Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys: Unknown Quantities

Tambellini Says "We have a few extra forwards right now"

Oilers' fans typically know the off-season as a time to bite your fingernails and cringe every time you hear breaking news of a free agent signing. Why? Well for the past few years Oilers' management has tended to hunt big name UFAs, willing to pay what these players are hoping to sign for and sometimes even more. The summer of Hossa is not so far removed from our memories.

So how did we know this summer would be different? Well, honestly, we didn't. Most fans were quite vocal, saying that they wanted a full rebuild, but what would the second summer of Steve bring? So far Tambellini has made a couple of good UFA signings, some trades, and most people would say, an excellent buy out. What can we expect before the start of training camp? We received some answers in an interview with Bob Stauffer on Oilers Lunch on Wednesday August 26th.

 

 

Star-divide

Steve Tambellini spoke first on Sheldon Souray: "Our intention is still [the same]; we're trying to find some way where we can make a trade, some sort of scenario that can help another hockey club and its been difficult to do."  Tambellini added, "We have some time, obviously, before camp. People are getting probably more focused on rosters and things like that as we're getting closer to camp. Hopefully prior to camp we can get something done." This was encouraging. Tambellini sounds very positive and leads me to believe that the trade Souray has requested is the only option being considered at this time. Sadly, though, it still leads to the conclusion that this will not be an easy to trade to make. There are a lot of "older" NHLers on the market right now looking for homes; several have already left for the KHL, and others are looking in that direction. What are the odds of Souray being moved in that environment?  If you're a pessimist, you likely aren't feeling too happy right now. But we're Oilers' fans! The glass is always at least half full! Right?

 

Next, Stuaffer asked about the remaining UFAs: "It's not that you don't like some players, it's that you don't have the room or the money or the roster spot." He goes on to say, "We have a few extra forwards right now." Most fans will take that statement at face value and agree. I definitely see that point of view, but it also got me wondering about Comrie and even back to the Souray trade. Will this place further limits on a potential Souray trade? If Tambellini's options are for another forward - and there could be a couple of less-than-desirable bodies coming back - would the trade idea be shut down right away? I realize that Tambellini is likely not looking to do a lot of three way deals or complicate matters too much, but I wonder if an unhappy Souray is better than adding another forward? I wouldn't think that would be the case.

My other thoughts focus on the direction this team is heading. As some people have said, we may have too many players. But that doesn't say anything about the quality of their game, or their stage of development. Tambellini went on to speak about this current group of players: "We need to take care of what the Oilers do as far as making people better and drafting and scouting." Tambellini says that he wants to see current Oilers improve, then other changes will be made accordingly. To me this means that this year in the rebuilding process will be a great opportunity to watch the magic happen, to give the players some ice time, some training, and see where the holes remain for future improvements.

As Tambellini continued to comment on the current players, Stauffer brought up leadership and how some of the previous veterans no longer remain with the club. Tambellini said, "You can teach people the type of leadership qualities and what to look for and that, but you really can't force it." The Oilers' organization is expecting more leadership from veterans like Shawn Horcoff, Ales Hemsky, Dustin Penner, Tom Gilbert and Ladislav Smid, "but we also think its time for guys like (Sam) Gagner to show up." Tambellini goes on to explain that he wants players to be "prepared to work every day, not just when its easy, not just 'when I feel right'; it's every day. That’s leadership, that’s what we’re looking for." This part speaks volumes to me. After a year like last year, I think that Tambellini and the rest of the Oilers' organization are looking to see which players have grown from the experience and are ready to move on. I'd like to think that this is another reason why Tambellini isn't looking for other players. The fractures that may have existed in the locker room need to be repaired and relationships need to be developed with new players. I think that Tambellini believes that he has enough building blocks at this point to start laying the foundation for a winning hockey club for years to come. Will we see true leaders step up this year? Will we see the professionalism that Tambellini speaks of? I hope so. If not, that doesn't leave one with much hope for the future, now does it?

Take it at face value and believe that the Oilers are in full rebuild, are not looking for new players, and that there is no panic for wins or the playoffs this year, or you can figure that there may still be a few surprises to come before training camp. Either way, it was nice to hear something from our GM as we try to figure out if we like his style of management or not. Personally, so far I can get behind Tambellini's moves and decisions, the decision not to bring in new players especially.

The attached poll idea is complements of our new columnist at The Copper & Blue, Jaysen Knight, a character you will surely grow to know and love.

Poll
"We have too many players..." should be considered management-speak for...
Stanley Cup here we come! So... who here bought Penguins' season tix? Counting myself, Tom and the boys we'll need about 30
6 votes
We have a plan. We spent a great deal of time planning our plan and we believe it to be a sound plan. Plans take both time and patience in order to bear fruit. I like peaches.
80 votes
We have Jacques, MacIntyre, and Strudwick all playing a regular shift, what could go wrong? High fives!
123 votes
We have too many players
99 votes

308 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 15 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

“We have too many forwards. For example, some idiot – and I’m not naming names here – signed every tall forward on the fuckin’ market except Derek Boogaard and we only missed out on him because he prefers New York to Edmonton for some reason.”

by Benjamin Massey on Aug 28, 2010 6:28 PM MDT reply actions  

I don’t understand the sentiment that the team has too many forwards. If we include Gagner and Cogliano, there are twelve players signed to one-way contracts. And that includes Giroux, MacIntyre, and Jacques. If the idea is developing players slowly and forcing them to win jobs, this isn’t the way to do it. Right now, two spots are pretty well guaranteed. I’d much rather the Oilers sign one or two more solid veteran forwards and force the kids to beat someone with a contract for a job. There’s no harm in sending Jacques, Giroux, and MacIntyre to the AHL if one of the younger players shows that he’s ready.

by Scott Reynolds on Aug 28, 2010 6:43 PM MDT reply actions   1 recs

Scott, the biggest problem with last year’s team was CHARACTER. And GRIT. And LEADERSHIP.

That’s why it’s so important there be room for Jacques, MaCcntyre, and Ryan O’Marra.

A posse ad esse.

The Copper & Blue|OilersNation|Hockey or Die!

Twitter: @JonathanWillis
Mail: jonathan.willis@live.ca

by Jonathan Willis on Aug 28, 2010 10:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

He’s probably counting The Big Three in that assessment, pencilling them in on opening night unless Renney very strongly feels otherwise.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Aug 29, 2010 11:39 AM MDT up reply actions  

That just seems problematic to me. If the goal is developing players slowly and making them earn a spot, which seemed to be the plan at the start of the summer, you should have someone better than Liam Reddox or Steve MacIntyre standing in the way. The money quote from Speeds’ article (linked above) is:

Do we want to make the playoffs? Absolutely, that should be your goal every year. So, our goals are to be better at developing…. And young people are going to be put into spots that maybe they will not be ready for, but maybe they will be by Christmastime. It’s going to be exciting.

I just don’t understand how these things work together. The goal is to make the playoffs and do a better job developing young players, so to facilitate that, the plan is to put young players into spots they’re not ready for. The goal is great (make the playoffs, do a better job of developing young players), but the application is terrible (putting young players into spots they’re not ready for).

by Scott Reynolds on Aug 29, 2010 4:49 PM MDT up reply actions  

Clearly, we don’t give a shit about the playoffs in 2011. It’s the only explanation.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Aug 30, 2010 7:24 AM MDT up reply actions  

Tambellini has to pay lip-service, but his actions speak much louder than his words, which has been the case all along. His inaction has been the overriding theme of his reign thus far. So when you’ve got a guy already known for doing nothing, just saying “Oh yeah, playoffs dead ahead” isn’t going to be enough.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Aug 30, 2010 7:44 AM MDT up reply actions  

Clearly :) It’s the development part that concerns me the most to be honest. Is starting the year with guys in roles they’re not ready for really a good development strategy? Once injuries hit (they always do), and they’re asked to take on even more responsibility, things could get ugly.

by Scott Reynolds on Aug 30, 2010 2:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

It’s the development part that concerns me the most to be honest. Is starting the year with guys in roles they’re not ready for really a good development strategy? Once injuries hit (they always do), and they’re asked to take on even more responsibility, things could get ugly.

It’s a ridiculous strategy. One kid might thrive in an environment like that, say Martin Hanzal. But when you’ve got 2-5 kids that can’t handle it and you’re asking them all to be like Martin Hanzal, it’s a real issue.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Aug 30, 2010 3:34 PM MDT up reply actions  

Future Captain

I know it’s really early for this type of speculation, but I have a feeling the in a couple of years Eberle will emerge as a captain. His never say die attitude is exactly what the Oilers have lacked for a long time.

by Daniel Raymond Bessette on Aug 28, 2010 8:15 PM MDT reply actions  

How is this relevant to having “too many forwards”?

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Aug 29, 2010 10:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

I also have a never say die attitude. Which is helpful because I’m getting older.

Boys. Its going to be another long year.

by Pat Mc on Aug 29, 2010 10:18 PM MDT reply actions  

Well, at least with some luck, they’ll have four legit forwards this year instead of one.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Aug 30, 2010 7:43 AM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dukeriver2_small
A Narrative Revisited: Hemsky 83

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 53 33 15 5 71
Minnesota 53 25 20 8 58
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Calgary 53 24 22 7 55
Edmonton 53 21 27 5 47

(updated 2.8.2012 at 7:10 AM MST)

21 - 27 - 5

Lost 1

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (22-7, .759)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-12, .571)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Edmonton Oilers (11-15, .423)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  12. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-3, .875)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (7-14, .333)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (51-39, .567)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (37-36, .507)
  5. Northwest (34-44, .436)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL