Minnesota Wild Free Agency Review
Just before the draft I looked at each of the teams in the Northwest division and talked about what I thought they needed to accomplish over the summer in order to best take advantage of their window to win. Since a lot of the work NHL general managers do springs into action at the end of June and beginning of July, I thought that it would be fun to track how each team has progressed. The first in this series of four will focus on the work done by the Minnesota Wild. I was pretty optimistic about the Wild at the end of June, thinking that a couple of talented free agent forwards capable of playing in their top nine combined with a bounce-back year from their goaltending could have them at the very top of the division. After the jump, I`ll take a look at what the Wild have done so far.
Individual Transactions
Traded the 129th overall pick in the 2010 entry draft for F Brad Staubitz - Anytime a general manager can move a pick from outside the top one hundred for a player who can step into an NHL lineup, he's probably won the trade. This trade is no exception. It's one thing to use a draft pick on an 18-year-old who might one day become good enough to play a fourth line energy role. That kind of thing is silly. It's something else entirely to trade the pick and take a get a player who's ready to step in immediately.
Signed F Matt Kassian a two-way contract for one year at $512,500 per year - He's a brawler who doesn't have enough skill to take a regular shift in the AHL. If the Wild are walking away from Boogaard and Scott, this fellow can't possibly be anything more than AHL muscle.
Signed D Nate Prosser to a two-way contract for one year at $650,000 per year - This situation is just so odd. After signing with the Wild at the end of last season for $900,000, Prosser took much less than his qualifying offer to sign his "second" NHL contract. Presumably, he did so to guarantee a higher paycheck in the AHL (the entry-level max is $67,500; Prosser is already up to $105,000), which may mean he thinks that the Wild are going to send him to Houston to work on his pro game for at least part of the year.
Signed F Guillaume Latendresse to a one-way contract for two years at $2,500,000 per year - Once Latendresse got to the Wild he scored 25 goals in 55 games, a pace he's unlikely to maintain over the course of the next two seasons. His career high 18.8% shooting percentage is very likely higher than his true talent level and Latendresse should settle in to something closer to his career average of 14% unless he gets a big increase in power play time. That said, Latendresse has a multi-year track record of success in Montreal as an even strength scorer and the Wild keep the contract to only two years which minimizes the risk of Latendresse flaming out and keeps him a restricted free agent at the end of his contract. The compensation certainly isn't low, but I think this is a good deal for the Wild.
Signed F Matt Cullen to a one-way contract for three years at $3,500,000 per year - Matt Cullen turns thirty-four in November and has also started dealing with a few more injuries over the last couple of seasons (leg, concussion). Those two factors make this contract a pretty risky bet. The number is high enough that if Cullen's play declines even slightly, the Wild aren't getting much value for their dollar. On the other hand, Cullen has been a consistent 40 to 50 point player since the lockout with about half of that coming at even strength. He hasn't been tested against top competition, but the Wild will likely have Koivu getting the tough competition and Brodziak getting the tough zone starts which certainly puts Cullen in a place to succeed. Personally, I don't really like this deal, mostly because of Cullen's age, but there's a good chance that it works out well in the first year at least.
Signed F Eric Nystrom to a one-way contract for three years at $1,400,000 per year - The team website has only one quote from Chuck Fletcher in their article on Nystrom's signing: "I really felt we needed to improve the character of our group, the work ethic of our group and the leadership in our room." That tells you pretty much all you need to know about Nystrom's skill level. A career high 12.1% shooting percentage helped Nystrom to a career highs in both goals (11) and points (19) while playing in a sheltered role with the Flames last season. In that the Wild already have several forwards to play a primary defensive role in their top nine which means Nystrom will probably be on the fourth line. To be frank, $1.4M is just too much for a fourth line player. This is a pretty bad deal.
Signed D Drew Bagnall to a two-way contract for one year at $600,000 per year - With the Wild letting Derek Boogaard and John Scott walk away, there's some chance that Bagnall makes the team as the designated tough guy if Brad Staubitz is deemed inadequate as the lone replacement.
Signed F Warren Peters to a two-way contract for two years at $537,500 per year - Another player who may want to fill the void of Boogaard and Scott. The problem is that he's not big enough to handle the heavyweights and he's not as good at hockey as Zack Stortini. That's not a good combination. Peters had a career high 20 goals and 34 points in the AHL last season which shows he can at least handle a regular shift at that level. I bet he challenges Staubitz to a fight the first chance he gets.
Signed D Jamie Fraser to a two-way contract for one year at $500,000 per year - Fraser is a depth defender for the AHL club who isn't likely to see action in the NHL, although he did get into one game for the Islanders in 2008-09. Fraser is now twenty-five and has played in more than 250 AHL games. He's not all that big and has never scored more than twenty-four points in an AHL season. Basically, he's a competent AHL defender.
Signed F Jon Disalvatore to a two-way contract for two years at $537,500 per year - This player is very likely nothing more than AHL. The twenty-nine year-old is a consistent twenty-goal scorer at the AHL level but has only played five career games in the NHL. His -23 rating also helped him to finish dead last in plus/minus with the Houston Aeros last season, a year after finishing next to last with a -15 for the Lowell Devils. An NHL contract here seems like a waste.
Signed G Dennis Endras to a one-year entry-level contract with an NHL cap hit of $650,000 per year - The deal includes a $90,000 signing bonus, so Endras had some nice monetary incentive to leave Germany. Most folks that remember Endras at all remember him as the Most Valuable Player (despite not playing all of his team's games) of the (somewhat) recently completed World Hockey Championships. That sounds promising, but there`s not much else there. His .905 save percentage in the German league is not particularly inspiring, especially when you take a look at the other goaltenders in the league and see that J.S. Aubin sitting at .924 and Fred Brathwaite at .914. It seems like Endras probably just turned a couple of good weeks into $90,000, which is a pretty good deal if you can swing it. With Matt Hackett coming into the organization this year, I wouldn't be at all surprised to see Endras as the fourth (or fifth if both Josh Harding and Anton Khudobin stay around) goalie on the depth chart.
Signed F Robbie Earl to a two-way contract for one year at $550,000 per year - Earl is a depth signing for the Wild and probably won`t make the team out of camp. He turned twenty-five in June, and played in thirty-one games for the Wild. That said, his best offensive AHL season came in 2007-08 when he scored 47 points in 66 games. It's highly unlikely that he ends up as anything more than a fourth line player at the NHL level and he`s not really a big difference maker in the AHL. I guess you need someone to fill the role of tweener, but I would have thought the Wild would have chosen someone either more established or with more upside.
The Big Picture
Those who've read here before know that I like to use the chart below as a cap space guideline. Because it's based on percentages, we need to set a cap figure for 2010-11. I used $57M, but the cap actually increased to about $59M and that's the figure I'll use here (in order to leave the club a bit of in-season wiggle room). Here's the chart:
Top 3 Forwards - 27.5% or $16,225,000
Middle 6 Forwards - 20.0% or $11,800,000
Top 4 Defenders - 27.5% or $16,225,000
Goaltending - 10.0% or $5,900,000
Bottom 8 Players - 15.0% or $8,850,000
And here it is again with the players the Wild have signed:
Top 3 Forwards - Havlat, Bouchard, Koivu - 21.6% or $12,330,000
Middle 6 Forwards - Latendresse, Miettinen, Brunette, Brodziak, Clutterbuck, Cullen - 22.4% or $13,216,666
Top 4 Defenders - Zidlicky, Burns, Schultz, Zanon - 22.0% or $12,983,333
Goaltending - Backstrom, ??? - 10.2% or $6,000,000
Bottom 8 Players - (Parrish), Barker, Stoner, Prosser, Wellman, Sheppard, Nystrom, Kobasew, Staubitz - 19.8% or $11,672,694
The Wild look like they're pretty much done which is, in my view, a real shame. I really thought that they would be able to add two very good players to the lineup, but instead they added one in Matt Cullen and then overpaid for a fourth liner in Eric Nystrom. Whereas previously I expected the Wild to be much better next season regardless of Bouchard's injury situation, the fact that the Wild haven't brought in any really talented wingers means they are counting on him to be healthy. I still think the Wild will have better results next winter than they did in 2009-10, but their summer has been pretty underwhelming.
31 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Good stuff, Scott. I too am underwhelmed by the two main signings, although renewing Latendresse was key.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
It was for less than I thought he would sign for. He may not be able to continue scoring at a pace he did, but i thought he might be able to cash in on something big time
Yeah, I thought they might screw it up and go long term with him at a big number. Even then, it could have worked out, but the risk level would have been really high. The short term deal makes a lot more sense to me.
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 10, 2010 10:04 PM MDT up reply actions
It's a good deal for both parties
The Wild didn’t overpay for a guy who may end up being a flash in the pan. Lats still has motivation for the big contract. I like the deal a lot.
Proprietor of Hockey Wilderness - We take Minnesota hockey WAY too seriously.
The Wild are going to be shit next year. Too many behindthenet stars and not enough real players.
The Wild are also the worst drafting/developing club in the NHL.
A smart GM would target Minnesota’s first in 2011.
I am probably going to regret this but........
What is the difference between a “behindthenet stars and real players”?
BTH is basically underlying statistics on a player. Can a player have poor stats and still be a real player?
Who are the guys you consider behindthenet stars on that team?
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 10, 2010 11:21 AM MDT up reply actions
Not to be bitter, but this coming from a fan of the worst team in the NHL last season?
The Wild are a better team going into next season than they were last season. Is that not the objective? To get better? No, they are not Cup contenders, but they also are not bottom dwellers. The old administration was the worst at drafting and developing talent. The new administration has made a huge commitment to improving both, but two drafts and one season do not a champion make.
I, too, would enjoy knowing the definition of a “behindthenet” star compared to a “real” player.
Hockey Wilderness
Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
Not to be bitter, but this coming from a fan of the worst team in the NHL last season?
It’s somewhat debatable whether Traktor is an actual fan of the Oilers. He is, however, a fan of stirring things up. Seems like he’s scored another direct hit.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Jul 10, 2010 12:41 PM MDT up reply actions
The Wild will never have any real success until they rebuild. Are they a better club today? Debatable. The Wild need a shitload of turnover and that’s pretty hard to do when you sign 3rd line guys to 4 year deals. Fletch would’ve been smarter to sign some guys to short-term deals that he can move at the deadline because the wild don’t have much chance at the playoffs this year.
The Wild at least looked to have a had decent draft this year.
The Wild need a shitload of turnover and that’s pretty hard to do when you sign 3rd line guys to 4 year deals.
Boy, does that sound familiar.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Jul 10, 2010 9:20 PM MDT up reply actions
I take it you don’t think much of their goaltending? My feeling is that their netminding will recover from an awful season last year and that alone will earn them enough points to be in the mix for a playoff spot even if the rest of the team doesn’t improve at all.
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 10, 2010 10:07 PM MDT up reply actions
I agree with you to some extent, but they were actually below average at EV last year at .914. I can buy that Lemaire had a small impact but I don’t think that Backstrom and Harding are a below average tandem. A small bump to league average would get them five extra goals and a return to the low end of their previous combined performance (.922) would save them fourteen extra goals. It seems to me that there’s a pretty reasonable chance of that happening. At the very least, it would seem that the goaltending is much more likely to be at least marginally better next year than it was last season.
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 11, 2010 10:25 AM MDT up reply actions
When have they done a rebuild before?
Hockey Wilderness
Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
I think Chuck Fletcher is assembling a team that can push the puck in the right direction but will lose the majority of games they play even if they out-chance the opponent.
See, this makes sense. I agree with this. They do not have a finisher, still. They solved the second line center question (hopefully), but still have a gaping hole where the scoring wingers should be. Antti Miettinen on the top line just is not going to cut it.
Hockey Wilderness
Assistant Editor:SBN Minnesota
Rule #17: You may not impersonate representatives of Hockey Wilderness and handout NHL themed wrist bands.
What’s the story with Koivu, any word if MIN is trying to get him extended now, before he becomes a UFA next summer?
And are they looking to sign Granlund and play him this year, or back to Europe?
by hockeysymposium on Jul 10, 2010 11:50 PM MDT up reply actions
Granlund will likely head back to Europe this season, much like Mikko did.
I’m guessing there will be a lot of effort to lock Koivu up for 5-6 years. He’s the face of the franchise, whether or not he is the flashiest player or not. Now, should he be the highest paid player on the team? Right now, probably, but he isn’t a #1 guy on a Cup competitor, but he’ll likely be looking at something in the 5.5-6.5M range for 5-6 years.
Proprietor of Hockey Wilderness - We take Minnesota hockey WAY too seriously.
They only had 3 players in the black in terms of possession last year.
by Kent Wilson on Jul 10, 2010 12:46 PM MDT up reply actions
I also wanted to ask again because I’m really curious, which guys on the Wild do you think are behindthenet stars but bad hockey players?
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 10, 2010 10:09 PM MDT up reply actions
When I said behindthenet stars I meant guys that usually bring more than the boxcars indicate. I didn’t even look at BTN but some players that fall into that category are: Koivu, Brunette, Miettinen, Zanon, Foster, Veilleux, Fritsche, Brodziak, Belanger, Walz…
I think the Wild definitely place a priority on safe players to the point that they will have nobody that can make a play. Obviously boxcar numbers only tell a small part of the story but I don’t Wild management care at all about boxcar numbers. Some of their signings would indicate that the place a high priority in advanced stats.
So what kind of players are you looking for? I agree with you that they need more offense, especially up front but I tend to think they need it mostly in addition to rather than instead of the (kinds of) guys you mention. Going back to your original comment, am I right in assuming that some of the guys you mentioned above are both “behindthenet stars” and “real players”?
by Scott Reynolds on Jul 11, 2010 3:37 PM MDT up reply actions
Furthermore, a bounceback season from Havalat should help them too. Rating purely on offensive skills, he might be the best in the conference!
Agreed. Havlat is one example of a signing for offence. He had a terrible first year in Minny. (Ask me, I have him in my pool.) 29 goals, +29 his last year in Chicago; 18 goals, -19 his first in the Twin Cities.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Jul 12, 2010 10:25 AM MDT up reply actions
It’s somewhat debatable whether Traktor is an actual fan of the Oilers.
I wouldn’t go that far.
Gilbert, Whitey, Smid and Peckham are nice pieces. Cogliano, Brule, Penner, Hall, MPS, Eberle, Gagner, Hemsky, Stortini, Lander, Hartikainen are all nice pieces up front. And I actually like JDD, particularly because most of the oilogosphere hates him. Same goes for JFJ.
The only players I don’t like are the vanilla useful variety and that don’t contribute offensively or physically and Tambellini exited most of those guys. The only useless player left to get rid of is Horcoff.

by 































