Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: How The Kings Beat The Coyotes: Lather, Rinse, Repeat

Some idiot at OilersNation quotes a Boston Herald article indicating the Bruins' willingness to deal and affection for Taylor Hall, and draws on his own analysis to come up with Nik Khabibulin and the Taylor Hall pick for Tim Thomas, Blake Wheeler, and the Tyler Seguin pick.

My opinion? I think more and more I'd rather have Seguin than Hall anyway. But Thomas's morbid contract makes Khabibulin's look pleasant, and as much as I like Wheeler I have a hard time selling myself on that contract.

almost 2 years ago Esaandstanley_tiny Benjamin Massey 9 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

re: Wheeler contract...

what do you mean “selling yourself on that contract”…according to both capgeek and NHL numbers, Wheeler is an RFA?

As far as Khabi and Thomas go, I’d say they’re pretty much a wash, and so if the Oil are going to draft Seguin anyways, why not get Wheeler out of the deal?

by gr8one1 on May 29, 2010 12:16 PM MDT reply actions  

that contract = Thomas’s.

Thomas is a better goaltender than Khabibulin but he’s worse value (and that’s seriously saying something).

by Benjamin Massey on May 29, 2010 12:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

Agreed. There are two advantages to having Thomas around. First, he’s better than Khabibulin. Second, he’s better than Khabibulin.

Thinking about this though – the Bruins would have to take Nilsson or O’Sullivan back to make this work. That, or Tambellini has to be willing to stuff a bunch of people in Oklahoma City.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on May 29, 2010 1:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

But Khabibulin won the Stanley Cup ! ! 1 ! ! one ! 1

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on May 29, 2010 1:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

But oh my god that contract is so unbelievably terrible. Khabibulin isn’t good, but Thomas isn’t that damned good either! At least, not good enough to give us a prayer of making the playoffs no matter what we do this offseason. I’d prefer to run Deslauriers-Dubnyk over either one of them if we could lose the Khabibulin contract somehow.

I’d rather forget the goaltenders entirely. I’m all for the idea of trading down, one hundred percent and entirely, and I’d take Wheeler as a return. But if we want to ditch bad contracts too let’s not take an even worse one back. I’d rather try to turn the trade up-hill and sell high on some other assets: does Boston still like Cogliano? I know they used to have a mile-long boner for the kid.

by Benjamin Massey on May 29, 2010 1:49 PM MDT up reply actions  

Oh, I have no issues just taking Wheeler back. But it sounds like there is more to this unless this is strictly Harris spitballing. But considering the conversation he just had it seems like there’s more to it.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on May 29, 2010 2:39 PM MDT up reply actions  

@ B.M.

Ahh, ok…

and yes, I agree with you that Thomas is a better goalie but worse value, however, for the duration of the contract we’re unlikely going to be spending to the cap since we’ll be in rebuild mode and likely(hopefully) just rounding in to form right about when the contract is expiring, so as long as it’s ok with Katz, it’s ok with me. Heh, wonder if there’s a way we could finagle Lucic out of Boston instead…

by gr8one1 on May 29, 2010 1:48 PM MDT reply actions  

how about our 1st and 2nd for their both 1st rounder?

by SumOil on May 29, 2010 2:32 PM MDT reply actions  

I think the optics would make it unlikely Tambellini trades the first pick, even if he gets the same player. But I really like the idea of giving Boston Hall in exchange for swapping the #31 and Boston’s pick, then maybe adding a mid-rounder and/or prospect and trying to move up even more. Top ten might be a little much to ask but a second good young player would be nice either way.

Where is Boston’s own pick, anyways? The sites I’ve found all say it’s #15 but that makes no sense to me since they won their first round series so shouldn’t they have moved down to #23? Or is it just the conference finalists who get shifted?

by edm_euler on May 29, 2010 6:42 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Oilers Next Head Coach
Small
Josh Anderson Scouting Report
Small
The 2012 NHL Draft and Combine - the Fanpost Almanac
Chambers-john_small
Risk Reward Radulov
Small
Joonas Korpisalo Scouting Report
2012-01-21-012338_small
Oilers Prospect Frans Tuohimaa Signs an Extension with Jokerit
Small
Ryan Murray - The Numbers
Chambers-john_small
Cody Hodgson, the game within the game, and inattention to detail
Small
Hong Kong Animators Draw NHL Violence
Small
Is Ryan Murray more NHL-ready than we think?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

32 - 40 - 10

Lost 3

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (27-11, .711)
  2. St. Louis Blues (24-10, .706)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (22-10, .688)
  4. Los Angeles Kings (18-11, .621)
  5. San Jose Sharks (18-13, .581)
  6. Phoenix Coyotes (20-15, .571)
  7. Nashville Predators (18-14, .563)
  8. Chicago Blackhawks (21-19, .525)
  9. Colorado Avalanche (16-19, .457)
  10. Dallas Stars (18-22, .450)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (14-19, .424)
  12. Edmonton Oilers (18-25, .419)
  13. Calgary Flames (13-21, .382)
  14. Columbus Blue Jackets (14-31, .311)
  15. Minnesota Wild (8-22,.267)

Eastern Conference

  1. Pittsburgh Penguins (31-13, .711)
  2. Boston Bruins (27-11, .711)
  3. New York Rangers (25-16, .610)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (21-17, .553)
  5. New Jersey Devils (18-16, .529)
  6. Ottawa Senators (19-17, .528)
  7. Washington Capitals (20-19, .513)
  8. Montreal Canadiens (16-19, .457)
  9. Winnipeg Jets (15-19, .441)
  10. Buffalo Sabres (14-18, .438)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (13-17, .433)
  12. Florida Panthers (14-19, .424)
  13. Toronto Maple Leafs (17-24, .415)
  14. New York Islanders (8-23, .258)
  15. Tampa Bay Lightning (10-30, .250)

Division Standings

  1. Central (79-58, .577)
  2. Atlantic (68-50, .576)
  3. Pacific (62-54, .534)
  4. Northeast (69-65, .515)
  5. Northwest (49-69, .415)
  6. Southeast (51-81, .386)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Small Alan Hull

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL