Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: UFC 146 Predictions

Taylor Chorney: Bad Player or Bad Teams?

Taylor Chorney is returning to the Oilers because injuries to more than half of the NHL Regulars, so it seemed a perfect time to take a look at a defenseman who can be read one of two ways:

  • he's a poor player who doesn't have the size and grit to play at the AHL level, as shown by his at atrocious +/- over his AHL career,

OR

  • he's a reasonable player who isn't going to win you any games but can play a balanced game and potentially help to put up some points

Star-divide

I decided to crunch some of Taylor Chorney's numbers.  Here's what I've found, and the conclusions I've drawn from some of the numbers:

2008-09
Springfield Falcons 68 PG -29 (TEAM 80GP -285)
Edmonton Oilers 2 GP -4 (TEAM 82 GP +/- 0)
Conclusion - Marginal AHLer, not NHLer

2009-10
Springfield Falcons 32 GP -20 (TEAM 80GP -337)
Edmonton Oilers 42 GP -21 (TEAM 82 GP -291)
Conclusion - Better AHLer, bad NHLer - fits right in on this Oilers squad

2010-11
Oklahoma City Barons 46 GP -1 (TEAM 80GP +23)
Edmonton Oilers 12 GP -5 (TEAM 82GP -212)
Conclusion: Decent AHLer, Still not a good NHLer

2011-12
St. Louis Blues 2 GP 0 (TEAM +6 OVER 2 GAMES)
Oklahoma City Barons 4 GP -1 (TEAM WAS EVEN IN 2W 2L - 4 GAMES CHORNEY WAS IN)
Conclusion: Respectable AHL and NHL numbers - may be option at either level - small sample sizes may affect numbers

It's easy to see the black hole of teams he's played on - a big part of his numbers are the team as a whole, and shouldn't be blamed on him alone.  There's also a trend that as his team improves, so does his  +/- over the last 4 seasons.  Hard to say whether that's because he's better, or his team is, but it is worth noting that there is progress on both sides, and there is likely some kind of relationship there.

It's clear he's not going to save an NHL team, but he's a reasonable option for 6/7 D-man.  The Oilers as a team are a collective -29 through 18 games this year.  Calling Chorney up to play for the big club shouldn't hurt the team any more than they already hurt themselves.  He's been getting better, and might be able to hold his own in the NHL very soon.

Comment 4 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Around SB Nation

Comments

Display:

I don’t think he’s being solely blamed for the bad teams he’s been on.

But in 08-09 he had by far the worst number amongst defencemen on the team.

In 09-10 he had the distinction of having the worst +/- amongst defencemen on 2 seperate teams.

Has he improved year after year? Sure. Has he improved enough to be a regular NHL player? I don’t think so.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Nov 20, 2011 10:36 AM MST reply actions  

It’s just when yuo are considered an offensive defensemen, yet provide little offence, it’s tough to really justify your spot on a team. He’s probably improved defensively since his first stint with the Oilers. I think most coaches look towards players with wither offensive of defensive (shut down) potential. Since he falls into the middle ground, without strong potential for one catagory, it makes it fairly tough to get recognized as an all around defenseman.

He’s probably not good enough to be on the team long term, but seems like a reasonable call up lately. He can’t be much worse than Barker or Sutton.

by George Roop on Nov 20, 2011 11:40 PM MST reply actions  

No team in the NHL Chroney reserves, if all are healthy or alternatives are available in space. Acceptable in a bad team – is no praise for a player. In regard to his age and his development, they must soon make a decision. The decision of the Oilers was once again wrong. From my point of view. Good luck to him – somewhere

by Screaming69 on Nov 22, 2011 3:57 AM MST reply actions  

While the number don’t lie, I’m going to reserve my opinion on him this year until we see a little more. With his stint in St. Louis, and the up and down between the Barons and Oil, he hasn’t had much of a chance to settle in anywhere and really produce any numbers.

by EMR on Nov 23, 2011 1:09 PM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ryan_2008_small
The Oilers Begin the Road to Rebuilding
Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL