Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Africa Cup Of Nations Semifinal: Black Stars Ripe For Upset?

Dustin Penner Joins Wayne Gretzky In The Record Books

Wayne Gretzky heads up ice. Mandatory Credit: ALLSPORT USA /Allsport

via cdn.picapp.com

Back in December, The Copper & Blue looked at Dustin Penner's start and saw that he was on pace to do something that only Wayne Gretzky had been able to accomplish as a member of the Edmonton Oilers -- lead the team in Goals, Assists, Points, and +/-.  Gretzky did this four different times from 1981-1987, and did one better.  Gretzky led the league in those four categories four times.  As Bruce said in the comments section:

99 led not just the Oilers but the NHL in all 4 categories in 4 different seasons between 1981-87. He lost the +/- crown to Charlie Huddy in ’82-83 and Mark Howe in ’85-86, and Jari Kurri led the league in goals that same ’85-86 campaign, but in ’81-82, ’83-84, ’84-85, and ’86-87 Gretzky swept the lot.

So Dustin Penner's incredible season wasn't just a great personal accomplishment, it was historic.  The Oilers haven't had much to hang their hats on this season, but this is certainly worth recognizing.  For the first time since 1986-1987, one player led the Edmonton Oilers in all four categories.  

Lowetide recapped Penner's season thusly:

In the fall I wondered if he could deliver enough offense to stay on the 1line, and by spring I'm convinced he could be the cornerstone of a 1line for years to come. This was a wonderful season delivered by a player in his prime and with many years of similar level production straight ahead.

In additional to the traditional stats, Penner swept the Oilers Advanced Stats categories as well.  He led the team in PTS/60, +-ON/60, Corsi, and Scoring Chances Differential.  He also led the team in Shots.   Nearly every statistical category that that both traditionalists and microstats adherents track was dominated by Dustin Penner.

Star-divide

 


Year Player Goals Player
Assists
Player PointsPlayer +/-
1988 Carson 49
Messier
61
Kurri 102 Muni
43
1989 Messier 45 Messier 84
Messier 129 Gregg
24
1990 Klima
40
Messier 52
Tikkanen
69 Klima
24
1991 Damphousse 38 Damphousse 51 Damphousse 89 Maciver
20
1992 Klima 32 Nicholls 32 Klima 48 Gelinas
3
1993 Arnott 33 Weight
50 Weight 74 Arnott
1
1994 Oliver 16 Weight 33 Weight 40 Kennedy
2
1995 Ciger 31 Weight 79 Weight 104 Satan
0
1996 Smyth 39 Weight 61 Weight 82 Marchment
13
1997 Weight 26 Weight 44 Weight 70 Tie
9
1998 Guerin 30 Guerin 34 Guerin 64 Poti
10
1999 Smyth 28 Weight 51 Weight 72 Smith
16
2000 Smyth 31 Weight 65 Weight 90 Tie
15
2001 Comrie 33 Niinimaa 39 Tie 60 Comrie
16
2002 Smyth 27 Marchant
40
Smyth 61 Reasoner
19
2003 Smyth 23
Smyth 36
Smyth 59 Ulanov 18
2004







2005 Smyth 36
Hemsky
58
Hemsky 77 Staios 10
2006 Smyth 31
Hemsky 40
Tie
53 Thoresen
-1
2007 Penner
23
Hemsky 51
Hemsky 71 Nilsson
8
2008 Tie 23
Hemsky 43
Hemsky 66 Grebeshkov
12
2009 Penner 32
Penner 31
Penner 63 Penner
6

 

Bruce points out that Penner really didn't lead the Oilers in +/- as both Ryan Whitney and Ales Hemsky outpaced him there, but neither player came close to playing enough qualifying games to be considered among the team leaders.  Bruce is calling this an asterisk, but I don't see it that way as the rules for statistical qualification are have been in place for a long time.  Besides given the way this season went, more games for either of those two may have meant long runs of minus play.

Even with the asterisk, Penner becomes the fifth Oiler to lead the team in Goals, Assists and Points.  He would keep company with Mark Messier, Vincent Damphousse, Doug Weight and Ryan Smyth, but that only matters to Bruce.

Penner's historical season places him on some rare ice, with only The Great One to keep him company.

Comment 16 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Bruce points out that Penner really didn’t lead the Oilers in +/- as both Ryan Whitney and Ales Hemsky outpaced him there, but neither player came close to playing enough qualifying games to be considered among the team leaders. Bruce is calling this an asterisk, but I don’t see it that way as the rules for statistical qualification are have been in place for a long time.

Whitney was +7 as an Oiler (19 GP) and -6 as a Duck, so I don’t recognize his +7 as meaningful in 2009-10. He wound up the season +1. Hemsky on the other hand finished the season officially at +7 in 22 GP.

As far as I know the lower limits for statistical qualification are for “per game” type stats, i.e. Colin MacDonald “led” the Oilers with 0.5 G/GP, but 1 G in 2 GP doesn’t really cut it. Whereas +/- is a cumulative stat. It’s possible for a player to lead his team in goals despite only playing, say, less than half the schedule, and he still leads the team because he has the biggest number. Are you sure a similar principle doesn’t apply to +/-?

Even with the asterisk, Penner becomes the fifth Oiler to lead the team in Goals, Assists and Points. He would keep company with Mark Messier, Vincent Damphousse, Doug Weight and Ryan Smyth, but that only matters to Bruce.

Actually he would be the seventh. You forgot Gretzky on the above list (who led the team in all three categories 8 times in his 9 years) and also Hemsky, who in 2008-09 was tied for the team lead in goals as well as leading outright in assists and points.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 18, 2010 12:05 PM MDT reply actions  

Penner <3

I don’t think Hemsky’s +/- counts. What was Penner 22 games in? Honest question. He likely was lower, but I’m not sure. Really, the team completely bombed part way through the season and Hemsky missed most of the disaster. His +7 is a bit tainted, in my mind. :P Just enjoy and recognize the fact that Penner had a pretty damn good season.. no need to question it. But I suppose if you’re dealing with records here, you have to consider all areas, granted.

Ok, so I just checked, for argument’s sake…. Penner was +11 in that time Hemsky was +7. Enough said?

Visit www.puttingonthefoil.com

by Racki on Apr 18, 2010 12:16 PM MDT reply actions  

Wow. Penner went -6 when Hemsky wasn’t around.

Wow.

Is it too early to call the last sixty games of 2009-10 the “Ales Hemsky Death March”?

by Benjamin Massey on Apr 19, 2010 1:18 PM MDT up reply actions  

or...

Sorry, not sure how to edit, but if you want to be anal about it, he was +10 at the same date of the season of Hemsky’s last game.

Visit www.puttingonthefoil.com

by Racki on Apr 18, 2010 12:18 PM MDT reply actions  

Yeah, it’s a moot point for sure. If Hemsky had played the other 60 games his +/- would have taken a hit. Or, Penner’s plus might have been a lot higher with a hot Hemmer on his flank. All I’m saying is it’s bit of an asterisk. Both of these statements are correct:

- Ales Hemsky led the Oilers with +7

- Dustin Penner led the Oilers with +6 (* among Oilers with minimum 40 GP).

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 18, 2010 12:27 PM MDT up reply actions  

PS

Not for a moment am I questioning that Penner had a great season.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Apr 18, 2010 12:29 PM MDT up reply actions  

You don’t need the asterisk. Hemsky didn’t qualify.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Apr 18, 2010 2:06 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t know if this is conclusive, but according to the nhl.com stats page Hemsky does qualify. If you do a player search for +/- you get 879 results because there is no qualification minimum compared to only 396 results for shooting percentage where the minimum does apply. IMO, there’s no asterisk by Penner’s name in the +/- leader category because Penner isn’t the leader.

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 18, 2010 11:36 PM MDT up reply actions  

I don’t know if this is conclusive, but according to the nhl.com stats page Hemsky does qualify. If you do a player search for +/- you get 879 results because there is no qualification minimum compared to only 396 results for shooting percentage where the minimum does apply.

It’s not conclusive. I believe the NHL requires a minimum of 60 games to lead in any category, but the plus-minus award is definitely a minimum of 60 games. Hemsky is not a qualifying player. Penner led the team.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Apr 19, 2010 3:01 PM MDT up reply actions  

Well, I’m not sure that Wikipedia and Rauzulu’s Street are necessarily any better as a source of information, especially considering I’m not sure the award they link to actually exists anymore. I’m pretty sure Hemsky qualifies and leads the team.

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 19, 2010 3:20 PM MDT up reply actions  

Well, it’s still an open question as to whether or not the award exists (the Caps certainly haven’t promoted Schultz as the “winner”) although that’s the first mention I’ve seen of a 2008 winner. It also doesn’t answer whether the Bud Light trophy is also the league standard. Either way, I can see that historically they’ve set the sixty game threshold for the award which I guess is good enough if you’ve decided that you want to laud Penner. It just looks like special pleading or a technicality to call a guy with the second-best +/- on the team the team leader. I mean, if I said Petr Sykora was the team leader in goals in 2006-07 instead of Ryan Smyth, surely that would look a bit silly. It sure isn’t intuitive.

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 19, 2010 4:02 PM MDT up reply actions  

In addition, did you know that Ethan Moreau and Jason Strudwick finished in a tie for seventh on the Oilers in plus/minus? That’s actually pretty good! We should sign those boys to contract extensions!

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 19, 2010 4:07 PM MDT up reply actions  

hmm.

Extreme example.. but.. if a team is full of minus players (and no plus players), is a guy that hasn’t played that season the plus/minus leader since he’s even? :P

Visit www.puttingonthefoil.com

by Racki on Apr 19, 2010 5:22 PM MDT up reply actions  

I think it speaks volumes about your team if your leader in plus/minus is: Vladimir Vujtek, 3 GP (even). Guess how good that team was! Using the 60 GP threshold the team leader was: Matt Johnson, 64 GP (-11). Way to go 1999-00 Thrashers!

by Scott Reynolds on Apr 19, 2010 5:50 PM MDT up reply actions  

Jets take a 2-1 series lead. These kids may be onto something here.

SNN Sports - A theoretical Oilers blog (i.e. theoretically, I write stuff there). Link now 100% less broken.

by Doogie2K on Apr 18, 2010 4:02 PM MDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dukeriver2_small
A Narrative Revisited: Hemsky 83

Recent FanPosts

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 53 33 15 5 71
Minnesota 53 25 20 8 58
Colorado 55 27 25 3 57
Calgary 53 24 22 7 55
Edmonton 53 21 27 5 47

(updated 2.8.2012 at 7:10 AM MST)

21 - 27 - 5

Lost 1

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (22-7, .759)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (12-6, .667)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-12, .571)
  6. Los Angeles Kings (10-9, .526)
  7. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (12-12, .500)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-15, .423)
  10. Edmonton Oilers (11-15, .423)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  12. Colorado Avalanche (9-13, .409)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-3, .875)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (14-13, .519)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  9. Ottawa Senators (10-13, .435)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-12, .368)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (7-14, .333)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-20, .310)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (51-39, .567)
  2. Northeast (49-39, .557)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (37-36, .507)
  5. Northwest (34-44, .436)
  6. Southeast (33-54, .379)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL