Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Full Coverage Of New York's Victory Celebration

Derek Boogaard's Value

via cdn.picapp.com

He's huge.  He's mean.  He's ugly.  He turns like a oil tanker in open water.  He throws hands like an angry Norse god.  He's Derek Boogaard, enforcer extraordinaire for the Minnesota Wild.  Depending on who you ask around the NHL, Boogaard has been the most effective enforcer and fighter in the NHL for a number of years because unlike Georges Laraque, Boogaard goes out of his way to hurt people.  With an elbow here, a knee there, and a forearm over there to go with his fists, Boogaard's time on the ice is rarely low-event, but does his time spent striking fear in the hearts of lesser men throughout the NHL worth it?  Do his fists cover the goals against?  Let's investigate below the jump.

Star-divide

Wu3ye02b5udoc89bk4pvf8rvn_medium

via www.sportslogos.net


SB Nation's Wild vs Oilers coverage

Hockey Wilderness

While researching an upcoming article on the value of goons, I compiled the goals for and goals against data for all goons over the last three years and found that the average yearly even strength +/- of an NHL goon is -6 in just under 6:00 minutes of even strength time per game.  As Tyler at MC79hockey has shown, a differential of just shy of six goals is approximately one win or loss per year.  Compare that to the performances of other 4th liners around the league and on his team.  the average yearly even strength +/- of an NHL 4th liner is -3.5 in just over 9 minutes of even strength time per game, including time spent with the goon on ice.  So the average goon costs his team one loss per year.  Is Boogaard better or worse than that?


Derek Boogaard

#24 / Left Wing / Minnesota Wild

6-8

257

Jun 23, 1982



GP G A P ES +/- TOI Corsi
Corsi Rk
QC PM ESTOI/G Shifts
2007 - Derek Boogaard 34 0 0 0 -5 133:42 -15.88 13/14 14/14 74 3:53 247
2008 - Derek Boogaard 51 0 3 3 +3 254:53 -13.21 13/14 11/14 87 4:54 419
2009 - Derek Boogaard 45 0 4 4 -9 285:02 -8.52 11/12
12/12 88 6:07 417


Over three seasons, in 713:37 of icetime, Boogaard has accumulated a -11 goal differential, including an awful -9 in 285:02 this season.  In his short stints on the ice, Boogard has cost his team about two wins over the last three years.  His minutes have been butter soft - he's never played anything more difficult than bottom line minutes and his Corsi has been mostly terrible as you can see above.  

Boogaard has less time on ice per game over the last three years than the average goon - 5:09 per game to be exact.  He was especially protected under ex-coach Jacques Lemaire, averaging about 4:30 per game.  New coach Todd Richards has given him a couple of extra shifts per game and bumped his ice time.  Boogard's Corsi has improved slightly, though it's likely that he will regress to the negative double digits sometime soon, but his EV sv pct is pretty terrible - he ranks 334 out of 338 forwards in on ice sv pct.

Essentially, Boogard's results are no better or worse than your average goon, that is, terrible.  Against the softest possible competition, he spends his time in his own zone, giving up shots against.  He tries to hurt people and pick a fight and costs his team about a win per year.

Comment 19 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I think a better analysis of how much a goon helps or hurts his team would be looking at win% or goal differential when he plays vs. when he doesn’t. that takes into account the intangible factor. e.g. when the Oil play Minny with the boogeyman they are even more scared and soft then otherwise…..hypothetically resulting in a more passive game and better chance to lose.

by Oi on Mar 5, 2010 2:30 PM MST reply actions  

I correlated fighting with all sorts of measures (wins, losses, points, GF, etc). There was no significant correlation, at least not that season.

I seriously doubt the “intangibles” are more valuable than the obviously tangible deficits goons bring to the ice.

by Kent Wilson on Mar 5, 2010 6:25 PM MST up reply actions  

I’m not sure how you end up concluding that the average goon costs his team one win per year, at least in terms of the math. Are you just going by the individual’s on-ice goal differential and attributing him as the most prominent cause the dividing by six?

by Scott Reynolds on Mar 5, 2010 3:15 PM MST reply actions  

The average goon numbers will be brought out in the future post.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Mar 5, 2010 8:35 PM MST up reply actions  

By the way, thanks for asking this question on the private email thread when I asked a month ago, rather than asking it in public.

Oh, wait.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Mar 5, 2010 8:35 PM MST up reply actions  

Wow Derek. Sorry about that, I just didn’t think of it in the email I guess. Didn’t think it would be a big deal to ask here.

by Scott Reynolds on Mar 5, 2010 10:21 PM MST up reply actions  

I’m just messing with ya Scott.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Mar 6, 2010 7:19 AM MST up reply actions  

One win! Holy shit!

 If you’re right about that… and considering that 6 minutes is the average ice time… that is an enormous effect.

by R O on Mar 5, 2010 3:37 PM MST reply actions  

Do you suppose there’s any relationship between Boogaard’s lousy on-ice Sv% and Boogaard’s lousy defence?

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Mar 5, 2010 3:48 PM MST reply actions  

I mean, shit, even Patrick O’Sullivan made him look like a tool.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Mar 5, 2010 3:48 PM MST up reply actions  

I doubt it. Andre Roy had one of the highest on-ice SV% on the team during his one season for Calgary. He’s better than Boogaard, but is still a goon.

by Kent Wilson on Mar 5, 2010 6:19 PM MST up reply actions  

Well I’m off to the game, so out of the GDT. I’ll do the post-game and file a scouting report of the new guys later on.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Mar 5, 2010 6:08 PM MST reply actions  

Hmmmm...

I am not a big defender of Boogaard’s but this is about as harsh a critique as I have seen.

Boogaard has been playing the best hockey of his career this season. He has missed goals by mere inches, had some beautiful deflections stopped by phenomenal goaltending. I am not trying to argue that he guy is going to turn into Ovechkin, but he has been playing much better than he was ever allowed to under Lemaire.

As for knees, elbows, etc. I know I am going to be taken as having an obvious bias, but I have seen very little of this in his career. Like any enforcer type, he has his share of plays I would question. He has been suspended, much like most enforcers. I have certainly seen him get his elbows up on occasion, but knees? I can’t say I have seen that.

As for going out and looking for a fight? Unless you are Darcy Horidchuk, I can;t say that I have ever seen him seek out a fight. Sure, that is his role, but the fights I see him get into are one of three types. 1. Pre-arranged with another enforcer, such as Parros. 2. Some idiot thinking he can go toe-to-toe with Boogaard, such as Todd Fedoruk. 3. Some moron agitator that takes liberties and then drops with Boogey only to fall into the fetal position and pray for death, such as Darcy Hordichuk.

I know Boogey’s type of play is on it’s way out in the NHL. It is unpopular to support the enforcer type, and especially useless to attempt to defend them to an opposing team, especially against a division rival’s fans.

Just keep in mind. If he were wearing the Copper and Blue, you would love him as much as we do.

by BReynolds on Mar 5, 2010 6:19 PM MST reply actions  

I think the “kneeing” comment probably comes from a game earlier this year where he (IMO intentionally) kneed Patrick O’Sullivan. We don’t see him all that much but one of the few times we did this year, he made a dirty play and given the reputation and viewings in past years it sticks in the mind.

As for the “shoe on the other foot” argument, if he were wearing Copper and Blue we’d all hate him and complain loudly except for possibly Bruce. On top of being a bad hockey player he takes a LOT of penalties which hurts the team’s ability to win games. I’m not convinced by Derek’s math above (but he might explain it more fully yet) but I am convinced that Boogaard is a below replacement level hockey player that I would never want on my team.

by Scott Reynolds on Mar 5, 2010 6:36 PM MST up reply actions  

I hate him and complain loudly when he cheap shots and injures yet another Oiler. Jones is at least the fifth Oiler Boogaard has directly injured in the last four years.

I wouldn’t want him within 1000 miles of the Oilers because he is a useless hockey player. I like crust and all but my whole point that I’ve made over and over again is you need tough guys who can play at least a little bit. Boogaard can’t.

Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries

"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg

by Bruce McCurdy on Mar 5, 2010 11:17 PM MST up reply actions  

So it’s confirmed then, we’d all hate him. Good to know.

by Scott Reynolds on Mar 6, 2010 8:30 AM MST up reply actions  

See… I try to defend the caveman, and he goes out and hits Jones knee on knee.

Thanks Boogey. Make me look like an idiot.

by BReynolds on Mar 5, 2010 7:23 PM MST up reply actions  

He needs to be suspended for that.

by BReynolds on Mar 5, 2010 7:27 PM MST up reply actions  

We’re like Kurri’s blessed children here.

Do not argue with the blessed.

Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.

by Derek Zona on Mar 5, 2010 8:34 PM MST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to SB Nation's Edmonton Oilers community.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Dukeriver2_small
A Narrative Revisited: Hemsky 83

Recent FanPosts

Small
Ken Campbell Wants to Make You Angry
Small
Oilers Worst (Quiet) Trade Ever
Ovechkin1_small
How Ryan Smyth Stunted Magnus Paajarvi
2012-01-21-012338_small
Milan Kytnar Loaned To SM-liiga Club HPK Hämeenlinna
N512640129_624767_3878_small
Jay Feaster Revisited : How do the Oilers get back to competing?
Ovechkin1_small
Grading Tambellini (free agent signings)
Ovechkin1_small
Grading Steve Tambellini (Trades)
Mets002_small
Reaching out to The Copper & Blue: Community research project
N512640129_624767_3878_small
Now and Then: the more things change...

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Northwest Standings

GP W L OTL PT
Vancouver 52 32 15 5 69
Minnesota 52 25 19 8 58
Calgary 53 24 22 7 55
Colorado 54 26 25 3 55
Edmonton 53 21 27 5 47

(updated 2.7.2012 at 7:26 AM MST)

21 - 27 - 5

Lost 1

Clear Victory Standings

Western Conference

  1. Detroit Red Wings (22-7, .759)
  2. San Jose Sharks (13-5, .722)
  3. Vancouver Canucks (17-7, .708)
  4. St. Louis Blues (11-6, .647)
  5. Chicago Blackhawks (16-11, .593)
  6. Nashville Predators (11-10, .524)
  7. Los Angeles Kings (9-9, .500)
  8. Phoenix Coyotes (11-12, .478)
  9. Dallas Stars (11-14, .440)
  10. Edmonton Oilers (11-15, .423)
  11. Anaheim Ducks (10-14, .417)
  12. Colorado Avalanche (8-13, .381)
  13. Calgary Flames (9-15, .375)
  14. Minnesota Wild (7-13,.350)
  15. Columbus Blue Jackets (5-19, .208)

Eastern Conference

  1. Boston Bruins (21-3, .875)
  2. New York Rangers (18-8, .692)
  3. Pittsburgh Penguins (16-9, .640)
  4. Philadelphia Flyers (14-11, .560)
  5. Toronto Maple Leafs (14-12, .538)
  6. Washington Capitals (13-13, .500)
  7. Montreal Canadiens (11-11, .500)
  8. Ottawa Senators (10-12, .455)
  9. New Jersey Devils (10-12, .455)
  10. Winnipeg Jets (10-14, .417)
  11. Carolina Hurricanes (9-13, .409)
  12. Florida Panthers (7-11, .389)
  13. Buffalo Sabres (7-14, .333)
  14. Tampa Bay Lightning (9-19, .321)
  15. New York Islanders (6-14, .300)

Division Standings

  1. Central (50-38, .568)
  2. Northeast (49-38, .563)
  3. Atlantic (45-37, .549)
  4. Pacific (36-36, .500)
  5. Northwest (33-44, .429)
  6. Southeast (33-53, .384)


Managing Editor

Kurri_small Derek Zona

Laraque_horcoff_250x360_small Scott Reynolds

Columnists

Batman_small ryanbatty

0615pisani_small dawgbone98

Okc_shoulder_small Eric Rodgers

Neal_small Neal Livingston

Mike_small Mike Wntrz

Contributors

Newtwitter2_small Jonathan Willis

Mccurdycloseup_small Bruce McCurdy

Esaandstanley_small Benjamin Massey

Me_smyth_bobblehead3__1_of_1__small Lisa McRitchie

Small Triumph44

Gyi0062208469-bobrovsky_small Chase W

Small JaredL