Fredrik Pettersson-Wentzel - Oilers Draft Watch
When I was talking to Jimmy Hamrin about Viktor Svedberg, he told me that "...if the Oilers should go for a Swede in this draft it should be the goalie Fredrik Pettersson-Wentzel. He might be available for the 31st pick. Sky´s the limit for that guy!"
I'm not a fan of drafting goalies early; neither is Scott. In fact, I'm not a fan of drafting goalies at all, but Jimmy is razor-sharp when it comes to all things Hockey Sweden, so at the very least I've got to track down his recommendation. Shortly after he made the recommendation to me, Jim Matheson, in his Edmonton Journal column, said "The Oilers need goalie depth, so don't be surprised if they chase Swede Fredrik Pettersson-Wentzel, who dazzled -- 1.85 goals-against average, six shutouts -- in the Swedish First Division this season."
Pettersson-Wentzel is ranked second among European goalies by Central Scouting, and is expected to be drafted in the second round by most mock drafts. I asked Jimmy for some background:
He was a big story in Sweden last season. He was the best goalie in the second-tier league in Sweden. His team, Almtuna, is a small team who had their best season ever. He was the biggest star on that team and he´s definitely Sweden's starting goalie in the World Junior Championships next season.
In 42 games last season, Pettersson-Wentzel posted a 1.85 goals against average, best in the league, and a .924 save percentage, good for fourth in the league. Elite Prospects says: A skilled and technically trained goalie with good basic technique. No major weaknesses and good psyche. Physical strength and explosive style.
It makes sense that the Oilers are interested in adding goaltenders to the system - a quick check of the organization shows Bryan Pitton, Andrew Perugini, Aaron Sorochan, and Olivier Roy. Of those, only Roy has a chance at an NHL career. The Oilers spent years "developing" Jeff Deslauriers and Devan Dubnyk, and both of their futures as NHL goaltenders are tenuous at best. Of course, by "developing" I mean, ignoring, splitting playing time, not finding an adequate backup, not finding adequate coaching, shuttling and dumping on them both at various times over the last few years.
The cupboards are bare, so by traditional thinking it makes sense to restock at the draft. But as Scott has shown, drafting goaltenders early is a risky gambit, and I've held that view for awhile now - Scott's study confirmed the feelings that I had towards goaltenders:
In my opinion, this free acquisition of young talent (especially Europeans but also NCAA and CHL free agents) ought to be the primary means of bringing in new goaltenders rather than expending resources in the draft. If draft resources are used, the tactic of taking a "Flyer" late would be my preference.
There are four widely agreed-upon superior goaltending talents in the 2009-2010 draft: Jack Campbell, Calvin Pickard, the Finn Sami Aittokallio, and Pettersson-Wentzel. If the Oilers are determined to land one of these four kids, they should look to use their pick from Nashville acquired in the Grebeshkov trade (#48 overall) and even then, it might be a mistake, but it would be a lesser risk than using the #31 on a goaltender.
15 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Choosing a goalie before the third round is a terrible idea. IF they really want one of the four and it is nearing the end of the the second round and their guy is still on the board, then I hope they try and trade up (a third and one of those sixths we have or even a fifth) We need to draft at least three forwards/dmen in the first two rounds if this is the end, not the beginning, of a rebuild. I
one of the founders and most prolific writers of Bringing Back the Glory
who said anything about this being the end of a rebuild? A couple decent goalie prospects (IE Roy and potentially this fellow or another of the four) could really help to stabilize a really weak farm system. I don’t like the idea of wasting a really high 2nd rounder on a goalie any more than the other writers here (except maybe our resident former goalie Bruce), but the Nashville pick on a goalie with this much potential is not a bad idea—not the best idea, but not a bad one either
the other regular writer for bringing back the glory and (occasional) columnist at the C & B...
by Stephen Sheps on Jun 18, 2010 3:15 PM MDT up reply actions
By “developing” I mean, ignoring, splitting playing time, not finding an adequate backup, not finding an adequate coaching, shuttling and dumping on them both at various times over the last few years.
Not to mention voluntarily disbanding the fucking farm team. The Oilers brain trust might as well have tattooed “Bush League” on their collective foreheads with that inexplicable withdrawal in the post-lockout days. I’m convinced JDD’s development in particular took a serious hit.
they should look to use their pick from Nashville acquired in the Grebeshkov trade (#48 overall) and even then, it might be a mistake, but it would be a lesser risk than using the #31 on a goaltender.
Well, #31 or #48 might be a mistake no matter who is chosen, at what position. No guarantees in the second round, as Oiler fans know all too well. I’m with you in that I prefer they wait until #48 for a netminder, but the upside with picking goalies is it just takes one great pick and you could be set for a long time.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
I suppose the argument is that with a goaltender being set for a long time is more important than if you get a #1D or a #1F? It’s not just really good goalies who are available (albeit rarely) later in the draft. Guys like Duncan Keith and Henrik Zetterberg are very rare, but they do exist every bit as much as Jaroslav Halak and Pekka Rinne.
by Scott Reynolds on Jun 18, 2010 12:59 PM MDT up reply actions
Yessir he was, 54th overall. I was just trying to think of extremely good talents taken after the first round. I figure Keith to be an impact player at the level of almost any goalie in the game.
by Scott Reynolds on Jun 18, 2010 1:15 PM MDT up reply actions
It’s simple, then, we just draft the next Dunkin Keef with the Nashville pick. I’m onboard with that.
Or, we could take the next Shea Weber. Isn’t that pretty much the number the Preds got him with?
Trouble is, it’s gonna be a dice roll at any position by that point.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Jun 18, 2010 11:28 PM MDT up reply actions
I completely agree that it’s no sure thing. It just seemed to me that you were implying a goaltender had the potential for a better payoff than players in other positions at that point in the draft with your comment above. That’s the part I disagree with (if that is in fact what you were saying).
by Scott Reynolds on Jun 19, 2010 8:58 AM MDT up reply actions
Nope, I don’t think that’s what I was saying. Let’s try this: G is the one position where the team’s needs can largely be solved with a single great move. If you think you’ve identified a good one and he’s dangling out there when it’s your turn, the temptation must be strong to pick him.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on Jun 19, 2010 11:08 AM MDT up reply actions
i don’t see how you guys can not draft this guy. Between “Jeff Drouin-Deslauriers” and “Magnus Paajarvi-Svensson”, you’re already well on your way to dominating the hyphenated-name table.
ooooo
look at this guy. he’s big, too.
by Passive Voice on Jun 18, 2010 1:06 PM MDT up reply actions
We should run a poll asking if it’s a good idea to take that kid with our third rounder.
by Scott Reynolds on Jun 18, 2010 1:17 PM MDT up reply actions
He looks like
Macauley Culkin.
"But yeah…like CC…I harbour no ill will." - VancityDan
"One time I was invited to come to a social gathering. I was paid a handsome amount of money, and I brought a shotgun and a bottle of Tanqueray and showed those people the best f***ing time they’ve ever seen." - Kenny Powers
by Chuckles Canuckles on Jun 19, 2010 6:50 PM MDT reply actions

by 
































