Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Dallas Cowboys: Unknown Quantities

Kurri or Selanne: who is the greatest Finn ever?

This image from the Nagano Olympics mirrors the author's ranking of the greatest Finnish players ever. In front: Jari Kurri. Just behind: Teemu Selanne. Lurking in the background: Esa Tikkanen.

It went right down to the wire with perhaps his final season soon drawing to a close, but Teemu Selanne hit a series of important career milestones in recent days. First the Finnish Flash joined a select club, becoming the 18th NHLer, and second Finn, to score 600 regular season goals in the NHL. A few games later he notched his 601st to draw even with countryman Jari Kurri. Then last game he scored a pair of powerplay markers against Vancouver to pull ahead of Kurri and establish himself as the leading Finnish goal-scorer in NHL history. Can Selanne now lay claim to being the greatest Finnish hockeyist ever?

Well that's a tough call. As a big fan of both players I was kind of hoping that Selanne would hit 601 just as the season was ending and the two would wind up dead even. That said, regular season goals are just a single measure of their relative merits, and even those were largely scored in different eras.  

Surely there is little argument that these two rank head and shoulders above any other Finn to lace up the blades. Born a decade apart, the two Helsinki natives are friends - witness Kurri's recent visit to Anaheim to participate in a ceremony honouring the 600th, and staying in Selanne's home - with a long association. Growing up in the 80s, young Teemu hung Jari's picture over his bed. Growing old gracefully in the 21st Century, General Manager Kurri had the formality of choosing Selanne to play, and medal, on the high-powered Finnish Olympic team. In between times, their careers overlapped on the ice: with Jokerit during the First Bettman Lockout, with the Mighty Ducks of Anaheim in 1996-97, with Finland at the Nagano Olympics. Where lest we forget, Finland won bronze, beating Canada 3-2 in the third place game.

But which one was better? A good case can be made for both Finnish stars. After the jump, we'll examine some of the statistical evidence and blend in healthy doses of observation and opinion.

Star-divide

First, I must admit an observational bias. I watched Jari Kurri play live close to 500 times over the years, as I was full season ticket holder during his entire career in Edmonton. Teemu Selanne's great rookie season was my last one before I had to let my tickets lapse, and of course he was never an Oiler, so I have only seen him play maybe 10 games live over his storied career.

Boxcars:

Kurri ******** 1251 GP, 601-797-1398, +298, 545 PiM
Selanne **** 1184 GP, 603-654-1257, +92, 521 PiM

* * *

Offence:

Kurri's lead as the career scoring leader is safe, even as Selanne has usurped his goal-scoring crown. Jari was the more productive on a per-game basis, scoring 1.12 P/G compared to Teemu's 1.06. That said, Kurri had two distinct, and distinctly related, advantages. His best years were spent during the high-scoring 80s when goal scoring was higher around the league. It was the Gretzky Era, and nowhere was scoring higher than on Wayne Gretzky's team, not to mention Wayne Gretzky's line. Jari Kurri was the right man in the right place and time, one whose game was the perfect foil to Gretzky's. Moreover, he adapted after the trade of the Great One to become his line's primary puck carrier and distributor.

Selanne meanwhile began his career after the 80s were over and goal scoring on the serious decline. A speedster who has been ever-dangerous on the rush, the Finnish Flash was himself the last NHLer to score 70 goals in a season, way back in his rookie season of 1992-93. When one adjusts for era affects, as hockey-reference.com has done, Selanne has 643 "adjusted goals" to Kurri's 503.

Each player was a great passer as well as a finisher. Each wound up among the NHL top ten scorers on six occasions, and each was a runner-up for the Art Ross twice.

Advantage: Selanne

* * *

Defence:

Once when at a game, one of my pals asked what are Kurri's vital statistics? and I just blurted out "two hundred by eighty-five". Both the question and the answer came right out of left field, but it was a perfect description of one of the great two-way players it has ever been my pleasure to watch. A wonderful skater, Kurri's positional play was close to perfect. When Oilers were on the attack he would lurk in the high slot finding open ice to unleash his devastating shot, all the while being the high forward in the best position to hightail it back on those inevitable occasions a high-risk pass went the other way. When the other guys had the puck he was a gap-closer rather than a hitter, with a deadly array of stick checks. (They didn't track takeaways in those days, but if they did Gretzky and Kurri would both have been right up top of the list for sure.) Once he did win possession he had a marvelous first pass, often to Gretzky. The Oilers were famous for their transition game, and Jari Kurri was its embodiment.

Selanne is competent defensively, but is primarily considered an offensive threat.

Advantage: Kurri

* * *

Special Teams:

Selanne remains a great powerplayer, ranking 9th on the all-time list with 218 career powerplay goals. More than half (78 of 151) of his goals since the lockout have been scored with the man advantage, which has been a key to Teemu's continuing productivity deep into his career. Selanne has been rarely-used as a penalty killer, scoring just 7 shorthanded goals in his career.

Kurri was a fine powerplayer in his own right, scoring 155 career goals with the man advantage. He also shone as a great penalty-killer, scoring 39 shorthanded goals in his career (plus 10 more in the playoffs). His PPG:SHG ratio of ~4:1 is much more balanced than Selanne's >30:1, speaking to Kurri's all-around game. Shorties hardly tell the full story of Kurri's penalty-killing prowess; he was his coach's first choice to play in a 3-on-5 or 3-on-4 situation. Even in his final season in Colorado (NHL.com's first of maintaining TOI stats) Kurri was still playing almost 3 minutes a game on the PK unit; Selanne has never played even 1:00/G during any of the dozen seasons on record.

Advantage: Kurri

* * *

Playoffs:

This is the area of greatest difference between the two. The boxcars are stark:

Kurri ******** 200 GP, 106-127-233, +73* (* incomplete)
Selanne **** 105 GP, 35-37-72, -12

Kurri scored 1.12 P/G during his regular season career, and upped the ante to 1.17 P/G in the post season. Selanne's scoring levels on the other hand dropped more than a third, from 1.06 P/G to just 0.69 in the playoffs. Selanne has never exceed a point per game in a single playoff season, while Kurri did so 10 seasons in a row! Jari led all playoff goal scorers in four different seasons (1984, 1985, 1987, 1988), and holds NHL records for goals in a playoff season and in a series. His +73 ranks second all-time* in playoffs (*records maintained since 1984), whereas Selanne has been a minus player over the course of his career.

Advantage: Kurri

* * *

Awards:

Selanne has won three individual trophies during his career, the Calder in 1992-93, the Masterton in 2005-06, and the first Rocket Richard trophy in 1998-99. The Richard is one trophy which can be confidently projected into the past, and Teemu would have shared this award on two other occasions earlier in his career had it existed, twice tying for the league lead in goals. Selanne also made the All-Rookie Team as well as four end-of-season All-Star Teams.

Kurri won just one trophy in his career, the Lady Bing in 1984-85. He led the NHL in goals the next season and would have won the Richard had it existed at the time. Many people in these parts felt Kurri should have won one or more Selke Trophies in his career but it never happened. Kurri did make five end-of-season All-Star Teams, and likely would have made the All-Rookie Team had it existed in 1980.

Advantage: Selanne

* * *

Team success: 

A member of three President's Trophy winners or equaivalent, Kurri became the first Finn to win the Stanley Cup in 1984. He made 7 trips to the Stanley Cup Finals, winning all but the first and the last. Selanne finally broke through with the Ducks in 2007, joining the select list of Finns who have won the Grail:

Jari Kurri 5 (all with EDM)
Esa Tikkanen 5 (4 with EDM, 1 with NYR)
Reijo Ruotsalainen 2 (both with EDM)
Jere Lehtinen 1 (DAL)
Ville Nieminen 1 (COL)
Teemu Selanne 1 (ANA)
Valtteri Filppula 1 (DET)

It's worth noting that 11 of the 16 Stanley Cup rings acquired by Finnish players over the years were won by members of the Edmonton Oilers.

Advantage: Kurri

* * *

International play:

Kurri was otherwise occupied most post-seasons, but represented his country as often as he could, playing in the World Championships in both 1982 and 1989 - the only two years his Oilers were eliminated in the first round of the playoffs - as well as '91 and '94. In those four tourneys Jari posted excellent numbers: 32 GP, 19-19-38, finally winning a silver medal in 1994. He also participated in four Canada/World Cups as well as Olympic Games in 1980 and 1998 that bookended his career, winning bronze in 1998. Kurri has also served as GM of the Finnish team, however this comparison is only about on-ice accomplishments so those successes will be discounted.

Selanne played in five World championships of his own, posting 43 GP, 25-23-48, winning a silver medal in 1999 and bronze in 2008. He played in three Canada/World Cups, capturing silver in 2004. Teemu notably participated in 5 Olympic Games, where he is the all-time career scoring leader with 31 GP, 20-17-37. (His last point in Vancouver broke a four-way tie with Valeri Kharlamov (URS), Vlastimil Bubnik (CZE), and Harry Watson (CAN).) Selanne received three Olympic medals, silver in 2006 and bronze in 1998 and 2010. In all he received six medals - 3 silver, 3 bronze - representing Finland.

Advantage: Selanne

* * *

Conclusion:

The seven chosen categories split out 4-3 in favour of Kurri. Moreover, what I see as the three most lopsided categories, defensive play, playoff performance, and team success, all favour the older man. It is therefore my opinion that Jari Kurri is the greatest player in the history of Finnish hockey.  

Comment 57 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Wow. I like the approach but I seriously question the importance of the “team success” category when comparing individual players. At least give me more of a reason to believe that Kurri was more important to the level of success the Oilers, Kings, Rangers, Ducks, and Avalanche achieved than Selanne was to the Jets, Ducks, Sharks, Avalanche.

Bettman's Nightmare: A Blog Where Hockey Aficionados Dismantle That Mighty Empire, One Balsillie at a Time

http://bettmansnightmare.blogspot.com/

by Bettman's Nightmare on Apr 5, 2010 8:17 AM MDT reply actions  

They play to win the game.

I had a feeling some might dispute that category, but it’s a central plank when summarizing any career. Read any retirement story, and a leading paragraph will be “Player X played on Y Stanley Cup winners”. It’s not the be-all and end-all, but it is career-defining in an important way. It’s also one category of seven that I chose for this exercise.

As for a reason Kurri was important to the Oilers’ success, the particulars of their individual contributions were summarized in the category “playoffs”. e.g. Kurri led the NHL in goals in four different playoff seasons, all of them ending with Oilers’ Cups. That’s a pretty major contribution. So was scoring the Cup-winning goal in Game 7 in ‘87, or scoring an overtime winner earlier in that series, or setting up Petr Klima’s triple-OT winner that all but decided the 1990 SCF, or … or … All of the individual moments are “anecdotal” evidence, but cumulatively they add up to a key contributor to championship clubs.

Kurri’s P/G production increased in the post-season, whereas Selanne’s declined precipitously; Kurri’s teams flourished in the post-season, whereas Selanne’s (mostly) didn’t. It’s hard to disentangle chicken from egg, individual success from team success, but it’s fair to say Kurri was a major contributor on a dynasty team. He wasn’t a passenger, let’s put it that way.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 8:53 AM MDT up reply actions  

PS

Note that I filed this story in the “Opinion” section, not “Analysis” or “History”. Ultimately, opinion is what player comps boil down to. If yours is different, by all means make your case.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 9:00 AM MDT up reply actions  

I would argue that Selanne battled with the constraints of teams with poor/developing personnel more frequently than Kurri. You’ve analyzed from the perspective of the pinnacle of success, but what if a player takes mediocre/middling teams up to the level of “good” teams (Selanne) rather than a player taking a good team up to the greatest (Kurri)?

Bettman's Nightmare: A Blog Where Hockey Aficionados Dismantle That Mighty Empire, One Balsillie at a Time

http://bettmansnightmare.blogspot.com/

by Bettman's Nightmare on Apr 5, 2010 10:28 AM MDT up reply actions  

Let me rephrase that…Selanne took “bad” teams up to mediocre teams.

Bettman's Nightmare: A Blog Where Hockey Aficionados Dismantle That Mighty Empire, One Balsillie at a Time

http://bettmansnightmare.blogspot.com/

by Bettman's Nightmare on Apr 5, 2010 10:33 AM MDT up reply actions  

Agree that Selanne was a positive difference-maker, at least in the regular season, and most certainly made his teams better. So did Kurri, in both regular season and playoffs, and the first measure of “team success” is “championships won”.

“What if they had switched places and circumstances” is a very interesting question. So is “what if Selanne hadn’t torn his Achilles in his sophomore year” or “what if Gretzky hadn’t got traded” or “what if Pocklington had paid Kurri what he was worth” or “what if Selanne’s parent had never met” (kidding with that last one). Ultimately, though, my analysis was based not on “what if” but “what is”.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 11:11 AM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I agree. How good would the dynasty Oilers have been without Gretzky? As good as the Winnipeg Jets, Philadelphia Flyers or Washington Capitals of the same era? Probably not, but in their range. They still would have been top heavy with a bottom six that got murdered. But they wouldn’t have been a great team.

Gretzky goes to to L.A (teams had started playing good players against Gretzky then, following Bob Johnson’s lead, but he was still dominant territorially and even moreso in terms of finish .. this was before Suter (or Chelios?) tried to murder him, mind) and L.A.s goal diff goes up a stunning 60 goals. I know there were other roster changes but that’s madass. And Edmonton’s goal differential drops 60 goals. Again, I know there were other roster changes (adding Carson and losing Krusher, several others too) , still, that’s flatout bonkers. It’s unimaginable in the modern game.

Gretzky was unbelievably good. The younger guys around here, those who saw him play post concussion, they think of him as a bit better version of Yzerman … they are wrong. He was unbelievable in the day. People project magic on him “he played the game on the downbeat”, that sort of thing … and others pissed on him at the time claiming he gave it all back the other way. And granted the guy wasn’t a great backchecker … but if you gave up the puck to him you just never seemed to give it back until something bad happened. It’s extremely rare for a centre to lead a team in shots on goal, exceedingly rare for a pass-first centre to do it, it was routine or Gretzky in the 80s, he even lead the league a few times iirc.

I wish we had scoring chances for back then, or even corsi. The numbers paint Orr as the best post-Howe player ever, but I think Gretzky would have given him a decent run by those measures. Plus he contributed more to the level of finish.

by Vic Ferrari on Apr 5, 2010 12:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

Jarri Kurri would be my first line winger in all situations, Selanne was a PP-freak and an offensive dynamo.

Tough to compare players between eras (which is what you have to do here), but overall I think Kurri was the more complete player but Selanne was the better offensive player. Neither would be a bad guy to have on your wing.

I guess the question is this… if Selanne could have rode shotgun to a great like Wayne Gretzky, could he have adapted his game like Kurri did? Could Kurri have lead his teams offensively like Selanne did?

by dawgbone98 on Apr 5, 2010 10:07 AM MDT reply actions  

Totally agree with your first two paragraphs. As for your question(s), it’s fun to speculate. What impressed me about Kurri during the 10 years in Edmonton that defined his career, was how he became such a perfect complementary player to Gretzky, but changed his game after the Great One left town. In ’88-89 he led his team in scoring with Jimmy Carson as his centre, and in ’89-90 was still a huge offensive force with Mark Lamb as his pivot, and was the key player on a second scoring line for the Cup champs, much as Selanne was in his one Cup triumph.

On the other hand, Selanne led his team in scoring seven different times, and was clearly the winner in the longevity dept. with a great “second career” after the lockout/surgery. A great, great player in his own right, as he would need to be to get in this conversation.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 11:29 AM MDT up reply actions  

I’m partial to the type of game Kurri played over the type of game that Selanne played/plays but I think Teemu is probably the best Finn of all-time. Kurri’s offence is helped by the things you’ve mentioned (playing with Gretz, era, etc.) but also by the fact that his NHL career started at 20 instead of Selanne’s 22. Teemu posted 120 points in 68 games in the SM-Liiga in those two years with Jokerit and his team won the playoff championship in 1992 (which should close that “team success” gap at least a little). Kurri also lost half of his 34-year-old season in the first lock-out compared to half a 24-year-old season for Teemu. In terms of generating offence I think Selanne is way out in front and that the numbers minimize the gap.

Overall at EV, the gap between the two players in terms of /- would also seem overstated. Kurri of course benefits from all of those PK‘s he accumulated over the years. That’s not to say play on the PK doesn’t matter, just that the special teams distribution makes the gap at EV seem wider than it is. Then there’s the team context of that stat which, IMO, also artificially pumps Kurri up. In his first four years Selanne was +8, -23, +1 while his teams posted overall goal differentials of +2, -99 and -20. So -14 on a club that was -117. Kurri’s first three years saw him go +26, +38 and +47 while his teams went +1, +122 and +109. So +101 on a club that was +232. I think it’s hard to say which line is more impressive. I could well be underrating Kurri’s play without the puck since most of the Kurri-watching I remember came later in his career but, for me, Selanne has the more impressive player.

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 5, 2010 11:57 AM MDT reply actions  

I should also mention that I really like your picture selection for this one Bruce. Selanne and Kurri in the foreground (of the debate) with Esa Tikkanen in the background (ready to give someone a two-hander and then yap at them about why he’s the greatest).

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 5, 2010 12:00 PM MDT reply actions  

Got super lucky with that pic, for sure. Yeah, Tikkanen would be in there yapping, in Tikkish. (I remember Kurri once saying that he couldn’t understand Esa either.) I’d argue for Tikkanen as the third best Finn ever, again largely based on team success which some will downplay. But he’s a tier down from the big two, in the conversation with, among others, Jere Lehtinen, Teppo Numminen, the Koivu Bros., and Ville Peltonen (who has won a remarkable 13 medals in 19 tournaments representing Finland at the senior level).

Selanne was indeed “only” -23 on a -99 team, although he missed a third of that season while the team kept playing and racking up the minuses. Selanne was the more erratic of the two, for sure. I would also argue on the plus/minus front that +26 on a +1 team is a much more impressive rookie season than +8 on a +2 team, splashy boxcars aside. Selanne gave a lot back, Kurri never did, right from the beginning. Even as a 20-year-old rookie he was a fine two-way player. His “worst” season as an Oiler was +18.

And yes, you almost certainly are underrating Kurri’s play without the puck. Think of him as Jere Lehtinen with much, much more offence and you’re getting warmer. He impacted the game in all three zones to a much greater degree than Selanne, which is a key reason why I give him the (slight) edge. Playoff performance being the other major factor, where I see no other interpretation than Kurri has a huge edge.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 12:26 PM MDT up reply actions  

Selanne gave a lot back, Kurri never did, right from the beginning.

Or is it that Kurri didn’t give a lot back at the beginning? The team context matters and the first half of Kurri’s career is markedly different from the first. Kurri wasn’t even close to as good once he got away from the Oilers. He was a + player 2 out of the 8 seasons with a total +/- of -69 over that time. His points-per-game totals fall to .71. His first four seasons in L.A. he was -46 on teams that were a combined -71 (all situations). Once Kurri started playing on non-dynasty teams, his numbers fall flat. Granted, it was also the post-30 part of his career which probably has a lot to do with the decline but the difference is sharp enough for me to think Kurri’s greatness in Edmonton had a lot to do with the players he had around him.

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 5, 2010 12:56 PM MDT up reply actions  

Good stuff Scott.

I think what happened in the day … people who bashed Gretzky and claimed he was overrated (and there were plenty in the day) pointed to his lack of defensive work.

Inevitably the Gretzky supporters would point out that 99s +/- was absurdly high. He was plus 90 one year or something like it (by dodgy memory). The response was a combination of:

1.) How many times do I have to tell you? +/- is meaningless!
2.) Kurri is covering for his sorry ass. He may be the greatest defensive winger the game has ever known.

The alternate theory is much simpler: That being “the puck has to be somewhere”, and Gretzky is driving that, just not in a conventional way. That never really got traction in the day, a shame. Don Cherry used to bootstomp Gretz until he found a new whipping boy (Mario Lemieux), which was very nearly equally foolish. Plus the goalies were terrible by today’s standards, that helped bith guy’s counting numbers no doubt.

by Vic Ferrari on Apr 5, 2010 1:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

Reread my two posts, and if I continue overusing the turn of phrase “in the day” … for crissakes someone give me an internet kick in the head, :D

by Vic Ferrari on Apr 5, 2010 1:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

Vic: Gretzky peaked at +98 in 1984-85. He was on for 188 EV + SH GF, and 90 against, for an outscoring ratio of 2.08:1. I’d call that meaningful.

Of course, some of that as Scott points out is SH scoring. The Oilers would occasionally kill a penalty in less than 2 minutes by both scoring a shortie and then allowing a PPGA, but what was +1/-1 on the scoreboard showed up in the event summery as a +1. So those numbers are distorted somewhat. Hell one year Gretzky went 12-11-23 just on the PK.

Of course, there were times when Kurri was covering his sorry ass, and hyperbole aside, he was one of the greatest defensive wingers of the era. They were a very complementary duo.

That same 1984-85 season Kurri peaked out at +76, on +140/-64 or an outscoring ratio of 2.19:1, even better than Gretzky’s.

As for Gretzky’s reputed lack of defensive work, he was a very unorthodox defensive player but a very effective one. In his own zone Job One was to have the opposing point men more worried about the brown stains on their pants than driving the attack. The mere threat of that transition game scared the bejesus out of everyone. But beyond that Gretzky was one of the great stealers of the puck I have ever seen; the only guy close to him in the modern NHL is Datsyuk. He also had this amazing knack for getting a stick on any puck within about a ten-foot radius, and then this incredible first step that would win the subsequent race to the disc 7 or 8 times out of 10. Or he’d chip it somewhere that only a teammate could get it. So absolutely, he was driving the puck somewhere a lot of the time.

But so was Kurri. Very often he would be the guy winning the puck and chipping it up to Gretzky who would be breaking into the open. Very often Jari would be the guy getting open himself to take advantage of some Gretzky wizardry or other. But it was a partnership, and as much as Gretzky is deservedly given credit for making his teammates better, those teammates deserve credit for getting better. Ultimately they became good enough to win a Cup without the Great One, which validates that the rest of the HHoF bunch weren’t merely riding coattails.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 3:12 PM MDT up reply actions  

Or is it that Kurri didn’t give a lot back at the beginning? The team context matters and the first half of Kurri’s career is markedly different from the first.

A good question, and a fair one. I perhaps should have addressed this more than I did; if I had a category for “Longevity” Selanne would get the nod for sure. Following the lockout-imposed year off in which he had major surgery and recovered his health and his passion for the game, his late-career renaissance has been wonderful. Among other accomplishments, Teemu became the first NHLer of any nationality to post consecutive 40-goal seasons after age 35. Oh yeah, and that Stanley Cup thing occurred during this prolonged Indian summer phase of his career.

Kurri on the other hand suffered a self-and-Pocklington-imposed year off at pretty close to the worst possible time. He had just won his fifth Cup and reached his full maturity as a player, having adjusted seamlessly to his role as the best player and puck carrier on his line. He celebrated his 30th birthday by scoring 3-2-5 in Game Two of the SCF at Boston Garden, in the process passing Gretzky as the all-time leading Stanley Cup goal scorer and reaching the somewhat ironic total of 92. (Gretzky would later reclaim that mark, but Kurri still ranks third all-time in both goals and points.)

Pocklington wouldn’t pay him what he was worth of course, so rather than engage in a nasty holdout Kurri went the European route, playing the ’90-91 season in Italy and essentially forcing the three-way deal that dealt him to the Kings.

In my eye he was a changed man when he got there. I had thought at the time that the choice of a second-rate league in Italy was a poor one, and it took him a whole year to get back up to speed in the NHL. He had one great year in L.A. in ‘92-93, scoring 87 points and another 17 in the playoffs as the Kings made their one run to the Finals. He was +19 that season, despite the absence of Gretzky for half of it due to Suter-induced back surgery. Not that playing with Gretzky was a panacea to one’s plus-minus in those days; the following year Gretzky would win his tenth and final Art Ross while posting a Lupulesque minus-25, and Kurri’s own +/- would plummet right along with it. Those Kings were a porous team, and that likely started with Gretzky himself, or at least his uncanny knack to suck his own defencemen up into the play. :) And Kurri’s ability to cover for him was clearly on the wane.

Now as I admitted way up top, my own observation bias is not from those late-career years but from that glorious decade that Kurri spent in Edmonton. That was his peak value period, not just a year or two but ten solid years where he was consistently outstanding. Impeccable numbers, too:

754 GP, 474-569-1043, +363 = 1.3833 P/G

Playoffs:
146 GP, 92-110-202, +71 (inc.) = 1.3836 P/G

Check out those points per game numbers. Did I mention he was consistent? Seven straight seasons of 43+ goals. Eight straight seasons of 93+ points. Nine straight seasons of 53+ assists. Ten straight seasons of +18 or better. The guy delivered the mail every single night with the sort of consistency that appreciates with repeated observation. To my mind he established himself as the greatest Finn ever and not even Teemu Selanne has yet knocked him off that perch. Your mileage may vary … that’s the beauty of opinions, the facts and even the numbers can only take you so far.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 2:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think we can agree that a lot hinges on how much you value Kurri’s Oiler career against his non-Oiler career. The former looks like one of the greatest players of all-time by the numbers, the latter like a good but not great player who didn’t age all that well. There are a lot of guys who look a lot better than Kurri from age 31 and beyond (once he wasn’t a part of one of the greatest clubs of all-time), Selanne among them (regular season):

Kurri: 497 GP, 127 goals, 228 assists, -69
Selanne: 547 GP, 224 goals, 232 assists, +44

That’s a pretty substantial margin and I just can’t see Kurri being that much better than Selanne for the first part of their careers despite Kurri being way out in front statistically. He was a great player made to look immortal by the group he had around him.

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 5, 2010 4:28 PM MDT up reply actions  

Playoffs up to age 30:

Kurri, 146 GP, 92-110-202, +71 (incomplete)

Selanne, 27 GP, 13-9-22, -5

That’s a pretty substantial margin too.

I agree he didn’t age all that well, for reasons cited above. The fact that he played into late May pretty much ten years in a row likely contributed as Derek points out.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 5:11 PM MDT up reply actions  

Another guy that hit a wall was Trottier. Same profile too.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Apr 5, 2010 5:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, those Selanne numbers have a lot to do with playing for the Jets and Ducks instead of (one of?) the best team(s?) ever. The numbers for Kurri are phenomenal with the Oilers, regular season, playoffs, whatever. For me, the decline is just too steep once he gets away from the situation for me to believe that a big part of his previous numbers were circumstances. I imagine a guy like Marian Hossa being put in those circumstances and people would be talking about him as one of the all-time greats like they do Kurri. But, like Kurri IMO, he’s not at that level.

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 5, 2010 5:52 PM MDT up reply actions  

One of the reasons the Oilers were one of the best teams ever – and yes, only “one of” – was because Jari Kurri played for them. It’s not like he was a passenger or something, he was a core player on a superpower.

Holy mackeral, we had a lot of superstars.

BTW, if a few years from now we had a similar conversation about who was the best Slovakian ever, I’ll bet Marian Hossa’s name would come up. Of course, he’ll need to improve his playoff performance to convince me. :)

In the meantime, I recommend you watch some Oiler game film from the 80s and focus on #17. I don’t think you appreciate how good this guy really was.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 6:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t think you appreciate how good this guy really was.

Very few people do when they think about those teams. Andy, Kurri, Huddy – they were extra pieces to people.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Apr 5, 2010 6:19 PM MDT up reply actions  

He’s not an “extra piece” but neither is Teemu Selanne. They were both phenomenal players and no one is arguing to the contrary. My “all-time greats” comment was meant in a “top-ten all-time forward” sense. With those Oiler teams, that’s what Kurri looked like, away from them he doesn’t look close. And I wouldn’t have either Kurri or Selanne in my top ten.

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 5, 2010 7:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

 We can certainly agree they were both phenomenal players, which I have tried to say consistently throughout the article and comments. I don’t think I ever said a word about “top ten all-time forward”, I just talked about the top two all-time Finns which is a different conversation altogether. Not sure where you’re getting that from.

Hardly a definitive source since rankings are by definition subjective anyway, but the Hockey News Top 100 of all time had Kurri ranked 50th, which is to say very comfortably inside the walls of the Hall of Fame. I’m pretty sure that if I engaged in the pastime of doing my own rankings, he would rank higher than that but outside the top 10. Selanne would be in the same conversation, but lower on my list. Not yours, and that’s the fun of conversations like this one.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 6, 2010 2:54 PM MDT up reply actions  

I was more responding to Derek who seemed to get the impression I considered Kurri an “extra piece” who really wasn’t all that important. I was just trying to clarify my earlier comment above when I said that Kurri is not “one of the all-time greats” which really isn’t very specific. I was just trying to be more specific about my own earlier comment while responding to Derek.

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 7, 2010 12:20 AM MDT up reply actions  

I’m not sure it’s possible to quantify the difference between playing with Wayne Gretzky and playing with Steve Rucchin. Well, I don’t think it’s possible to do without nonstop giggling.

Good post, though.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Apr 5, 2010 1:11 PM MDT reply actions  

Earl: You mean “playing with Steve Rucchin and Paul Kariya”? Not as good as Gretzky and Tikkanen, granted, but damned good. The Ducks trio was the Russian style with two (fast!) attacking wingers, with the C having major defensive responsibilities. Rucchin was excellent in that role in the late 90s, even as he “only” put up Tikkanen-like numbers, whereas Kariya and Selanne led a two pronged attack. Those guys could fly, both of them. They liked to flood one side of the ice, where one would cut across and fly up the neutral zone behind the puck carrier. That was one fun line to watch.

Whereas on Gretzky’s line that was pretty much inverted, the centre was Front and Centre, usually ahead of the play in more ways than one. The wingers had two-way responsibilities; Kurri had somewhat the Rucchin role on his line, yet he put up numbers like Selanne. Some of those numbers were due to Gretzky, absolutely; but a great big chunk of it was Kurri himself. They complemented each other far better IMO than Kariya and Selanne ever did. That’s not intended as a knock at all. Key to the partnership was Kurri’s ability to think the game at Gretzky’s level. Which made him probably the second smartest player in the league. :)

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 1:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

That wasn’t meant as a serious comment — just me copping out of wrapping my mind around the era and teammate issues.

Whatever — I’m pleased as punch having the lifelong support of Teemu; you’re happy as well having experienced the days of Kurri. The fact that nobody wishes they had “the other guy” means they’re both winners here.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Apr 5, 2010 1:53 PM MDT up reply actions  

Are you kidding?

I’d absolutely love to have both of them. The one we had was a first ballot HHoFer, and yours will be too.

The real winners here are hockey fans everywhere. Both guys were/are great players and class acts.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 1:57 PM MDT up reply actions  

I meant one at the expense of the other. One thing Teemu particularly excels at is fan energy — his personality and play make him pretty much the favorite player Anaheim has ever had.

Kurri may or may not have had that in Edmonton — I have no idea, frankly — but it makes me glad as hell we ended up with our Finn. Teemu’s grin is awesome.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Apr 5, 2010 2:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

Nope, they were pretty much polar opposites in the charisma dept.; one was brick, the other mortar. Kurri was as understated as he was underrated, very rarely the focus of attention, a fact he exploited fully. But in the eyes and hearts of the knowledgeable faithful, Jari was absolutely revered. Every single Oiler fan I knew absolutely loved the guy, whereas opinions were a little more polarized on Messier, Anderson, Coffey, Fuhr. The only guys to knock Kurri were a couple of douchebag talk show hosts looking to drive a little traffic.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 3:22 PM MDT up reply actions  

If somebody didn’t like Mark Messier, you could safely ignore everything else they’d ever say for the rest of their lives.

by Benjamin Massey on Apr 5, 2010 3:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

Let’s just say that some people, including this one, didn’t like everything Mark Messier did. Clearly the total package was a major asset, but he was prone to occasional ten-bell clangers, taking nights off, and the odd cheap shot or dumb penalty that not everybody enjoyed. He could be, uh, crude at times. Whereas Kurri was all class and grace and reliability, so very few people found anything to knock about his game.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 3:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

Knocking Mark Messier for being crude and taking the occasional dumb penalty is like knocking a new Corvette because it’s loud. The flaw is an intrinsic part of what makes the whole package so great. I don’t just mean that in the “aggressive penalties are easier to kill” sense: Messier was certainly no more gifted physically than Kurri but he was able to do so much of what he did because he almost constantly played on that edge. Gordie Howe and Maurice Richard, two very classy gentlemen off the ice, did the same thing.

(And when he didn’t have that edge? Well, that’s why he’s the most famous alumnus of the Houston Apollos.)

by Benjamin Massey on Apr 5, 2010 4:25 PM MDT up reply actions  

Well, he was dirty, and for some, season-ending elbows to the head aren’t something to rave about.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Apr 5, 2010 7:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

Some people are kinda wimps.

by Benjamin Massey on Apr 5, 2010 8:21 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah Earl, it’s best not to argue with an old school Oiler fan We’re talking about diehard fans, folks who really, truly believe that Glenn Anderson belongs in the Hall of Fame. There isn’t enough ether in the world to make that conversation enjoyable.

Teemu was a gawdawful cherrypicker when he was young though, Pavel Bure had nothing on that cat. Carlyle played D for the Jets back then, he’d wig on Teemu. Right on the ice with everyone there to hear it. It still surprises me that Selanne ever agreed to play for Randy, and that he lasted in that situation.

Selanne is a cool guy, though. I have huge respect for the way that he bashed the NHL for moving Winnipeg. Everyone else on that team just sat on their hands. I would guess that’s why he was traded (for Tverdovsky?) just before the Jets started playing in Phoenix. I saw a sidebar on a website the other day titled something along the lines of “Selanne says Winnipeg
 fans deserve an NHL team”. Good for him.

Socal gets all the ballsy guys. Robitaille is my all time favourite player. Just for the way he would flagrantly, dramatically and hilariously break all of Gretzky’s rules. If a journalist wrote a deragotory article about a friend of his, be it McSorley or Pocklington or whover, Wayne would impose a rule, say “Nobody gives a quote to this reporter for 28 days, or until I say so” … and the fuckery would begin. There’s some funny shit in there, a shame Wayne wasn’t brighter and didn’t have a sharper sense of humour. Most cats whose “wives” have gambling problems are usually sharp and in the moment. Wayne … not so much. I know you don’t get Canadian television, but shortly before the CAN olympic team was announced for Salt Lake, Jim Hughson interviewed Robitaille … try to find that on line. Luc was past his prime, but still leading the NHL in goals at the time, and he had a hunch that he wasn’t going to get the call for Canada. Very tongue in cheek, a funny dude.

by Vic Ferrari on Apr 5, 2010 5:00 PM MDT up reply actions  

Not in a million years would I have guessed that Robitaille is your favorite player. It’s got me giggling a little bit because it’s so outside of what I thought.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Apr 5, 2010 5:09 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah Earl, it’s best not to argue with an old school Oiler fan We’re talking about diehard fans, folks who really, truly believe that Glenn Anderson belongs in the Hall of Fame. There isn’t enough ether in the world to make that conversation enjoyable.

Ha! You’re probably right, we old-school Oiler fans can be pretty trying. We were incredibly lucky to see six Hall of Famers on one squad, and tend to go on and on about them once you get us started. Or, ahem, we get ourselves started as the case may be.

Funny you should mention Anderson. A year and a half after I wrote this letter, the Hockey Hall of Fame saw fit to agree with me. :)

I understand morphine works well.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 5:33 PM MDT up reply actions  

I saw a lot of hockey in the 80s Bruce, no way in hell should either Anderson or Kurri be in the Hall of Fame. You can say that Dick Duff and Clark Gillies are there, so Kurri and Anderson isn’t much of a stretch … but I don’t think those other two guys should be in either.

It’s like you get in for playing on a good team. That seems crazy to me. I mean surely this wouldn’t be a conversation if Anderson had played his career in St Louis or Hartford.

by Vic Ferrari on Apr 5, 2010 6:58 PM MDT up reply actions  

You’re saying that Ron Francis doesn’t make it if he stays in Hartford?

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Apr 5, 2010 7:04 PM MDT up reply actions  

No, he’d get in. Marcel Dionne got in. But he’s Ron Francis, he was THAT good. If he’s Doug Gilmour or Adam Oates, they make you wait. Both of whom were better than Anderson.

by Tom Awad on Apr 5, 2010 10:17 PM MDT up reply actions  

Kurri

Seriously, you’ll need these many words to say “Kurri”. Damn and folks around here call me long-winded.

one of the founders and most prolific writers of Bringing Back the Glory

by B.C.B. on Apr 5, 2010 4:02 PM MDT reply actions  

Kurri

And it’s not as close as some are making it around here.

While Selanne was likely the better even strength player on offense, that was all he was and at the end as he’s kept putting in the goals, he’s a power play specialist.

Kurri was an outstanding player on offense at even strength, just not as good as Selanne. Kurri was also much better in his own zone for the duration of his career. Beyond that, Kurri logged a lot of minutes on the penalty kill, in fact, he was the best penalty killer in the league for awhile. Selanne was neither good in his end or on the penalty kill, which is really odd for a Finn. Selanne sticks out like a sore thumb amongst NHL Finns in this aspect.

Would Selanne have turned his game into something like Kurri if he would have been on the OIlers? Who cares, it’s keyboard masturbation. We have apples, so let’s compare them.

As for the quick falloff, Kurri played 154 games in the post-season before the age of 30. That’s two extra seasons of hockey. Kurri and Andy both had some falloffs in their early 30s and it may or may not be related, but I’m willing to guess that Selanne had fresher legs later in life. Selanne’s production has halved after two long playoff runs 3 and 4 years ago.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Apr 5, 2010 4:52 PM MDT reply actions  

Selanne’s production has halved after two long playoff runs 3 and 4 years ago.

Well, not truly “halved”.

Combining his first two postlockout regular seasons, he had 88-96-184 in 162 GP. The last three regular seasons he has 63-59-122 in 143 GP (which includes a game against the Oilers where he cut himself on his first shift).

Points-per-game-wise, he’s been running about 75% his old self, it seems. And some of that can be associated to things like fake retirements, a self-sliced leg, a broken hand, a broken jaw, and the old “Andrew Ebbett vs. Andy McDonald” debate.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Apr 5, 2010 5:32 PM MDT up reply actions  

Yeah, I was there when Teemu cut himself right in the first minute IIRC. A total drag, took the shine right off that game.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 5:38 PM MDT up reply actions  

I’m looking at ES production versus his lifetime production. It’s nearly in half.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Apr 5, 2010 5:41 PM MDT up reply actions  

If Kurri’s shorthanded accomplishments are allowed to matter in this debate, I don’t know why you’d ignore Selanne’s impressive power play production late in life.

Probably to make some point sound better.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Apr 5, 2010 5:45 PM MDT up reply actions  

Oops — that was a bit harsh. But I think it is selective just to look at ES numbers on Selanne — he’s providing tons of value in his special teams minutes.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Apr 5, 2010 5:48 PM MDT up reply actions  

Hmmm, this is what I said originally.

Selanne remains a great powerplayer, ranking 9th on the all-time list with 218 career powerplay goals. More than half (78 of 151) of his goals since the lockout have been scored with the man advantage, which has been a key to Teemu’s continuing productivity deep into his career. Selanne has been rarely-used as a penalty killer, scoring just 7 shorthanded goals in his career.

What’s inaccurate there? I also mentioned later that PPG count the same as other goals. I nonetheless gave the nod to Kurri on special teams cuz he was good on the PP and great on the PK, whereas Selanne is great on the PP but not a factor on the PK. An easy call IMO.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 5, 2010 6:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

Do we have any data on PK in the 80s early 90s? I understand that the Oilers scored a bunch, but how much did they give back? I’d be interested to look at some numbers on Kurri’s PKing if such a thing is possible.

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 5, 2010 7:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

Sorry, Bruce — I wasn’t commenting on your piece there — was commenting on Derek’s line of using ES only to declare Selanne’s production has halved:

I’m looking at ES production versus his lifetime production. It’s nearly in half.

This one.

http://www.battleofcali.com/

by Earl Sleek on Apr 5, 2010 8:43 PM MDT up reply actions  

Because Kurri’s penalty killing didn’t come at the end of his career in isolation?

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Apr 5, 2010 6:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

Selanne is the better player. Surely this wouldn’t be a conversation with unbiased observers.

I remember reading a long thread at Vancouver Canuck board a couple of years ago, the debate was about which was the better player at their peak, Bure or Gretzky? They were about split down the middle iirc, Bure might have had a bit of an edge in total supporters.

Surely anywhere other than a VAN board and it’s not a conversation. But there was no sense in arguing.

by Vic Ferrari on Apr 5, 2010 7:07 PM MDT reply actions  

I have to agree with Vic. No question, Kurri was awesome, and at their peaks they were probably as good as each other. Kurri is the more complete player, but Selanne is the better player, and if you’re looking at their total body of work over their career Selanne has to get the nod. If you adjust for league scoring levels, Selanne has ~130 more goals and roughly the same number of assists in 80 fewer games playing with worse linemates. I still think it would be “a conversation” even with unbiased observers, because I know Selanne fans who honestly ask the same question without being sure of the answer.

by Tom Awad on Apr 5, 2010 10:14 PM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dukeriver2_small
A Narrative Revisited: Hemsky 83

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 53 33 15 5 71
Minnesota 53 25 20 8 58
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Calgary 53 24 22 7 55
Edmonton 53 21 27 5 47

(updated 2.8.2012 at 7:10 AM MST)

21 - 27 - 5

Lost 1

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (22-7, .759)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (11-6, .647)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-11, .593)
  6. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  7. Los Angeles Kings (9-9, .500)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (11-12, .478)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-14, .440)
  10. Edmonton Oilers (11-15, .423)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  12. Colorado Avalanche (8-13, .381)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-3, .875)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (13-13, .500)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. Ottawa Senators (10-12, .455)
  9. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-11, .389)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (7-14, .333)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-19, .321)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (50-38, .568)
  2. Northeast (49-38, .563)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (36-36, .500)
  5. Northwest (33-44, .429)
  6. Southeast (33-53, .384)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL