Wings Shutout Oilers 3-0
Another night and another stop in Original Six city for the Oilers on this road trip. Last night it was Boston where the Oilers dropped a 6-3 decision, tonight the opponent was the Detroit Red Wings. Going into tonight's game the Oilers made a couple of lineup changes, putting Magnus Paajarvi back in the line-up in place of Ben Eager and Andy Sutton drew back in after his five game suspension in place of Cam Barker who returned to Edmonton with an ankle injury. Nikolai Khabibulin also returned to action after getting last night off.
The Oilers would start strong on this night but an unlucky bounce would give Detroit an early lead. From there it was the Wings who took the play to the Oilers for most of the night, winning the game by a final score of 3-0 and handing the Oilers their second loss in as many nights. As was the story last night, the Oilers were outchanced by a wide margin and looked very much like a team that is nowhere near ready to compete with the big boys of the NHL, regardless of what their early season record may have made you hope.
Scoring Chances
Fenwick/Corsi
Head-to-Head Ice Time
Shift Charts
Box Score
Event Summary
Faceoff Report
Shot Report
In the first period the Oilers started out well, getting the puck deep and creating some problems for the Wings; but it was the Red Wings would would get on the score sheet first. Depressingly the goal came right after what was probably the OIlers best shift of the game so far; a shift that saw Ales Hemsky take control of the puck circling behind the net to keep Henrik Zetterberg at bay, followed by Ladislav Smid driving to the net looking for a very rare goal. The OIlers were controlling the puck and then on a harmless play at the other end of the rink Tom Gilbert moved the puck around the net, Patrick Eaves got to it first and threw it into the slot where it would bounce of Jeff Petry and then Gilbert before landing on Drew Miller's stick who would bang home his first goal of the season.
In the opening minutes of the second period the Wings would extend their lead when a Niklas Kronwall slap shot beat Nikolai Khabibulin high to the glove side. In Khabibulin's hot start to the season this was one of very few shots that he's seen all the way that he hasn't managed to stop. Before the puck got to Kronwall, Theo Peckham had it in the corner and rather than make the simple play up the boards to Jordan Eberle opted to move the puck into the middle in the direction of Ryan Nugent-Hopkins. The safe play woud have been advisable.
After falling down two goals the Oilers would find themselves starring at a four-minute shorthanded situation less than a minute later when Lennart Petrell was assessed an instigator penalty after jumping on Justin Abdelkader after he ran over Paajarvi near the WIngs blue line. On the play Petrell got an extra two because he instigated a fight while wearing a visor. In the first period the Oilers had successfully killed off their first penalty of the night but it looked like a Wings goal with the man advantage was only a matter of time. On this kill though the Oilers were much more organized, and thanks to a Kronwall interference penalty didn't have to kill off the full four minutes.
The Oilers would get a short man advantage of their own after the Petrell penalties expired but nothing came of it. Later in the period the Oielrs would get another chance to cut into the Wings lead after the Wings were caught with too many men on the ice. With the extra man the Oilers looked less than dangerous however and registered only one shot. With the team generating very little at even strength seeing a mostly ineffective powerplay was less than encouraging.
Eric Belanger almost got the Oilers on the score board early in the third period but his shot rang off the post. Another penalty to Kronwall would give the Oilers another man advantage but the still the Oilers couldn't get the puck past Jimmy Howard. Detroit would get another extended powerplay when Gilbert was called for interference and then as the penalty was winding down Ryan Jones took a slashing penalty. The Oilers would successfully kill off both but with five and a half periods of hockey played in the last two days it was starting to look as if the Oilers were just out of gas.
Just when you're ready to count the Oilers they come back with a couple of their best shifts since the first period. The burst would generate a couple of scoring chances but wouldn't results in any goals. With the Oilers pressing for a goal Zetterberg and Valtteri Filppula would get an odd man rush that would end with Filppula tapping home a wonderful saucer pass from Zetterberg extending the Wings lead to three. From there the Oilers were just playing out the minutes knowing that a second straight loss was on the horizon.
News and Notes:
- Another tough night for the Taylor Hall / Nugent-Hopkins / Eberle line, not that most lines with a lot more experience wouldn't also struggle up against Pavel Datsyuk, Tomas Holmstrom, and Dan Cleary. At least they didn't have to consistently see Nicklas Lidstrom too.
- Speaking of Lidstrom he is just amazing. He played 23:33 tonight, tops on either team and he's 41. The way he moves the puck and keeps himself in the absolutely perfect position almost all the time, there is no reason he couldn't play another five years if he wanted to.
- Sam Gagner had one of his better games of the season tonight. Still no points of course but he, and his line mates, Belanger and Jones, seemed a little more dangerous on this night they have in recent games. As a line I'm still not sure about these three but at least they were effective tonight.
- The Oilers powerplay failed to score for the fourth time in five games on this road trip. Since leaving Edmonton the powerplay is just 1 for 16; before that the powerplay had gone 10 for 48 or 20.8%.
17 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I’m a little concerned about Paajarvi. Offensively, he has very little confidence right now, good thing he still plays a responsible defensive game.
The Edmonton Oilers - All we do is win!!
by OilLeak on Nov 11, 2011 9:28 PM MST via mobile reply actions
I would like to see Paajarvi Lander and Hemsky together for a game. I think Belanger Eager and Petrell would make a good shutdown line.
Who is that group going to shut down?
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98
Considering the Oilers were playing their third in four
I thought they handled themselves very well. I was impressed by the pressure they were able to produce on the forecheck. The Wings did a good job of staying poised and patient, but it took them way more touches to get the puck out of the zone than they like to make and it really helped to cut down on speed through center ice. Detroit did a good job limiting mistakes, but the Oilers forced a good amount of them.
This game really was about who capitalized on errors better and it just happened to be the fresher team. This game always felt closer than the score let on.
by J.J. from Kansas on Nov 11, 2011 9:43 PM MST reply actions
Aside from the first 10-15 minutes of the game, the Oilers weren’t ever in it. The score being 1-0 for a long time made the game seem close, but in terms of actual play the Wings were by far the better team.
The Oilers had 4 scoring chances in the first 13 minutes then 4 for the last 47. They were held chanceless for over 20 minutes at one point.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98
They also had two stretches where they prevented Detroit from creating a 5-on-5 chance for more than ten minutes, including a stretch of 14:51.
Edmonton got outplayed, to be sure. Every metric from the game supports this. I still felt they had a chance to turn the game around right up until Detroit’s third goal though. The game could have easily ended 5 or 6-0, but I also felt it could have ended 2-3 just as easily if not for mitigating circumstance. I felt Edmonton’s forecheck did a good job in the first period (as evidenced by the EV-scoring chance differential for that period). They made an adjustment in the 2nd which didn’t work (at one point, the forwards were keying too much on preventing the Wings from making the outlet to the middle of their own zone and left the board outlets, which Detroit used effectively in that period). By the third, the Oilers just looked tired, but I’m having a hard time separating out how much was the Oilers’ schedule catching up and how much was Detroit doing a good job actually keeping focus. Edmonton made it easier, but the Wings still had to execute.
The Oilers are still going to get beaten by teams who can deal with their forecheck and execute their own system… but that can be said of any team which actually forechecks. I thought last night’s game spoke better of Detroit playing well than of their opposition failing to do so (which I thought the Ducks game last Saturday and stretches of the Avalanche game on Tuesday did)
by J.J. from Kansas on Nov 12, 2011 9:23 AM MST up reply actions
8 minutes of the 14:51 were spent on the special teams.
And during those stretches the Oilers weren’t generating much either (2 each during those 2 stretches).
The Oilers were unlucky to be down 1-0 when they were, but after that they weren’t in the game anymore.
Yes, down by 1 or 2 goals your team can always get back in it, no matter how bad they are being out played.
There’s no doubt that some of this can be attributed to scheduling. Phoenix – Montreal – Boston – Detroit is not easy travel wise or quality of opposition wise.
I just didn’t agree with the notion that it was just simply one team capitalizing on errors. I mean hockey is always like that but this wasn’t an even game and the puck spent a lot of time in the Oilers end, which is going to lead to errors.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98
Fair enough
Maybe not so much a simple distinction between capitalizing on errors, but a distinction between creating enough on which to capitalize.
Either way, based on a horribly small sample size of Oilers games I’ve watched this year (1.3), I can say that I still think they’re on the right track to true competitiveness.
by J.J. from Kansas on Nov 12, 2011 10:15 AM MST up reply actions
No doubt this years team is much improved, and like I said the schedule probably had an impact last night.
That was pretty much the first game like that this year. Last year this was almost a weekly occurance.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98
The thing the Oilers are going to realize is how to manage their energy, especially in a back to back set. On the first goal, Petry had a chance to chip the puck out of the zone, instead passed to back to Gilbert to reset the play. Problem was Gilbert was begging to get off the ice at that point, resulting in a turnover and a goal. Just common sense hockey, keep the puck going forward and don’t let your teammates run their shifts too long.
Instigating a fight while wearing a visor? I didnt even know that was a thing.
Insert Witty Comment Here
They added that rule recently.
Though I didn’t think it was supposed to be called if both guys wore a visor.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98
I think the rule was prompted when a few punks who were generally accused of “hiding behind their shields” instigated the odd fight. I’m thinking Matt Cooke was one of them. Say no more.
Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.
by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 12, 2011 11:52 AM MST up reply actions
Bruce, do you know offhand what season that rule was instituted? I had never ever heard of it at all until last night.
I’m pretty sure it was at the start of last season.
You don’t hear about it much because it’s supposed to be called in conjunction with the instigator penalty which rarely gets called.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98
Quite a while ago. If I was guessing, pre-lockout. Or maybe immediately post- . Some dude got instigated and broke his fist when defending himself IIRC, that amped up the conversation.
Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.
by Bruce McCurdy on Nov 13, 2011 10:38 AM MST up reply actions

by 

























