I Need A Coach That Won't Drive Me Crazy
I was one of Craig MacTavish's foremost critics for the way he managed his team last season. While he self-admittedly lost control of the team and burned bridges with a number of players, he maintained tactical superiority against most coaches during games throughout his tenure as Oilers' head coach. His system, considered boring by Oilers fans, kept under-talented Oilers teams competitive or superior at even strength and his dedication to finding the best matchups was steadfast until last year. MacTavish's replacement, Pat Quinn, has recaptured the team's respect and commands attention, but the Oilers have lost tactical superiority on almost all nights. Quinn does not match lines or defensive pairings, consistently exposing the bottom of his roster to the best his opponents have to offer. Every game seems like an away game as Quinn allows the opposing head coach to create favorable matchups. With apologies to John Mellencamp, I need a coach that won't drive me crazy.
SB Nation's Anaheim vs. Edmonton Coverage
Randy Carlyle has been in Anaheim since the lockout and during that time the Ducks have averaged 100 points per season. Carlyle has guided the Ducks to ten playoff series, a conference final and a Stanley Cup.
This year the Ducks have fallen back, but have rallied to within four points of 8th place with game in hand heading into tonight's game. Aside from playing Scott Niedermayer and Chris Pronger 30 minutes a night, how has Carlyle found so much success in Anaheim? The simple answer is matchups.
In the 2006-2007, the year in which the Ducks won the Stanley Cup, they were paced by Teemu Selanne's 94 points, Andy McDonald's 78 points and Chris Kunitz' 60 points. The "Number One" line in Anaheim was dominant on the power play and at even strength, with Selanne outscoring his opponents 59-35, McDonald 56-40 and Kunitz 59-34.
The storyline from that year was the emergence of the young players, and their outstanding performance in the regular season and playoffs. Ryan Getzlaf and Corey Perry were just 21 years old that season, and Dustin Penner was 23. Getzlaf and Perry were outstanding together and Penner joined them late in the year. Perry and Getzlaf outscored opponents 36-20 when together and the three of them outscored 10-9 in their time together later in the year, all astounding numbers from a group of young players.
While it would seem that the success in Anaheim stemmed from these two huge scoring lines, the reality is that these two lines got to play the easy minutes thanks to Carlyle's checking line of Travis Moen - Samuel Pahlsson - Rob Niedermayer. That line finished 1-2-3 in qualcomp that year, not just for forwards, but for the entire team. Todd Marchant was 4th, Penner 6th as Penner played with Marchant at even strength prior to joining Getzlaf, and Kunitz - McDonald - Selanne were 5-7-8. Perry and Getzlaf finished 11-12 in qualcomp. If we had zonestart available for the 2006-2007 season, it would likely follow the same pattern. Carlyle was always careful to protect the two scoring lines, leaving Pahlsson and Marchant to take the tough faceoffs.
Carlyle's dedication to protecting his scorers led Anaheim to a cup that year and followed the same blueprint into the playoffs the following two seasons. In 2007-2008, that tough minutes trio again led the Ducks team in qualcomp, while Kunitz, Perry and Getzlaf finished 4-5-7. The zonestart stats from that season show more of the same - Niedermayer, Moen, and Pahlsson finished 1, 2, and 4 in defensive zone faceoffs, with Todd Marchant in 3rd.
The 2008-2009 Ducks slipped from their previous 100 point seasons, but the tough minutes line continued to take the same assignment while the Ryan Getzlaf - Corey Perry - Bobby Ryan line racked up 91, 72 and 57 points respectively.
In the 2009 offseason, GM Bob Murray traded away Chris Pronger to Philadelphia and brought back noted tough-minutes phantom Jeoffrey Lupul and young defender Luca Sbisa. While many in the mainstream media outlets have blamed Anaheim's misfortunes on this trade, others have blamed Scott Niedermayer's falloff. Few, if any, have looked at the deeper reason that Anaheim has suffered - Murray's loss of his tough minutes line and his failure to replace them. He traded both Samuel Pahlsson to Chicago for offense-first defender James Wisniewski; and Travis Moen to San Jose for a 4th round pick at the 2009 trade deadline then let Rob Niedermayer leave via free agency in the summer.
Now the tough minutes are being soaked up by Getzlaf's line and while they continue to produce points (Getzlaf - 57 points, Perry - 57 points, Ryan - 47 points) they aren't dominating at even strength like they once did. The chart below shows the trio's even strength +/- per 60 over the last three seasons.
While the number in 2009-2010 is still outstanding, they aren't dominating tough minutes like they were able to do to second and third minutes. Combine that with the increased load of defensive zone faceoffs and that line is going to be hard-pressed to duplicate their previous success. Without his reliable matchup line of the last three seasons, Carlyle is unable to do much go with a power vs. power strategy and hope for the best. This is the first year that Carlyle is hamstrung by his General Manager's moves and it's showing. Gone are Moen, Niedermayer, Pahlsson, and Kunitz and they've been replaced by Saku Koivu, Kyle Chipchura, Joffrey Lupul and Jason Blake.
If Anaheim is serious about a playoff run, it's likely that Murray is going to have to find some tough minutes players for the stretch run. He won't be able to find a grouping as effective as Moen - Pahlsoon - Niedermayer and it's likely that Getzlaf's line isn't enough to make up the difference. Like Craig MacTavish in previous seasons, Carlyle is going to have to ride his one effective even strength option and see what happens. We've seen MacTavish's results in Edmonton.
0 recs |
7 comments
|
Comments
Very solid analysis, Derek.
Writer for The Copper & Blue and primary shareholder of Zorg Industries
"Never be ashamed of who you are" -- Jean-Baptiste Emanuel Zorg
Thanks Bruce. I have some experience with a team losing their tough minutes players.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Great post — to be fair, though, it was part of the Burke plan. Pahlsson, Moen, and Niedermayer all hit UFA status at the same time, and now the line has priced itself out of Anaheim’s range, especially considering the salaries due Getzlaf and Perry.
The crazy thing wasn’t just that Pahlsson-Moen-Niedermayer was effective (check out their outscoring during the cup run itself — off the charts), but they were damn affordable, too. Rob was always the “pricy” one at $2M, but I always counted half that salary as finder’s fee for securing his brother Scott.
Pahlsson is god — it’s been a slogan at BoC for quite a while.
http://www.battleofcali.com/
So if this holds true (no line matching). Then it means a guy like Horcoff is actually facing the weakest competition in years? You would expect even with some bad luck, that there might be a nice little spike in his offensive numbers, no?
Firstly, I agree with Derek that Pat Quinn doesn’t do much line-matching. Just doesn’t. But, Horcoff is still getting the most difficult assignments and his linemates have been less than what he’s had the last several years. Players like Jacques, O’Sullivan, Pisani and Moreau are simply not as good as Hemsky, Smyth or Penner. His zone-start number has in fact improved substantially from a year ago, but he’s still down near the bottom among Oiler forwards in terms of OZ:DZ ratio with 275 DZ draws and 236 OZ draws.
Despite the tough (but not as tough as last year) matchups, the tough (but not as tough as last year) starting positions and the tough (much, much tougher than last year) linemates Horcoff’s Corsi number is a poor but not deplorable -7.5/60. That’s a better number than any of Moreau, Pisani, O’Sullivan or Jacques and he’s been playing with those guys an awful lot. He’s making them better. It’s just still not good enough.
But the big thing is in fact the percentages. Some of that is luck, some is the fact that the Oilers have truly awful goaltending, some is likely the fact that the guys he’s playing with the most don’t have good shooting percentages historically. It adds up to a PDO number of 93.7 (.876 on-ice save percentage and 6.11% on-ice shooting percentage) which is tied for 8th last in the league. Sometimes you really are one of the unluckiest guys in the league.
I’m not convinced that Horc’s best years aren’t already behind him but he hasn’t been anywhere close to as bad as his numbers suggest this season.
by Scott Reynolds on Feb 15, 2010 1:32 PM PST up reply actions
Horcoff is doing just fine as long as Jacques isn’t on the ice. He’s being outscored, but like Scott said below, it’s the percentages.
Editor of The Copper & Blue, and leader of The Cult Of Hartikainen.
Great article Derek. The Ducks definitely propsered with the “traditional” checking line set-up. But a lot of teams find success PvP too. The Ducks problem has been that other than Koivu, no one has been able to outscore the second minutes. It’s been a very disappointing year from Selanne and (we’re so surprised!) Lupul at EV. If they had some better support that could really handle the seconds and thirds this team would be laughing.

by 























