Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl Recipes: A Guide To The Perfect Game Day Menu

Glory Days (They'll Pass You By)

It feels like forever since the Edmonton Oilers made their glorious run to the 2006 Stanley Cup finals. A million little things in a million little ways bring this home every time we open a newspaper. A team that so recently caressed the pinnacle of hockey glory mired in a relentless rebuild, hoping that a cocky first overall pick from Calgary can bring back the magic of Sergei Samsonov. The Oilers signing the backup goaltender from the team that beat us. Watching Erik Cole inspirationally come back from a serious neck injury in the Finals against us, then trading for him, then trading him away, then releasing the guy we traded him for. We've gone through two coaches, a general manager, an owner, and two minor league affiliations.

And of the thirty-eight players that took some part in that magnificent 2005-06 season with the Oilers, precisely two remain. Ales Hemsky and Shawn Horcoff. Two.

For crying out loud, this team has more members of the 2006-07 Chicago Blackhawks than they do of the 2005-06 Edmonton Oilers!

Don't pretend this is the norm. Remember the 2005-06 Detroit Red Wings? Of course you do, we kicked the hell out of them. Thirty-two players played at least one NHL game for them that season and ten remain. Want me to list them? Sure! Pavel Datsyuk, Henrik Zetterberg, Nicklas Lidstrom, Tomas Holmstrom, Johan Franzen, Dan Cleary, Andreas Lilja, Niklas Kronwall, Jimmy Howard, and Chris Osgood. Ten.

How about the team that vanquished us, the Carolina Hurricanes? Flukey winners in a small hockey market who had a lot of impending free agents looking for a big payday. Well, they're down to Eric Staal, Erik Cole, Chad LaRose, and Cam Ward, or four. That's not a lot, but it's twice as many as we've got. We're actually tied with the 2005-06 St. Louis Blues, who retain only Eric Brewer and Barret Jackman from a team that finished last four seasons ago.

If you think that hockey players are interchangeable parts, just cogs to be swapped in and out of the machine as the desire strikes you, then this isn't necessarily a bad thing. But for us mad fools who believe in things like chemistry and familiarity, gutting a conference champion over the course of four seasons is pretty dumb, and well, the cause for alarm should be pretty obvious.

Star-divide

It's easy to say that in a salary cap world, there'll be more player turnover. But that's a cheap answer. There were no players on the 2005-06 Edmonton Oilers who, when their contracts were up, we genuinely could not afford. There were a few (Jaroslav Spacek and Sergei Samsonov leap to mind) who we could have paid but whose price flew beyond their value and the Oilers sensibly let go. There was Ryan Smyth, who may or may not have fallen into that category and is a can of worms there's no need to open again.

And, again, some of these departures make sense. Chris Pronger... well, he left and there was nothing we could have done about it. Igor Ulanov and Rem Murray were both, essentially, zombies by the end of the 2006 season. That team was loaded with bit players I could either take or leave individually (I don't recall being heartbroken when we swapped Danny Syvret for Ryan Potulny). None of these players were essential to our Stanley Cup hopes on their own, and very few of them have made a lot of noise after leaving Edmonton. But getting rid of as many of them as we did over a short period left us having to replace an entire slew of bottom six players who had played most of a season together, grown to know each other, and with whom the coaching staff was familiar. In some cases, we replaced the players successfully, but more often we didn't, and another nail was driven into our coffin.

Things deteriorated even further as we move on. We're still trying to replace Jarret Stoll, a tough-minutes faceoff-chewing centre with a cannon from the point and a loud voice in the dressing room, even though we sold off the guy we traded him for last trade deadline and got sixty cents on the dollar for him. We sent Jason Smith out east in exchange for a guy who did not in the least want to play in Edmonton, and we haven't exactly been bathing in shutdown defenders since then either. Georges Laraque was allowed to sign in Phoenix despite being a fan favourite and an enforcer who could actually play hockey: something Zack Stortini has only recently been able to duplicate. Ditching Dwayne Roloson and Jussi Markkanen as free agents to replace them with Nikolai Khabibulin and Jeff Deslauriers for more money is an act so astoundingly stupid it should get you sent to a psychiatric institution. And if you compiled all the effective tough minutes roleplayers this team sent up the river for nothing or next to it - Radek Dvorak, Mike Peca, Todd Harvey, and now Marc Pouliot and Fernando Pisani - you could get a pretty bloody good team together on their own.

It's not just the loss of continuity, although that's important. It's the loss of so many effective, reliable, and high value players for whom we got nothing or next-to-nothing that can help the team today. Kyle Brodziak made a whopping $1.15 million last year and was one of Minnesota's best forwards. We traded him for the pick we used to take Kyle Bigos. What chance could there possibly be in this universe that Kyle Bigos will play more NHL games than Kyle Brodziak, to say nothing of playing them as well? We'd have been better served if we set Brodziak on fire. And that move is by no means atypical.

This last season has almost completed the process of gutting the Finals team. Most of us would agree that Steve Staios and Ethan Moreau, two guys who survived into last year, had to go, and many of you would include Fernando Pisani and Marc Pouliot in that category. Again, the point is not that every move was bad. The point is that we took a team that came within one bad break of winning the Stanley Cup, tore away more than 90% of it, and replaced that 90% with almost nothing: no top prospects that we've traded for, no promising young players that we picked up in those many, many deals, just a lot of lost free agents and some nice youngsters we got because we were so terrible. We've traded players for worse players and traded those worse players for even worse ones. We've diluted the talent of that team until it can no longer be detected, and only our two oft-injured first liners, their primes passing like scenery out the window, remain.

And people wonder why we'll be in the lottery again next year.

Comment 12 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Benjamin just might be right

Despite the Bruce Springsteen and Pisani references, Ben you have made a very valid point that front office history does not mean that the team on the ice has any history (or chemistry or …). Why should we expect these kids to play like the boys on the bus. We should consider ourselves a very good expansion team and look forward to a bright future.

The Deslauriers decision will show us how costly it would have been to sign Pouliot. Hopefully Marc will be challenged to take it to another level to earn his salary, while we should be extremely happy if Deslauriers earns his.

Darcman - Tikk for HoF!!!

by darcman on Aug 9, 2010 4:45 AM MDT reply actions  

Now I think I’m going down to the well tonight
and I’m going to drink till I get my fill
And I hope when I get old I don’t sit around thinking about it
but I probably will
Yeah, just sitting back trying to recapture
a little of the glory of, well time slips away
and leaves you with nothing mister but
boring stories of glory days

by ~S~K~ on Aug 9, 2010 9:27 AM MDT reply actions  

You forgot that JF Jaques was 7 games into his record setting 0-fer 60 something run in 2005-2006 – so there are 3 parts to that fabulous team remaining.

by DJFlynn on Aug 9, 2010 10:11 AM MDT reply actions  

By god you’re right. The Copper & Blue regrets Jean-Francois Jacques still being on this team.

by Benjamin Massey on Aug 9, 2010 10:38 AM MDT up reply actions  

Eleven

Jiri Hudler played six games for the Red Wings that year, and will be returning to them this year after one year in Russia.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Aug 9, 2010 11:22 AM MDT reply actions  

Dammit!

I counted the guys up as my last part of writing this article, which I did at one this morning. When I first counted up the Red Wings I got eleven, but when I went to list them I only came up with ten. So I assumed I was just an idiot and put ten. But now that you say it I realize Hudler’s the one I missed! Dammit dammit dammit!

by Benjamin Massey on Aug 9, 2010 11:24 AM MDT up reply actions  

Also, who’s the third Hawk? I have Fraser and Khabibulin.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Aug 9, 2010 11:29 AM MDT reply actions  

Right. Gotcha.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Aug 9, 2010 3:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

Looking at the list of players from 2006, almost none of them are relevant. As soon as Pronger got on a plane to Mexico, the team was dismantled. The windows of many careers were about to close for some of the players from that roster, but we kept them anyways, hoping to overcome the loss, and they proved their true worth as their declines kicked in immediately: next to nothing. Why are you surprised that they were unable to be traded for substantial returns? You only get miracle trades so often when you’re dealing garbage. The closest we got was Brule.

The free agents that year left on their own accord, although most of them weren’t worth a paycheck. Peca was too old to go on and soon retired, and Samsonov/Spacek earned some nice contracts out of a fluke run and turned into nothing but dead cap space for the teams they managed to fool.

If most of the players who were traded (or walked away) were still here, you’d be writing an “article” about how awful and inevitably overpaid they are. And really, Georges Laraque being able to play hockey? The only person who would give you that information is Laraque himself; but he’d use it as an excuse for not fighting or “enforcing”. Ask Montreal or Phoenix or Pittsburgh about that one. Or maybe the Green Party. Todd Harvey an effective tough minutes role player? How come he never played another NHL game after the season ended? And truly the crowning gem of it all, Fernando Fucking Pisani. The only way the organization sent Fernie “up the river” is if they were the ones who gave him a debilitating disease. Absurd.

I can’t tell whether or not you were being facetious when you likened yourself to a “mad fool” before the break, but at least taking that pair of words seriously, both in conjunction as well as separately, helps put what follows into perspective.

by zys on Aug 9, 2010 11:43 AM MDT reply actions  

If not for that debilitating disease, Fernando Pisani would remain this team’s best checker. Hell, he might still be this team’s best checker even with perpetually bleeding bowels.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Aug 9, 2010 3:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

What wouldn’t I give to put Fernando’s head on JFJ’s body. But I’m afraid his own body has deserted him.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Aug 9, 2010 3:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 52 32 15 5 69
Minnesota 51 25 19 7 57
Colorado 54 26 25 3 55
Calgary 52 24 22 6 54
Edmonton 51 20 26 5 45

(updated 2.4.2012 at 4:07 PM MST)

20 - 26 - 5

Won 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (22-7, .759)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (11-6, .647)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-11, .593)
  6. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  7. Los Angeles Kings (9-9, .500)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (11-12, .478)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-14, .440)
  10. Edmonton Oilers (11-14, .440)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  12. Colorado Avalanche (8-13, .381)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (20-3, .870)
  2. New York Rangers (17-8, .680)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-8, .667)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-9, .609)
  5. Washington Capitals (12-12, .500)
  6. Toronto Maple Leafs (12-12, .500)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (10-10, .500)
  8. Ottawa Senators (10-11, .476)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (10-13, .435)
  10. Florida Panthers (7-10, .412)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. New Jersey Devils (8-12, .400)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (7-14, .333)
  14. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (8-19, .296)

Division Standings

  1. Central (50-38, .568)
  2. Northeast (46-37, .554)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (36-36, .500)
  5. Northwest (33-43, .434)
  6. Southeast (32-51, .386)

The Oilers Top 25 Under 25


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL