Khabibulin Guilty: Sentencing Pending, Speculation Immediate
Like a poorly-written novel, the Nikolai Khabibulin saga has taken forever to get going but the climax has been brief and brutal.
From the Twitter of the Arizona Republic's sports reporter Sarah McLellan in the courtroom comes the news that the Edmonton Oilers' goaltender has been found guilty of the charge of extreme driving under the influence, a charge that's likely to land Khabibulin in Tent City for a minimum of thirty days and a maximum of six months -- more than enough to shred his 2010-11 NHL season and perhaps throw his career into doubt. He also faces a range of other penalties, as DUI Attorney David Maletta told Derek in early August:
"Extreme DUIs carry a mandatory minimum of thirty days in jail, with a maximum of six months in jail, alcohol counseling, an interlock device placed on the vehicle for one year, fines, probation, and a ninety-day driver's license suspension....DUI convicts serve their sentence in Tent City at the County Jail. It's an outside jail, where men sleep in army tents."
Those new to the Khabibulin saga would be well advised to hit up Tyler Dellow's posts on the subject; he's been on top of the Khabibulin charge since day one. But what matters is that Khabibulin's defense, long speculated upon, was that a retest of his blood sample, taken months after his original arrest, showed that Khabibulin had only a blood alcohol level of .158 with a 10% margin of error. In short, taking the most generous possible view of the lawyer's word regarding Khabibulin's privately commissioned test would put him just under the .150 minimum for extreme DUI and certainly leave Khabibulin guilty of some sort of drunk driving offence. To quote our own Derek Zona, "My client was hammered, but he wasn't fall-down drunk, he was tip-over drunk."
The quick judgment in Khabibulin's case came as a surprise to me and others given that Khabibulin was arrested way the hell back on February 8th, and that his trial had originally been scheduled to begin July 7th. It had been delayed to hell and gone all through the spring and summer, so to see such a quick decision - it came within three hours of the trial's beginning - is enough to give one unversed in courtroom procedure vertigo.
It was probably easier that Khabibulin's only defense was on just how drunk he was. Khabibulin was tested at a .164 by the state with a 5% margin of error, and that margin of error falls on a bell curve so it was more likely to be a .163 than a .155. Again, the boundary for extreme DUI in Arizona is .150, which is a long way from the State of Arizona's estimation of Khabibulin's intoxication and still awfully far from Khabibulin's own lawyer's estimation. Given that four and a half months passed between the two tests and some of the alcohol in Khabibulin's blood may have degraded while it was in storage, that doesn't so much raise a reasonable doubt regarding Khabibulin's guilt as it raises a reasonable doubt about how much that lawyer could possibly have been worth.
McLellan noted that Khabibulin's team argued that the field sobriety tests should be ignored because of his back injury, a tactic they previously tried in an attempt to get the tests declared inadmissible in June. Though McLellan doesn't specifically mention the judge's reaction, it's clear that the tactic failed yet again.
The story isn't over quite yet. Khabibulin still has to be sentenced: the tentative sentencing date is August 31st, pending approval from the prosecution. Both sides will have an opportunity to present additional arguments, and it's a foregone conclusion that the defense will ask for 10 days in prison and the other 20 days suspended as part of an agreement in which Khabibulin will undergo psychological evaluation and agree to an alcohol treatment program. The prosecution will likely press for 30 days, and possibly more based on the extreme speed involved in the incident.
NHL teams could be well into training camp by the time Khabibulin even knows how long he'll be in prison for. Then there's serving the actual time. The point is that, as any Dellow reader could tell you, the Oilers have reasonable grounds to void Khabibulin's contract based on breaking the performance clause in the standard player agreement. As anyone with any common sense could tell you, they have a very good reason to do the same: it's safe to say that a goaltender with serious back problems and a criminal record in the United States who's spent up to half a year as a guest of the United States government isn't going to be worth almost $4 million a year for three more seasons. And as anyone who's watched the Oilers for the past four seasons could tell you, Khabibulin will probably be a part of this team for years to come.
Even if Khabibulin were to avoid jail time during the season, which is highly unlikely, there remains yet another major issue outstanding -- the fact that Khabibulin has yet to be declared officially healthy. Khabibulin ended the season on long-term injured reserve and it now becomes in his best interest to stay on LTIR. He can't face punishment for non-performance, nor can he be suspended for the conviction while on injured reserve.
Check into this space over the course of the evening as the rest of the Copper & Blue crew sticks their heads in and gives us their opinions on the whole Khabibulin mess.
A tip of the hat to Sarah McLellan who did an amazing job reporting from the courtroom and taking questions on twitter.
28 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Morals clause
Ben, in the post by Mr. Dellow that you link to, he said that the morals clause won’t play that big of role if Khabibulin misses games due to jail time, and thus breaches his contract. He went so far to say that the morals clause was a “dead end”. Perhaps you should focus less on the morals clause?
I wrote this post really, really quickly while sitting by a lake. The error was mine (I was thinking about the mirals clause in general and it spilled over a bit) and I regret it.
You have a sharp eye, Roke. Should do sone writing of your own. Maybe about soccer.
by Benjamin Massey on Aug 27, 2010 5:50 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
If this thing could be decided in an afternoon, why did we have top wait until the cusp of the season to get a verdict? And why another delay before sentencing? Won’t it be the same judge?
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Aug 27, 2010 6:14 PM MDT up reply actions
Sentencing is separate hearing, and from what I understand, both sides will be able to present additional arguments.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Because NHL goalies have no special privileges and are treated like anyone else in the courts.
by book!e on Aug 27, 2010 6:38 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions
That’s just it. The most logical gambit for Khabibulin, from my perspective, is to take the sentence now, tell the Oilers his back is still fucked (reasonable based on what we know), and get it looked at again after he’s released. He’s on LTIR, so he can’t be canned for not showing up, and he gets his sentence out of the way so it’s not a distraction.
The best thing for the Oilers would be for him to be perfectly healthy and in jail come October 7.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Yes, I think he could opt to start his sentence now in anticipation of jail time.
I also think he should start showing remorse (big time) or he may not receive much of a welcome back in Edmonton. I understand that while a court case was underway, he was somewhat muzzled, but with the whole ‘constitutional rights being violated’ thing and the silence, he has come across pretty bad in all of this.
BETTER BE GONE!!!
If he is ever in an Oilers jersey again I for one will be disappointed not just because I think the contract was bad but because there is no excuse for what he did. I would expect if he is ever on the Ice that MADD and SADD will be picketing Rexall and justifiably so. The only way Habbi can redeem himself is some serious community service not just in Arizona and a lot of apologizing to all Oiler fans. A lot of time in schools expounding on the stupidity of what he did would be good. He will have to go the extra mile to convince me that the Oilers not voiding the contract was at minimum OK. I would void the contract.
by Sheldon Oilers Fan for Life on Aug 27, 2010 6:22 PM MDT reply actions
Craig MacTavish had a pretty productive career as an Oilers player and coach after spending a year in prison for a DUI vehicular manslaughter charge in 1984-85. I agree with you on having him talk to schools about drunk driving and responsible alcohol consumption (I believe that’s something MacT did during his time in Edmonton, no?), but based on League and Club precedents, there’s no reason he can’t come back, at least on that basis.
Again, whether they want him back is a separate kettle of fish.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
They could get the same effect (BEEG STRONG CUP-WINNING EURO GOALIE) by voiding the Khabibulin contract and signing Niemi to a not-bargain-basement deal for two years – something less than his arbitration number and more than the Turco deal.
Or they could grab Theodore on a Turco-like contract.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
I would almost be inclined to do both, get rid of one of the kids, and have a solid vet duo in the NHL and Gerber mentoring, say, DD in the AHL. But I’d take either one as reKhab insurance/replacement regardless.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Voiding the K
Just to play devil’s advocate, do the benefits of ridding ourselves of the horrible Khabibulin K outweigh any possible chilling effect such a move would have on potential UFA deals? Let’s say, for the sake of argument, that some players may have second thoughts about joining a team that would seek to void a K only a quarter of the way through the deal.
by hellofasandwich on Aug 27, 2010 7:40 PM MDT reply actions
Just to play devil’s advocate, do the benefits of ridding ourselves of the horrible Khabibulin K outweigh any possible chilling effect such a move would have on potential UFA deals?
I think that question will be answered as we approach October. If he’s incarcerated, I’d say it’d be less likely to have a negative effect.
Lead Writer for Oil On Whyte - An Edmonton Oilers Blog
Do most of the UFAs that want to come to Edmonton expect that they will be incarcerated?
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Do most of the UFAs that want to come to Edmonton
Stop right there.
Lead Writer for Oil On Whyte - An Edmonton Oilers Blog
That’s a helluva incentives clause.
Camp Tortorella - Where Vomit is a Mainstay
Blueshirt Banter - "ARISTH"-Assuming Redden is sent to Hartford
Twitter: RangerSmurf
by George E. Ays on Aug 27, 2010 9:05 PM MDT up reply actions
DUI Arrest
WOW! Some lawyer!! Is there really a difference between driving while falling over drunk and tipping over drunk??? If you’re in his path you’re dead either way! Jackass!!
Uh, I think it was a joke. No laughing matter, I suppose, but we Oilers fans have been surviving on water, dry bread, and gallows humour for years now.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Aug 28, 2010 9:39 AM MDT up reply actions
On the other hand, that was more-or-less the actual defense.
by Benjamin Massey on Aug 28, 2010 9:47 AM MDT up reply actions
I knew it was a mistake when Khabi hired the firm of Strudney & Chorwick to handle his defence.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Aug 28, 2010 9:58 AM MDT up reply actions 1 recs
Pretty much how the trial played out, too: four minutes hours of playing well out of your depth, then collapsing exhausted at the bench.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
The difference, it seems, is creating doubt that the DUI was extreme. It makes a big difference in sentencing.
by Scott Reynolds on Aug 28, 2010 1:24 PM MDT up reply actions
Defence counsel's strategy...
It seems to me abundantly clear that Khabibulin’s lawyer was focused entirely on getting an acquittal on the extreme DUI with his BAC expert. He was trying to mitigate damage by avoiding a mandatory jail sentence.
The idea is basically to create a “reasonable doubt” as to the accused’s BAC by showing that the lower limit of the expert’s range falls below the legal limit.
In my opinion the (failed) constitutional challenge was Khabibulin’s best chance at a full acquittal. If a factually identical trial and constitutional challenge were held in Alberta I think Khabibulin would probably be a free man right now.
If the Oilers terminate Khabby’s contract justified or not, could turn into a disaster for the Oilers in years to come. But at the same time that Khabby should be suspended by the NHL, because this looks bad for hockey as a whole. If he is allowed to play with no consequences, only encourages poor behavior off the ice. The NFL doesn’t have a problem with suspending players, who get themselves into trouble with the authorities. And now is the time when the NHL needs to set a precedent, that it won’t tolerate poor behavior from it’s ambassadors.
Check out oilfieldhockey.com
Well, the Mark Bell suspension already “set” the precedent for this. I don’t recall another DUI conviction resulting in jail time since then, so we’ll see if the league punishes Khabibulin in the same way (15 games). Bell’s incident also involved a hit-and-run, so it’s not really the same thing, but I could see the NHL treating Khabibulin’s conviction in similar fashion.
by Scott Reynolds on Aug 29, 2010 12:08 AM MDT up reply actions

by 
































