Sports rivalries and why we love them: Celtic vs. Rangers
This is the final piece of my travel series, and ironically, actually the first piece I intended to post. About three weeks ago, my brother and I were in Glasgow and without realizing it, we stumbled in to a pub around 5:30 in the afternoon on the 4th of May not expecting much of anything except cold beer and a football game. What we got was one of the greatest rivalries in sports coming to life before our very (ignorant) eyes; Celtic vs Rangers, the bloodiest and one of the most incredibly complicated, political, social and even religious rivalries to ever exist in sport. The Scottish Premiership is a truly elite level of football, just as intensely competitive as the top English league, but because Scotland is so much smaller, the rivalries tend to be that much more intense.
![]() |
The Celtic Ranger rivalry has been the most dominant rivalry in Scotland dating back to 1888. In more than 122 years, only 16 players have played for both teams. To put it in perspective, in the 30 years of the battle of Alberta, more than half that amount have played for both the Oilers and the Flames. The most unusual part of this old Scottish rivalry is how intensely religious and political it actually is. Now, of course I didn't know anything about this until arriving in the pub and not knowing which side of it to sit on. A couple locals asked us if we were Catholic or Protestant, of which my brother and I are neither, so they told us we could sit anywhere we liked, but may face consequences depending on the score. We sat at the bar right in the middle, so as to stay out of the lines of fire but still have a good view of the screen.
To be more specific, the Rangers, who have been an active football club since 1873, are more closely aligned with protestantism and British/Scottish loyalists, while Celtic F.C. is predominantly catholic, with political sympathies given to Irish freedom fighters.The Rangers have had only 4 Catholics to ever play for them and will avoid drafting or trading for Catholic players almost as a rule. As a left leaning Jew, I really felt like this was not my fight, and just quietly drank my MacEwans 80 without lending support in any particular direction.
![]() |
The rivalry itself dates back to 1888, when Celtic F.C. debuted; of course their very first match was against the Rangers, so this rivalry has some serious history. Under current Scottish Premiership rules, the teams play each other 4 times a year, but given that both teams are based in Glasgow, home field advantage doesn't really apply, aside from maybe in the locker rooms. Fans of both clubs have a history of violent disagreement, much of which has been curbed by both clubs in recent years. Sectarian fight songs, hooliganism and annoying flag waving (Irish vs. Scottish) have been banned, and the increased usage of surveillance technology at matches has taken the rivalry down a notch. The fans are still just as passionate as ever, just now they come with 80% fewer death threats per game. Celtic now even has a program to combat bigotry and racsim in the community that was launched in 1996, with the Rangers joining in to help the cause a year later. As of the May 4th match that I watched, Rangers and Celtic had played each other 388 times, with Rangers winning 155 matches, Celtic 140 matches and 93 draws.
We can talk all we want about the Oilers dominance of the 80s, and the fact that between the Oilers and Flames, 6 of 7 Stanley cups between 1984-1990 were won by Alberta teams, but the fact that at different times in their respective histories, both Celtic and the Rangers won 9 Scottish league championships in a row is really dammed impressive. Essentially, these two great teams, known collectively as the Old Firm, are two of the most dominant teams of any professional sport, ever--and they're in the same city. To be honest, the way some of the fans were in that pub that afternoon, I'm surprised Glasgow hasn't burned to the ground; yet throughout it all, there was still a deep sense of affinity and mutual respect between fans of both clubs, something that we rarely see between Oilers and Flames fans (Kent from Flames Nation aside...you do some good work there...), at least at home. A few years ago I was living in Windsor, and I had a friend in Law school from Calgary. We had a mutual respect for each other and went to watch games together fairly regularly, each of us wearing our colors with pride. The deal was loser pays the tab, unless it was a shootout loss-then it's a split bill, and we both agreed to support the other side if they happened to be playing the Leafs. I think the only reason we were able to stand it was because we were the only Albertans for miles, and that being that close to the Toronto hockey market was a fate worse than death, something almost any hockey fan outside of the GTA can probably agree on.
Sports rivalries are an interesting thing. In Canada, it seems to be based purely on a sort of civic pride, an obligation to root for the home team blindly and get worked into a frenzy about every little detail. I suppose that is what comes about living in places like Edmonton and Calgary, with very little history, particularly lacking the often violent social and political histories that have the capacity to shape the demographic make-up of any one place. That is what makes the Celtic/Rangers rivalry so interesting and unique. It was not about blind love of the city, but rather about the political and social realities that made up a place like Glasgow in the 1880s that still ring true today. The history shapes the rivalry, which continues to grow and influence modern life and new historical interpretations of life in that particular place and time. Sports isn't an empty, vapid passion for men with too much time on their hands and an excuse for dumb hooligans to get drunk and start riots; it is a reflection of culture, of passion and of collective pride and feeling like a part of something bigger than any one person. It is emotional, it is political, and most of all, at least 4 times a year in Glasgow, it is a very real reminder of where the city has been and where it will go in the future.
By the way, Celtic won 2-1, but the Rangers took the league championship again this season. It was a great game to watch, and I am grateful for the locals who represented both clubs who took the time to give the history lessons I needed to have any idea what was going on underneath the pretext of the football match.
This concludes my series from the Eurodesk. Thank you for reading, and of course thanks to Derek, Bruce, Scott, Ben and Jonathan for letting me write these columns on their site.
8 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Thank you for writing, Shepso. I was anticipating your Rangers-Celtic piece would be great, and I’m not disappointed. Too bad you couldn’t get into the grounds, though your method of hitting up sports bars has its merits, especially your knack of finding supporters of both teams. Well done.
Unfortunately, no discussion of the Celtic-Rangers story is complete without mention of the Second (!) Ibrox Disaster:
The second major incident occurred on 2 January 1971 at the end of an Old Firm game. After 89 minutes of scoreless football Celtic took a 0–1 lead and many Rangers supporters left the stadium. However, in the last seconds of stoppage time, Colin Stein scored an equaliser for Rangers.
As the crowd was leaving the ground, barriers on Stairway 18 gave way causing a massive chain-reaction pile-up of spectators. The tragedy resulted in the loss of 66 lives, including many children – five of them schoolmates from the town of Markinch in Fife. Most of the deaths were caused by compressive asphyxia, with bodies being stacked up to six feet deep in the area. Over 200 other fans were injured.
As a fellow sports fan, this one hit a little closer to home than a plane crash or natural disaster with equivalent loss of life. The stories of the (English-speaking, more or less!) survivors were heart-rending in the extreme. A very sad day.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
I think that the brothers Shepso should have taken opposite sides, just for the day.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Derek, you’re right, that would’ve been fun. To be fair, I think I might be on my way to becoming a Celtic fan now, mostly due to my feelings about Irish independence. The Rangers were the stronger club this season but Celtic played with more heart that night. The link I included has the goal highlights.
that other regular writer for bringing back the glory...
by Stephen Sheps on May 31, 2010 3:20 PM MDT up reply actions
and Bruce…backpacking doesn’t often lend itself to being able to afford tickets to the top match of the year…and my brother and I were saving our cash for when we went up to Oban and did the distillery tour. Many bottles of scotch were purchased on this trip. It seemed a bigger priority at the time.
that other regular writer for bringing back the glory...
by Stephen Sheps on May 31, 2010 3:23 PM MDT up reply actions
Fair enough
Like I said, “too bad”. I just meant, “it would have been fun”. Your priorities are 100% understandable, and like I said, your methodology had lots to be said for it. Including, presumably, still more scotch. :)
And good point about cost, no doubt it would be a pretty penny even if you could round up a ticket. Ben would have faced the same issues in Montreal if there had happened to be a Game Six … just fun to be there, period. Thanks for sharing.
Speaking of which, you might enjoy this old piece I wrote about Celtic about a year and a half ago. Your picture up top reminded me.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
by Bruce McCurdy on May 31, 2010 11:18 PM MDT up reply actions
for sure Bruce…It would have been an incredible experience, one that I totally would have been up for had I had any prior knowledge of the match. Sadly, I was writing my final paper for the year up until about 8 hours before I left Canada…I didn’t really do any pre-trip research, I just went. That was my sloppy methodology in a nutshell…I just went. When I do my next major research project, I may not be able to do the same, but the results were pretty decent.
Also, scotch good…so much scotch. I think we each tried about 20 or 25 different varieties in our 6 days in Scotland, including a trip up to Oban.
the other regular writer for bringing back the glory and (occasional) columnist at the C & B...
by Stephen Sheps on Jun 1, 2010 5:26 AM MDT up reply actions
Rec’d. I love stories about sport transcending itself and reflecting society as a whole. Not something we see nearly as often here in North America, at least not with club teams: the Richard Riot and its place in the history of French-Canadian nationalism would be a rare example. I think the Summit Series would almost be the best example, with the ideological divide in both hockey and politics, and national pride riding on supremacy in a game we had thought our exclusive domain for 100 years.
SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.
THANK YOU!
As a lifelong Celtic supporter, I’ve tried in vain to convince anyone who’d listen that this is by far the best rivalry in pro sports. While in Scotland a few years back, I desperately wanted to attent a game (against Dundee), but the wife vetoed due to fears of hooliganism, such is the damaged view we North Americans have of the beautiful game. Regardless, we watched in a pub a few blocks from Celtic Park and it was truly magic nonetheless. Oh, and we too spend piles of cash on Scotch (Macallan and Glenmorangie FTW!).
One of my best trips ever, thanks for bringing it back!
Before I die, I WILL attend an Old Firm match – what other atmosphere could top that?
Oddly, I am currently wearing a Celtic jersey to work for the first time in months. Synchronicity!




































