Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How The Kings Beat The Coyotes: Lather, Rinse, Repeat

On Ryan Smyth Bobblehead Night Who Else Would Lead The Way?

On Ryan Smyth bobblehead night who else would you expect to score the game winner?

Given the buzz surrounding Ryan Nugent-Hopkins since his hat trick Saturday night versus the Canucks in front of a national TV audience, I half expected my Ryan Smyth bobblehead to have a head shot of the Oilers newest rookie sensation to be taped to it. To say that Edmonton is in the grips of Nuge-mania would probably undersell where the City is at right now. But, in the middle of a rebuild there isn't much to be excited about besides the future, and Nugent-Hopkins figures to be a big part of that future.

On this night though Nugent-Hopkins wouldn't score a single goal. No, instead all he would do is make a tremendous cross ice pass to Taylor Hall allowing him to tie the game on the way to a third period Oilers come from behind win. On this night it was a different Ryan who brought the crowd to it's feet, on this night it was Ryan Smyth who was both honoured with a bobblehead giveaway and scored the game winning goal. See rookie that's how it's done.

Scoring Chances
Fenwick/Corsi
Box Score
Event Summary
Faceoff Report
Shots Report
Ice Tracker

Star-divide

In the first period the Oilers and Predators traded chances and power play opportunities but neither could find their way past the other teams netminder and onto the scoreboard. In the first the Oilers held the advantage in both shots and chances but it's hard to say that they really took control. The team played well enough compared to the Preds but there wasn't any impression of control at any point, they just seemed a little better.

The second period was more of the same except for a puck that found it's way past Nikolai Khabibulin early in the frame. Having seen the play both live and on the replay I still do not know how this Sergei Kostitsyn shot find it's way to the back of the net. It's a shot Khabibulin, or any goalie battling for his job, needs to stop. Without a doubt Khabibulin has been solid this season allowing just a single goal in each of his two starts but that still leaves him on the outside looking in at the starting job for now; if Devan Dubnyk falters tomorrow things could change in a hurry.

Fast forward to the third period and the Oilers finally cashed in on their shot and chance advantage. Hall scored first on the power play off a cross crease feed from Nugent-Hopkins. I've said it before, and I will say it agains and again, I want Nugent-Hopkins returned to Red Deer this season. Any points he scores won't change my opinion but they also make it impossible for the Oilers for to do what I want them to. If there was any chance coming out of training camp that Nugent-Hopkins wasn't staying past game nine it's long gone now.

Minutes after Hall tied the game, Smyth gave the home team the lead when he tucked home a gimme off a pass from Shawn Horcoff. Think 2003 and you've probably seen that goal before. Then yet another Ryan, in this case Mr. Jones, would score the games final goal, an empty netter in the final minute assisted by Smyth an Horcoff. It might not have been the best game Oiler fans have ever seen but it was a win, and in Edmonton we don't ever turn away a win.


News and Notes:

  • Horcoff's line: 21:32 minutes of ice time, 3 assists, +1, 50% on faceoffs, 11-2 scoring chances, a Corsi of +10. That's not a good night, that's a great night. Nugent-Hopkins may be getting the headline but Horcoff has been the Oilers best forward this season.
  • Horcoff and Eric Belanger continue to shoulder the defensive load for the Oielrs, taking 26 of the 36 faceoffs of the non offensive zone faceoffs tonight. It's not an easy, or glamorous role, but the simple fact that Tom Renney is at least trying to match lines gives me a warm felling inside.
  • TheTom Gilbert/Ladislav Smid paring was fantastic on this night. They didn't give up much of anything and were great on the offensive side of the equation. I'm sorry, I know this will just encourage Derek.
  • Ben Eager played 3:04 tonight. With the limited time Darcy Hordichuk saw in the first three game I just can't iunderstand why these players are on this team. If this pattern holds I'll have to think that Renney and Steve Tambellini are on different pages about these types of players, for now though it's just odd.
  • Fun Ryan facts. Ryans have scored nine of 23 points recorded by the Oilers this season. Ryans have scored seven of eight goals. And Ryans have registered a point on every goal.

Comment 56 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from The Copper & Blue

Will Theo Peckham Be Back?

May 2012 by Scott Reynolds - 7 comments

Can Eric Belanger Recover?

May 2012 by Scott Reynolds - 7 comments

Comments

Display:

Let's just enjoy the win, can't we?

The article sounds soooo negative. Like the Oilers are not going to get another win this month… Take some positives out of this game and the situation…

- Many of the best players ever and first overall picks play in their draft season. many go on to great careers and not all end up flaming out.
- Horc may not be able to play up to his big salary, but he’s trying his best and is earning his “C”.
- The highlight reel was pretty fun. Oilers’ hockey is Run-and-Gun and is exciting. Hopefully Whitney will have a healthy season, and the Oil will be reasonably competitive.

I know that the Copper and Blue consensus is for another 30th overall finish, but I really think that the last 2 seasons have made all the writers jaded. With their young talents, I think that both the Islanders and the Avs will be competitive this year (playoff bubble), and the Oil won’t be last overall, and you can call me foolish, but they won’t even be in the lottery (same position as the Leafs).

On the other hand, the Sens, Preds, Jackets, Flames and the Jets will need to start trading for picks by the deadline.

by BillHK on Oct 18, 2011 2:28 AM MDT reply actions  

Agreed- this was a convincing win against a defensively oriented team. As I wrote in my comment above, this promises to be a difficult and long season with our current defensive corp. This was a solid, three period effort that needs to be enjoyed.

by Oilfromdownunder on Oct 18, 2011 2:34 AM MDT up reply actions  

I think this could be a decent team, with another top 2 defenseman, too bad there will be the nights where Peckham, Barker, and Petry will get torched. Hopefully this issue is addressed at some point this season.

The Edmonton Oilers - All we do is win!!

by OilLeak on Oct 18, 2011 2:40 AM MDT up reply actions  

What is negative in this article? Point it out. Ryan heaps praise upon Smyth, Nugent-Hopkins, Horcoff’s line, Horcoff, Horcoff again, Belanger, Renney, Gilbert and Smid. That’s not negative, it’s overwhelmingly positive.

You’re angry because Ryan would rather see Nugent-Hopkins back in junior to save a year on the ELC? Suck it up, it’s an opinion about the management of a contract, it’s not “soooo negative”. Perhaps you shouldn’t let your bias cloud your understanding of Ryan’s writing.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 18, 2011 7:31 AM MDT up reply actions   2 recs

This is the only negative thing I could find in the article….

But, in the middle of a rebuild there isn’t much to be excited about besides the future, and Nugent-Hopkins figures to be a big part of that future.

Though perhaps some are reading the “See rookie, that’s how it’s done” line and taking it far more seriously than it was intended.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Oct 18, 2011 7:34 AM MDT up reply actions  

Movement of The Nuge

I disagree about the need to return RNH. Although the data set is limited, he has shown his scoring ability translates well onto the NHL stage. His major deficiency to this date has been his faceoff proficiency.

This year Edmonton has two premiere faceoff men in town with Belanger and Horcoff. The pre-game video has already shown Horcoff tutoring RNH on F/O techniques.

How does sending him down to the WHL improve a skill that he in his own words, he thought to be a strength? To indirectly quote him, he thought he was good at F/Os in the W, so how does sending him down improve him in that arena?

He has shown chemistry with Hall and Eberle. He has won the hearts of an Edmonton FanBase that will be asked to support a team which will undoubtedly struggle this season.

Why send him down?

by Oilfromdownunder on Oct 18, 2011 2:28 AM MDT reply actions  

Pick from the following:
- Because with or without him, this is not a playoff team.
- Because Gagner deserves one more year to prove he is more than a 40 point player.
- Because the controlable window for an NHL player is seven years, and the Oilers would be better off in the long term to control his age 26 year than his age 18 year.
- Because the sample size is too small. Because they learned from keeping Gagner up when he probably would have benefited from another year in Junior to round out his game.
- Because well run organizations don’t rush players if it doesn’t mean more play-off wins.

Not saying he start hasn’t been impressive. It has. But in the bigger picture, sending him back is a valid, and perhaps preferable, approach.

by gcw_rocks on Oct 18, 2011 10:10 AM MDT up reply actions   2 recs

Totally agree. I watched every second & thought we played a really solid game. This post game article kinda ticked me off with all the bitterness. Can’t we enjoy a solid win on home ice with our heart & soul player back getting the game winner on his Bobblehead night? Geez Louise.

And no, RNH has no business going back to Junior; what would that achieve?

Well, that was the 1st regular season game I got to see all the way through this year due to band practices. What a 1st game to watch! We dominated them in so many ways & came at them in waves on the rush & the puck movement was incredibly crisp in the offensive zone. Oh, and we killed all five PK & scored a PP goal, too.

BillHK, I agree. The overt negativity on here sometimes can be a little disappointing. I, for one, am excited about this year. In all 4 games the Oilers have been competitive and each game was decided by 1 goal, save for the EN tonight. A little positivity goes a long way, even from some of the writers. Bitterness & sarcasm is something we do not need around here, IMO.

What a great game!

by painfulloss on Oct 18, 2011 3:10 AM MDT reply actions  

What f@#king article did you guys read!? I got, at worst, tempered excitement from this article and I couldn’t agree more. Bitterness & sarcasm was the Ben Massey specialty and is missed after a terrible game but this was nowhere near that style of writing or attitude.

by Joe Girth on Oct 18, 2011 9:48 AM MDT up reply actions  

I just want to rec the last line over and over.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Oct 18, 2011 7:36 AM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

Well done sir.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 8:20 AM MDT up reply actions  

Go Oilers!

Best game of the year… so far. And with efforts like that, I expect it will be surpassed many times over. Like the Penguins game, and the Canucks pretty much as well, they played as a competitive NHL team. Except in this game, they played the part of the superior team.

Yahoo box scores don’t show time spent in each end zone but I swear the Oilers spent at least a period’s worth of 5 on 5 controlling the play in the Preds end. The shots certainly indicate that they doubled up the Preds in offense generated and I know more Oilers shots were blocked adding to that advantage.

A couple goals change everything though. Before Hall finally tallied, had they not been able to beat the Rinne Wall, my impression would be a very sound game, and quite the shutdown effort defensively. Again, offensive zone domination, but it just didn’t seem like they were making the kind of plays that were difficult for Rinne. Very little of making him move side to side, and almost no screened point shots. Not to say that there weren’t a handful of quality chances. But they finally break through with a sweet feed from RNH to Hall, and then another precision pass from Horcoff to Smyth who showed great veteran presence to use the time and space given to him and leave Rinne in his dust.

Which brings me to my feelings for adding Smyth to this team. I’ll be the first to admit that when I first heard about Smyth wanting to return but that Calgary might be in the picture as an alternate Alberta destination, I was hoping it’d be them. Doing the math, I figured that would put Teemu H. back in OKC, and I’d really like to see him on the major circuit based on his brief tour late last season not to mention all the hype (dude has a ‘Cult’). But all the intangibles, and evidently last night even the tangibles, that Smyth could possibly bring to the team, have all been on display early this season. It was two parts, one that the organization has a ton of forwards and forward prospects, and grouped with the other forward acquisitions it seemed little attention had been paid to the one area that needed the most improvement which is on defence. However, Smyth more than fits it, he makes the offense and the whole team more credible and something to be weary of.

Gotta say they’re going to need the Swedes to start finding the net, but loving the entertainment I’m getting so far.

Couple final notes for me. I join in with the chorus of people negative on the negative toned post-game report. This was a well deserved win. And there’s no indication of Bulin being on the outside. By my count he’s played half the games so far albeit not the opener. A shout out to the big save he made on the 3 on 2 with 1:40 left in the game. And finally, Petry had a marvellous game. Peckham, is a defender and will certainly need tons of experience to live up to his potential, but I gotta say, especially with Petry’s solid performance, that the D group looked much better with that lineup switch. For the sake of winning I definitely prefer Petry as he just played over anything Peckham has done this year so far.

1st star. Ryan Smyth. Smitty heard the loud chants in the 3rd after his highlight winning goal.

2nd star. Ryan Nugent Hopkins. The kid’s bringing it. Oh that’s my other gripe with the post-game report. What the heck good would it do him to play with juniors? He has proven that growing alongside his peers, namely Eberle and Hall, is the best course for his development.

3rd star. Jeff Petry. Gotta give it to him. Where he showed nerves in his first game, he showed composure this time around. I’ll be a bull and expect the latest up-trend to continue.

by ajcrocks on Oct 18, 2011 7:59 AM MDT reply actions  

Without a doubt Khabibulin has been solid this season allowing just a single goal in each of his two starts but that still leaves him on the outside looking in at the starting job for now

Ryan, I unfortunately think you are wrong on this. I believe Renney is now committed to splitting starts on an equal basis. I see no evidence that he will do anything other than to keep up the rotation of goaltenders on a game by game basis. I’m uncertain whether this is a good or bad thing. Of course, given Khabi’s injury history, it might not last too long.

by Yeti# on Oct 18, 2011 8:10 AM MDT reply actions  

I would normally agree with you except that Renney has me completely confused this season. Dubnyk starting in the season opener. Sheltering forwards who need to be sheltered. Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together… mass hysteria!

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 8:20 AM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

Negative-ish

Derek, not sure if this as you say ‘sooo negative’ but it has that tone and isn’t even accurate.

“The team played well enough compared to the Preds but there wasn’t any impression of control at any point, they just seemed a little better.

The second period was more of the same…" Sorry, by this point, Oilers had generate significant zone control and had the Preds on their heels.

and this one. “It might not have been the best game Oiler fans have ever seen but it was a win, and in Edmonton we don’t ever turn away a win.”

you can spin this any way you want, it’s not the closing statement any of the rest of us would make, and yes it is negative, it might not have been is a negative statement. So you can see how the rest of us reading this report were unappreciative after watching a solid game from the Oil. Turn a way a win? They deserved it.

Done.

by ajcrocks on Oct 18, 2011 8:14 AM MDT reply actions  

Chances at ES were 3-3 in the first, 2-2 in the second.

I don’t know if that’s what I’d call having a team on their heels.

The 3rd was full value but the first 2 periods weren’t very good hockey by either team. The Preds don’t want a track meet, they want a low event game and the Oilers allowed it the first 2 periods.

They kicked ass and took names in the 3rd though.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Oct 18, 2011 8:21 AM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

I’m in agreement with this. While the Oilers looked like a much better team possessing the puck than I’ve seen for a while, there wasn’t a lot happening in the first two periods. The one broken play that led to the Preds 2 on 1 and the resulting goal had me feeling the usual frustration from last year. The third period completely turned it around though.

by TakeoutArtist on Oct 18, 2011 8:57 AM MDT up reply actions  

Eager

I read that Eager failed his fitness test but due to injuries was inserted into the lineup anyway. Might have something to do with his 3 minutes of icetime.

by Peacecountry on Oct 18, 2011 8:29 AM MDT reply actions  

I hope that isn’t the case. Given this team’s history though…

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 8:38 AM MDT up reply actions  

I think he means the Renny fitness test. He’s not physically in shape enough to play a regular shift.

Different than being hurt.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Oct 18, 2011 8:39 AM MDT up reply actions  

If he’s not physically in shape to play a regular shift wouldn’t that potentially make him more susceptible to an injury when he does see the ice? Granted this is Eager we’re talking about so an injury might not be all bad but if a guy can’t take a regular shift I not sure he should be dressing, even if he is just a place holder.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 10:26 AM MDT up reply actions  

More a cardio issue than anything.

And that’s why they only played him about 3 minutes.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Oct 18, 2011 11:01 AM MDT up reply actions  

If that’s all he was capable of then dressing him is pointless. Use Peckham as a 7D as a hedge against an injury.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 11:14 AM MDT up reply actions  

Quote of the day

“That was one of the worst losses I’ve ever been part of,” said Predators defenceman Shea Weber. from TSN’s post-game report.

by ajcrocks on Oct 18, 2011 8:33 AM MDT reply actions  

Oilers RTSS guy strikes again…

Edmonton: 15 giveaways, 12 takeaways

Nashville: 9 giveaways, 4 takeaways

Can anyone explain this to me without needing to bring Stephen Hawkings in to explain blackholes?

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Oct 18, 2011 8:40 AM MDT reply actions   1 recs

What’s to be explained? Assuming the definitions of these things to be pretty standard, a giveaway doesn’t necessarily result in a takeaway, and the reverse is true as well.

Driving Play - The Blog with Three First Lines

by Triumph44 on Oct 18, 2011 9:22 AM MDT up reply actions  

Don’t think that’s DB’s point, in fact the two are mutually exclusive – a turnover can be a giveaway OR a takeaway (or neither), but not both.

I think DB’s question has to do with the blackholes up on the catwalk who are responsible for recording these pseudo-stats. In home games it’s not at all unusual for the Oil to be credited with double or more the number of events as the opposition.

Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.

by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 18, 2011 10:15 AM MDT up reply actions   1 recs

Considering the time Omark spent lugging the puck around and around the offensive zone last night, I don’t think there was enough time left for the rest of the team to commit 15 giveaways.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Oct 18, 2011 10:31 AM MDT up reply actions  

I think you can have a takeaway and a giveaway on the same play.

If Legwand has the puck and Gilbert lifts his stick, why can’t that be scored a giveaway for Legwand and a takeaway for Gilbert?

I just don’t understand how you can score a game like this, and then score the Oilers Canucks game like this:

Edmonton: 21 giveaways, 5 takeaways

Vancouver: 3 giveaways, 2 takeaways

I can’t for the life of me figure out what this guy considers a giveaway and takeaway.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Oct 18, 2011 11:11 AM MDT up reply actions  

Isn’t technically a giveaway an un-coerced turning over of the puck – i.e. a pure mistake (misplaced pass, fumbled control, etc)? Whereas a takeaway is precisely a successful attempt to strip the puck (and therefore it rules out a giveaway on the basis of the previous definition).

In any case, the insane imbalance between home team and away team stats demonstrates that the scorers at Rexall only recognise the Oiler players, so only efficiently record their stats. Seriously.

by Yeti# on Oct 18, 2011 11:47 AM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t think there’s an actual definition, which is part of the problem.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Oct 18, 2011 2:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

The Oilers were “OK” last night even without drafting Adam Larsson…(I’ve been craving to say this for a long time, so you have it:) ). If our defense and the rest of the team continues playing like this at their own end, with our offense heating up we can not possibly do worse thjs year than the fLames did last year. That’s a benchmark of sorts. If they can do better – I wouldn’t object. Gilbert and Smid, Potter and Petry, our “Cs”: beautiful or what? Barker was a bit overshadowed, but was solid nonetheless. I do hope that we keep this “D” configuration for tonight’s game and let Peckham watch how things should be done properly before sending him to play. Overall, it was nice to see a quality NHL team wearing the Oilers’ jerseys last night.

by Roman_Pilgrim on Oct 18, 2011 9:34 AM MDT reply actions  

Roman, I was a huge backer of drafting Larsson as well. Just based on need and that teams don’t win championships without a star defenseman, if not 2. Chara – Keith/Seabrook – Gonchar – Lidstrom/Rafalski – Pronger/Niedermayer – I forget who was on the Canes back end when they beat the Oilers. That’s just post lockout. I will say though that living in Toronto, all you’ve heard since Sundin left is how they need a #1 centre. I do like Hopkins, and how he fits with the other kids. I’ve made up for it by trading for Larsson in my NHL ’12 season.

by ajcrocks on Oct 18, 2011 10:34 AM MDT up reply actions  

I forget who was on the Canes back end when they beat the Oilers.

Nobody. Literally.

Bruce looked at the last decade at CoH a few months back.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 10:40 AM MDT up reply actions  

You need defense that does its job well and you draft the best player available, and that is not Adam Larsson (imo). As for the “star defensemen”: where were Weber and Suter yesterday when it mattered to the Preds? Did they deliver to sway the game? I really liked our defensive game yesterday. It can get much better, but that’s a start. We also have Marincin, Gernat, Musil, Klefbom, Davidson, Petry, Potter, plus a shot at some quality “RD” next year. I don’t think we are lacking anything except another quality goalie.

by Roman_Pilgrim on Oct 18, 2011 11:42 AM MDT up reply actions  

We also have Marincin, Gernat, Musil, Klefbom, Davidson, Petry

Pretty slim chance that all those guys turn into NHL players. Some prospects don’t pan out, that’s part of the game.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 11:50 AM MDT up reply actions  

The cupboard is far from empty though. Would you argue otherwise? Our “Cs” also had to do something with our defense last night. I like this sign of the team jelling together.

by Roman_Pilgrim on Oct 18, 2011 11:53 AM MDT up reply actions  

I see players in the Oilers system that could be a top pairing defenseman but none that almost certainly will be. This team needs that. It should have addressed it at the draft last year. It has to be addressed at the next draft.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 12:03 PM MDT up reply actions  

Fair enough. Another way is to get one via trade, for example for Hemsky, when he is healthy and playing (I believe in miracles, you see).

by Roman_Pilgrim on Oct 18, 2011 12:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

I would also settle for four guys, good enough to be second pairing “Ds” on most teams. Nowhere close to the “stars”, but cheaper and solid.

by Roman_Pilgrim on Oct 18, 2011 12:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

Haha. I thought you were pro-Larsson, didn’t read the sarcasm.

by ajcrocks on Oct 18, 2011 11:56 AM MDT up reply actions  

Nugent-Hopkins

Ryan, just a question. At what point do you look at changing your opinion on sending RNH back to Red Deer. I think the team is better with him on it and contract management can’t be the only thing you look at. It surprises me that you can rationally ignore the fact that he is capable of competing (if not thriving, although right now he is) in the NHL.

by borisnikov on Oct 18, 2011 9:57 AM MDT reply actions  

I’ll expand more on my position later in the week.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 10:07 AM MDT up reply actions  

First of all he needs to dig a moat. :)

Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.

by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 18, 2011 10:17 AM MDT up reply actions  

I certainly won’t be including my seat location so people can come by and talk to me in person.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 10:23 AM MDT up reply actions  

Guess

I’m gonna guess the turning point would be 1/3 of the season with him still going strong and the team looking like they could last till march in the playoff race.

Wherever it is, there’s still a long way to go from here to there, but trending good at the start is a good place to begin.

by till_horcoff_is_coach on Oct 18, 2011 10:49 AM MDT up reply actions  

professional

I want Nugent-Hopkins to returned to Red Deer this season. Any points he scores won’t change my opinion but they also make it impossible for the Oilers for to what I want them to.

What?

by Bananahammer on Oct 18, 2011 1:34 PM MDT reply actions  

Let me try and be more clear, send him back to Red Deer.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 1:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

Send our leading scorer to a lower league.

That’ll fly high with the rank and file fans.

Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.

by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 18, 2011 2:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

Oilers haven’t given a shit about their fans since 2006.

In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!

Tactical contributor to the Copper & Blue and just as boring on the twitters... @dawgbone98

by dawgbone98 on Oct 18, 2011 2:15 PM MDT up reply actions  

Given they are still advertising tickets for Saturday night’s game against Rangers (!) the likelihood that they’ll send down the talk of the town any time soon seems remote.

My own view is that RNH is developing by leaps and bounds here, so what would be the reason to send him down? (Accepting of course that the contract argument advanced in various corners of the blogosphere doesn’t seem to be much of a consideration in the real world.)

Oilers fan through thick, thin and anorexic. Writer for The Cult of Hockey.

by Bruce McCurdy on Oct 18, 2011 2:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

it’s like you and Mcritchie have this thing against proof reading…

by Bananahammer on Oct 18, 2011 2:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

I wrote it at one in the morning. Sorry I wasn’t able to meet your high standards.

Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and a frequenter of the time waster that is Twitter.

by ryanbatty on Oct 18, 2011 2:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence
Small
Is Ryan Murray more NHL-ready than we think?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL