The All-Time Ranking Of The Oilers Special Teams (STE)
Two months ago, in a quest to determine just how bad the Oilers special teams were, I created a simple but useful metric:
If we had a simple metric to apply to special teams, we could get a sense of just how much of an impact special teams can have on a season. Since the league average for power play success percentage plus penalty kill success percentage is 100, why not add the two and use it as a baseline for measuring special teams efficiency? Though the tendency to regress toward the mean may be somewhat less strong (but then again, maybe not!), it may still be useful as an evaluation tool. In this case, we'll call the combined number Special Teams Efficiency, or STE.
Since writing that article, it's been nothing but sunshine, lollipops and rainbows in Edmonton as the Oilers have raised their STE from 83.31 up to 86.80. It's been an astounding climb from 30th place to 30th place. The Oilers trail 29th place Toronto by 6.79 percentage points, so barring a miracle of immaculate proportions, the Oilers will finish last overall in STE in the league.
The gap between 29th and 30th is larger than the gap between any three other spots in the list, so it follows that the Oilers STE might be one of historically bad proportions. After the jump is a list of the all-time worst special teams in the NHL since Original Six expansion.
| Year | Team | PK | PP | STE |
| 77-78 | St. Louis | 73.2 | 16.67 | 89.87 |
| 73-74 | Long Island | 75.95 | 13.91 | 89.86 |
| 92-93 | Ottawa | 75 | 14.73 | 89.73 |
| 76-77 | Detroit | 76.97 | 12.59 | 89.56 |
| 70-71 | California | 77.17 | 12.34 | 89.51 |
| 88-89 | Toronto | 72.7 | 16.77 | 89.47 |
| 83-84 | New Jersey | 75.3 | 14.05 | 89.35 |
| 77-78 | Cleveland | 74.04 | 15.27 | 89.31 |
| 85-86 | Los Angeles | 71.7 | 17.56 | 89.26 |
| 78-79 | Washington | 70.25 | 18.87 | 89.12 |
| 90-91 | Quebec | 73.37 | 15.55 | 88.92 |
| 75-76 | Washington | 74.6 | 14.13 | 88.73 |
| 74-75 | Minnesota | 73.27 | 15.36 | 88.63 |
| 09-10 | Toronto | 74.65 | 13.97 | 88.62 |
| 74-75 | California | 74.91 | 13.37 | 88.28 |
| 75-76 | Minnesota | 73.46 | 14.5 | 87.96 |
| 93-94 | Ottawa | 73.3 | 14.48 | 87.78 |
| 94-95 | Anaheim | 75.65 | 11.39 | 87.04 |
| 77-78 | Minnesota | 72.02 | 14.94 | 86.96 |
| 10-11 | Edmonton | 75 | 11.44 | 86.80 |
| 72-73 | Long Island | 75.86 | 10.85 | 86.71 |
| 82-83 | Detroit | 72.6 | 13.81 | 86.41 |
| 75-76 | Kansas City | 72.88 | 13.07 | 85.95 |
| 74-75 | Washington | 71.34 | 12.9 | 84.24 |
| 77-78 | Washington | 71.92 | 12.23 | 84.15 |
There you have it. The Edmonton Oilers have the worst special teams in the NHL since the 1982-1983 Detroit Red Wings. In the Ducks game thread, I mentioned the final penalty kill having some historical significance -- by killing that penalty, the Oilers vaulted over the Islanders and out of the bottom five. Even though the OIlers are just playing out the string, fans have something to track -- can the Oilers stay out of the bottom five all-time? Except for Detroit, the teams they've managed to put behind them with their post-December rally were all expansion teams and except for the North Stars, the teams directly in front of them were expansion teams.
12 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I wonder if it might be instructive to look at special teams’ PDO, which would be shooting percentage on the PP and save percentage on the PK. EDM is at 940 which seems rather bad to me. Seems like they are getting unlucky in addition to being terrible (they are -17 shots/60 in PP – PK shot differential)
I’m wondering, if what little confidence the team has left continues to wither and die with every loss, can we swing the other way getting back to that 83.31 that would give us the true All-Time Rankingest Special Teams?
It's a catastrophic success. (Read: GO OILERS GO)
As bad as the special teams have been I doubt they can be bad enough to get to the bottom of the list. The farther in to the season you get the harder it is to move those percentages. Take our miserable powerplay as an example. For that 11.3% success rate to drop another 1% the Oilers would have to fail on their next 20 tries. The powerplay is awful but it can’t consistently go on 0-for-40 runs. At least I really hope it can’t.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
but on the flip side that PK% can drop in a hurry.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Giving up 5 goals on their next 10 penalty kills pushes them below Kansas City.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
With a little more bad luck and bad play over the stretch here, the Oilers llok like they could have the worst power-play in league history.
fingers crossed
A posse ad esse.
The Copper & Blue|OilersNation|Hockey or Die!
Twitter: @JonathanWillis
Mail: jonathan.willis@live.ca
by Jonathan Willis on Feb 14, 2011 3:21 PM MST reply actions
But when we look back on this, we’ll all see just how perfect Tom Renney was for this team.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
This is a good idea. Pass it over to the behindthenet guys. Maybe they can also do situational shot differential per game too.
http://hockeyzen.com - An Oilers blog

by 

























