Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dan Marino Starting College For Developmentally Disabled

Edmonton's Top 25 Under 25 - #25 Brandon Davidson

Brandon Davidson was first eligible to be drafted in 2009, but all thirty NHL teams passed on the young man who had just finished his rookie season of AAA midget hockey.  Yes, Davidson spent his draft year playing for the Lethbridge Y's Titans, a step up in competition from the year before when he was playing AA midget hockey in Taber.  At the start of the 2009-10 season, Davidson went to Regina to try to make the team as an eighteen year-old rookie.  After a strong start to the season this is what Regina's coach, Curtis Hunt, had to say:

You have to give him full marks for having the determination and drive to get himself recognized and come here with the right mindset to not only make our team but try to make an impact every single night.  He has done a real good job for us and shown he can play on the power play, kill penalties and take an even-strength shift against a top line. He continues to get better every day.

Eight months later that eighteen year-old rookie was getting drafted into the NHL.  What a whirlwind.  For me, Davidson's history is one of the major reasons to believe there may be a player here.  Unlike most of the players his age, Davidson has only recently started getting access to the best available coaching, training, teammates and opposition.  He's already demonstrated strong work habits and has experienced the reward that comes with believing in yourself when it looks like the world has passed you by.  It seems to me that this is a young man with strong work ethic and a tonne of room to grow, a wonderful combination.

Oh, and his results are pretty good too.  After the jump I'll take a statistical look at Davidson and, since Jordan Eberle played for the same club, the Regina Pats as a whole.

Star-divide


RankPlayer DOBDraftedYearBen
Bruce
Derek
JonScott
25 Brandon Davidson
8/21/91
162 2010
23 26 27 23 23

 

There's an awful lot to like about the numbers Brandon Davidson put up this past season.  Although he only scored one goal, he had thirty-three assists to go with it in fifty-nine games.  The only reason he didn't play a full slate was because of a knee injury in December that cost him about a month.  Of course you'd prefer he never get injured but the fact that he missed a month of the season and still did enough to end up on many "Top 100" lists is pretty impressive.  But the points are just the start of the story.  Perhaps the most impressive thing about Davidson is that he led the team in plus/minus by a reasonably large margin; his +15 was well clear of Jordan Eberle's second place total of +8 and even further up on any of the other defenders.  Of course, that kind of record leaves most observers with questions.  My first question in looking at the plus/minus numbers is whether or not Davidson was being sheltered to put up those results.  If so, his season become much less impressive but if in fact he was being used in a shut-down role, his results would be extremely impressive.  Thankfully, we can roll through the WHL gamesheets and use that information to come to some conclusions.  In order to get a sense of the "degree of difficulty" I modified the quality of competition formula first used by Jonathan Willis

In order to get a sense of the "quality of competition" each player was facing I simply looked through the boxscores and identified all of the opposition forwards on the ice for every goal scored for and against each player on the Regina Pats when the teams were playing 5-on-5 hockey.  The final "quality of competition" number is thus the average points per game of the opposing forwards when a given player is on the ice.  So, for example, a player with a score of 0.500 would be facing forwards who, on average, scored 0.500 points per game in 2009-10.  A score of 0.800 would mean that the average opposition forward scored 0.800 points per game.  It seems pretty straightforward to me, but if you've got questions or suggestions, let me know in the comments.  Anyroad, here are the results for all of Regina's regular defenders (minimum 25 goal events):

Regina_qc_defense_medium

Using just five-on-five results there are two defenders who end up on the right side of the ledger.  Although Davidson's number goes down slightly, it still stands out relative to the rest of the group.  However, Davidson seems to be taking on the second toughest minutes for the Pats rather than handling the opposition's most dangerous offensive firepower.  It's probably worth noting that although Davidson looks like he's fifth here, he's actually fourth because Delahey - Davidson's partner for the early part of the season - and McColm were traded for one another half-way through the season and thus never spent time together on the the same roster.  But if you're projecting him as a shut-down defenseman, these results are probably something of a disappointment.

Now, just because I think it's interesting, here's the same chart for Regina's forwards:

Regina_qc_forwards_medium

Wowzers did this team every have some terrible hockey players.  Craig Orfino's season is downright nightmarish.  On the other side you've got Jordan Weal who comes out of this exercise looking like an exceptional player.  It's unbelievable to me that he lasted as long as he did on draft day.  Jordan Eberle, meanwhile, comes out of this looking pretty good, one of only four forwards to post a positive goal differential and taking on pretty good level of competition as well.

It's those two Jordans that are the source of my next question about Brandon Davidson's numbers.  Because he scored only one goal  and doesn't have much history it's hard to know if he was picking up a lot of cheap assists by making an easy pass to Eberle or Weal who then made a play to create a goal for himself.  As it turns out, that's not the case.  Of Davidson's thirty-three assists, only nine came on goals scored by either Eberle (8) or Weal (1), or a total of 27%.  Considering Weal and Eberle scored 35% of Regina's goals, that's really not a big number and it suggests to me that Davidson is likely doing something to help create offence for some of his less talented teammates. 

The other nice thing about Davidson's results is the amount of scoring he did at even strength.  Of his thirty-four points, sixteen came on the power play and eighteen came at even strength.  Davidson was also on the ice for several short-handed goals, although he didn't register any points.  Taken together, it seems that Davidson is relied on to be responsible with the puck in all different situations; with Colten Teubert and Mitch McColm not returning next year, it seems that Davidson will probably be taking up the slack which means more responsibilities on special teams, in taking on tough competition at evens, and even in his role as a team leader.  There's a lot he'll need to improve on to get to the NHL - especially his skating - but it seems to me that Davidson is building from a nice base of talent and will have plenty of opportunity to grow into a larger role.  Davidson could easily have another year of huge improvement.  I'll definitely be pulling for him.

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If he missed most of december, that means he missed most of the time when Eberle wasnt playing in WHL for WJC camp and tournament. If i am not wrong Regina played some of its worst games during that stretch. So he missed the time when the club was terrible. That probably inflates his +/- by a bit

by SumOil on Jul 11, 2010 8:03 AM MDT reply actions  

Eberle left the team around 9th for the camp and was back after 1st week of January.
48-25 was the goal differential that Regina faced when Davidson was out in December. And 2 games after his injury Eberle left the team. During that stretch the differential was 39-16. Now I havent doen the analysis of how many of them were PP and how many EV. But it doesnt look that horrific, It might have brought it down by 4 or 5 So being a +10 on that team is pretty impressive as well. So here I am countering my own point. I thought the numbers will back me up strongly, but I was wrong, they show a marginal difference.

by SumOil on Jul 11, 2010 8:17 AM MDT up reply actions  

But if you’re projecting him as a shut-down defenseman, these results are probably something of a disappointment.

I dunno about that, as such. I mean, rookie D don’t tend to take on second-toughs in any league, unless they’ve already demonstrated superiority in a comparable or better league elsewhere already, do they? We’ll see how he does next year with Teubert gone.

Also, I’m pretty sure Weal and Eberle were linemates. Not to get too far ahead of things, because I only saw them play a couple of times, but is it possible that Weal’s being carried a bit by Eberle? (Again, I guess we’ll find out next year.)

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Jul 11, 2010 9:41 AM MDT reply actions  

I agree with you but there was some talk (even the quote from his coach above) that he was taking on the opposition’s best. Further, his rookie season came at 18 so the circumstance was a little different than usual. At any rate, I should clarify that I don’t think his season is disappointing overall, it just means that he’ll need to keep on taking big steps forward in order to catch up with the prospects ahead of him.

by Scott Reynolds on Jul 11, 2010 10:12 AM MDT up reply actions  

As for Weal and Eberle, they were very often linemates. I’m sure it helped him to put up numbers, but those are some really fantastic numbers. It just seems to me that a prospect with that much offense really shouldn’t be available in the third round.

by Scott Reynolds on Jul 11, 2010 10:15 AM MDT up reply actions  

Insert obligatory Brandon Kozun comp here.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Jul 11, 2010 11:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

That’s actually a really interesting idea going forward.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Jul 12, 2010 6:37 AM MDT up reply actions  

Oh, comparing Kozun and Weal? They’re a similar size, both Kings prospects, and had Canadian World Juniors on their line their draft years (Brett Sonne and Jordan Eberle, respectively). Beyond Eberle, Weal doesn’t have the quality supporting cast Kozun has enjoyed, though, so I don’t see him leading the CHL in points from the lowest-scoring of the three leagues, but I think if he can sustain at 100+ points as Kozun did (the ‘10 Hitmen finished better than the ’09 Hitmen, but the ’09 group was the better one by a mile; if they hadn’t fallen asleep in the WHL final, they might have beat Windsor last year), that’s an arrow up going forward.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Jul 12, 2010 7:19 AM MDT up reply actions  

but isnt Kozun a much better skater than Weal is

by SumOil on Jul 12, 2010 8:55 AM MDT up reply actions  

I dunno; I don’t have much of a sample to compare it to. ;)

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Jul 12, 2010 2:51 PM MDT up reply actions  

A Most Interesting Thing

One thing that Jonathan did during his meteoric rise through the Oiler-sphere was take ideas and work them – put the time into them.

On 11/24/08, five weeks before Jonathan’s AHL QualComp post, the Oilers re-called Tim Sestito.
On Lowetide’s post for that event, I complained that Guillame Lefebvre shudda got the call. He was playing the Tough Minutes with Reddox & Sestito [both re-called], but unlike those two, was a Plus player.

Another commenter suggested Lefebvre wasn’t playing those minutes.
As Lefebvre’s biggest booster, I leapt in with this comment:
On Oct 31
The Springfield line of 9-11-14
was on the ice for
an ES GF & an ES GA.
Then
On Nov 8, that same line was on the ice for an ES GF.
Scant evidence I know, but it appears Lefebvre was playing on a line with Reddox & Sestito

Within weeks this snarky comment was turned into a theory of Lower League Quality Comp.
Man was I impressed.

by Mr DeBakey on Jul 11, 2010 9:59 AM MDT reply actions  

And Vic showed the strong correlation with Gabe’s qualcomp metric.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Jul 11, 2010 12:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

Outstanding Work

Amazing work, Scott. I can’t believe you counted all of this by hand. This is easily the most detailed look at any later round pick I’ve seen.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Jul 11, 2010 12:36 PM MDT reply actions  

Great post

Excellent work, C’n’B-ers. Do you guys have a release schedule for this series? I’m really looking forward to reading the rest!

by hellofasandwich on Jul 11, 2010 2:54 PM MDT reply actions  

It’ll be one a day going forward, so long as people are on time. I was supposed to get this one out the day after Ben’s “outside looking in” article but parsing out the Regina stuff took longer than I expected. Glad you enjoy the reports!

by Scott Reynolds on Jul 11, 2010 3:31 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sure did enjoy it. Outstanding work, Scott. You’ve set the bar mighty high for the Top 24 under 25!

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Jul 12, 2010 10:34 AM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 53 33 15 5 71
Minnesota 53 25 20 8 58
Calgary 54 25 22 7 57
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.9.2012 at 7:25 AM MST)

21 - 28 - 5

Lost 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-12, .571)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-39, .571)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (37-36, .507)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL