Colorado Avalanche Free Agency Review
The guys running this show are cheap, cheap, cheap.
Long version after the jump.
Individual Transactions
Signed G Jason Bacashihua to a two-way contract for one year at $500,000 per year - Bacashihua is a veteran goalie who's bounced around the minor leagues quite a bit. He has a back-up for the St. Louis Blues in 2005-06 and 2006-07 but has since fallen out of the league and hasn't been able to put up elite numbers in the AHL. Last season he played twenty-two games with the Hershey Bears and posted a .911 save percentage, his best performance since 2003-04. Assuming Bacashihua is the leading candidate for the starting position in Lake Erie, this deal doesn't strike me as being all that good. To put it bluntly, if I had to choose between this guy and Jeff Deslauriers, I'd take Deslauriers.
Traded a fourth round pick in 2012 to the Phoenix Coyotes for F Daniel Winnik and signed F Daniel Winnik to a one-way contract for two years at $950,000 per year - It's hard to know how one ought to value penalty killing skill but it seems like that's one of Winnik's primary contributions. He led Coyotes' forwards in ice time last season and was a part of the PK unit each of the last three. Assuming Winnik was looking for similar money from the Coytoes as he was from the Avalanche, the Coyotes must not think much of his penalty killing. Penalty killing aside, Winnik is a pretty typical big-bodied fourth liner. One point in his favour against some others of his ilk is his ability to draw significantly more penalties than he takes. He's also only twenty-five, so at least in theory, he may eventually be able to step into a slightly bigger role like third minutes at even strength. A good trade and signing by the Avalanche.
Signed D Kyle Quincey to a one-way contract for two years at $3,125,000 per year - I thought that the Grebeshkov contract was aiming high for Quincey but it turns out that's exactly what he got give or take $25,000. Quincey was an important contributor for the Avalanche a year ago, playing on the top defensive pairing with Scott Hannan and having a lot more success than I would have expected from someone with Quincey's pedigree. The wildly positive goal differential results are due largely to some very favourable percentages, but even if he had had league average percentages, he would have ended the year with an even strength goal differential of -8, which is pretty darn good considering the circumstances he faced. His numbers on the power play were much less than what the Avalanche had hoped for, considering how well he'd performed the year before with the Kings, but I have to think that Quincy exceeded expectations overall. The money seems a bit high for a restricted free agent (it's the number I would have expected had they locked him up for five or six years), but at least Quincey isn't unrestricted when the current pact runs out.
Signed D David Liffiton to a two-way contract for one year at $500,000 per year - Liffiton is a physical defender with a bunch of professional experience at the AHL level. Last season, Liffiton scored twenty points, the highest total of his career - he's not being hired for his abilities with the puck. Liffiton's signing makes the competition for ice time in Lake Erie that much more interesting. The Avalanche have plenty of good defense prospects, but it doesn't hurt to make them earn their ice.
Signed F Julian Talbot to a two-way contract for one year at $550,000 per year - Julian Talbot is the player the Avalanche got in exchange for T.J. Hensick. As I said in my last Avalanche article, he's nowhere near as good as Hensick and has actually regressed with each passing year. In 2007-08 Talbot had a very promising season at twenty-two, scoring fifty points and posting a +13. 2008-09 saw those numbers fall to forty-three points and +7 and 2009-10 saw them fall further to thirty-two points and -7. I assume the Avalanche traded for this player because they wanted him, but there's not much there to like.
Signed F Greg Mauldin to a two-way contract for one year at $500,000 per year - Mauldin is an AHL veteran who can score a bit and has been near the top of his team in plus/minus as well. He's averaged 0.6 points per game in the AHL over the last three seasons, but at twenty-eight years old, he's certainly not a prospect. As you'll see, the Avalanche have signed a bunch of guys like this so far in the off-season. If I were to guess at the reason, I'd say it's likely because their most important AHL prospects are defenders and they likely want to make sure their young defenders are getting responsible support from an experienced group of pro forwards. If that's the plan, this signing makes good sense.
Signed G John Grahame to a two-way contract for one year at $500,000 per year - With Craig Anderson and Peter Budaj firmly entrenched on the NHL team, and Jason Bacashihua likely to start in the AHL, Grahame's signing is surprising, even if the idea is for he and Bacashihua to work as a tandem. I would have thought that the club would go with someone younger than the thirty-five year-old Grahame since two older goalies doesn't make a whole lot of sense from a development perspective. I also would have thought that the club would go with someone a bit better (Grahame's career save percentage in both the AHL and NHL is .898). Strange decision here.
Signed F Ben Walter to a two-way contract for one year at $500,000 per year - Ben Walter is a solid AHL player who's had a cup of coffee in the NHL each of the last five seasons and I expect he'll be getting the same treatment again this season. He had twenty goals and fifty points in each of the last four AHL seasons, so he's a scorer at that level, even if he hasn't been able to translate that success to the NHL. A good depth pick-up that should help in Lake Erie.
Signed F Brandon Yip to a one-way contract for two years at $725,000 per year - A special congratulations to Yip and his agent for getting a two-year deal. In that I don't think Brandon Yip is a very good NHL player, this strikes me as a great deal for him. I've talked a lot about percentages evening out for the Avalanche as a team and Yip is basically the poster boy for that on the player level. He had one the highest PDO number on the team at 104.8 (94.2 Sv% and 10.6% Sh%) which isn't the kind of thing that players can often repeat. On the personal level, he scored on 16.9% of his shots last season, compared to 14.3% for his four-year college career which means that number is probably also going to come down in the future. Yip was destroyed in terms of Corsi even if we just compare him to his teammates. I thought that a good barometer for whether or not the Avalanche were going to be good next season was whether or not Yip was on the team. It looks like he will be. G
Signed F David Van Der Gulik to a two-way contract for one year at $500,000 per year - The last of the AHL veteran brigade, Van Der Gulik is a very good AHL player who brings more than just offense to the table. Although he's only scored 161 points in 297 career AHL games, he's been either first or second among forwards on his team in plus/minus in each of his four AHL seasons. His biggest obstacle in finding a home in the NHL is likely his size since most teams are unwilling to carry a 5'10'' forward with little offense on their bottom two lines, no matter how hard the player is on the puck. At any rate, Van Der Gulik is likely better than a few of the guys who played for the Avalanche a year ago. He'll certainly help Lake Erie if that's where he ends up but should have a shot to stick with the big club if he performs well. A good deal for all involved.
The Big Picture
The cap has been announced at $59.4M, but I like to use $59M is a guidline because most teams will start the year with at least a small amount of wiggle room. For the Avalanche, the budget is probably a lot smaller, as in, closer to the floor of $43.4M. Here's the chart I've used before, but this time I've included the numbers for a cap spending team ($59M) and for a floor spending team ($43.4M):
Top 3 Forwards - 27.5% or $16,225,000 (C) / $11,935,000 (F)
Middle 6 Forwards - 20.0% or $11,800,000 / $8,680,000 (F)
Top 4 Defenders - 27.5% or $16,225,000 / $11,935,000 (F)
Goaltending - 10.0% or $5,900,000 / $4,340,000 (F)
Bottom 8 Players - 15.0% or $8,850,000 / $6,510,000 (F)
And here it is again with the players the Avalanche have signed with the percentages reflecting the Avalanche spending to a $43.4M budget:
Top 3 Forwards - Stastny, Duchene, ??? - 22.6% or $9,800,000
Middle 6 Forwards - Hejduk, O'Reilly, Galiardi, Yip, Jones, ??? - 14.6% or $6,337,500
Top 4 Defenders - Hannan, Liles, Quincey, Foote - 30.1% or $13,075,000
Goaltending - Anderson, Budaj - 7.1% or $3,062,500
Bottom 8 Players - (Preissing), Cumiskey, Wilson, McLeod, Winnik, Porter, Koci, ???, ??? - 12.2% or $5,286,667
If the plan is to spend to the cap floor, as I suspect it is, the Avalanche are right on track, although I suspect the actual player budget is around $45M. The percentages above are cap hits, but all of those players combined are set to earn $35,144,167 in actual cash before bonuses. If Matt Duchene, Adam Foote and T.J. Galliardi hit all of their bonuses that salary figure rises an extra $2,787,500 to $37,931,667. Since they (well Duchene, anyway) won't hit all of those bonuses, that leaves another $8M or so to sign Chris Stewart, Peter Mueller plus another forward and a defenseman. Given the weakness of the roster they should probably be something more than a fourth line forward and a bottom pairing defender, but I suspect they'll be exactly that. Estimates in the range of $3.5M for Stewart, $2.5M for Mueller and $1M for each of the other slots seem about right. And that's it, they're done and headed into next season with a team that will likely get its head blown off.
In my opinion, this is a very bad way to use the cheap years of their good players. It may work out that the Avalanche build a good team in the end, but it seems to me this next year of sucking would have been avoidable had the Avalanche been willing to spend. That Greg Sherman is building a floor team and still saying that "the Avalanche organization is about winning, so certainly our expectations are that," is ridiculous. This team isn't very good. They likely won't win, and since Sherman isn't a stupid, I'm sure he knows that. Framing the issue as "building from within" to avoid losing your players later is also pretty goofy. Are there really no free agents willing to sign one or two year deals? Obviously, the answer is "no." There's still plenty of time in free agency, and maybe the Avalanche will prove me wrong and sign a couple of useful free agents that take them closer to the cap. But I doubt it. After all, it's plain to see that they're playing on a budget "building from within."
0 recs |
42 comments
|
Comments
The Quincey deal was outstanding for the Avs. He’s a difference maker and was about the only Avs (besides Hannan) to prove that against the Sharks. The entire team was out of place in that series except for that pairing.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
My only issue with the Quincey deal is that it seems like a lot for a player who’s not giving up any UFA years. Going long-term at that number would have been great ,but for two RFA years it’s really not that special.
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 12, 2010 5:33 PM PDT up reply actions
Colorado should be a team that is circling teams like the Hawks, Flyers and Sharks waiting for them to relieve their cap stress. They have all kinds of cap space and can use a useful player or two.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
I suppose it’s possible that they’re just waiting for the right opportunity, but I think that the verbiage of the off-season so far, the Wolski trade, the unnecessary buy-out of Tom Preissing and the inaction in free agency suggest that they’re mostly trying to save money and wouldn’t be interested in saving a team from cap stress unless it was cost effective (which is hard to do).
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 12, 2010 5:29 PM PDT up reply actions
you can go back even farther than that. Last summer they added just two free agents – David Koci and Craig Anderson. Obviously, one of those worked out really well…but neither of those deals were bank breakers. Last summer is also where we say the botched Patrick Roy courtship, a deal that ultimately broke down over (drumroll please) money.
The Avs new motto is “It’s All About the A”. I’ve suggested that be changed to It’s All About the $.
Assistant *to* the Managing Editor, Mile High Hockey
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Jul 13, 2010 5:03 AM PDT up reply actions
I should be clear and say that it’s perfectly reasonable for them to act this way. I wouldn’t lambaste, for instance, Nashville for competing on a budget. The weird thing is that they won’t just come out and say it. From a business perspective, I find it odd that they’re talking about winning being the standard because it’s probably going to get fans expecting playoffs when a more realistic expectation, if they don’t make any significant additions, is the lottery. It seems like that might alienate some people.
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 13, 2010 10:30 AM PDT up reply actions
that’s exactly my position. if you are being cheap, say so. don’t dress it up as some silly rebuilding BS.
Assistant *to* the Managing Editor, Mile High Hockey
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Jul 13, 2010 11:07 AM PDT up reply actions
Van Der Gulik was a good minor league player for the Flames. He had a cup of coffee with the big club a yea or two back and put up better than average results, albeit in a limited sample. He probably could have made the team out of camp last September, except Sutter needed to sign Brian McGrattan for whatever reason. Word is he’s also a capable penalty killer.
I’m so very disappointed.
Here I was, hoping that objective, cogent analysis on the part of an independent observer would reveal the clever, yet unorthodox manner in which Kroenke Sports Entertainment was constructing a juggernaut unbeknownst to the rest of the league.
It is, however, what it appears to be – namely the actions of a franchise abandoned by its capricious billionaire owner as last year’s toy. He’d so much rather play with his new football toys (both NFL and EPL) and leave his ONLY championship property to wither under the baleful eye of its bean-counter headsman of a “GM”.
Hmmm, I wonder why they aren’t selling out the Pepsi Center any more? Perhaps its due to the fact that Maple Leafs / Canadiens ticket pricing doesn’t march in lockstep with the utter lack of marketing brought to bear by a team that is the 4th most popular “major” sport in its market? Make no mistake, this franchise, could and will sell out its arena and make money hand over fist for its owner – if it can find one that gives a crap about the team and/or its fans.
Stan Kroenke, thy name is Bill Wirtz!
/thanks for a more cogent and intelligent analysis of the Avalanche strategy (or absence thereof) than anything offered by anyone in Colorado outside the blogosphere. P.S. Can we have Tom Gilbert back? Please?
Colorado Avalanche Offseason Strategy - Please wake us in October
I’m with Hopfen above.
We, as Avs fans, are trying awful hard to convince ourselves that this strategy is going to work. Some of us are hoping that there is secretly an offer for Kovy on the table somewhere, and the team is waiting to see what happens with that. Some of us speculated on helping Chicago relieve its ever-increasing cap issue, only to have the Thrashers swallow most of it for some reason. Others are comparing big, crease-clearing defensemen, hoping that one of them will be signed a little down the road. Just a couple of pieces added could make this whole ‘rebuilding’ thing a whole lot easier to swallow.
But it looks like we are going to hug the cap floor, maybe even hoping for a higher draft pick [like we were supposed to get in ‘9-10, but that plan was messed up by a couple 18 year olds and Craig Anderson]. It just doesnt seem like a good idea to us on any level, but it turns out that the team isn’t listening to us. The nerve!
Thanks Joe...
I’m not going to say that the “strategy” won’t work in the long run. They will avoid making any big mistakes in free agency by going this route and they are likely to get a high draft pick, though as the Avs showed last year, you can’t really be sure. It’s just that there’s no really good reason to wait. The Avalanche have some very good young players now and several of them on cheap contracts. There’s every reason to believe that if they were willing to spend now, they could actually be quite good. We’ll see if the strategy is to spend in the future when these players are ready to be paid big money. I know there were other issues surrounding Wolski, but he was a very good player and only 23 who was traded for a cheaper, younger option once his performance suggested he should get some cash. Once that cycle starts, it sometimes doesn’t end as soon as fans would like.
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 12, 2010 9:19 PM PDT up reply actions
sigh
Intelligent opinion does not follow the transitive property
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Jul 12, 2010 10:10 PM PDT up reply actions
You still miss Wolski, eh?
Sandie
"We called him Clark Kent because away from the rink, he was just a nerd. Then he'd go into the Colorado dressing room and put on his Avs jersey, and all of a sudden he was Super Joe"- Theo Fleury
a little
but I think Mueller will be an adequate replacement.
Intelligent opinion does not follow the transitive property
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Jul 13, 2010 9:50 AM PDT up reply actions
I’m not really suggesting that it ’won’t’ work either, but its a treacherous road to follow. Buttressing a FA or two to fill some holes would be awful nice to shore the situation up.
Thanks Joe...
Welcome to our nightmare.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
I was reading an Avs blog, maybe the one on Sbnation, The blogger kept insisting, during the regular season, that the fans shouldnt look too much into the success and not hope for a money spending FA for the avalanche. He also suggested that the re-building wasnt completed and Avs will continue to do so. I think either he was some guru at understanding the management, or some seer.
I think the management realizes that the last season was a fluke and many rookies contributed a lot to the success and not to mention the role the goalie played, ala Oilers -07-08. So instead of spending right away after the season, I think the management wasnts to wait out another season to see which rookies continue their strong play next season and then they will be poised to address all the holes next off-season. Who knows that the last season wasnt a one-off performance for Anderson. It was the first year he was thrusted in the starter role. He may pull a Garon and suck in the season where there is a lot of responsibility on his shoulder.
So I am not really unhappy from the avs perspective that they havent jumped the gun on signing the FA. I think staying to the floor this season is a good idea for them.
What advantage is there to staying close to the floor though? They’re already through one year of Duchene and O’Reilly and after this season, they’ll be through two. It will be harder to supplement good young players once those players are actually getting paid. There’s no reason not to give out a couple of two year deals and try to push forward and win some games while you have a plethora of cheap contracts. As for Anderson, I strongly believe he’ll be fine. Garon’s fall from grace was somewhat predictable. His PK save percentage in 2007-08 was one of the best in the league (.908) but his EV save percentage was actually slightly below average (.916). He was an average goalie who had a lucky season. Anderson’s track record suggests to me that he’s actually good (and is another guy on a cheap deal next year who will likely get paid after that).
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 13, 2010 10:37 AM PDT up reply actions
Imagine
If the Avs went after Kovalchuk & a guy like Martin, Vishnovsky or even Mihalek. That would make the Avs a pretty decent team…
Instead….
Intelligent opinion does not follow the transitive property
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Jul 12, 2010 10:12 PM PDT reply actions
Kovalchuk is the opposite of what the Avs need.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
I think Kovalchuk makes them a better club, but I agree that Colorado isn’t exactly well-positioned to use Kovalchuk well. They need guys who can move the puck the right way. If only one of their young players was really good at that, I’m sure they wouldn’t think of trading him…
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 12, 2010 10:49 PM PDT up reply actions
The Avs need someone who can finish and put pucks in the net on the powerplay. Kovi fits that need perfectly.
but I think I’ve moved past that. Semin will be available next season (and he’s probably a better fit for the avs than Kovi, in all honesty), I’m already getting excited at the Avs having the best chance to sign him and sit on their thumbs instead
Intelligent opinion does not follow the transitive property
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
by Jibblescribbits on Jul 13, 2010 7:21 AM PDT up reply actions
Avs fan here, visiting...
I agree that I don’t think it’s the best way to spend the few years we have many players for cheap.
But, um, it’s not Mike Sherman, it’s Greg Sherman :)
Sandie
"We called him Clark Kent because away from the rink, he was just a nerd. Then he'd go into the Colorado dressing room and put on his Avs jersey, and all of a sudden he was Super Joe"- Theo Fleury
John Grahame
Grahame’s re-signing isn’t all that surprising given his ties to the team – his mother is Vice President of Hockey Administration with the Avs.
Assistant *to* the Managing Editor, Mile High Hockey
by David Driscoll-Carignan on Jul 13, 2010 4:56 AM PDT reply actions
I did not know that. That does make signing him make a lot more sense.
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 13, 2010 10:38 AM PDT up reply actions
Yip played over his head goal scoring wise but I disagree that he’s not a good player. He’s not a 1st line forward, but he’s got a very good shot, skates really well and finishes checks. He’s really a fantastic 3rd line guy (which his salary supports).
I’ve only ever watched him this season, but I haven’t liked him going by eye (he seems to sometimes go out of position to make hits and his support work in puck battles didn’t impress me at all which is pretty important for a winger) and the numbers I’ve seen suggest that he’s a pretty terrible player at the NHL level who had a very lucky season. When I said that David Van Der Gulik was probably better than some of the guys on the Avs, Yip was one of the players I had in mind (and Koci obviously, but Koci is on the team for reasons other than ability to play hockey).
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 13, 2010 10:45 AM PDT up reply actions
Nope. I don’t think I’ve ever watched an NCAA hockey game. For some reason NCAA hockey isn’t very big in Canada and thus isn’t televised much at all. I’ve watched lots of junior hockey and I’ve seen some Canadian University hockey as well, but that’s about it for non-NHL leagues.
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 13, 2010 1:47 PM PDT up reply actions
It could be with rosey-colored glasses
But I think Yip didn’t over-perform. There are players on every team and at every level who just seem to do “pretty well” at each level. He just seems, to me, one of those players who will be a good NHL player. Maybe 20 goals depending on whether he has a top-2 center. I actually see Galiardi becoming a 3rd line winger and Yip being on the 2nd line.
I don’t disagree with this recap as much as I anticipated. If it had been written over at Matchsticks and Gasoline it would have been much shorter, maybe 11 vitriol words:
“The Avalanche suck. They have no good players. Not even one”
Jimmy Howard invented the Stanley Cup.
If you get the Shaw HD package, you can get Big Ten HD. They have hockey. A lot of the good teams, too.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Big Ten Network actually carries very few hockey games because their teams are in the WCHA or the CCHA and there are rights issues. I had a lengthy discussion with them about this.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Oh really? I know the first week I got it, I saw the ’99 (I think) title game replay and part of a Michigan-MSU game, but I kept forgetting to check back later.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
Well, as to his Canadian bona-fides, he tore up the BCHL and didn’t opt for major juniors because he was a late bloomer in the size dept so committed to the college system. The reason he’s a legit NHL guy is because he can do things on the ice when goals aren’t going in. Some Avs fans think he’s a sniper but he’s a non-shield wearing / aggressive checker that broke his hand in a preseason fight. Not your typical Asian NHL proto-type for sure. But, you’ll see :)
I guess my complaint is that I really don’t like “the rest of his game,” and think he would be a pretty awful checker beyond the fourth line. He didn’t take on tough competition last season and, by the numbers, the Avs didn’t do well moving the puck the right way while he was on the ice (poor Corsi, ending more shifts in the Avs zone than he started there). By eye, I thought some of this was on him personally because of his willingness to wander a bit and his inability to win the puck a goodly portion of the time along the boards. He may well get better at those things next season given that he was a rookie pro a year ago, but if last season is going to be close to his best level of play, I don’t think he can fill an important role in the NHL.
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 14, 2010 9:40 AM PDT up reply actions

by 
























