Note the presence of two data points for 2008-09, the first Eberle's NHLE for 74 points in 61 WHL games (NHLE = 0.30) and the second his 9 points in 9 AHL games (NHLE = 0.44) during his end-of-season pro tryout. While I agree that's a small sample size, the fact its data point fits so smoothly on the overall curve makes the case that this was just another small, positive step in Eberle's development, perhaps a stepping stone for his points explosion back at the junior level in 2009-10.

The expected jitter from the 9-game sample can be found in goals and assists distribution, whose curves are therefore less regular but nonetheless on a clear upward slope in both cases. A scorer and a playmaker both is young Jordan.

Eberle's playoff stats fit comfortably on the upward slope as well. Although they are yet again tiny sample sizes of just 6 and 5 games respectively, in both seasons his points-per-game rate increased from the regular season to the playoffs. In fact, in every one of his tiny sample sizes - 3 international tourneys, 2 WHL playoffs, 1 AHL call-up - Eberle scored at least a point per game each and every time. That's Clutch!

But those are only numbers. The other part of the scouting report must come from the old-fashioned seen him good . In all three of those live looks, plus the 2008 Top Prospects Game which was in my pre-blogging days, I came away favourably impressed by Eberle's game.

He's a very cerebral player, befitting the 2007-08 winner of the Doc Seaman Trophy as WHL Scholastic Player of the Year. Each time I've seen him I've been impressed with his understanding of the offensive zone, how to find the soft spots and when to exploit them. He has the scorer's gift of timing his arrival at the optimal moment, a nifty trait that has done wonders for finishers like Mike Bossy, Luc Robitaille, Brett Hull, Dino Ciccarelli to name just a few that scored a lot more goals than they were expected to on draft day. Subtle, but deadly.

Now Jordan Eberle does not yet possess a shot of the calibre of those snipers mentioned above so I should hardly put such weighty expectations on him. He does, however, seem to have a low panic point and that knack for surprising and beating goalies. I am fairly confident that those skills will translate at the NHL level. Moreover, that NHLE graph displays the curve of a quick learner.

To produce a couple of crude comparables, I put the upper end for Eberle at Joe Mullen, the lower end at David Oliver. The way I look at it, if he's even a little bit better than Oliver he'll be a useful NHL player. And if he's anywhere close to as good as Mullen, he'll be a star in this league.

As Rod Phillips is fond of saying, only time will tell. Or, as I laughingly said to my C&B colleagues who questioned my placing him so high on the prospect rankings, "As for the top of the list I think MPS will look a lot flashier not scoring goals than Eberle will scoring them."