Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Events Cause Mariners To Lose To Rangers

Clear Victory Standings

Most of the discussion around luck on this site and others is around shooting percentage and save percentage (Oiler fans are reveling because of the latter at the moment, and why the heck not). But another element of luck come in winning more than your fair share of one-goal games. Not only do good teams have a tendency to win more by two or more goals, there's almost no correlation from season-to-season in a team's ability to win one-goal games. That doesn't mean that a team winning a lot of one-goal games is poor, just that teams should see their winning percentage in one-goal games mirror their winning percentage in games decided by two or more. In last year's standings, for example, the Oilers had a terrible record in games decided by two or more, so their terrible record in one-goal games was to be expected. After the jump, we'll take a brief look at how teams have done so far in games decided by two goals or more.

Star-divide

Before looking at the results, I should note that empty-netters aren't included. If you win 3-1 but got the third goal on an empty-netter, I didn't consider that win a "Clear Victory". If you win 4-1 but got two empty-netters, still doesn't count. With that little caveat in mind, here are the standings for the Western Conference:

Cv_west_medium

In case you were wondering why I'm talking about this so early, you can look at the team at the very top of the standings. Yeah, baby! Anyroad, not too much different here from the actual standings, although the Avalanche have won by one a bunch, and there's no team really separating itself from the pack.

Which brings us to the Eastern Conference:

Cv_east_medium

Again, not too different from the regular standings, but the Penguins look absolutely fantastic (despite last night's one-goal loss to the Leafs). The Bruins, on the other hand, have been losing a lot of close games to start the year. I heard someone on the radio talking about them being a team that's finding a way to lose, and while I haven't seen them at all this season, that "playing okay but stuff's going wrong" assessment jives pretty well with these numbers.

Finally, let's take a look at how each division has done so far. I did this last year too, but found that the results were getting swamped by games where the winner and loser were both from the same division. For that reason, I decided not to include any divisional games in the results this season:

Cv_division_medium

I was actually expecting a bigger gap at this early stage with at least one division getting off to a very fast or very slow start, but at least for now, things are still quite clumped together. The funny thing is, I wouldn't be surprised to see those winning percentages looking pretty similar at the end of the season.

If at any point in the season, you want to check out where your team stands relative to the rest of the league, you can find the Clear Victory Standings, which are updated each morning, on the right-hand sidebar.

Comment 7 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Just to be clear, are you including games like Boston-Montreal last night where it was an empty netter brought the lead from 2 down to 1? Seems like you should count that as a loss.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by JaredL on Oct 30, 2011 1:21 PM MDT reply actions  

Not including those.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 30, 2011 1:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

They’re not included as anything correct? Or do they count as a two-goal loss?

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 30, 2011 2:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

Nope. Do not count in the CV standings.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 30, 2011 4:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

So I guess you could say you don’t count goals scored into an empty net but you do count goals scored by a team with their own net empty.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by JaredL on Oct 30, 2011 4:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yup.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 30, 2011 4:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Otherwise you’d end up with the odd game where a team would be credited with a clear victory even though they lost the game.

The biggest fanana of the Havana Bananas.

by Scott Reynolds on Oct 30, 2011 4:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence
Small
Is Ryan Murray more NHL-ready than we think?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL