The Oilers Early Season Penalty Kill Success
By posting a 6-2-2 record to start the season, a record good enough to currently have the team sitting atop the Northwest Division, the Oilers have turned a few heads. I didn't think the Oilers would be a much improved team over the squad we watched last year, and while I'm not ready to completely abandon that stance since it is still very early in the season, I am willing to say that there are areas of their game where they have been much better than I had expected. The penalty kill would be one of those areas.
After finishing fifth overall in the league on the penalty kill in 2007/08 the Oilers have turned their penalty kill standing on its head finishing fourth, fifth, and second last in the last three seasons. To say that the penalty kill has been a problem would be an understatement. But this season the Oilers find themselves once again near the top of the penalty kill charts, currently sitting fourth with a 90.7% success rate. This ten game stretch has been the Oilers most successful since January of 2008 when the Oilers penalty kill was successful 91.3% of the time between January 7 and 29.
The turnaround has had a big impact on the Oilers early season success. If the Oilers were killing penalties with the same success as last season they would have allowed an additional six powerplay goals already. For a team struggling offensively it's fair to say that those extra goals would be showing up in the Oilers record and that 6-2-2 would look a little less rosy. So why the change?
Probably the biggest reason for the early season transformation is a change in the penalty killing personnel up front. Here is a quick look at the Oilers penalty kill ice time leaders from from this season compared to last season (this season is on the left).
| Player | SH TOI/G | Player | SH TOI/G |
| Shawn Horcoff | 3:18 | Liam Reddox | 2:58 |
| Eric Belanger | 2:58 | Andrew Cogliano | 2:43 |
| Ryan Jones | 2:50 | Colin Fraser | 2:39 |
| Ryan Smyth | 1:53 | Ryan Jones | 2:07 |
Three of the four guys who led the way on the penalty kill last year are no longer with the club. When something is broken, and the penalty kill most certainly was, it needs to be fixed, and the Oilers addressed it in the offseason by bringing in Smyth and Belanger. While I liked Reddox and Cogliano, I was happy to see the addition of players who have a history of killing penalties and being successful at it and can also play a prominent even strength role on the team's top lines. I thought that they would, without a doubt, improve the penalty kill, but I didn't think the improvement would be quite so drastic.
But the change hasn't only been with the players up front; there has also been a change in the Oilers net. Not literally of course as both Devan Dubnyk and Nikolai Khabibulin are still there but their play while the Oilers are shorthanded has been much improved, to the point where it almost seems as if new players are there. Looking at the numbers from Behind the Net shows just how improved the play between the pipes has been.
| 2011 | Rank | 2010 | Rank | Difference | |
| SA/60 | 42.0 | 5 | 56.2 | 27 | -14.2 |
| SV % | 0.920 | 7 | 0.849 | 28 | 0.071 |
What I like the most about those numbers is that not only are the Oilers giving up fewer shots, but the goalies are making more saves. That is a combination that can only have good results and provides a buffer should one of the categories slide back towards the average a bit. Right now both Dubnyk and Khabibulin are playing at levels that, while fun to watch, simply won't be sustained over the course of a full season. But even as their numbers regress, the penalty kill should still be relatively successful as long as they can limit the number of shots against. And of course anything north of the terrible numbers posted last season will instantly be an upgrade.
It's still very early and the Oilers likely aren't as good as their record might make you think, but make no mistake, they are improved. And if they can keep doing things like killing penalties they might just make a few people's predictions look a little silly come the end of the year.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This is part of what worries me. There are so many things set to regress, combined with Hopkins’ getting smoked on the road…ugh.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Oh there is a lot of potential regression but if we can just regress to the average we’ll be okay. I’m starting to believe a little and that scares me.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.
The last three games’ worth of shot totals should scare you more.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
I don’t think the PK is set to regress other than a .920 sv% is really hard to maintain.
By eye they’ve been full value on the PK. They don’t allow possession nearly as easily and they aren’t breaking down like they have in the past (minus a couple of exceptions).
The PK looks real.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98
The SH SP is going to regress along with a whole bunch of other things. The three things that will stay are the improved PK strategy, the improved PP strategy, and the coach who is doggedly pursuing matching and zonestarts.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
There are so many things set to regress, combined with Hopkins’ getting smoked on the road…ugh.
As one who has taken my share of abuse for citing small sample size on occasion, I am astonished by how much you keep pounding on this point after THREE games. You’ve made the same point about a hundred times, even when totally off-topic, as here.
I know you’ve got way more to add to the conversation than whistling the same tune over and over. Yes he’s a kid, yes he plays with other kids, yes they will have trouble at times.
I’m expecting good nights on the road too, just not so many of them. But not zero either. Why wouldn’t regression apply here as well? I don’t see how it can’t.
Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.
by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 30, 2011 3:11 PM MDT up reply actions
We need you here to keep Derek in line.
by eddy the lip on Oct 30, 2011 3:31 PM MDT up reply actions
Regression is most likely going to happen but it may not be by much, the goalies might not be able to keep playing like this but even average and we will still be able to compete. It’s also worth noting that Paajarvi still hasn’t potted a goalie which I think he will start doing, the Oilers offense hasn’t been there but I think it will improve just like the goalies with regress so hopefully there is a balance there and we can still win more games then we lose.
The defense is playing over their heads too. If Whitney can’t stay healthy…ugh. If he comes back and Petry stays around in front of Barker/Sutton, there might be something here.
Of course, it depends on Potter playing at this level.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by 


























