in the locker room in a few weeks.
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
And yeah, washington and san jose fans most definitely would be in your face about the president’s trophy…at least any that I knew were.
Not sure which ones you know. And considering how well that trophy went for us, don’t see us rubbing it in anyone’s face. :)
GO SHARKS!
Ever get the feeling we are on a collision course with reality?
"They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty or security" -- Benjamin Franklin (see profile for more info on this quote)
heh
well not NOW…
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
How is the Presidents’ Trophy nothing? It’s a great accomplishment.
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Apr 6, 2011 11:14 AM MDT up reply actions
It is certainly a great accomplishment but in a league where all success is measured in the playoffs winning it doesn’t amount to much. If you want to argue that too much emphasis is placed on the playoffs where two bad goals can undo 82 games of work I’ll certainly agree. But reality is that if a team won the Presidents’ Trophy three straight years only to go out early in the playoffs each time, the coach would be fired and the GM, if he survived, would be on thin ice.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
Well, I certainly don’t measure success just by how a team performs in the playoffs. If my team won three consecutive Presidents’ trophies, I’d be pretty darn excited. In terms of personnel, it’s hard to say since no team has ever won the Presidents’ Trophy three straight years, let alone done so and fallen terribly short in the playoffs each time. In other words, the situation is an extremely unlikely hypothetical, but even so, I think it would be very surprising to see the GM canned, and unsurprising to see the coach fired (although it would also likely be dumb). All that said, I agree it’s not valued as highly as the Stanley Cup, but “nothing” seems like a huge overstatement. It would be similar to saying the Oilers accomplished “nothing” in 2005-06 because they didn’t win the Cup (which I think is ridiculous).
Interestingly, although the league emphasizes team performance in the playoffs, it’s not the same for individual performance. Almost all of the individual awards and career achievements (i.e. such-and-such plays his 1,000th game) are measured with just regular season results. It’s kind of odd.
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Apr 6, 2011 11:58 AM MDT up reply actions
Smid has come up a couple of times now, and I have no clue where it comes from. I remember Burrows siding with Sean Avery when Smid got sucker-punched (because he’s a class act!), but that’s the only specific incident I recall between Smid and anyone on the Canucks. So what’s the dirt on Smid?
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Apr 6, 2011 11:18 AM MDT up reply actions
my point is
that smid and burrows play the same way… they’re both a bit chippy and get under the skin of opponents, and neither are especially dirty. Yet you guys have so much burrows hate, when you’ve got the same kind of guy (minus the goal scoring ability) on your team. I don’t get the ‘he dives’ and the ‘cheap shot’ complaints from people who are fans of guys who play exactly the same way. As far as diving specifically, there are very few players in the NHL who don’t embellish hits on a regular basis, and the only reason anyone throws the diver label on burrows comes down to ron maclean backing up his reffing buddy with a slam piece. He’s done some pretty blatant dives… but then so has everyone else. Heck one of your guys did it last night sorry don’t remember who, just remember watching it and thinking ‘shit, another penalty’ but it wasn’t called, and when the refs didn’t call the play all of rexall went nuts. Watch the replay tho, and he wasn’t even touched, just tried to sell it hard. That’s the very definition of a dive.
So, anyways, yeah I bring up smid to point out the hypocrisy of dissing burrows when you’ve got the same guy on your team. Also, I hate smid. :)
"I'd take Twitchy over Rome any day of the week" - Chuckles 'MikeGillis' Canuckles
Dropping F-bombs since the early 70's.
'Nucks Misconduct Sr. VP of Inappropriateness and Questionable Conduct, second director of immaturity.
Here’s the thing. Can you point to any specific plays or comments where Smid has done or said something you’d consider egregiously dirty at any time in his career? With Burrows there is no shortage of examples! I actually don’t disagree with your characterization of Smid much at all, but your characterization of Burrows is hilariously generous, which is why I don’t see any hypocrisy in calling out Burrows and not Smid. And believe me, most of us were down on Burrows well before Ron MacLean’s slam piece presentation of facts.
As for diving, it’s true that pretty much every team has guys that do it (Ryan Jones is the worst for it on the Oilers). I still don’t like it, and I wish it was called more often.
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Apr 6, 2011 12:39 PM MDT up reply actions
Nice write up as usual Lisa.
Paajarvi certainly seems to be coming on leaps and bounds the last few games, almost to the point of being dominant imo. I love his reaction when he scores, that big beaming smile – can’t wait to see what he does when we next hoist the cup!
Lisa – any chance of you getting a spot on Nation Radio one week with LT? Be great to hear the opinions of a fan who has practically travelled the entire continent following the team and visiting the different cities/arenas.
Thanks so much, I really appreciate the comments and any feedback.
Paajarvi has long been my favourite. I didn’t think the Oilers would try to break in three rookies, but I have been pleased. There are still some out there that think he’s a bust, so I hope that Paajarvi can continue to prove them wrong.
I’m nearly halfway done the list of arenas, but there are fans who have seen more than I have. I really don’t think that I’m on LT’s radar. Anything you want to ask, I’m glad to tell.
Copper & Blue
by Lisa McRitchie on Apr 6, 2011 7:59 AM MDT up reply actions
There are still some out there that think he’s a bust
Really!? Who are these people?
The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.
by Scott Reynolds on Apr 6, 2011 11:19 AM MDT up reply actions
I kid you not Scott. Not many, but I was reading some comments somwhere and I just shook my head.
Copper & Blue
by Lisa McRitchie on Apr 6, 2011 11:50 AM MDT up reply actions
Watched the game last night and it looks like oilers have a great bunch of forwards. The team will do better next year especially if Dubnyk can keep up his play.
Few questions from outsider
1. What is the plan with oilers defence – resign Vandemeer, Schmid and maybe Peckham.
And let strudwick walk? Or look for other UFA?
2. Devan looks like he maybe the real deal in net so what do the oilers do with Khabbi?
3. Is Horcoff part of the oilers rebuild/future or will the team try to move him?
1. All three should play next year, but I’m really hoping we upgrade Vandermeer.
2. Devan looks like he might be the real deal compared to Khabby. A hungry team would have jumped on those juicy rebounds he let go last night and we would have been singing a different tune today. He’s a decent backup.
3. No scenario exists where anybody is stupid enough to take on a player of Horcoff’s caliber for the contract he’s lugging around. He’ll be on the ice taking the ceremonial first faceoff in the new arena.

by 

























