Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

The Edmonton Oilers' Penchant For Too Many Men Penalties

Renney_moores_medium

Photo by Lisa McRitchie, all rights reserved

I complained out loud recently that every season the Edmonton Oilers take more too many men penalties (TTMP) than their opponents. The thought occurred to me during the Columbus Blue Jackets game on Friday, in which we not only took a TMMP but also had a 30-second stretch where we played with four men on the ice despite not serving a penalty, further destroying my faith in the team's ability to throw five copper and blue shirts over the boards when five copper and blue shirts come off. Ryan O`Marra's development in the AHL does not include getting on the ice when he is told apparently.

My friend, ever the devil's advocate, asked me whether the Oilers actually take more TMMPs or whether I am a victim of confirmation bias. Where did this belief of mine spring from? Is it just a case of me just being annoyed by the most easily avoidable of minor penalties and subsequently exaggerating the ratio with every sloppy line change? Of course at that moment it occurred to me that I had never actually looked into this and that I had not read any blog or article that had delved into the matter so really I had no basis for my belief other than my potentially flawed memory. Clearly it was time to do some digging.

Star-divide

NHL.com does not keep track of TMMPs specifically but they do keep track of bench minors which is overwhelmingly composed of TMMPs. I am happy to report, all of the griping, moaning, bitching and whining Ive done over the years has been accurate. The Oilers do indeed take more than their fair share of TMMPs. The Oilers have ranked in the bottom half of the league every year since the lockout and are currently dead last this year. Hurray for vindication!


Oilers Rank Bench Minors League Average
2005-06 T-22nd 11 9.5
2006-07 T-18th 11 9.7
2007-08 30th 13 8.5
2008-09 T-20th 10 8.6
2009-10 T-18th 9 8.3
2010-11 T-19th 10 8.5
2011-12 30th 7 2.7

One thing to keep in mind before lighting the torches and hefting the pitchforks is that while it is excruciating as a fan to see a penalty assessed for botched line changes (read: mental brain farts), the overall effect amounts to 2-9 extra minutes of penalty kill time a year which probably only translates to an extra 1-2 goals against a year given an 80-90% PK rate.

Comment 6 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

which probably only translates to an extra 1-2 goals against a year given an 80-90% PK rate.

If any post-lockout team could use an extra 1-2 goals per year, it’s the Edmonton Oilers.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Dec 4, 2011 9:59 AM MST reply actions  

Interesting stuff! Do you have a link to the NHL’s tabulation of bench minors (I’d like to see what some of the other teams are up to in this regard, and I can’t find it)?

Purely out of curiosity, I’d be interested to know what exact percentage of bench minors are for TMM. I’d guess, and this is only a guess, that it’s in the neighbourhood of 99%.

by Chunklets on Dec 4, 2011 10:14 AM MST reply actions  

It’s almost the same exact play too.

Oilers are in the midst of a line change and the puck comes right into their change box and someone plays it.

I’d guess that’s a good 80% of the TMM penalties that the Oilers have gotten over the years. On the flipside, the ones that go in their favour are the ones where the opposition has 6 guys involved in the play.

I find it hard to blame O’Marra for the one vs the Blue Jackets. Horcoff was coming off and instead of getting the puck deep, Smyth plays it back towards the Oilers bench. Horcoff sees the puck and dumps it back down as O’Marra is getting on the ice.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Dec 4, 2011 10:30 AM MST reply actions  

Thats been my observation as well. It doesnt seem like the Oilers are taking these penalties with the intent of cheating a bit to get the jump on the opponent. It usually a player making an outlet out of the zone to the bench when an Oiler is getting off the ice.

Also, I agree that Smyth should shoulder the blame for the TMMP. But thats not the play Im blaming O’marra for. Im blaming O’marra for not getting on the ice and leaving only 4 oilers on the ice during even strength play.

by Samuel Ngai on Dec 4, 2011 12:04 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ryan_2008_small
The Oilers Begin the Road to Rebuilding
Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL