Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Sixers Vs. Celtics: Countdown To Game Seven

Theo Peckham or Taylor Chorney? You Decide.

Theo Peckham has struggled to stay in a lineup filled with a career AHLer, a player with 35 games of NHL experience coming in to 2011-12, an enormous 3rd-overall pick bust and a very old and slow, but large defender.  Chorney couldn't even make the team.  But after watching Peckham play for the first two months, I'm not sure Peckham deserves to be on the team, even when taking the current injuries into account.

Tom Renney has given him the easiest minutes he's been able to, yet Peckham has been overwhelmed.  Tonight, tonight was a different level of bad.  He was directly responsible for 1st goal with a terriblly ill-advised pinch that stopped neither the man nor the puck.  On the very next penalty kill,  Peckham ran to the far (side side) boards to finish a hit and took himself 30 feet out of position, leaving no defenseman in front of Khabibulin.

Star-divide

On the fourth goal, Jeff Petry moved down the slot to receive a pass from Jordan Eberle, but Eberle lost the puck, then dove for the puck (it wasn't a penalty).  Peckham never realized that Petry pinched.  As the puck came out of the zone, Peckham looked the puck carrier straight in the belly.  When the puck was moved over to Winchester, Peckham looked up for the first time and saw Petry wasn't there.  At that moment on the replay, Peckham's "OH NO" face was plainly visible.  It was terrible ice awareness. 

After watching Theo Peckham play the worst game of his career tonight, I'm left to wonder - Who is a better defenseman right now, Taylor Chorney or Theo Peckham? I'm not talking about potential, skillset or last season, rather, I'm talking about this moment.  Is the Theo Peckham we've seen for the last six weeks better than Taylor Chorney?

Poll
Who is a better defenseman right now?
Taylor Chorney
143 votes
Theo Peckham
63 votes

206 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 36 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I remember Chorney pretty bad with his disastrous escapades with Strudwick, but you have to be really bad to make Jesse Winchester look like Alex Ovechkin.

by Oiltank on Nov 17, 2011 11:28 PM MST reply actions  

how many times did you vote Derek???

Just kidding bud

by One_Roy_Save_On_The_Calendar on Nov 18, 2011 12:29 AM MST reply actions  

Theo vs. Tay. the subclass of the successful defender. Nevertheless, I would opt for Theo or equal to look for another alterative. Chorney is too soft, it also attracts the injury luck.

Should the Oilers to try their luck and get Chorney in the NHL, for him to then have to re waiver (if he is not injured). I think not.

 An alternative would be for up to 10 games Plante, he needs the NHL air to develop.

by Screaming69 on Nov 18, 2011 12:47 AM MST reply actions  

Sure neither are a great choice, but Chorney is only horrible, Peckham at this point is an abomination.

The Edmonton Oilers - All we do is win!!

by OilLeak on Nov 18, 2011 1:30 AM MST up reply actions  

Why does too soft matter if he can get the job done?

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 18, 2011 6:44 PM MST up reply actions  

I think the better option would be to recall Plante, he at least looked respectable in his one game up with the protected peckham minutes.

by NZoilerfan on Nov 18, 2011 5:18 AM MST reply actions  

I am with you. I would rather give Plante a chance over Chorney. Problem is if you have to put him with Sutton, you are screwed. No footspeed in that pairing.

If the Oilers can get Motin’s contract off the books, what about signing and calling up Montgomery or Tupulov rather than Chorney? Montgomery can pass and yet has the size to handle NHL-sized forwards and Tupulov can clear the front of the net.

by gcw_rocks on Nov 18, 2011 6:26 AM MST up reply actions  

Pair Plante with Potter.

At least the jokes will write themselves.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Nov 18, 2011 7:41 AM MST up reply actions   1 recs

Hadn’t thought of that. that’s classic.

More seriously, I would rather see:

Gilbert – Smid (pairing works)
Tulupov – Potter (puck mover and clear the front of the net guy)
Montgomery – Sutton (puck mover and clear the front of the net guy)

Peckham in the pressbox for a while.

by gcw_rocks on Nov 18, 2011 8:13 AM MST up reply actions  

Allows Teubert to develop on the farm, and gives Plante some serious minutes on the farm to show something.

by gcw_rocks on Nov 18, 2011 8:15 AM MST up reply actions  

And that I beleive that that would be the Oilers best option at this point highlights how deperately I think they need to make a trade.

by gcw_rocks on Nov 18, 2011 8:35 AM MST up reply actions  

The thing about Tulupov is that he can’t stay in the lineup in the AHL. I can’t help but think he’d get absolutely demolished at the NHL level.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Nov 18, 2011 9:33 AM MST up reply actions  

Is that due to Nelson rotating bodies to keep everyone in game shape or because he sucks? I had the sense it was because of the former. Could be wrong though.

Besides, how would that be any worse?

by gcw_rocks on Nov 18, 2011 10:25 AM MST up reply actions  

There’s some rotation happening, but a bunch of guys have played every game. Teubert and Plante have played every game (that they haven’t been in Edmonton), and Montgomery and Helmer have been in the lineup very consistently as well.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Nov 23, 2011 12:26 AM MST up reply actions  

I suspect Nelson has been told to play those two the vast majority of games. The rest of the crew, not so lucky.

by gcw_rocks on Nov 23, 2011 9:19 AM MST up reply actions  

There might be some raw ability there, but it’s going to take some time to develop.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 18, 2011 6:45 PM MST up reply actions  

i agree, but honestly couldn’t be much worse than Peckhs…..and I love Peckham

by One_Roy_Save_On_The_Calendar on Nov 19, 2011 1:38 AM MST up reply actions  

At the very least, he might hit Eager again.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 19, 2011 8:51 AM MST up reply actions  

I wouldn’t waste an NHL contract on Tulupov at this point. I would like to see if Montgomery could hold his own at the NHL level though.

The Edmonton Oilers - All we do is win!!

by OilLeak on Nov 18, 2011 6:16 PM MST up reply actions  

They’re actually lucky he couldn’t find a job. He’s probably better than Barker.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 18, 2011 6:42 PM MST up reply actions  

If tambo is too chicken to make a trade, Montgomery would be worth a shot

by gcw_rocks on Nov 21, 2011 9:27 AM MST up reply actions  

Monti would be good for a two-way deal. Maybe he gets a chance?

by Screaming69 on Nov 23, 2011 12:05 AM MST up reply actions  

This is a bit like asking if you’d prefer a poke in the eye or a kick in the ass. Sadly, given the injuries, it’s quite possible that we will have both of them in the team for the next game, probably as a pairing.

by Yeti# on Nov 18, 2011 6:12 AM MST reply actions  

I just threw up in my mouth a little.

by Matt.N on Nov 18, 2011 6:53 AM MST up reply actions  

Which one is the kick in the ass because I’ll take that everytime over a poke in the eye!

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Nov 18, 2011 7:41 AM MST up reply actions  

Let me rephrase the metaphor: would you prefer to contract swine flu or syphilis?

by Yeti# on Nov 18, 2011 8:12 AM MST up reply actions  

I’m pretty sure I have one of those already too…

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Nov 18, 2011 10:32 AM MST up reply actions  

Bring on the Swine Flu!!

The Edmonton Oilers - All we do is win!!

by OilLeak on Nov 18, 2011 6:22 PM MST up reply actions  

If Sutton were healthy, I would pair Chorney with him on the 3rd pairing rather than have Peckham in the lineup.

Without Sutton…it is a tossup right now. Peckham physicality and can play the PK a bit give him the edge.

by godot10 on Nov 18, 2011 9:51 AM MST reply actions  

Building a strong defence

With or without Chorney or Peckham, even with everyone healthy, this team is thin on defence. Khabi stole a few games, but in the long run this defence is just not good enough.

Come draft time, at the top of the first round the team stocks up on forwards.

This year with the strength of the draft being dmen, there is an opportunity to rebuild this defence. We’ll see if we do that or just add more forwards.

by Marvellous on Nov 18, 2011 10:56 AM MST reply actions  

I think if you get into the top 2, those Russian kids are too good to pass up.

Maybe if you can get a good offer from #3-5 for that pick and something else you might be able to take it.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Nov 18, 2011 12:33 PM MST up reply actions  

Drafting in the top 2 would make it interesting, that’s for sure. But it had better be because the team lucked out and moved from 6th to 2nd.

Even then, I would think about moving down. Sooner or later you gotta address this defence, and if defensve prospects take longer to mature then waiting is pure folly.

by gcw_rocks on Nov 18, 2011 12:48 PM MST up reply actions  

Going to be tough to catch the Jackets and the IslAvs.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Nov 18, 2011 6:43 PM MST up reply actions  

mps will be the next nick lidsstrom…..

by One_Roy_Save_On_The_Calendar on Nov 19, 2011 1:39 AM MST up reply actions  

On the third Ottawa goal (the winner) Peckham did such a sensational job of screening Khabibulin that I would contemplate putting him in front of the other guy’s net on our powerplay. Khabibulin took most of the blame for that one but I’m pretty convinced he never saw a thing except Peckham’s backside.

Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.

by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 19, 2011 10:43 AM MST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Ryan_2008_small
The Oilers Begin the Road to Rebuilding
Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL