Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Despite Relocation Drama, Coyotes Overcome Adversity

The Shackles of the Press

Are you a fan of relentless self-indulgence? Then this has been the week for you, because the new media has been talking about itself again. The Toronto Sun translation liberation from our blogging brothers from different mothers at Pension Plan Puppets. Greg Wyshynski at Puck Daddy writing articles on how paranoid some NHL teams are about letting filthy bloggers near their high-priced athletes, and how the NHL is reacting by suggesting teams relegate bloggers to segregated parts of the building and give them distinct identification to keep them from mingling with the purebloods upstairs.

I realize I'm being a bit flip about this, but honestly, these shenanigans don't deserve to be treated seriously. The ancient, esteemed, and sacrosanct profession of sports journalism deserves none of those adjectives, least of all "journalism". Besides, I'm not really bothered by whether I'm considered a worthy member of the press corps or a pimply-faced part-time buffoon in an ill-fitting shirt. I say this as a guy who not too long ago had a chance to wave NHL press credentials around like I was compensating for something: I think that having access to professional athletes can be important and interesting, but as a member of the brotherhood of bloggers I can genuinely do without it. In fact, in some important ways I'd prefer it.

Going to the NHL draft as a credentialed member of the press was a lot of fun. I met some people I'd previously only heard about, and to borrow a metaphor, saw how sausage is made. I got to lord around and feel superior, which is one of my favourite things in the world, and if given the opportunity, I'd do it again. But that's because it was entertaining, not insightful. I'm not convinced it made my writing any better doing it from the media riser than from the stands, nor do I think I'm a case that far out of the ordinary. Press access might provide a few interesting tidbits and pieces of fluff around the edges, but if the teams deny it to us bloggers I don't think it'll make a difference.

Star-divide

Don't confuse the retrograde attitude of some NHL teams with the attitude of the NHL itself. When the SB Nation guys, including myself, went to the draft back in June, it was a class act. We got real press passes that gave us access to the actual press riser, not merely a special Bloggers' Section in the trough of the men's bathroom. There was a shortage of seats, but that was true for everyone, not merely us basement-dwellers, and a professional time was had by all. The only piece of plagiarism I remember was when I stole Pierre LeBrun's information about the Dan Hamhuis trade. I actually sat behind the aforementioned Greg Wyshynski on the second day and at no point did he crowd Taylor Hall into a corner and insist on personalized autographs for his entire extended family. Blueshirt Banter's Jim Schmiedeberg, in spite of his alleged line-crossing and unprofessionalism, didn't once try to hop the fence and throttle Glen Sather. Or if he did, I was grabbing stale pretzels at the time and missed it.

And what did I get out of it that I wouldn't have got by sitting in the stands? A power outlet for my laptop, I guess. I asked Stu MacGregor a question and he looked at me like I was so stupid he wasn't sure how I forced my way into the building. Derek had a question about John Davidson's actions at one point and I was able to go ask John Davidson what the answer was, which would stand out a lot more for me if I could remember what the question was. But the bulk of what I did in our two draft-day threads - the sarcasm, the observations, the news, the additional sarcasm - I could have done just as effectively from the stands. Perhaps better, since I was so far away from the Oilers' table I could neither see nor photograph a damned thing. Would our draft coverage have been that much worse if I hadn't given you Steve Tambellini's inconclusive quote about Andrew Cogliano?

I don't want to oversell the point here. Getting a press pass and going to the draft was a lot of fun and I'd do it again. I certainly enjoyed seeing the cogs and wheels of the professional media instead of the slick facade we usually enjoy. But that shouldn't matter to you, the reader, and I don't think it does.

Was there anyone who would have completely ignored our coverage of the draft had I not been wearing a rather tasteful press pass? To turn it another way, when one of us comes up with some brilliant piece of work about the Oilers, how many people out there say, "Well, I would read Copper & Blue, but they don't even talk to the players so their opinions are invalid." How many people who don't work for the Edmonton Sun, I mean? I'd be willing to argue that sports blogs have become popular because of that lack of access: once upon a time somebody wanted to write about his favourite sports team, but couldn't get access to the club or its players. So he made a virtue out of necessity and concentrated on analysis, intellect, and wit rather than "Do you think you'll have to give it 110% to beat the defending world champions tonight?"

To the extent that press credentials have value, it is only in the perception that there's value. It's an implied endorsement: "Okay, you guys look solid, we'll let you near the athletes, but no eye contact". The problem with an implied endorsement is that you don't always want the organization's endorsement. Particularly not when it comes with strings attached: it's important to not only be fair but to maintain the appearance of fairness. I run a little soccer blog about my local team and haven't even applied to the front office for some sort of credential. Yeah, it would be neat, but I'd miss standing in the self stands with my fellow leather-lungs hurling imprecations at the opposing goalkeeper. I don't want to be seen as in the pocket of the organization, and I'm not sure what I'd get out of it besides a free seat and a roof over my head in the press box (admittedly a powerful motivation some nights).

Most importantly, the more we start aping the mainstream media the greater the risk we run of becoming just like them. Sure, I'd happily hit the big time and become a professional journalist; I'm not proud. But not at the cost of losing whatever it was that got me to that point.

Comment 11 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Good post.

if given the opportunity I’d do it again. But that’s because it was entertaining, not insightful.

Bingo. When I went to Montreal all I really got was some funny anecdotes about the MSM that I was too lazy to relay in a post but I whip out once in a while when I’ve downed a few in a pub. Otherwise, it was just funny to watch the media go about their job and notice who did and didn’t go about it.

But, when it came time to ask questions, it turns out that it’s a. much harder than it seems and b. you can’t really ask what you’re thinking anyway.

Pension Plan Puppets: A Toronto Maple Leafs blog and a group therapy session.
Like reading thoughts confined to 140 characters? I'm on Twitter too.

by PPP on Aug 27, 2010 12:55 PM MDT reply actions  

But, when it came time to ask questions, it turns out that it’s a. much harder than it seems and b. you can’t really ask what you’re thinking anyway.

Oh god, is that ever true.

by Benjamin Massey on Aug 27, 2010 12:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

To turn it another way, when one of us come up with some brilliant piece of work about the Oilers, how many people out there say “well, I would read Copper & Blue, but they don’t even talk to the players so their opinions are invalid.”

Probably not.

But, I can’t see how having the opportunity wouldn’t potentially increase the quality of the overall product.

Lead Writer for Oil On Whyte - An Edmonton Oilers Blog

by chappy35 on Aug 27, 2010 2:07 PM MDT reply actions  

You don’t think that access can be used as a crutch as often as it can be used as a tool?

Journalists aren’t stupid and they’re not lazy. It’s hard to get into journalism as a stupid, lazy person. But they have this great access they have that nobody else does, and they can write the stories and not think about them too hard and people will read it because it’s something they don’t normally have access to even if it doesn’t add to their lives.

by Benjamin Massey on Aug 27, 2010 2:08 PM MDT up reply actions  

I’m sure it can be used as a crutch. Whether or not it enhances a story is also a case by case basis.

I think if I have an opinion about a certain topic, and I can get some information or input from the horses’s mouth, I can’t say as it would be a bad thing.

Lead Writer for Oil On Whyte - An Edmonton Oilers Blog

by chappy35 on Aug 27, 2010 3:22 PM MDT up reply actions  

But what happens when blogs get access? Do they immediately fall into the stupid and lazy column writing, or do they seize the chance to improve their game? I believe I do a fairly good job of writing about the Wild without access, just as you feel you do for the Oilers. However, I believe that, given access, I could improve my product exponentially.

You only provide yet another reason why bloggers need access. If I have access, it pushes the writers here in Minnesota to improve their product. If I have access, I enter into a equal competitive standing, and I can now compete. Otherwise, I am left with the table scraps that someone else feeds me, and I am not OK with that. I don’t understand why anyone would be.

Hockey Wilderness
Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota

Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.

by BReynolds on Aug 27, 2010 3:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

However, I believe that, given access, I could improve my product exponentially.

I agree with this. Granted it may not work for everyone, but I can’t see how access would alone ruin the gig.

Lead Writer for Oil On Whyte - An Edmonton Oilers Blog

by chappy35 on Aug 27, 2010 3:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

The more distance, the more objectivity to the situation. If you realized how hilarious Struds was is in person and became acquaintances, could we really trust that the reverse three wasn’t tainted by it?

That said, the level of protection is a bit ridiculous. Interviews shouldn’t be so hard to come by. There are many interviewers that can be openly critical of a person or idea, and still do a damn respectful interview. The players don’t need to live in a glass bubble.. knowing there are some smart fans out there might be refreshing as opposed to either the hero/scapegoat tag.

by till_horcoff_is_coach on Aug 27, 2010 3:19 PM MDT reply actions  

If you realized how hilarious Struds was is in person and became acquaintances, could we really trust that the reverse three wasn’t tainted by it?

I don’t know personally anyone who has had a one-on-one with Ethan Moreau, yet I believe that we had a near unanimous opinion of him.

Lead Writer for Oil On Whyte - An Edmonton Oilers Blog

by chappy35 on Aug 27, 2010 3:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

Look at how many times Fernando Pisani was a Reverse Three Star last year.

by Benjamin Massey on Aug 27, 2010 3:44 PM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

Ben, I think I see where you’re going here. Maybe I’m all wet. But, having viewed several talented writers in this sector of the internet, I can think of at least a handful that could benefit from not being looked at as a scab in the writing world.

Lead Writer for Oil On Whyte - An Edmonton Oilers Blog

by chappy35 on Aug 27, 2010 4:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence
Small
Is Ryan Murray more NHL-ready than we think?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL