Gilbert Brule #18 In The Top 25 Under 25
Yeah I'm free, I'm free fallin'
--Free Falling, Tom Petty
Gilbert Brule was a bit of a lightning rod amongst the voters here during the summer vote. Brule moved up from 10th overall to 8th on the back of Ben raising him from #17 to #6, and Scott from #17 to #12. I kept him at #13 but was very leery of that ranking, and with good reason.
This time around, Brule falls from eighth (and actually just a point out of a tie for seventh) all the way down to eighteenth. Ben dropped him back down eight spots, Bruce nine, Jonathan ten, Scott five and I dropped him nine spots.
Brule's fall off was not a surprise to some. Jonathan's five red flags article talked about the issues that would cause a regression, I talked about Brule's upcoming negotiations, and Tyler thought it best to trade Brule:
In short, he’s a guy who I’m not sure it makes sense for the Oilers to keep around. My thinking is that his value is unlikely to be higher than it is right now - Brule might seem attractive to a team that thinks its going places and likes his ES scoring from last year. If you’ve got a bad bet who is about to get expensive, unlikely to repeat his results and doesn’t seem like a fit for the top six moving forward, it seems to me like the time to sell.
If Brule wants north of $1,500,000 per season, plug in Linus Omark and send Brule packing. The Oilers have leverage, wasting it would be sad, but predictable.
Though he was looked reclaimed talent by the fans (read the vitriolic comments in response to Jonathan's article to understand more), the numbers knew better and Brule was bound to regress. He has. Jonathan wrote about his red flags and it was prescient. He pointed out the red flags as being Injuries, Shooting percentage, The Dustin Penner effect, AHL results, Points relative to ice-time. The biggest factor in his career-best season was the Penner effect. To quote Jonathan:
Gilbert Brule was a different player when he was paired with Dustin Penner. That pairing was plus-5, on the ice for 21 goals for and 16 against, and they outshot the opposition 147-133. Penner apart was a little worse (35 goals for, 32 against, outshooting 364-346), something I’d attribute to the fact that he was likely playing better opposition away from Brule. Brule fell off the rails without Penner around, going minus-10 (17 goals for, 27 against) and getting outshot 203-233. That disparity is not a good sign.
Without Penner playing pack mule for Brule, his numbers fell apart this season and look surprisingly like his previous NHL career. In fact, the table below shows that breakdown.
| GP | G | A | P | P/G | S | SPct | S/G | |
| Total | 256 | 37 | 43 | 80 | 0.313 | 372 | 0.099 | 1.453 |
| 2009-10 | 65 | 17 | 20 | 37 | 0.569 | 121 | 0.140 | 1.862 |
| 2010-11 | 34 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 0.235 | 55 | 0.109 | 1.618 |
| Total w/o 2009-10 | 191 | 20 | 23 | 43 | 0.225 | 251 | 0.080 | 1.314 |
In addition to a career year thanks to Dustin Penner in 2009-10, Brule has already missed has missed nearly 18% of his NHL career due to injury, another of Jonathan's red flags.
Brule needs to re-invent his game. He's got to understand his own zone, he's going to have to figure out the defensive part of this game and stop running around without the puck. If he can do that, I've previously compared his possible career to that of Dean McAmmond, and under-sized bottom four winger who had a long career. Linus Omark's performance has made Brule redundant. In fact, Brule should watch video of Omark to understand what he needs to change in his game to become successful. Omark is strong on the puck in the zone, a pit bull on the puck behind the net and while he doesn't throw hits, Omark, at least in the offensive zone is a far more physical player than Brule. He's not reckless like Brule his physical play is focused on gaining and maintaining control of the puck. Omark doesn't have the flashy shot that Brule possesses, but he's better in every other facet of the game.
Brule's second chance is fading fast, and it's a bit sad - Brule is a really good guy, and someone a team with some serious public relations issues should want to keep around. But they've already paid him a bit too much for his role and it's likely that he's not going to cover that bet without some serious shelter and a makeover.
15 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
In the face of plenty of evidence and well thought out arguments to the contrary I really thought this year would be a turning point for Brule. Wow was I wrong. He doesn’t generate much of anything and most nights is a complete non factor. Good thing there is another year on his deal.
Looking at those numbers, if I’m Penner I’d be asking Brule for about 500k this year and next too.
Everyone knows rock attained perfection in 1974. It's a scientific fact.
by ryanbatty on Jan 19, 2011 11:57 AM MST reply actions 1 recs
Imagine what Cogliano’s underlying numbers would look like if he didn’t have these Penner numbers
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
From this summer's article:
“A well-run team wouldn’t move such a player, even if that team had a rock solid belief in hockeymetrics.”
“Once again your opinion is way out in left field, in fact thats being generous, its sitting in the bleachers in the nose bleed section. You can’t trade a guy like Brule based on stats, I bet you could make up stats to say the Oilers should trade Hemsky.”
“Yes the Brule we saw this year is the Brule I think we will see going forward with the potential to score 15 to 20 goals and 40-50 points and yes I am 100% convinced of that.”
“If I was to make a list of Oilers players NOT to trade, it would be short, but Brule would be near the top of it.”
“Brule will be signed. It’s a no-brainer.”
“God it’s annoying when people put so much emphasis into stats.”
“If they dont sign him thats it, I’m fu$%in done with this team.”
“[I]t was Penner who was a different player when Brule was on his wing rather than the other way around this season.”
“Red flags… really? JFC Willis…”
“Surprise, surprise…Willis doesn’t like Brule because of the math. If you want to conduct a proper rebuild, you don’t trade away players like Gilbert Brule. You just don’t.”
“For the first time ever, I firmly believe Willis is over-analyzing the numbers. At some point, you just gotta trust what you SEE rather than what you calculate.”
“Mark my words Brule’s gonna be at least a 60-70 point guy once this team starts having fun and playing better as a whole.”
A posse ad esse.
The Copper & Blue|OilersNation|Hockey or Die!
Twitter: @JonathanWillis
Mail: jonathan.willis@live.ca
by Jonathan Willis on Jan 19, 2011 4:10 PM MST reply actions 2 recs
Oh, don’t I know it JW. You’ve been markedly reserved thus far. Good on you.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Run this as a post at ON when the Jones signing comes up.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Any plans to revisit your criticisms at the end of this year? ;)
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Ah, the Good ol' Daze
Brownlee too:
“you spent six or seven paragraphs on what you see as “red flags.” When I look at the player and not just the numbers, I can’t say I share your vision."
And then there was this brainiac:
“All fans of the Horcoff contract [you know who you are] should be worried about Brule’s 09-10 shooting percentage. Nothing screws up a NHL GM like a guy having a good shooting % in his contract year.
One thing that hasn’t been discussed is roles – specifically wunderkid Jordan Eberle is going to be looking for that soft-minute scoring role enjoyed by Brule this past season.”
Of course Brownlee had to get into it with me about Eberle.
It’s a well known fact that statistics can be used to prove anything, and I find it profoundly intellectually dishonest (and not a little arrogant) of Jonathan Willis to only use them to prove things that are actually true. I mean, of course statistics are going to look good in that situation.
by sarcasticidealist on Jan 19, 2011 5:37 PM MST reply actions 5 recs
Guys, I don’t know what you are talking about. Brule is having a great year.
You guys must be confused because he changed his number to 28 and his name to Jones. Easy mistake.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
by dawgbone98 on Jan 19, 2011 6:07 PM MST reply actions 2 recs
Actually Jones underlying numbers are a bit suspect too, as we’ve discussed on HF. Maybe we should trade him too :)
http://hockeyzen.com
I think it’s part of the helmet.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
by dawgbone98 on Jan 20, 2011 2:53 PM MST up reply actions 1 recs

by 
























