Save Percentage on the PK Since the Lockout
I've spoken in the past about save percentage on the penalty kill being a pretty volatile measurement of performance. Because in any given season there really aren't all that many shots on the PK, a lot of times goaltenders can put up a fantastic number over what seems like a long period of time (like half a season, or a full season), only to see their performance regress significantly. Oiler fans will recall the season Mathieu Garon's performance in 2007-08 as a prime example. That season, he had a magnificent save percentage of .908 while the Oilers were penalty killing. The next season? .828. That difference is extreme, but the general principle (a decline in performance after an outstanding season) is typical.
So when I look at this year's leaders and see that Michal Neuvirth has a PK save percentage of .911, an EV save percentage slightly below average (.916), and a professional track record that doesn't exactly suggest a fantastic netminder, I'm inclined to think that his performance while shorthanded will regress significantly as the year goes on. But that's not to say that stopping shots while killing penalties is all luck. In the case of Neuvirth, we don't have much data, but what about a guy like Jonas Hiller who has a save percentage of .885? It's still well above average, but it's not outlandish? Should we expect him to regress? In an attempt to help in answering that question, I've put together the PK save percentages for every goalie who has faced at least 1,000 shots since the lockout.
The upcoming chart is pretty self-explanatory. I've included every goalie who's faced at least 1,000 shots from 2005-06 through what's been completed in 2010-11. I also decided to use data from both the regular season and playoffs, which should increase our sample at least a little bit, and besides, the playoffs are important. I've also included each goaltender's best and worst season (min. 100 shots) to give a sense of the volatility from year to year:As you can see, there really is a tremendous amount of volatility here. There's a substantial spread from best season to worst season, and some goalies who have put up amazing years have also put up a stinker (Craig Anderson, and Mathieu Garon come to mind in this category). But some goalies seem to just be very good in short-handed situations. In fact, most of the "regulars" tend to be better. The average on the PK over the last several years has been about .866, so seeing the group that gets the most playing time outperforming shouldn't be surprising, but it does support the idea that these goalies are in fact showing some skill. Going back to Hiller, the .885 he's put up so far this season is right in line with what he's done since coming to the NHL, so I'd be inclined to expect that level of performance to continue.
But the real star here is Niklas Backstrom, whose numbers are amazing. I know some will discount those because of where he's played (and last season, his first without Jacques Lemaire, was his worst), but the guy is twelve points clear of the field at this point, which is an awful lot of ground to give to coaching (especially since Martin Brodeur had his worst season last year with Lemaire).
As for the Oilers, there's bad news and more bad news. Nikolai Khabibulin has been one of the worst goalies on the PK over the last several years, so even though he's bound to improve on the .750 save percentage he's posted so far this season (if he's ever healthy enough to play), he's not likely to provide average netminding going forward. Unfortunately, the recently recalled Martin Gerber is one of the few men on this list who's actually worse. It's not like we should have been expecting anything great from the old Swiss, but it's a bit disappointing that average would likely be too much to ask. And more bad news? Tom Renney is probably being so stubborn about this diamond penalty kill formation because it worked so well for him in New York. Now, in fairness, it really did seem to work there, and likely would have been in the top half of the league even if Henrik Lundqvist wasn't stopping pucks at a higher rate than almost everyone else in the league.
8 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
In fairness… Neuvirth is unproven in the NHL but he leads the league in wins, has some great stats, was rookie of the month and won 2 straight Calder Cups in the AHL before the callup to the NHL (waiting for Theodore to disappear)…. my point? The kid is good (as is Salak who deserves a spot in the NHL).
He might be good, but I’m not convinced yet. That he leads the league in wins convinces me of nothing and, as far as I can tell, his “great stat” of choice seems to be PK Sv%, which helped him to win RoM. In that there’s no way he’s going to be able to keep up that pace over the long haul, I don’t think we have enough evidence to say he’s particularly good (i.e. an above average NHL netminder).
by Scott Reynolds on Nov 21, 2010 2:39 AM MST up reply actions
The only concern I have with Neuvirth is the lack of games. His sv% in the AHL was good enough for 6th place in 09-10 and still in the top 10 in 08-09, he just didn’t have enough minutes to qualify for the regular season leaders.
But you can’t ignore the .933 in 22 games he put up in the 09 playoffs nor the .920 he put up in 18 games last year. His AHL track record is actually pretty darn good for a 22 year old goaltender.
In theory, there is little difference between practice and theory, but in practice there is!
Obviously, being on Washington helps stats tremendously… no doubt. However, I think he is going the traditional European route… excel in the Minors, get called up to little fanfare and work his way through it. Best recent example would be Halak. Plus, the Czech depth pool is very shallow right now so we need this.lol
Are 5v3, 4v3, 6v4 and 6v3 shots filtered out here? If not, then I doubt any conclusions can be drawn.
by RiversQ on Nov 21, 2010 9:53 AM MST via mobile reply actions
They wouldn’t be filtered out, as this is just a compilation straight from nhl.com. That information would probably make a substantial difference for some of these guys, and especially for individual seasons, but I think the information we have here is probably good enough to say something about the goalies at the top and bottom of the list (i.e. that they’re above and below average respectively).
by Scott Reynolds on Nov 21, 2010 3:08 PM MST up reply actions

by 

























