The Oilers' Mount Puckmore
As many of you know, Puck Daddy's Mount Puckmore series is well under way. We've already had some discussion about who the Oilers should have on their monument, which I'm confident Bruce used to fine-tune his list before going live with his choices today on Puck Daddy. After Bruce's recent series of articles on the best of the best, it's no surprise that Wayne Gretzky tops his list. The other three choices may (or may not) result in a bit more debate. So head on over to Puck Daddy to join in the craziness!
10 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
One minor thing: I thought the Oilers could protect two skaters. I know Gustafsson was denied for some dumbass reason, but then I thought they protected Brett Callighen or someone like that instead.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Nope. They protected Gustafsson over other possible choices like Dave Langevin, the Capitals appealed that the Oil had broken some minor rule or other, and by the time Ziegler ruled in favour of the existing NHL club – surprise, surprise – the other players had already been dispersed to the four winds. So the Oil just flat out lost one of their two skaters.
Fortunately, the other guy turned out to be pretty decent.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Aug 28, 2010 12:35 PM MDT up reply actions
Fuck the merger. The WHA should still be going in my books. GO NEW YORK GOLDEN BLADES!
by Benjamin Massey on Aug 28, 2010 3:28 PM MDT up reply actions
Hm, I thought in Willes’ book he said they’d named someone else as their replacement.
Whatever the case, there was really only one guy they kept who mattered. ;)
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
It says a lot about the Oilers’ history that my reaction to that post was “Well, can’t argue with that,” but that I would have had a similar reaction if Lowe and Smyth had been replaced with any two of Kurri, Coffey, Anderson, or Fuhr (despite Scott’s comment that the non-Gretzky choices could result in some debate, I can’t fathom Messier being left off).
I hope that we can all agree, however, that the comments on that post are painful to read.
(A propos nothing, I have this suspicion that a few years down the road there’ll be money to be made betting people that Ryan Smyth was never the Oilers’ captain.)
by sarcasticidealist on Aug 28, 2010 8:04 PM MDT reply actions
Agreed. It was only ever going to be 99, 11, and “pick two from a list of about ten.”
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Well, Messier did play for the Canucks, so I could probably make an argument if pressed.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Messier sabotaged the Canucks; ask any Vancouver fan.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by 































