Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Predictions

Edmonton Oilers Organizational Depth Chart

Photo

One of the reasons that we do a twice yearly Top 25 Under 25 is to give readers insight into the organization as a whole.  Most fans are intimately familiar with the NHL team, and have heard of the higher-end prospects in the organization but may not get the opportunity to view the entire depth chart.  After the jump, I've created an organizational depth chart using the Oilers and Barons' depth charts combined with our Top 25 Under 25 rankings.

Star-divide

Left Wing
Center
Right Wing
Dustin Penner 
Shawn Horcoff 
Ales Hemsky 
Taylor Hall 
Sam Gagner 
Jordan Eberle 
Magnus Paajarvi 
Andrew Cogliano
Zack Stortini
Linus Omark
Gilbert Brule
Ben Ondrus
Ryan Jones 
Liam Reddox
Tyler Pitlick
J. F. Jacques
Colin Fraser

Toni Rajala
Steve MacIntyre 
Anton Lander
Kristians Pelss
Curtis Hamilton
Ryan Martindale
Cameron Abney
Alexandre Giroux

Chris Vande Velde
Alexander Bumagin
Teemu Hartikainen

Ryan O`Marra 

Philippe Cornet

Milan Kytnar


Drew Czerwonka

Robby Dee


Kellen Jones




Greg Stewart




Matt Marquardt










Left Defense
Right Defense

Ryan Whitney
Tom Gilbert 

Ladislav Smid
Jeff Petry 

Martin Marincin
Jim Vandermeer 

Theo Peckham
Kurtis Foster


Jason Strudwick
Alex Plante


Shawn Belle
Taylor Chorney

Brandon Davidson Jérémie Blain

Johan Motin

Kyle Bigos



Troy Hesketh



Jordan Bendfeld







Goaltender



Devan Dubnyk



Nikolai Khabibulin



Martin Gerber



Jeff Deslauriers



Olivier Roy



Tyler Bunz



Bryan Pitton

Comment 11 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Our RW sucks…
Also Reddox center? I thought a winger.

Rebuild is a convenient excuse for GMs who dont wish to do their jobs

by SumOil on Feb 13, 2011 7:31 AM MST reply actions  

It’s criminal to see Strudwick above Belle.

Does he call it Luongo underwear?

Co-Manager at Behind the Net

by Bettman's Nightmare on Feb 13, 2011 7:38 AM MST reply actions  

Yeah, I know his job is to get the Barons into the playoffs, but it seems like some additional time in the NHL on the bottom pairing could have shown whether he is capable of playing the $550,000 7th defender role.

They’re better off paying $800,000 for someone out of the Mottau / Weaver / Pothier tree, but it does seem like one of those missed opportunities.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Feb 13, 2011 8:06 AM MST up reply actions  

We are missing a stud Dman , impact center.
On this related topic, HF fas it’s oilers propect ratings up. Some of them seem a little inflated. Other than that it’s good

Rebuild is a convenient excuse for GMs who dont wish to do their jobs

by SumOil on Feb 13, 2011 7:43 AM MST reply actions  

Omark is currently playing right wing with Gagner and PRV. Is this not his natural position?

by Matt.N on Feb 13, 2011 7:54 AM MST reply actions  

Omark and Paajarvi are strange cases. Omark is listed at LW and has played LW in the SEL, KHL and AHL. He’s playing RW right now, and I believe he did the same at the world championships.

Paajarvi is listed at LW and has played both LW and RW, and according to our intrepid Swedish interviewer, Johan, Paajarvi has played his best hockey on the right side.

I just listed Omark at his listed position.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Feb 13, 2011 8:03 AM MST up reply actions  

Interesting to see the lack of elite talent beyond Eberle and Hemsky at RW, which is why it would be a big mistake to trade the latter. That said, I believe Penner and Paajarvi are capable of playing either wing. Are we safely assuming now that Pitlick is at RW and not C? Him and Rajala in that case would be potential strong skilled RWs (Rajala’s a longshot though).

@SumOil: yeah I thought the prospect ratings were pretty good on the whole, they seem to agree with a lot of what has been said here, except for Chorney’s entry where they fail to mention his massive improvement from this year to last.

@Matt.N: I believe Omark is a natural LW, but seems capable of playing either when needed.

by EasyOil on Feb 13, 2011 7:56 AM MST reply actions  

Interesting to see the lack of elite talent beyond Eberle and Hemsky at RW, which is why it would be a big mistake to trade the latter. That said, I believe Penner and Paajarvi are capable of playing either wing.

Omark has been capable thus far and Penner is capable, but given his all around game, it’s better to keep him on the left side.

Are we safely assuming now that Pitlick is at RW and not C?

Who knows? He’s played the entire season on the wing and claims to like it over there.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Feb 13, 2011 8:09 AM MST up reply actions  

You need to take this depth chart with a grain of salt. Brule has played almost exclusively RW, but he is up as a centre. Omark has played RW and Penner can play their too. Gagner can also play RW. There are lots of RW options if Hemsky goes.

Makes you wonder what the Oilers do on draft day and Larsson is gone off the board and Landeskog is still available. Do they draft another LW because he is the best player available (assuming they think he is)?

If you take Pitlick out of the mix at centre, its a pretty scary picture down the middle. Some decent defensive and two-way centres, but no real point producers. The Oil better hope Martindale is the real deal based on that chart. Otherwise we are building the Anaheim Ducks of the Kariya/Selanne days with Horcoff as our Steve Rucchin.

by gcw_rocks on Feb 13, 2011 9:40 AM MST up reply actions  

What are your criteria for these rankings? It strikes me unlikely the Martin Marincin is, at this moment, a better hockey player than Theo Peckham. On the other hand, Taylor Hall obviously promises to turn out as a much better player than Dustin Penner. Is it some combination of current ability and upside you’re using?

by sarcasticidealist on Feb 13, 2011 11:56 AM MST reply actions  

It looks like if Hemsky rumours pan out they feel there are LW that will pull their weight at RW. There are a lot of options at the wings.

The D to me looks like it will be solid if unspectacular in the next few years even with no franchise guy. There is offense and puck moving players, could use another solid banger right side (maybe Plante but tougher would be better ) – it’s passable.

For me #1 centre has to be highest priority over the other gaps. Only Martindale really has the tool kit to be that type of player in the current mix, but a long shot for sure. It would be a huge mistake to address the stud D and not the stud C before the sweet picks go away.

I truly hope they don’t think Gagner will grow into that. He could be quite a good player, but there are too many top opposing centres that would hand him his lunch, having his hockey smarts and speed/size.

Thanks for the chart.

by hugo agogo on Feb 13, 2011 10:50 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ryan_2008_small
The Oilers Begin the Road to Rebuilding
Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL