(2) Alexei Yashin v. (3) Wade Redden
Rick DiPietro faced his toughest challenger yesterday, but was still able to overcome Vincent Lecavalier 131-55 in order to move on to the finals. His opponent there will be either the now-bought-out Alexei Yashin or the man who's played in the AHL all year long, Wade Redden. The case for each after the jump.
Alexei YashinThere isn't a whole lot to say about this deal that hasn't already been said. The Islanders will take a $2.2M cap and cash penalty over the next four seasons, and Alexei Yashin won't come close to playing a game for them. For a team like the Islanders who need to be efficient just to be competitive, that much waste is going to be difficult to overcome.
Wade Redden
With Redden buried in the minors, his contract only provides a cap penalty for the Rangers. The team would ordinarily be permitted to spend up to 10% above the cap by during the summer, but Redden's deal takes care of that and then some, which stifles the Rangers' ability in the off-season. Redden is also going to provide no value to the club over the next three years for a cost of $16.5M. I know we all like to think that some of the clubs in the NHL have unlimited resources, but I guarantee they all have budgets to meet. This deal goes a long way towards blowing one of New York's main advantages over other clubs. Would they rather have a $2.2M cap penalty to gain flexibility over the summer and have less waste? It's a tough call.
The Bracket
6 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
People really hate that Redden deal
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Hey, it’s close!!!
My blog and Twitter, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
If you don't know how to use Timeonice, read this.
Behindthenet quick link to QoC/QoT/Corsi/PDO/Zonestarts
"Numbers don't lie, they just don't agree with you"--George E. Ays
If I reference a lot of stats, just assume I haven't seen anything to contradict or invalidate them.
This seems a bit like apples and oranges, if redden were bought out, his cap hit would be
11-12 1.83M
12-13 3.33M
13-14 3.33M
14-15 1.83M
15-16 1.83M
16-17 1.83M
Au contraire, if Yashin had never been bought out, this would be the last year of a 9 year deal, 10-11 having a cap hit of 7.15M
This just makes it seem even closer
by One_Roy_Save_On_The_Calendar on Apr 3, 2011 1:12 PM MDT reply actions
Yashin worse IMO
I think having a 2.2 M cap hit for a player never going to lace up for you during the season is worse than the extra cash and 10% off season flexibility.
Teams competing for the Cup are usually going to need all the cap room they can get…2.2 M can get you a solid depth D-man for a playoff run.
Yes, Redden is terrible. But there’s a (very low) chance he could be somewhat useful again at some point in the contract. He has okay AHL numbers this year (69GP, 8-34-42) And if he toils in the A the rest of the contract, it’ll never affect the NYR cap during the season, which is what counts.
The Yashin deal was a terrible bet but it had some potential upside at the time it was signed, and now the damage is limited going forward. The Redden deal was horrible the moment it was signed, and he will probably never play in the NHL for a winning team with a cap hit of 6.5M. I wonder if he even considered that angle, or if he is now some kind of cautionary tale for other players.

by 

























