Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: VIDEO: Austin Rivers' Buzzer Beater Finishes Off UNC

Farewell Then, Marc Pouliot

Steve Tambellini has made so many mistakes it's hard to give him credit for what he does right. After all, surely each good move is predecessor to tragedy.

The Colin Fraser trade? Brilliant. The Steve Staios affair? Magnificent. Now he's losing Ethan Moreau on waivers, which is a hell of a thing to do to your captain and a bold move from a guy nicknamed Mr. Dithers and immortalized for his eternal propensity to evaluate. It's also the right thing for the hockey club (although as Tyler Dellow has shown, buying him out would have been a step too far). Certainly, Dithers isn't dithering anymore.

Perhaps he should have done a bit more evaluating, though, before he plunged into the offseason. Even with those occasional tethers of hope, the hits of a last-place general manager keep on coming. If he buys out Patrick O'Sullivan, for example, he'll be getting rid of a guy with a track record of NHL success just because of one bad season and paying medium-term for the privilege. Yet somehow that's not the worst part. The worst part is Tambellini's handling, or rather mishandling, of his restricted free agents.

He hit the gimmies. Qualified Sam Gagner, Andrew Cogliano, and Gilbert Brule. Wow, real tough decisions there. Qualifying Jeff Deslauriers was questionable, but since the goaltender he signed last summer turns out to have a drinking problem you can see Tambellini's logic. Goaltenders of Deslauriers' calibre aren't free. Okay, actually, they are, but he has one so why get another? There's thinking there, of a sort.

But dumping Ryan Potulny? Yes, he had a career year last season he is unlikely to repeat. Yes, he'd have required an NHL contract. But he's one of the only forwards on this team with a record of professional success and Tambellini refused to even deign to a qualifying offer. This forward lineup isn't exactly packed with outscorers. Lowetide speaks of a "logjam up front" but what thirtieth-place team was he watching? I saw a lot of guys getting  NHL minutes last season and the only way most of them could be in a logjam would be as the boaters wrecking on it.

On the other hand, Potulny was eligible for arbitration, and a career year is a good time to get an arbitration award. Perhaps Tambellini thought he would have been saddled with an expensive arbitration result and another Robert Nilsson. He could have walked away from the award of course, but we know the Oilers aren't too good with the fine points of the collective bargaining agreement. If you twist your brain and pretend to be an idiot, you can make an argument why Ryan Potulny shouldn't have been qualified. You can't make a good argument but you can at least have the discussion.

What a pity for us all that the Potulny decision still wasn't Tambellini's most unforgivable restricted free agent sin. That error could be boiled down as follows: how is Jean-Francois Jacques still on this hockey team and Marc Pouliot not?

Star-divide

You don't need an introduction to Marc Pouliot, but as the sole remaining officer of the Marc Pouliot Fan Club I'll give you one anyway. Drafted twenty-second overall in the 2003 NHL Entry Draft, after Kevin Lowe traded the draft pick that became Zach Parise for the Pouliot pick and the Jean-Francois Jacques pick (oops). But Pouliot was actually a great pick: he'd starred with the Canadian U-18 team and was the best player on the abominable pre-Sidney Crosby Rimouski Oceanic, a resume he kept up through junior by just missing some of the best Canadian World Junior teams of all time, posting some star seasons in the QMJHL, and taking second place in the Memorial Cup.

But he was hurt, and his development delayed, and he never got that offensive touch in the NHL. What he brought instead was moderate offensive ability combined with some defensive skill. He could win a faceoff, play the wing if necessary, and was effective in all situations. At no point has Marc Pouliot ever been a star, but at no point has he ever failed to be a useful NHL player. He's a quintessential utility man, someone who won't kill you no matter what you have him do and can outscore when he's in his best situation. You're not going to win a Stanley Cup with a lineup of twelve Marc Pouliots but you're also not going to win a Stanley Cup without a couple.

Yet Tambellini has cut him loose entirely. Pouliot would only require a two-way contract, not that it should matter since he's far too good for the American league (in a brief AHL rehab stint last season, he was so much better than the rest of the last-place Falcons that it was almost funny). In 37 NHL games last year Pouliot was -4, which for an Oiler playing with scumbag linemates is pretty excellent. He scored six times at even strength despite playing twelve minutes a night. He was better than guys like Ryan Jones who the Oilogosphere was collectively crawling all over for being relatively not-terrible before he got hurt.

And let's take a look at some of the members of that "logjam" who Tambellini has elected to retain in lieu of Pouliot. Ryan O'Marra, who admittedly has a career NHL points-per-game of 0.5. Jean-Francois Jacques, probably the worst player in the NHL last season and possibly the worst player in the history of the Edmonton Oilers. Liam Reddox, who is younger than Pouliot but counts that as his only redeeming feature after an AHL season where he was bad even for the Springfield Falcons. That's a real murderer's row there, Tambo. Glad you decided to keep that nucleus together.

This is just another example of Steve Tambellini's erratic thinking. Remember last year, when he swapped the workmanlike Kyle Brodziak to Minnesota for, essentially, nothing? Remember this year, when on a team whose only effective penalty killer was Fernando Pisani he refused to even talk extension with the guy? Same thing. He brought Colin Fraser in from the Blackhawks and the more optimistic of us may have thought he learned his lesson, but it seems true wisdom still eludes him. It takes more than whales to create a winning hockey team, which is what Tambellini seems to miss amidst his pursuits of Khabibulin and Dany Heatley and Marian Hossa and the gang, with his talking about Taylor Hall being the future of the franchise while neglecting to add that four other skaters are on the ice with him. Swapping your bottom-six players, especially your few effective and affordable bottom-six players, in and out like interchangeable parts is a bloody stupid way to do business. Not as stupid as thinking 25-year-old Jean-Francois Jacques has any chance of rounding into a marginally effective hockey player, but still extremely stupid.

This isn't about the future. Nobody's worried about what Pouliot may develop into. This is about the present, where Pouliot was an effective centre on a team where "effective centre" was a critical issue. This is a world where a guy could have been signed to a two-way contract for short coin or at least retained as a restricted free agent to keep some value in the system, and yet is being jettisoned for nothing. This is a general manager whose ability to evaluate hockey players seems limited to gushing over their body types and unrelated to their actual hockey knowledge. This is a man who shuffles deck chairs on the Titanic and when the ship keeps sinking thinks he's just not shuffling hard enough.

This is the reason we're going to be in the lottery again next year.

Comment 26 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

With everything that’s going down as we speak, this seems a touch premature?
Still, why waste good writing even if it is out-of-date before it is published.

by Yeti# on Jun 30, 2010 11:58 AM MDT reply actions  

I should say, I agree with you on Pouliot.

by Yeti# on Jun 30, 2010 11:59 AM MDT up reply actions  

Thank You From A Pisani Fan

You just proved my point why the Oilers in the very least need to invite Pisani to training camp to earn his spot. Not that it’s going to happen, but the penalty killer thing is significant.

by Lisaann on Jun 30, 2010 4:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

It might be, but Ben’s got a vested interest in Pouliot. Still, to his point, they now have to find a dirt-cheap flexible player that can win faceoffs, kill penalties and take playing with Ethan Moreau.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Jun 30, 2010 9:23 PM MDT up reply actions  

“vested interest” = “thinking he’s good at hockey”

by Benjamin Massey on Jun 30, 2010 9:37 PM MDT up reply actions  

He could have walked away from the award of course, but we know the Oilers aren’t too good with the fine points of the collective bargaining agreement.

They actually couldn’t walk away from any and every award. If Potulny had gotten less than a certain figure, the team doesn’t have the option to walk away. I’m not entirely sure what that number is now but it’s somewhere between $1.1M and $1.5M. I can understand why the club wouldn’t want to risk being forced to pay the player $1M+ on a one-way deal.

by Scott Reynolds on Jun 30, 2010 12:00 PM MDT reply actions  

I can’t. $1.5 million is chicken feed for a player of Potulny’s calibre. How on Earth are you going to replace him for less than that?

by Benjamin Massey on Jun 30, 2010 12:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

If you acknowledge that he had a career year, then you can probably find a similar replacement for him for les than 1.5 mil.

The thing is though, If you put a 3 year deal worth $850k/season in front of him, I’m pretty sure he signs right away and you’ve got an effective NHL player for not a lot of money.

by dawgbone98 on Jun 30, 2010 12:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t think it’s good to get into the habit of paying, essentially, fourth-line players (you know, if you’re a good team) more than $1M. It’s not a good idea. I do like Dawgbone’s suggestion of a three-year deal at less money. They probably didn’t actually try that, but it would have been a good way to get a deal done.

by Scott Reynolds on Jun 30, 2010 1:44 PM MDT up reply actions  

As for Pouliot, his non-offer is baffling to me.

by Scott Reynolds on Jun 30, 2010 12:13 PM MDT reply actions  

Can we presume that it is an attitude thing – i.e. they think he’s a weak character who will never become more than vanilla fudge and yet can set a bad example?

by Yeti# on Jun 30, 2010 12:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t think we can presume that because I don’t know of any evidence for it. I could just as easily presume that Ales Hemsky is causing all of the young guys into heavy drug use and advocate trading him. If there were evidence of it, it could be a viable position. Alas, without evidence, it’s not.

by Scott Reynolds on Jun 30, 2010 1:46 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hemsky got that scar when Gator glassed him after Hemmer introduced Grebeshkov to LSD.

by Benjamin Massey on Jun 30, 2010 1:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

Trade Hemsky! If only he was an RFA, we could just not qualify him… damn our luck.

by Scott Reynolds on Jun 30, 2010 2:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

There’s a part in Oil Change which gives evidence to this being their thought process. Lowe is talking about guys with the mindset to be bottom 6ers, talking about how some guys just don’t have the mental makeup for it. His specific example of a guy who went from top 6 dreams to great bottom 6er? Carbonneau. Recalling Pou balking at MacT comparing him to Carbonneau awhile back, it sure looks like that’s who Lowe was talking about.

Not that it makes this a correct decision. Just that it gives some credence to them dumping him for personality reasons, rather than on ice play reasons.

by MattM on Jun 30, 2010 3:59 PM MDT up reply actions  

The other thing Lowe mentioned in that program was how bottom sixers needed a physical edge to their game. I didn’t have a complaint with this part of Pouliot’s game (most nights) but there was a broad perception that the guy was a little soft.

Maybe Tambellini just saw this as straightforward as Fraser >>> Pouliot and it’s time to clear the decks a little. Not saying he was right on the second part … I was hoping Poo would get another shot after a pretty decent post-injury run last year. Clock finally ran out, I guess.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Jun 30, 2010 4:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

Considering Jason Gregor would tell anyone who would listen Pouliot was soft to play against, this makes perfect sense. I think he had an orgasim when he heard Pou was not qualified.

by DarrenV on Jun 30, 2010 4:23 PM MDT up reply actions  

The other thing Lowe mentioned in that program was how bottom sixers needed a physical edge to their game.

This boggles my mind, considering he spent a few years doing the opposite.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Jun 30, 2010 9:24 PM MDT up reply actions  

He’s got plenty of evidence now that that method doesn’t work.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Jun 30, 2010 10:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

POS

You know, POS is a nickname with a double meaning when it comes to O’Sullivan…..

I 100% disagree with your assessment. You say he has “a track record of success….” Are you on crack? The guy has a career high of 22 goals – not exactly a track record of success. There’s a reason he was the throw-in to the Vishnovsky trade when the Oil got him from LA – and his 2 years here was when we figured out why. A guy who leaks goals against, and is prone to disappearing in the effort department for long stretches of time – something which not even multiple benchings cured. He’s gone through 2 teams and more coaches than that – all with the same results and the only constant is POS. He doesn’t get it, he’s a bum. Let some other team deal with him. This guy doesn’t have a history of success, it’s a history of failure.

Then there’s the fact that he would be taking a roster spot away from a much more deserving player. Who do we take out to let POS keep his spot – Hall? Eberle? MPS? Gagner? In literally every single case the roster spot would be a downgrade from any player you could think of taking that spot in the top 6 from any other player.

Then there’s the fact that the Oilers are rebuilding and need to develop for the future, not keep anchors in the present. Projects are for Stanley Cup contenders looking for cheap secondary scoring help or teams like Calgary that spend so much on 4 players they have to look to the scrap heap to fill out their roster. Veteran projects don’t belong on the Oilers roster, developing rookies who have earned their spots should be there.

Goodbye and good riddance, POS. Don’t the door hit your ass on the way out.

by No Homerism on Jun 30, 2010 7:11 PM MDT reply actions  

Number of Oilers with a career high of 22 NHL goals or better as of July 1: four. Horcoff (22), Hemsky (23), Souray (26), Penner (32). Twenty-two goals isn’t exactly a plug. And bear in mind O’Sullivan just turned twenty-five in February, so unlike the rest of those guys he hasn’t hit his prime yet.

Bleeds goals against? His first full season he was -8 on a team where Anze Kopitar was -15 and Dustin Brown was -13. Even his -6 in 44 games as a rookie wasn’t bad considering the team he was on and considering that, well, he was a rookie. Also, your memory is letting you down on the trade: we actually got O’Sullivan for Erik Cole.

There’s no doubt that O’Sullivan wasn’t great his first season in Edmonton and was lousy in his second. No doubt whatsoever. But I absolutely sent MPS to the minors to keep O’Sullivan up. I send Eberle to Oklahoma City in a heartbeat, just to keep their service time down and keep them from being overwhelmed by being cast straight into the NHL on an awful team. And that’s without getting into piles of useless like Jean-Francois Jacques.

by Benjamin Massey on Jun 30, 2010 7:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

I’m surprised that you think O’Sullivan’s time in Los Angeles was poor. If we look at that time in isolation, does he still seem like such a failure? As Ben pointed out, he wasn’t even a part of the Visnovsky trade but rather the key piece that helped them acquire a useful player in Justin Williams. I’m not upset that he was moved along (though buying him out would have been a poor move), but there’s a very good chance that O’Sullivan gets much better results in 2010-11 than he did in 2009-10. Now that he’s “free” of that big price tag, I daresay his new employer will be downright pleased with his performance per dollar.

by Scott Reynolds on Jun 30, 2010 7:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

I say that if the Oilers can sign him for three years, $1.5 million, they do it! Not that he’d want to come back…

by Benjamin Massey on Jun 30, 2010 7:35 PM MDT up reply actions  

You’re trolling me this time.

Were you guys defending Joffrey Lupul on his way out too? Sheesh. Billed as a sniper, POS notched all of 13 goals in 92 games as an Oiler. Whatever magic he had (I think “anze” means “magic” in slovenian) it was sorely missing his entire time here. It’s not like he was Jari Kurri without the puck, either.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Jun 30, 2010 8:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

I wouldn’t take O’Sullivan back for $1.5M, especially if it came with term but I suspect he gets a gig somewhere in the NHL for a bit less than that and that his quality of play is somewhere between what was a nice couple of years in L.A. and a disastrous couple of years in Edmonton. Lupul is actually a pretty nice comparison in that he had by far his worst season in Edmonton and was moved by the Oilers at the absolute bottom of his value. Lupul’s certainly not a great player but he’s not putting up 30 points and a -30 every year either. If O’Sullivan is on a cheap contract and experiences a similar bounce-back to Lupul, his new club will no doubt be pretty pleased with the results.

by Scott Reynolds on Jun 30, 2010 11:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I was going to say the same thing about Lupul. He bounced back, he still sucks, and I still wouldn’t want him on my team.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Jul 1, 2010 11:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 53 33 15 5 71
Minnesota 53 25 20 8 58
Calgary 54 25 22 7 57
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Edmonton 54 21 28 5 47

(updated 2.9.2012 at 7:25 AM MST)

21 - 28 - 5

Lost 2

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (23-7, .767)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-12, .571)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  11. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (11-16, .407)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-4, .840)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (8-14, .364)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (52-39, .571)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (37-36, .507)
  5. Northwest (34-45, .430)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL